| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Transplantation |
Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Address correspondence to: Dr. Roy D. Bloom, Renal-Electrolyte and Hypertension Division, University of Pennsylvania, 700 Clinical Research Building, 415 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6144. Phone: 215-662-4643; Fax: 215-615-0349; rdbloom{at}mail.med.upenn.edu
Received for publication January 11, 2006. Accepted for publication August 29, 2006.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Posttransplantation anemia (PTA) occurs frequently, with prevalence rates between 20 and 60% depending on the criteria used for defining anemia (814). PTA has not been defined uniformly in terms of time frame or hemoglobin level after transplantation. Some authors have suggested distinguishing early from late PTA, with the cutoff between the two periods being the 6-mo posttransplantation time point (10,1518). Several risk factors have been associated with PTA, including chronic allograft dysfunction, antiproliferative immunosuppression (e.g., mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], sirolimus), chronic iron deficiency, and renin-angiotensin system blocking therapies (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors [ACEI] and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers [ARB]) (10,13,18,19). PTA has been associated with an increased risk for congestive heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy in kidney recipients (2022). Given the high frequency of PTA and that cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death with a functioning renal allograft, persistent anemia may be an important contributor to mortality in this population. However, the impact of PTA on kidney recipient outcomes is not well studied and is sparsely reported. The aims of this single-center, retrospective study were to characterize the factors that are associated with anemia at 12 mo after kidney transplantation in patients who were on a de novo MMF-containing regimen and to determine whether anemia at 12 mo after transplantation affects long-term patient outcome.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anemia Definition and Treatment
Anemia was defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dl. This definition was selected because it fulfilled criteria for anemia in both men and women with CKD, as defined by National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) guidelines (2325). The presence or absence of anemia at 1, 3, 6, and 12 mo after transplantation was documented. Chronic PTA was defined as the presence of anemia at the 12th posttransplantation month for the following reasons: (1) Anemia occurs more often than not during the early postoperative period; (2) drug- and other transplant-related complications are most common in the first few postoperative months, when rectification of the complications frequently results in resolution of the anemia; and (3) anemia typically is corrected by months 2 to 8 after kidney transplantation (26,27). During the study period, a workup for anemia was not performed routinely, and neither iron supplementation nor recombinant human erythropoietin typically was implemented as therapy. Patients with hemoglobin levels <11 g/dl were considered to have severe anemia.
Immunosuppression
Maintenance immunosuppression consisted of CsA (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) or tacrolimus (Astellas Pharmaceuticals, Deerfield, IL). Target tacrolimus levels were as follows: (1) Weeks 0 to 12, 7 to 12 ng/ml; (2) weeks 12 to 24, 7 to 10 ng/ml; and (3) beyond 24 wk, 5 to 10 ng/ml. Target CsA levels were as follows: (1) weeks 0 to 12, 200 to 300 ng/ml; (2) weeks 12 to 24, 150 to 250 ng/ml; and (3) beyond 24 wk, 80 to 150 ng/ml. MMF (Cellcept; Hoffman-La Roche, Nutley, NJ) was administered at 1 to 2 g/d in divided doses, as tolerated, and adjusted to maintain white blood cell count above 4 x 106/L; the dosage was titrated downward for adverse drug reactions. Steroids initially were given as bolus methylprednisone 500 to 1000 mg intraoperatively. Prednisone was started postoperative days 1 to 2 and tapered according to center protocol to 5 mg/d by 60 to 90 d after transplantation. Induction therapy consisted of one of the following: Rabbit antithymocyte gammaglobulin (Thymoglobulin; Genzyme, Cambridge, MA), dosed at 1 to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously over 4 h, commencing intraoperatively prereperfusion and infused daily for 3 to 7 d; equine antithymocyte gammaglobulin (ATGAM; Pharmacia-Upjohn Pharmaceuticals, Kalamazoo, MI), administered intravenously at a dosage of 15 mg/kg per d over 4 h for 7 to 10 d; or anti-CD3 mAb (OKT3; Ortho Pharmaceuticals, Raritan Bay, NJ) given as a 5-mg intravenous push as initial dose, followed by 2.5 mg/d intravenously for 5 to 7 d.
Rejection Monitoring and Treatment
Acute rejection was suspected by unexplained serum creatinine elevation, in the presence of clinical findings (including decreasing urine output, weight gain, increasing BP, and allograft tenderness). Whenever possible, suspected acute rejection was confirmed by percutaneous renal transplant biopsy before initiation of antirejection treatment. Pulse methylprednisone (10 mg/kg) was used for mild acute rejection episodes; OKT3 and Thymoglobulin were reserved for more severe grades of or steroid-resistant rejection.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis
Single-strength trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1 tablet daily for the first 6 mo after transplantation, was given for Pneumocystis carinii prophylaxis. Cytomegalovirus prophylaxis for 1996 and 1997 consisted of 12 wk of acyclovir, 800 mg twice daily if serum creatinine was >3.5 mg/dl and 800 mg four times a day if serum creatinine was <3.5 mg/dl. Between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2001, oral ganciclovir (Cytovene; Hoffman-La Roche) was administered for the first 12 wk after transplantation for D+/R, D+/R+ and D/R+ patients. D/R patients received acyclovir, titrated to serum creatinine as described above. After January 1, 2002, oral ganciclovir was given for 24 wk for D+/R recipients. Ganciclovir dosing was consistently 1000 mg thrice daily for patients with serum creatinine <3.5 mg/dl and 500 mg twice daily for serum creatinine >3.5 mg/dl.
Data that were collected included recipient age, gender, race, and cause and duration of ESRD; the dialysis, hepatitis C, and diabetes status of patients before transplantation; and previous transplant history. Donor age and source (deceased versus living) were recorded. Posttransplantation data collected included type of antibody induction, immunosuppressive regimen during the first 12 mo, use of ACEI and ARB, and serial serum creatinine and hemoglobin levels. The outcomes graft loss and patient death also were ascertained. Cause of death was obtained, whenever possible, from either inpatient or outpatient records or from local physicians for patients who died.
Statistical Analyses
Descriptive patient variables were analyzed according to the presence or absence of PTA. Numeric variables are shown as means ± SEM unless otherwise specified. Normally distributed variables were analyzed by t test and ANOVA. Categorical values were analyzed by
2 tests and by Fischer exact test when an individual cell size was less than five. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was fit in a forward manner with the variables that had a significant unadjusted association (P < 0.10) with the development of PTA within the first posttransplantation year. Variables were retained in the model at P
0.05 by the Wald test. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare patient and graft survival in patients with and without PTA, and significance was assessed by the log-rank method. Finally, a Cox regression model was fit to investigate whether PTA was a risk factor for mortality in this cohort. In addition to PTA, this model incorporated baseline demographic variables (age, gender, and ethnicity) as well as other covariates that previously have been associated with mortality in this population (pretransplantation diabetes, ESRD duration, serum creatinine, previous transplant, and hepatitis C). Given that anemia could be a consequence of allograft dysfunction, we included in the model an interaction term 12-mo PTA*12-mo serum creatinine. In a separate Cox regression model, we explored whether PTA was a risk factor specifically for death as a result of cardiovascular disease, incorporating all of the covariates that were used in the previous model; eight patients for whom we could not determine the cause of death were excluded from this second analysis. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 10 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anemia Prevalence
The prevalence of anemia declined throughout the first year after transplantation. The proportion of patients with hemoglobin levels <12 g/dl was 72% by the end of the first posttransplantation month, 40% at 3 mo, and 20.3% at 12 mo (Figure 1). Severe anemia was observed in 51, 19, and 8% of recipients at 1, 3, and 12 mo after transplantation, respectively. The 127 recipients with PTA at 12 mo after transplantation served as case patients, and the remaining 499 nonanemic patients served as the control cohort. Baseline characteristics of these two groups are compared in Table 1.
|
|
From a therapy standpoint, use of antibody induction, tacrolimus, ACEI, or ARB was not significantly different between the two cohorts. MMF was discontinued in 32% of patients with PTA versus 19% of the group who were not anemic after the first posttransplantation year (P = 0.002).
Pertinent laboratory characteristics of patients with PTA are reflected in Table 2. Compared with the nonanemic cohort, patients with 12-mo PTA were almost three times more likely to have had anemia at 3 mo (83 versus 28%; P = 0.0001). Hemoglobin levels were significantly lower and serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in the PTA cohort.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our study, almost 75% of kidney transplant recipients had hemoglobin <12 g/dl at the end of the first posttransplantation month. The prevalence of anemia declined to 43% by the third posttransplantation month and was 22% at the end of the first 12 mo. These declining frequencies of PTA over time during the first posttransplantation year are consistent with previously reported prevalence rates (8,12,14). Anemia is very common in the first posttransplantation month for several reasons, including low erythropoietin production that is common to patients with ESRD, erythropoietin resistance postoperatively in the setting of surgery and infectious complications, blood losses, and frequent phlebotomies early after transplant. Deficiencies of iron, B12, folate, or other substrates for red blood cell production among transplant recipients and bone marrow suppression or other immunosuppressive complications further contribute to development of PTA (17). Whereas endogenous production of erythropoietin commonly begins within the first day after kidney transplantation, complete restoration of erythropoietin synthesis depends mostly on recovery of graft function (17). An exception to this occurs in patients with ADPKD, for whom higher endogenous erythropoietin levels and lower PTA rates have been reported (13). In accordance with this report, we have found that the prevalence of ADPKD was lower in the PTA cohort (8 versus 17% among nonanemic patients; P = 0.054).
We observed several risk factors for 12-mo PTA. The strongest predictor of this complication was anemia at 3 mo after transplantation, present in 83% of individuals who ultimately developed PTA. We identified direct associations between 12-mo PTA and both older donor age and decreased levels of kidney function, as well as an inverse relationship with male gender, as previously reported (12,13,16). The significant association that was observed between 12-mo PTA and requirement for and duration of pretransplantation dialysis was not maintained after adjustment for potential confounders in the logistic regression model.
MMF is the most widely used maintenance immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplantation (28). MMF may induce anemia by a direct myelosuppressive effect (29,30). The prevalence of PTA that we observed in MMF-treated patients is similar to what has been reported (8,13). Contrary to other studies, we did not find use of ACEI and ARB to be significantly associated with PTA (13). We believe that there are a few possible explanations for this discrepancy in our study. First, MMF, itself an established independent risk factor for PTA, was used in our entire cohort (versus 50% in the Transplant European Survey on Anemia Management [TRESAM]). Moreover, MMF was administered together with tacrolimus and prednisone in 85% of our cohort (versus 17% in the TRESAM) (13). We believe that uniform use of MMF in our patient population may have masked the potentially permissive effect of renin-angiotensin blockade on PTA. Second, the use of ACEI/ARB in our patient population (41% overall) was more widespread than in these other studies. Because patients in our center are only commenced on renin-angiotensin system blockers between 3 and 6 mo after transplantation, anemia already would have been present before initiation of this therapy in the vast majority of patients who ultimately developed PTA. It also is plausible that longer follow-up beyond 12 mo after transplantation (as was done in the TRESAM) may have revealed significant differences in use of renin-angiotensin system blockade between groups. Finally, whether the concomitant use with MMF of tacrolimus, which is associated with increased mycophenolic acid exposure relative to CsA, thereby could further augment the risk of anemia is not known.
Anemia has been linked to negative long-term outcomes in CKD. Most studies have focused on anemia in patients who are on dialysis. In the National Kidney Foundation K/DOQI clinical guidelines for anemia in CKD, anemia is recognized as being associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity, impaired cognitive abilities, and reduced quality of life in ESRD (23). In predialysis patients, anemia has been identified as an independent risk factor for progression to kidney failure (31). Treatment of anemia with erythropoietin has been found to slow the decline in kidney function (32). In our study, we found that graft and patient survival are markedly diminished in patients with PTA at 12 mo compared with nonanemic patients. Because our analysis focused primarily on the relationship between PTA and mortality, we did not investigate specifically the association between PTA and allograft failure in this article; however, we speculate that the inferior allograft outcomes that were observed in the PTA cohort in part reflect that allograft dysfunction itself is an important risk factor for anemia. Conversely, although anemia may be a surrogate for chronic disease severity and comorbidity, the persistent, independent effect of 12-mo PTA on mortality after adjustment in the Cox regression model is compelling evidence of its importance as a risk factor for patient outcome. The absence of a significant interaction between PTA and serum creatinine further strengthens this observation. Despite that the overall mortality in the study was low, death related to cardiovascular disease was observed more commonly in the 12-mo PTA patient cohort. The finding that cardiovascular disease was the leading cause of death in our patient population is entirely in keeping with all published studies in this regard. Because recombinant human erythropoietin was not used routinely in our patient cohort during this period of observation, it is unknown what impact this therapy might have had on patient outcomes. Certainly, recent studies have shown the efficacy and the safety of recombinant human erythropoietin in the correction of anemia in kidney recipients (3236).
There are several limitations to our study. First, our data were collected retrospectively, as has typically been the case with studies on this subject. Unlike most previous studies, however, we examined PTA-related outcomes in a transplant population that was treated with a relatively homogeneous immunosuppressive regimen, which also is the most widely used regimen in the United States. Second, although our transplant program did not use recombinant human erythropoietin routinely during this study period, we cannot exclude the possibility that some patients may have received this therapy through prescription by their community nephrologists. However, the fact that kidney recipients typically are followed in our transplant program exclusively for the first 6 to 12 mo after transplantation largely mitigates against this possibility. Moreover, even in the event that a small proportion of patients were receiving recombinant human erythropoietin, the risk factors and implications of anemia that were identified in this study still are very relevant regardless of whether this hormonal treatment was administered. Third, we were unable to ascertain the cause of death in eight of the patients who died. However, we established that cardiovascular disease by far was the most common cause of mortality and that patients with 12-mo PTA had an increased risk for death in this manner. Although most of the traditional risk factors for cardiovascular disease were examined in this study, we lacked information regarding tobacco use or body mass index (although weight at the time of transplantation was captured). Fourth, in our center, we do not measure or estimate GFR or creatinine clearance for quantifying renal function in kidney recipients (37). However, we believe that these measurements are imprecise and not validated in this population, as supported by several recent publications (3841). Last, we cannot exclude the contribution of residual confounding to our findings from unmeasured factors.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This paper was presented in part at the American Transplant Congress; May 21 to 25, 2005; Seattle, WA.
| Footnotes |
|---|
See the related editorial, "Anemia after Kidney Transplantation: Time for Action," on pages 29622963.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Articles
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. Chhabra, M. Grafals, A. I. Skaro, M. Parker, and L. Gallon Impact of Anemia after Renal Transplantation on Patient and Graft Survival and on Rate of Acute Rejection Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2008; 3(4): 1168 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Borrows, M. Loucaidou, G. Chusney, S. Borrows, J. V. Tromp, T. Cairns, M. Griffith, N. Hakim, A. McLean, A. Palmer, et al. Anaemia and congestive heart failure early post-renal transplantation Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2008; 23(5): 1728 - 1734. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Gill Cardiovascular Disease in Transplant Recipients: Current and Future Treatment Strategies Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S29 - S37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Winkelmayer and A. Chandraker Pottransplantation Anemia: Management and Rationale Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(Supplement_2): S49 - S55. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Augustine and D. E. Hricik Anemia after Kidney Transplantation: Time for Action J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2006; 17(11): 2962 - 2963. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |