Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


Published ahead of print on February 1, 2006
J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 686-696, 2006
© 2006 American Society of Nephrology
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2004070515

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2004070515v1
17/3/686    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheerin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheerin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, S. H.

Basic Immunology and Pathology

Accumulation of Immune Complexes in Glomerular Disease Is Independent of Locally Synthesized C3

Neil S. Sheerin, Katsushige Abe, Paul Risley and Steven H. Sacks

Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Address correspondence to: Dr. Neil Sheerin, Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, 5th Floor, Thomas Guy House, Guy’s Hospital, St. Thomas’ Street, London, SE1 9RT. Phone: +44-207-955-4305; Fax: +44-207-955-4303; neil.sheerin{at}kcl.ac.uk

Received for publication July 1, 2004. Accepted for publication December 7, 2005.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Although complement activation can make immune complex glomerulonephritis worse, the third complement component also can solubilize immune complexes and thus reduce the severity of disease. How C3 that is produced within the kidney contributes to this balance is unknown. This study therefore investigated the relative roles of systemic and local C3 production in a model of glomerular immune complex disease. Injection of sheep anti–glomerular basement membrane antibody into preimmunized mice resulted in accumulation of immune complexes and progressive loss of function over 14 d that was much more marked in C3-deficient (C3–/–) mice. In C3-sufficient mice that received a transplant of a C3–/– mouse kidney and in C3–/– mice with C3-sufficient mouse kidney transplants, the severity and the pattern of injury went with the complement status of the recipient. That is, mice with deficient circulating C3 developed severe glomerular immune complex disease, whereas those with a high level of circulating C3 had well-preserved glomerular structure and function. It is concluded that circulating C3 is a critical factor in reducing the glomerular accumulation of immune complexes. Local synthesis of C3 did not have a major influence on this aspect of glomerular disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
It is widely known that complement plays a role in the pathogenesis of immune complex disease. However, the nature of this role is controversial, because complement activation can mediate inflammatory injury (13), whereas deficiency, especially of the early components, can predispose toward immune complex disease. In particular, C1q deficiency has been associated with reduced clearance of apoptotic cells (4) and the development of antibody-mediated glomerulonephritis (5). C3 has an important role in the removal of immune complexes both from the circulation and from the glomerulus (68), and failure can result in glomerulonephritis. It is likely that the effect of complement in the pathogenesis of glomerular disease may be dependent on the stage of the disease (9). Acute glomerular inflammation after a single injection of anti–glomerular basement antibody is reduced in the absence of complement (1,10), whereas the slower accumulation of glomerular complexes that are formed by autologous antibody may be increased (9).

A further complexity is that whereas a large amount of complement, produced in the liver (11), is present in the circulation, smaller, although significant, quantities can be synthesized locally in the extravascular space. Circulating components are instantly available, whereas tissue-specific components are produced in a regulated manner after the induction of disease or after exposure of cultured cells to various inflammatory stimuli. In the kidney, glomerular epithelial (12), mesangial (13,14), and endothelial cells (15) have the capacity to synthesize C3, a pivotal component of the complement cascade that is able to mediate the clearance of immune complexes as well as induce inflammation. In addition, renal tubule cells can produce C3 (16). After the induction of glomerular disease in rats, tissue expression of C3 mRNA is increased, and the degree of protein leak from the injured kidney correlates positively with the level of C3 gene expression (17). It therefore has been proposed that locally synthesized C3 may have a role in the pathogenesis of renal injury and that this function may differ from that of circulating complement.

To assess the contribution of systemic and local production of C3, we investigated the development of immune complex glomerulonephritis after the administration of anti–glomerular basement antibody to mice. We specifically examined the development of this disease in mice that lack either circulating C3 or renally produced C3, achieved by transplanting kidneys between mice that are C3 deficient and C3 sufficient.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Mice
The C3-deficient (C3–/–) mice were originally generated by homologous recombination in the laboratory of Prof. M.C. Carroll (18). The mice have no detectable C3 by ELISA. Although originally generated on a mixed C57Bl/6 x 129 background, the C3–/– mice that were used in these experiments had been backcrossed six generations onto a C57Bl/6 background. Skin that was engrafted from these mice onto C57Bl/6 mice showed no evidence of rejection (data not shown). C3-sufficient C57Bl/6 (C3+/+) mice were bred in our own facility. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with United Kingdom Home Office regulations.

Measurement of Anti-Sheep IgG Titers
To determine whether C3–/– and C3+/+ mice had similar anti-sheep IgG antibody titers, we injected 1 mg of sheep IgG in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) into 10 mice from each strain. Blood was taken at days 5, 12, and 19. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with 20 µg/ml sheep IgG in PBS overnight at 4°C. Plates were blocked with 1% BSA, and serial dilutions of serum in PBS–1% BSA were added for 1 h at 37°C. After washing, the plates were incubated with 1:1000 dilution of goat anti-mouse IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (Stratech Scientific Ltd, Soham, UK) or rabbit isotype-specific alkaline phosphate conjugate (Southern Biotechnology Associates Inc., Birmingham, AL) for 1 h at 37°C, washed, and developed with O-phenylenediamine or p-Nitrophenyl phosphate.

Induction of Glomerular Injury and the Transplant Model
Anti–glomerular basement membrane (GBM) antibody–mediated glomerular injury was induced in 6- to 8-wk-old female C3+/+ and C3–/– mice (13 mice per group). Five days before the injection of anti-GBM antiserum, mice were immunized subcutaneously with 1 mg of sheep IgG (Sigma, Dorset, UK) in CFA. Before the injection of anti-GBM antiserum, mice were housed in metabolic cages to measure baseline albuminuria, and blood was taken to measure serum albumin and urea concentrations. Mice received an injection of 50 µl of sheep anti-GBM antiserum (Dr. D.J. Salant, Boston, MA) intravenously on 3 consecutive days. Urine and blood were collected at days 7 and 14 after the first injection of anti-GBM antiserum. Mice were killed at day 14, and their kidneys were harvested for histologic analysis.

Heterotropic kidney transplantation was performed in two donor–recipient combinations: Group 1, C3–/– donor mouse to C3+/+ mouse recipient (n = 4); and group 2, C3+/+ donor mouse to C3–/– mouse recipient (n = 4). The resulting mice either were deficient in locally produced C3 in the transplanted kidney but with intact systemic production (group 1) or had intact local C3 production but deficient systemic production (group 2). The donor and recipient aorta and vena cava were joined by end-to-side anastomosis. A patch of donor bladder was attached to the recipient bladder (19). Unilateral recipient nephrectomy was performed at the time of transplantation. After a period of recovery (10 d), a second native nephrectomy was performed so that the only source of renal function was from the transplanted kidney. Preliminary studies demonstrated that the transplanted kidney was histologically normal 14 d after transplantation, with donor and graft survival for at least 3 mo with no evidence of rejection. Fourteen days after transplantation, anti-GBM antibody–mediated glomerular injury was induced.

Assessment of Renal Functional Injury
Urine albumin concentration was measured by ELISA, and the 24-h urinary albumin excretion was calculated. Ninety-six-well plates were coated with 5 µg/ml goat anti-mouse albumin (Nordic Immunological Laboratories, Tilburg, The Netherlands) in carbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4°C. After blocking with 2% BSA at 37°C for 2 h, samples or control dilutions of mouse albumin (Sigma) in blocking buffer were added to the plates for 2 h at 37°C. A secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse albumin (Nordic) in blocking buffer was added for 2 h at 37°C. Absorbance was measured after incubation with O-phenylenediamine. Serum urea and albumin concentrations were measured using Sigma kits according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Assessment of Histologic Injury
To assess histologic injury we stained formalin-fixed, wax-embedded kidney sections (2 µm thick) with periodic acid-Schiff reagent (PAS). The severity of injury was scored by a blinded observer according to the following scheme: 0, normal; 1, mild (small areas of glomerular abnormalities); 2, moderate (<50% of the glomerulus affected by necrosis or crescent formation); and 3, severe (>50% of the glomerulus affected by necrosis or crescent formation) (20). Fifty glomeruli were assessed for each animal.

Immunohistochemical Staining
Cryostat sections (5 µm) were fixed with acetone at 4°C for 10 min. Deposition of mouse IgG, mouse IgM, and sheep IgG was detected with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG, HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgM (both Stratech), and HRP-conjugated anti-sheep IgG (Serotec, Oxford, UK; preabsorbed against sheep and mouse Ig, respectively, and lack of cross-reactivity tested by ELISA [data not shown]). For C3 staining, the primary antibody was rabbit anti-human C3d (Dako Ltd, Cambridgeshire, UK) and a secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG. For C4 staining, the primary antibody was rat anti-mouse C4 and a secondary HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rat (Stratech). HRP-antibody was detected with diaminobenzidine. Sections were counterstained with methyl green.

Fifty glomeruli from each animal were examined, and a semiquantitative assessment of the intensity of the immunochemical staining was performed using a scale from 0 to 3 (0, negative; 1, weak; 2, moderate; 3, strong staining) according to the methods described previously (21).

Electron Microscopy
Tissue was prefixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and postfixed with osmium tetroxide. Sections were stained with lead citrate and viewed on a transmission electron microscope (Hitachi H7000; Hitachi, Berkshire, UK). A minimum of three glomeruli were assessed in each mouse.

Demonstration of Renal C3 Synthesis
Using standard phenol-chloroform methods, RNA was extracted from the renal cortex of transplanted kidney, and cDNA was synthesized. C3 gene expression was detected by reverse transcription–PCR using the primer sequences 5'-TCACACACCGAAGAAGACTGCC-3' and 5'-GTGGCTGATGAACTTGCGTTGC-3' (product size 407 bp). beta-Actin gene expression (5'-GAGCAAGAGAGGTATCCTGACC-3' and 5'-GGATGCCACAGGATTCCATACC-3') was used as an internal control. All amplifications were performed in the linear phase of amplification (28 cycles: 94°C for 1 min; 60°C for 1 min; 72°C for 2 min). The specific PCR product was not seen in non–reverse-transcribed mRNA or genomic DNA controls with the primers used (data not shown).

In situ hybridization for C3 mRNA was performed using a 30-base antisense oligonucleotide probe, corresponding to bases 167 to 196 of mouse C3 cDNA. The probe was labeled using digoxigenin (DIG) oligonucleotide tailing kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Boehringer Mannheim, Lewes, UK). Frozen sections (4 µm) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. The sections were deproteinized by using HCl and proteinase K, prehybridized, and then hybridized with DIG-labeled oligonucleotide probe in prehybridization buffer at 37°C overnight. After washing with 2x SSC, the DIG-labeled probe was visualized using HRP-conjugated sheep polyclonal anti-DIG antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) and diaminobenzidine (22). Control studies with a sense probe and competitive binding studies with sense and antisense probe confirmed specificity.

Statistical Analyses
Data were expressed as mean ± SD. Differences between different groups were tested for statistical significance using one-way ANOVA with Scheffe’s F test. P < 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
In the first phase, anti-GBM antibody–mediated glomerulonephritis was studied in the C3+/+ and C3–/– back-crossed mice. The second phase used a transplantation strategy to define whether locally synthesized C3 plays any role in the development of injury.

Assessment of Anti-Sheep IgG Titers in C3+/+ and C3–/– Mice
C3+/+ and C3–/– mice developed similar anti-sheep IgG titers 12 (Figure 1A) and 19 (Figure 1B) days after immunization with 1 mg of sheep IgG in CFA. Titers were low in both groups at day 5. In addition, the titers of IgG1 and IgG2b were similar in the two groups of mice (Figure 1, C and D). Very little IgG2a or IgG3 was detected in either group of mice (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Anti-sheep antibody titers in C3+/+ ({blacksquare}) and C3–/– ({blacktriangleup}) mice. IgG titers were measured 12 (A) and 19 (B) days after the injection of 1 mg of sheep IgG in complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). IgG1 (C) and IgG2b (D) titers were also assessed in the day 19 sample. Serum from nonimmunized mice was also included ({blacktriangledown}). n = 10 per group.

 
Assessment of Antibody-Mediated Injury in C3+/+ and C3–/– Mice
Before the injection of anti-GBM antiserum, C3+/+ and C3–/– mice had equivalent low levels of albuminuria. Seven days after the first injection, C3–/– mice had significantly greater albuminuria than the C3+/+ mice (57.5 ± 30.1 versus 4.3 ± 3.6 mg/24 h, respectively; P < 0.01). This difference persisted to day 14 (62.3 ± 17.4 versus 9.9 ± 4.5 mg/24 h; P < 0.01). By day 14 after the induction of disease, the serum urea was significantly higher in the C3–/– mice than in the C3+/+ mice (31.2 ± 8.0 and 9.5 ± 2.1 mmol/L, respectively; P < 0.01). These observations confirm greater disruption to glomerular filtration function in the mice that are deficient in C3.

Histologic analysis 14 d after the induction of disease demonstrated that severity of the injury was dependent on the complement status of the mice: The C3+/+ mice showed only minor glomerular changes (Figure 2, A and C). In contrast, the kidneys from C3–/– mice showed significant glomerular injury with glomerular hypercellularity and crescent formation. There was also capillary wall thickening with deposition of PAS-positive material (Figure 2, B and C).


Figure 2
View larger version (100K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Histology of mouse kidney 14 d after the induction of anti–glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) antibody (Ab)-mediated glomerulonephritis. Representative histology of C3+/+ mice (A) and C3–/– mice (B) is shown. (C) Semiquantitative analysis of the severity of glomerular damage was performed on a minimum of 50 glomeruli from all mice (n = 13) in each group. Magnification, x400 in A and B, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining.

 
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Diseased Kidneys
The kidneys from C3+/+ and C3–/– mice 14 d after disease induction were examined for the presence of C3, C4, sheep IgG, and mouse IgG and IgM. C3, C4, and IgM can be detected in the glomeruli of normal mice in a mesangial distribution (data not shown). Increased C3 deposition was detected in the glomeruli of C3+/+ mice after disease induction. C3 was deposited in both a pericapillary and mesangial distribution (Figure 3A). As expected, there was no C3 deposition in the kidneys from C3–/– mice (Figure 3B). C4 staining was seen in the glomeruli of both C3+/+ and C3–/– mice predominantly in a mesangial distribution (Figure 3, C and D, respectively). The intensity of staining was greater, as assessed on a semiquantitative scale, in the C3–/– mice (Table 1).


Figure 3
View larger version (79K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Immunohistochemistry of mouse kidney after the induction of anti-GBM Ab-mediated glomerulonephritis. Staining for C3 (A and B), C4 (C and D), sheep IgG (E and F), mouse IgG (G and H), and mouse IgM (I and J) was performed on C3+/+ mice (A, C, E, G, and I) and C3–/– mice (B, D, F, H, and J). Magnification, x400.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Semiquantitative assessment of the intensity of staining for complement and Ig in the C3+/+ and C3–/– mice 14 d after disease inductiona

 
Staining for sheep IgG (Figure 3, E and F), mouse IgG (Figure 3, G and H), and mouse IgM (Figure 3, I and J) was more intense in the C3–/– mice than in the C3+/+ mice. Antibody staining was predominantly in a pericapillary distribution, although some mesangial staining was also seen. Using a semiquantitative scoring system, this reached statistical significance in all three cases (Table 1). Increased deposition of Ig in the glomeruli of C3–/– mice could explain the increased amounts of C4 detected in these mice. We previously reported that the C3–/– mice have immune complexes within their glomeruli more frequently than do control C3+/+ mice (9). This was true again with this group of mice (data not shown) and is consistent with the increased glomerular deposition of Ig and C4 in C3–/– mice.

Assessment of Functional Injury in Mice with a Transplant
The data above suggest that, after intravenous injection of anti-GBM antibody, mice that are totally deficient in C3 accumulate immune-reactive material in their glomeruli and subsequently develop more severe renal injury. To dissect the relative importance of circulating and locally synthesized C3, we used a renal transplantation model.

Fourteen days after the second native nephrectomy, the mice that received a transplant in both groups 1 and 2 seemed healthy. Before the induction of anti-GBM antibody–mediated glomerulonephritis, the serum urea was equivalent in both groups but approximately two-fold higher than in normal unmanipulated mice (Table 2), as a consequence of the animals’ surviving on a single transplanted kidney. The serum albumin was also higher in the mice that received a transplant before the induction of disease. Before disease induction, there was minimal albuminuria in mice from both transplant groups (Figure 4). After the induction of disease, albuminuria developed in both groups but was significantly greater in mice from group 2 (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient) at both days 7 and 14 (P < 0.01 at both time points). Fourteen days after the induction of disease, C3–/– mice that received a kidney from a C3+/+ donor (group 2) had severe functional disturbance with a significant rise in serum urea and reduction in serum albumin (P < 0.01; Table 2). In contrast, the renal function of mice in group 1 was not altered significantly after the induction of disease. Therefore, the functional disturbance seen after disease induction in the mice that received a transplant was dependent on the complement status of the recipient rather than that of the donor kidney.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Serum urea and albumin in mice that received a transplanta

 

Figure 4
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. 24-hour urinary albumin excretion (mg/24 h) in the mice that received a transplant. Albuminuria in group 1 mice (C3–/– donor: C3+/+ recipient; dotted line) was significantly less than group 2 mice (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient; solid line); n = 4 per group.

 
Assessment of Histologic Injury in Kidney Transplants
The glomeruli of the group 1 mice were hypercellular and exhibited areas of minor sclerosis (Figure 5A). The glomeruli of mice in group 2 showed marked histologic damage, including capillary occlusion with PAS-positive material and areas of focal proliferation and crescent formation (Figure 5B). Scoring of the glomerular histologic changes confirmed the greater injury in group 2 mice (2.5 ± 0.6) compared with group 1 mice (1.4 ± 0.2; P < 0.01). Similarly, the tubulointerstitium in C3+/+ mice that received a C3–/– kidney (group 1) was well preserved in contrast to mice from group 2 that had tubular dilation, epithelial cell flattening expansion of the interstitial compartment with evidence of a mononuclear cell infiltrate.


Figure 5
View larger version (95K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Histology of the transplanted kidneys. Representative glomerular histology from group 1 mice (C3–/– donor: C3+/+ recipient; A) and group 2 mice (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient; B) is shown. The glomeruli from group 2 mice showed severe histologic damage including capillary occlusion with PAS-positive material and areas of focal proliferation and crescent formation. Magnification, x100, PAS staining.

 
Immunohistochemical Analysis of Transplanted Kidneys
Complement C3 was deposited in the glomeruli of mice from both transplant groups 14 d after disease induction (Figure 6, A through D). Because mice from group 2 lack systemic C3 production, the C3 that is deposited in the glomeruli must be of donor kidney origin, presumably derived from resident renal cells. Staining for C3 was present in a capillary wall and mesangial distribution. C4 was also seen in the glomeruli of mice from both groups, as in the mice that did not received a transplant, in a mesangial distribution, suggesting activation of the classical pathway of complement (Figure 6, E and F). Sheep IgG and mouse IgG and IgM were deposited in the glomeruli of mice from both groups in both the capillary walls and the mesangium (Figure 7). Semiquantitative assessment of the intensity of staining showed greater intensity of C4, sheep IgG, and mouse IgG and IgM in group 2 mice (Table 3). Therefore, as with the functional changes, the pattern of deposition of immunoreactive proteins followed the complement status of the recipient. We cannot exclude an effect of nonspecific protein trapping in the glomeruli of the more proteinuric mice in group 2, in particular the mesangial IgM.


Figure 6
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Immunochemistry of transplanted kidneys. C3 staining was demonstrated in mice from both group 1 (A and C) and group 2 (B and D). Glomerular C4 staining was also demonstrated in both groups (E and F) but with greater intensity in group 2 mice (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient; F). Magnification, x160 in A and B, x400 in C through F.

 

Figure 7
View larger version (146K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Immunochemistry of mice that received a transplant. Sheep IgG (A and B), mouse IgG (C and D), and mouse IgM (E and F) all were detected in mice from both groups. However, the staining for all three immunoreactants was greater in mice from group 2 (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient; B, D, and F) compared with group 1 mice (C3–/– donor: C3+/+ recipient; A, C, and E). Magnification, x400.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Semiquantitative assessment of the intensity of staining for complement and Ig in the mice that received a transplant

 
Electron Microscopy on Kidneys from Mice with a Transplant
The kidneys from mice in group 1 (Figure 8A) and group 2 (Figure 8B) were examined by electron microscopy. In the glomeruli of mice from group 2, there were electron-dense immune complexes in all mice examined (three of three). In addition, there was epithelial cell foot-process effacement and endothelial cell swelling. Evidence of immune complex deposition was detected in only one mouse (one of four) from group 1, and the structural changes were less severe than those seen in group 2.


Figure 8
View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Electron microscopy of transplanted kidneys. Representative glomerular changes in group 1 (C3–/– donor: C3+/+ recipient; A) and group 2 (C3+/+ donor: C3–/– recipient; B) mice is shown. Group 2 mice demonstrated accumulation of electron-dense material in the subendothelial space (arrows). Bar = 500 nm. Magnification, x20,000.

 
C3 Production within Transplanted Kidneys
PCR was used to analyze reverse-transcribed mRNA from the renal cortex of mice that received a transplant. C3 mRNA was detected in the cortex of both groups (Figure 9A), suggesting that C3 gene expression was occurring in both infiltrating cells (group 1) and native renal cells (group 2). To localize cortical C3 gene expression further, we performed in situ hybridization. In kidney transplants that were derived from a C3–/– donor, C3 message was detected only in infiltrating cells around damaged tubules (Figure 9B). When the kidney was derived from a C3+/+ donor, glomerular and tubular C3 gene expression was evident (Figure 9C). The result with sense probe is shown as a control (Figure 9D). Therefore, during the development of renal injury, C3 that is synthesized within the kidney could be derived from both native and infiltrating renal cells.


Figure 9
View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 9. C3 mRNA analysis in transplanted kidneys. Reverse transcription–PCR was used to determine the presence of C3 gene transcription in mice from both group 1 and group 2. In situ hybridization was used to identify the site of C3 gene expression in mice from group 1 (B) and group 2 (C). Staining with sense probe of group 2 tissue is shown as control (D). G, glomerulus; T, tubule. Magnification, x300 in B, x400 in C, x250 in D.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This work supports a protective role for the complement system in the later, autologous phase of anti-GBM antibody–mediated glomerulonephritis. The protective effect is mediated by circulating complement rather than complement that is produced from resident glomerular cells.

Patients with circulating antibody directed against the GBM develop a severe, rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Antibody is deposited along the basement membrane, activating the complement system, components of which can be demonstrated on the GBM by immunohistochemistry. This led to the hypothesis that complement activation was important in the generation of injury, either by causing direct cell damage or by promoting an inflammatory cell infiltrate. Early studies in animal models using complement depletion (23,24) supported this view; however, this was not a universal finding, particularly in the mouse (25,26). More recent studies using C3–/– mice support a role for complement activation. After the injection of anti-GBM antibody, there is rapid complement activation and neutrophil influx. At this stage of the disease, complement activation seems to have a harmful effect as deficiency (1,27) or inhibition (28) reduces injury. However, as the disease progresses and the animal develops autologous antibody against the heterologous serum, the absence of C3 seems to have a detrimental effect, both on renal function and on histologic injury (9).

The results presented here suggest that the reason for the greater functional injury in the C3–/– mice is the accumulation of immune complexes in the glomerular capillary wall. This could be explained by either reduced clearance of circulating immune complexes or reduced clearance of complexes from within the glomerulus. C3 is readily incorporated into immune complexes because of the high density of Ig Fc regions, thereby disrupting immune complex structure and increasing solubility (29). In addition, in some mammals (not rodents), C3 within immune complexes acts as the ligand for complement receptor 1 on erythrocytes, binding to which facilitates immune complex transport to phagocytic cells of the reticuloendothelial system (30). However, the model of anti-GBM antibody–mediated glomerulonephritis that is used in this study relies on affinity of the heterologous serum for the GBM. Therefore, the immune complex disease seen in this model is probably strongly dependent on in situ immune complex formation. This does not exclude the possibility that reduced clearance of circulating complexes plays a role in the pathogenesis of glomerular disease in the C3–/– mice.

Complement also has a function in the solubilization of immune complexes from within the glomerulus (31) and the transfer of immune complexes across the GBM. Studies in animals have shown that, in contrast to the normal passage of antigen and antibody through the GBM, in animals that are depleted of complement with cobra venom factor, antigen remains in a subendothelial position (32,33). The disruption to the structure of the immune complex that is caused by complement binding probably facilitates transfer through the GBM, although the exact mechanism remains unknown.

In the C3–/– mice described in this study, the absence of one or more of these mechanisms leads to the accumulation of immunoreactants and immune complexes within the glomerulus and therefore greater functional injury. A similar increase in severity of immune complex glomerular disease was seen when the targeted C3 deletion was back-crossed onto an MRL/lpr background. Greater glomerular IgG deposition and albuminuria was observed in the C3–/– mice (34). However, the role of complement in this model is complex, and mice that are specifically deficient in the alternative pathway (35) or in which complement activation is inhibited (36) have reduced disease severity. Overall, this suggests a predominant role for the classical pathway of complement activation in protecting from glomerular immune complex disease.

We next addressed the issue of the source of C3 that reduces the build-up of immune complexes in the glomerulus. Native cells within the glomerulus, including mesangial (13,37), epithelial (38), and endothelial cells (15), as well as tubular epithelial cells (16,39) have the capacity to synthesize C3. Although it is well documented that glomerular expression of C3 mRNA is increased in glomerulonephritis, the data presented here provide no evidence for a functional role for intraglomerular complement synthesis. Logically, in this context, the local synthesis of C3 should protect against immune complex accumulation, a clearly defined physiologic role of the complement system. In our model of immune complex–mediated disease, however, we were unable to demonstrate this effect of locally synthesized C3, despite evidence of C3 production in the glomerulus during disease development.

It is possible that because the glomerular capillaries are exposed to high concentrations of circulating complement components, locally synthesized C3 has only minor importance in disease that is induced by anti-GBM antibodies. Moreover, in other models of glomerulonephritis, the glomerular expression of C3 is time dependent, and maximal expression is achieved after 14 d (17). Therefore, local synthesis of C3 may have a greater contribution to make in more protracted models of renal injury than in the model described here. In models of very acute injury, such as the heterologous phase of this model, local synthesis of C3 is even less likely to contribute to disease expression.

It should also be noted that the main site of complement gene expression in the kidney is the renal tubule (40), and expression at this site is upregulated during renal injury. It is possible that locally synthesized complement that is secreted into the extravascular, interstitial compartment has a greater impact on the development of injury than glomerular-produced complement. For example, there is increasing evidence that complement activation may contribute to the damage to the tubulointerstitial compartment in proteinuria (4143). In addition, renal tubular epithelial cell production of C3 is increased by exposure to serum proteins. However, as yet, there is no direct evidence for involvement of locally synthesized complement proteins in this phase of renal disease.

Thus, although local expression of C3 clearly is upregulated by the induction of immune complex glomerulonephritis, this study does not show that local synthesis of C3 plays a contributing role in the pathogenesis of glomerular dysfunction. Rather, these data suggest that circulating complement plays a vital role in prevention of glomerular disease, consistent with the removal of circulating or planted immune complexes mediated by C3. It seems likely that locally produced complement may have greater impact on diseases of the tubulointerstitium, the main intrarenal site of complement synthesis in such disorders (44).


    Footnotes
 
Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Sheerin NS, Springall T, Carroll MC, Hartley B, Sacks SH: Protection against anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM)-mediated nephritis in C3- and C4-deficient mice. Clin Exp Immunol 110 : 403 –409, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Couser WG, Schulze M, Pruchno CJ: Role of C5B-9 in experimental membranous nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 7 : 25 –31, 1992[Medline]
  3. Topham PS, Haydar SA, Kuphal R, Lightfoot JD, Salant DJ: Complement-mediated injury reversibly disrupts glomerular epithelial cell actin microfilaments and focal adhesions. Kidney Int 55 : 1763 –1775, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  4. Botto M, Dell’Agnola C, Bygrave AE, Thompson EM, Cook HT, Petry F, Loos M, Pandolfi PP, Walport MJ: Homozygous C1q deficiency causes glomerulonephritis associated with multiple apoptotic bodies. Nat Genet 19 : 56 –59, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Mitchell DA, Taylor PR, Cook HT, Moss J, Bygrave AE, Walport MJ, Botto M: Cutting edge: C1q protects against the development of glomerulonephritis independently of C3 activation. J Immunol 162 : 5676 –5679, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Schifferli JA: The classical pathway of complement prevents the formation of insoluble antigen-antibody complexes—Biological implications. Immunol Lett 14 : 225 –228, 1987[CrossRef][Medline]
  7. Schifferli JA, Ng YC, Peters DK: The role of complement and its receptor in the elimination of immune-complexes. N Engl J Med 315 : 488 –495, 1986[Medline]
  8. Fujigaki Y, Batsford S, Yamashita F, Yonemura K, Hishida A, Kawachi H, Shimizu F, Vogt A: Sequence of events in the glomerular capillary wall at the onset of proteinuria in passive Heymann nephritis. Virchows Arch Int J Pathol 438 : 136 –145, 2001[CrossRef]
  9. Sheerin NS, Springall T, Abe K, Sacks SH: Protection and injury: The differing roles of complement in the development of glomerular injury. Eur J Immunol 31 : 1255 –1260, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  10. Quigg RJ, Lim A, Haas M, Alexander JJ, He C, Carroll MC: Immune complex glomerulonephritis in C4- and C3-deficient mice. Kidney Int 53 : 320 –330, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Alper CA, Johnson AM, Birtch AG, Moore FD: Human C3: Evidence for the liver as the primary site of synthesis. Science 163 : 263 –288, 1969[Free Full Text]
  12. Sacks SH, Zhou W, Pani A, Campbell RD, Martin J: Complement C3 gene expression and regulation in human glomerular epithelial cells. Immunology 79 : 348 –354, 1993[Medline]
  13. Sacks S, Zhou W, Campbell RD, Martin J: C3 and C4 gene expression and interferon-gamma-mediated regulation in human glomerular mesangial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 93 : 411 –417, 1993[Medline]
  14. Timmerman JJ, Beersma MF, Gijlswijk-Janssen DJ, van Es LA, van der Woude FJ, Daha MR: Differential effects of cytomegalovirus infection on complement synthesis by human mesangial cells. Clin Exp Immunol 109 : 518 –525, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Sheerin NS, Zhou W, Adler S, Sacks SH: TNF-alpha regulation of C3 gene expression and protein biosynthesis in rat glomerular endothelial cells. Kidney Int 51 : 703 –710, 1997[Medline]
  16. Brooimans RA, Stegmann AP, van Dorp WT, van der Ark AA, van der Woude FJ, van Es LA, Daha MR: Interleukin 2 mediates stimulation of complement C3 biosynthesis in human proximal tubular epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 88 : 379 –384, 1991[Medline]
  17. Sasaki O, Zhou W, Miyazaki M, Abe K, Koji T, Verroust P, Tsukasaki S, Ozono Y, Harada T, Nakane PK, Kohno S, Sacks SH: Intraglomerular C3 synthesis in rats with passive Heymann nephritis. Am J Pathol 151 : 1249 –1256, 1997[Abstract]
  18. Wessels MR, Butko P, Ma M, Warren HB, Lage AL, Carroll MC: Studies of group B streptococcal infection in mice deficient in complement component C3 or C4 demonstrate an essential role for complement in both innate and acquired immunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 : 11490 –11494, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kalina SL, Mottram PL: A microsurgical technique for renal transplantation in mice. Aust NZJ Surg 63 : 213 –216, 1993
  20. Reynolds J, Tam FWK, Chandraker A, Smith J, Karkar AM, Cross J, Peach R, Sayegh MH, Pusey CD: CD28–B7 blockade prevents the development of experimental autoimmune glomerulonephritis. J Clin Invest 105 : 643 –651, 2000[Medline]
  21. Gomez-Guerrero C, Duque N, Casado MT, Pastor C, Blanco J, Mampaso F, Vivanco F, Egido J: Administration of IgG Fc fragments prevents glomerular injury in experimental immune complex nephritis. J Immunol 164 : 2092 –651, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Abe K, Miyazaki M, Koji T, Furusu A, Ozono Y, Harada T, Sakai H, Nakane PK, Kohno S: Expression of decay accelerating factor mRNA and complement C3 mRNA in human diseased kidney. Kidney Int 54 : 120 –130, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  23. Cochrane CJ, Unanue ER, Dixon FJ: A role of polymorphonuclear cells and complement in nephrotoxic nephritis. J Exp Med 122 : 99 –116, 1965[Abstract]
  24. Hammer DK, Dixon FJ: Experimental glomerulonephritis. II. Immunologic events in the pathogenesis of nephrotoxic nephritis in the rat. J Exp Med 17 : 1019 –1034, 2002
  25. Huang XR, Holdsworth SR, Tipping PG: Th2 responses induce humorally mediated injury in experimental anti-glomerular basement membrane glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 8 : 1101 –1108, 1997[Abstract]
  26. Feith GW, Assmann KJM, Bogman MJJT, Vangompel APM, Schalkwijk J, Koene RAP: Albuminuria in the late heterologous phase of anti-GBM nephritis in beige mice is complement independent but leukocyte dependent. Kidney Int 43 : 968 –1108, 1993
  27. Hebert MJ, Takano T, Papayianni A, Rennke HG, Minto A, Salant DJ, Carroll MC, Brady HR: Acute nephrotoxic serum nephritis in complement knockout mice: Relative roles of the classical and alternate pathways in neutrophil recruitment and proteinuria. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13 : 2799 –2803, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Quigg RJ, Kozono Y, Berthiaume D, Lim A, Salant DJ, Weinfeld A, Griffin P, Kremmer E, Holers VM: Blockade of antibody-induced glomerulonephritis with Crry-Ig, a soluble murine complement inhibitor. J Immunol 160 : 4553 –4560, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Schifferli JA, Woo P, Peters DK: Complement-mediated inhibition of immune precipitation. 1. Role of the classical and alternative pathways. Clin Exp Immunol 47 : 555 –562, 1982[Medline]
  30. Birmingham DJ: Erythrocyte complement receptors. Crit Rev Immunol 15 : 133 –154, 1995[Medline]
  31. Schifferli JA, Peters DK: Complement, the immune-complex lattice, and the patho-physiology of complement-deficiency syndromes. Lancet 2 : 957 –959, 1983[CrossRef][Medline]
  32. Fujigaki Y, Nagase M, Honda N: Intraglomerular basement-membrane translocation of immune-complex (IC) in the development of passive in situ IC nephritis of rats. Am J Pathol 142 : 831 –843, 1993[Abstract]
  33. Sawtell NM, Hartman AL, Weiss MA, Pesce AJ, Michael JG: C-3 dependent, C5 independent immune-complex glomerulopathy in the mouse. Lab Invest 58 : 287 –293, 1988[Medline]
  34. Sekine H, Reilly CM, Molano ID, Garnier G, Circolo A, Ruiz P, Holers VM, Boackle SA, Gilkeson GS: Complement component C3 is not required for full expression of immune complex glomerulonephritis in MRL/lpr mice. J Immunol 166 : 6444 –6451, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Elliott MK, Jarmi T, Ruiz P, Xu Y, Holers VM, Gilkeson GS: Effects of complement factor D deficiency on the renal disease of MRL/lpr mice. Kidney Int 65 : 129 –138, 2004[CrossRef][Medline]
  36. Bao LH, Haas M, Boackle SA, Kraus DM, Cunningham PN, Park P, Alexander JJ, Anderson RK, Culhane K, Holers VM, Quigg RJ: Transgenic expression of a soluble complement inhibitor protects against renal disease and promotes survival in MRL/lpr mice. J Immunol 168 : 3601 –3607, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Montinaro V, Serra L, Perissutti S, Ranieri E, Tedesco F, Schena FP: Biosynthesis of C3 by human mesangial cells. Modulation by proinflammatory cytokines. Kidney Int 47 : 829 –836, 1995[Medline]
  38. Zhou W, Campbell RD, Martin J, Sacks SH: Interferon-gamma regulation of C4 gene expression in cultured human glomerular epithelial cells. Eur J Immunol 23 : 2477 –2481, 1993[Medline]
  39. Tang S, Zhou WD, Sheerin NS, Vaughan RW, Sacks SH: Contribution of renal secreted complement C3 to the circulating pool in humans. J Immunol 162 : 4336 –4341, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Andrews PA, Finn JE, Lloyd CM, Zhou W, Mathieson PW, Sacks SH: Expression and tissue localization of donor-specific complement C3 synthesized in human renal allografts. Eur J Immunol 25 : 1087 –1093, 1995[Medline]
  41. Hori Y, Yamada K, Hanafusa N, Okuda T, Okada N, Miyata T, Couser WG, Kurokawa K, Fujita T, Nangaku M: Crry, a complement regulatory protein, modulates renal interstitial disease induced by proteinuria. Kidney Int 56 : 2096 –2106, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  42. Nangaku M, Pippin J, Couser WG: C6 mediates chronic progression of tubulointerstitial damage in rats with remnant kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 13 : 928 –936, 2002[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Morita Y, Ikeguchi H, Nakamura J, Hotta N, Yuzawa Y, Matsuo S: Complement activation products in the urine from proteinuric patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 11 : 700 –707, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Pratt JR, Basheer SA, Sacks SH: Local synthesis of complement component C3 regulates acute renal transplant rejection. Nat Med 8 : 582 –587, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
S. Sacks and W. Zhou
New Boundaries for Complement in Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2008; 19(10): 1865 - 1869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
N. S. Sheerin, P. Risley, K. Abe, Z. Tang, W. Wong, T. Lin, and S. H. Sacks
Synthesis of complement protein C3 in the kidney is an important mediator of local tissue injury
FASEB J, April 1, 2008; 22(4): 1065 - 1072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
ASN.2004070515v1
17/3/686    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sheerin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sheerin, N. S.
Right arrow Articles by Sacks, S. H.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP