Increased Endothelin Activity Mediates Augmented Distal Nephron Acidification Induced by Dietary Protein
Apurv Khanna*,
Jan Simoni,
Callenda Hacker*,
Marie-Josée Duran and
Donald E. Wesson*,
Departments of *Internal Medicine, Surgery, and Physiology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Texas Tech University School of Medicine, Lubbock, Texas
Correspondence to Dr. Donald E. Wesson, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Renal Section, 3601 Fourth Street, Lubbock, TX 79430. Phone: 806-743-3107; Fax: 806-743-3177; E-mail: donald.wesson{at}ttuhsc.edu
ABSTRACT. The hypothesis that increased dietary protein augmentsdistal nephron acidification and does so through an endothelin(ET-1)-dependent mechanism was tested. Munich-Wistar rats thatate minimum electrolyte diets of 50% (HiPro) and 20% (CON) casein-providedprotein, the latter comparable to standard diet, were compared.HiPro versus CON had higher distal nephron net HCO3 reabsorptionby in vivo microperfusion (37.8 ± 3.2 versus 16.6 ±1.5 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001) as a result of higher H+secretion (41.3 ± 4.0 versus 23.0 ± 2.1 pmol/mmper min; P < 0.002) and lower HCO3 secretion (3.5± 0.4 versus 6.4 ± 0.8 pmol/mm per min;P < 0.001). Perfusion with H+ inhibitors support that increasedH+ secretion was mediated by augmented Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPaseactivity without augmented H+,K+-ATPase activity. HiPro versusCON had higher levels of urine ET-1 excretion, renal corticalET-1 addition to microdialysate in vivo, and renal corticalET-1 mRNA, consistent with increased renal ET-1 production.Oral bosentan, an ET A/B receptor antagonist, decreased distalnephron net HCO3 reabsorption (22.4 ± 1.9 versus 37.8± 3.2 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001) as a result of lowerH+ secretion (28.4 ± 2.4 versus 41.3 ± 4.0 pmol/mmper min; P < 0.016) and higher HCO3 secretion (6.0± 0.7 versus 3.5 ± 0.4 pmol/mm per min;P < 0.006). The H+ inhibitors had no additional effect inHiPro ingesting bosentan, supporting that ET mediated the increaseddistal nephron Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPase activity in HiPro.Increased dietary protein augments distal nephron acidificationthat is mediated through an ET-sensitive increase in Na+/H+exchange and H+-ATPase activity.
The routine acid challenges to systemic acid-base status facedby humans are modest compared with the large acid loads administeredto animals in most experimental protocols. Augmented distalrather than proximal nephron acidification is the predominantrenal regulatory response in experimental animals to modestdietary acid loads induced by acid-producing mineral salts (1,2).Augmented distal nephron acidification induced by dietary acidis mediated by multiple mechanisms, including (1) increasednet HCO3 reabsorption (3), consistent with increased H+ secretion;(2) reduced HCO3 delivery to the terminal distal nephron (4)that facilitates NH4+ secretion (5) and permits secreted H+to effect acid excretion rather than HCO3 reclamation; and (3)decreased distal nephron HCO3 secretion (1) mediated by endogenousendothelins (ET) (2).
In contrast with the acid-producing mineral salts that are mostcommonly used to induce an acid challenge in experimental protocols,increased intake of dietary protein that contains acid-producingamino acids constitutes the acid challenge that humans moreroutinely face. Intake of acid-producing amino acids increasessystemic acid production and urine net acid excretion (6), butits effect on distal nephron acidification or its hormonal and/ortransport mediators are not known. Recognizing that ET mediateincreased distal nephron acidification induced by modest dietaryacid loads as a result of intake of acid-producing mineral salts(1,2), the present studies tested the hypothesis that increasedintake of acid-producing amino acids as dietary protein increasesdistal nephron acidification and that this increased acidificationis mediated by enhanced ET activity.
Animals and Diet Protocol
Male and female Munich-Wistar rats (Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Houston,TX) that weighed 200 to 220 g ate standard rat chow (ProlabRMH 2500 with 23% protein) for 1 wk (week 0), then ate a customminimum electrolyte diet with protein as purified high nitrogencasein (ICN Nutritional Biochemicals, Cleveland, OH) for 3 wk(weeks 1, 2, and 3). High-protein rats (HiPro) ate custom dietwith 50% protein, and controls (CON) ate 20%. In preliminarystudies, similar-weight rats ate 24.6 ± 0.9 and 27.1± 1.2 g/d, respectively (n = 4, P = 0.15), and so allrats received 24 g/d diet to ensure similar diet intake. Someanimals received bosentan (Hoffman-LaRoche, Basel, Switzerland),a nonpeptide ET A/B receptor antagonist (7), mixed with studydiet at 100 mg/kg body wt per d and so was completely ingested.This oral dose blocks action of pressor doses of intravenousbig ET-1 for >24 h (7). All drank distilled H2O except fora separate CON group that was given 4.0% dextrose drinking solutionto approximate the increased urine output associated with theHiPro diet. Animals drank ad libitum.
Urine Net Acid and ET-1 Excretion
We measured daily excretion of urine net acid (NAE) (8) andET-1 (9) in a 24-h sample collected on days 7 (week 0), 14 (week1), 21 (week 2), and 28 (week 3) of the protocol from eighteach of HiPro and CON in metabolic cages. We examined the effectof ET receptor blockade with bosentan on urine NAE in pairedand separate groups of eight each (four with and four withoutdrug) of HiPro and CON. NAE was the mean for each animal group.
Arterial Blood Parameters
We measured pH, PCO2, calculated [HCO3] (IRMA Blood AnalysisSystem, Diametrics Medical, St. Paul, MN), and total CO2 (TCO2)by ultrafluorometry (see below) in 1.0 ml of blood from a chroniccarotid arterial catheter in eight each of awake, gently restrained,and calm HiPro and CON at weeks 1 and 3 to assess the effectsof HiPro on plasma acid-base parameters. We also measured arterialBP through this chronic arterial catheter as done previously(9).
Microdialysis Technique for Measurement of Renal Cortical Fluid ET-1
Renal cortical fluid ET-1 addition was measured using microdialysisof the renal cortex as done in our laboratory (10) at weeks0, 1, 2, and 3. Three consecutive 20-min collection periodswere done in four each of HiPro, CON, and CON + 4.0% dextroseanimals for microdialysate ET-1 measurements.
Micropuncture Protocol
Animals were prepared for micropuncture of accessible distaltubules (9) at weeks 1 and 3. In situ early distal flow ratefor HiPro and CON was 9.4 ± 0.7 (n = 6) and 6.4 ±0.4 nl/min (n = 8), respectively. Separate superficial distalnephrons of HiPro and CON were each perfused 9 and 6 nl/minwith a Hampel pump to approximate respective in situ flow rates.We measured distal tubule transepithelial potential differenceto calculate blood-to-lumen HCO3 permeability (9). After weighingthe micropunctured (left) kidney, perfused nephron length wasdetermined by measuring the length of a latex cast injectedafter micropuncture, recovered after acid digestion of the kidney(9). We measured [HCO3] in stellate vessel plasma to determineperitubular blood-to-lumen HCO3 gradient for calculating transepithelialH+/HCO3 passive permeability (9). Diet but not H2O was withheldthe evening before micropuncture to yield higher baseline HCO3reabsorption (11), as done previously (9).
The perfusion solutions used are in Table 1. Solution 1 contained5 mM HCO3 and 40 mM Cl to approximate their concentrationsat the early distal nephron in situ (12). Solution 2 containedCl but no HCO3 to measure Cl-dependent luminalHCO3 accumulation and to calculate an "apparent" blood-to-lumenH+/HCO3 permeability (9). Solution 3 was HCO3- and Cl-freeand contained 0.5 mM acetazolamide to inhibit transtubule H+/HCO3transport and was used to determine "passive" blood-to-lumenH+/HCO3 permeability (9,13). We used this "passive" permeabilitydetermined using solution 3 to calculate passive blood-to-lumenHCO3 secretion when perfusing with the HCO3-containing solution1 (9). We used the "apparent" blood-to-lumen H+/HCO3 permeabilitydetermined from perfusing with solution 2 to calculate "total"HCO3 secretion when perfusing with HCO3-containing solution1 (9,13). We subtracted calculated "passive" HCO3 secretionfrom calculated "total" HCO3 secretion to obtain "net" HCO3secretion when perfusing with solution 1 (9,13). The HCO3 secretionreported herein is the "net" HCO3 secretion that excludes thepassive HCO3 secretion calculated as described above. Distalnephron H+ secretion was calculated by subtracting the calculated"net" HCO3 secretion (a negative value) from the measured netHCO3 reabsorption (HCO3 perfused into the distal nephron minusHCO3 collected) (13). All perfusing solutions contained raffinoseto minimize fluid transport and gluconate substituted for Clwhen necessary (9). Each surface distal nephron was perfusedwith each perfusing solution in the following order: 1, 2, 3.Previous studies that conducted random perfusions of these solutionsshowed that the order of perfusing solutions did not affectcalculations of the components of distal nephron HCO3 reabsorption(9).
Identification of the H+ Transport Mediators of HiPro-Induced Changes in Distal Nephron Acidification
We compared the net decrease in distal nephron H+ secretionin response to specific H+ transport inhibitors in HiPro versusCON to determine the contribution of Na+/H+ exchange (EIPA,105 M), H+-ATPase (bafilomycin, 107 M), and H+,K+-ATPase(Sch 28080, 105 M) as done previously in our laboratory(14). Greater inhibitor-induced decrease in H+ secretion inHiPro versus CON determined increased activity of the H+-transportinhibited by that compound (14).
Qualitative Comparison of ET-1 mRNA Expression Total RNA Extraction and Reverse Transcription-PCR.
After treatment, kidneys were removed from anesthetized rats.Pieces of tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogenand stored at 80°C until use.
Total RNA Isolation.
Total RNA was isolated using 1 ml of TRI-Reagent (MolecularResearch Center, Cincinnati, OH) for 50 mg of tissue, a commercialvariant of the guanidium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform reagent,using the manufacturers suggested protocol (15). Theresulting RNA was dissolved in DNase/Rnase-free water and storedat 20°C until use. Only RNA preparations whose A260/A280ratio exceeded 1.6 were analyzed further. The RNA quality wasassessed by running the samples in a 1% formaldehyde agarosegel following standard protocol.
Reverse Transcription.
We then performed reverse transcription with 2 µg of RNA,preheated 5 min at 65°C, in a final volume of 20 µltat contained 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 75 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2,0.2 mmol of dNTP (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), 10 mM dithiothreitol,1 mg of oligo(dT)1218 primers (Roche), 40 units of RNasin(Promega, Madison, WI), and 200 units of Moloney murine leukemiavirus reverse transcriptase (Promega). After 1 h at 37°C,the enzyme was inactivated by boiling (10 min at 95°C).
PCR.
Specific oligonucleotide primers (5'-CTCTGCTGTTTGTGGCTTTC-3'and 5'-GTCTGTGGTCTTTGTGGGA-3' for sense and antisense primers,respectively) were designed to hybridize the rat ET-1 (rET-1)mRNA using Vector NTI 7 (InforMax, Frederick, MD). rET-1 cDNAamplification was carried out as follows: 1 µl of thereverse-transcribed mixture was added to the PCR mixture thatcontained 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 500 mM KCl, 15 mM MgCl2,200 µM of dNTP, 400 nmol of each primer, and 2.5 unitsof TaqDNA polymerase (Roche) up to a final volume of 50 µl.After 2 min at 94°C, samples were submitted to 30 cyclesunder the following conditions: 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 48°C(specific annealing temperature for the rET-1 primers), and45 s at 72°C. After the final cycle, an additional elongationperiod of 7 min was performed at 72°C.
Real-Time PCR.
Because rat kidneys express very little ET-1 mRNA, we performeda real-time PCR using the LightCycler apparatus (Roche) afterthe conventional PCR. The SYBR Green, which has a high affinityfor double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) and exhibits enhancement offluorescence upon binding to the dsDNA, was chosen as the fluorescentdye. Each reaction contained 2 µl of cDNA from the conventionalPCR, 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM of each primer, and 1x of FastStartDNA Master SYBR Green I mix (Roche) in a 20-µl final volume.Samples were then placed in the LightCycler instrument in duplicateand underwent the following thermal cycling profile: cDNA wasdenatured by a preincubation of 30 s at 95°C, and the templatewas amplified for 35 cycles of (1) denaturation for 0 s at 95°C,(2) annealing at 48°C for 10 s, and (3) extension at 72°Cfor 25 s. The increase in fluorescence, dependent on the initialtemplate concentration, was acquired after each extension phaseat 83°C, a temperature above the Tm of the primer dimersand below the Tm of the specific PCR product, thus minimizingacquisition of nonspecific fluorescence intensities. After amplification,a melting curve was generated by cooling the samples to 55°Cfor 30 s and slowly heating the samples at 0.1°C/s to 95°Cwhile the fluorescence was measured continuously. The LightCyclerrun was concluded with a 40°C incubation for 30 s. Groupswere qualitatively compared, with earlier amplification indicatinggreater number of ET-1 mRNA copies. Product identity was confirmedby sequence analysis and electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gelstained with ethidium bromide (Expected PCR product size, 290bp).
Analytical Methods
Immediately after experiment termination, initial and collectedperfusate, as well as stellate vessel plasma samples, were analyzedfor inulin (9) and for TCO2 using flow-through ultrafluorometry(16) as described previously (17). All tubule fluid and plasmaTCO2 were measured on the experimental day by comparing fluorescenceof a 7- to 8-nl sample aliquot (corrected for a distilled H2Oblank run with each sample group) to a standard curve as describedpreviously (17). This technique actually measures TCO2, butwe refer to this measured value as HCO3 for simplicity.
Microdialysate and urine [ET-1] was measured using a RIA kit(Peninsula Laboratories, Belmont, CA) after disposable columnextraction (Sep-Pak C18, Milford, MA) preconditioned with methanol,H2O, and acetic acid as done previously (10) at weeks 0, 1,2, and 3.
Statistical Analyses
Data were expressed as means ± SEM. Paired perfusionsof the same tubule were compared using paired t test; otherwise,ANOVA was used for multiple group comparisons. We used the Bonferronimethod for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05) of the same parameteramong groups.
Effect of HiPro on Animal/Kidney/Tubule Growth and Urine Volume
HiPro and CON had similar body weight at week 0 (214 ±4 versus 216 ± 5 g, respectively), but HiPro gained moreweight (159 ± 4 versus 114 ± 3 g, respectively;P < 0.001) by week 3. Daily food intake was identical betweenHiPro and CON (see Materials and Methods), but HiPro daily urinevolume was higher at week 3 (44.0 ± 5 versus 15 ±2 ml, respectively; P < 0.001). Left kidney weights in HiProand CON were similar at week 1 (1.011 ± 0.019 versus0.988 ± 0.022 g, respectively; P = 0.44) but were higherin HiPro at week 3 (1.251 ± 0.028 versus 1.048 ±0.025 g, respectively; P < 0.001). In addition, length ofaccessible distal tubule was similar in HiPro and CON at week1 (1.041 ± 0.032 versus 0.978 ± 0.030 mm, respectively;P = 0.17) but was greater in HiPro at week 3 (1.289 ±0.041 versus 1.023 ± 0.033 mm, respectively; P < 0.001).Bosentan did not affect animal or kidney weight, tubule length,food intake, or urine output in either group.
Effect of HiPro on Arterial Acid-Base Parameters of Conscious Animals Table 2 shows that weeks 1 and 3 arterial pH and PCO2 by bloodgases with calculated [HCO3] were not different, but plasmaTCO2 by ultrafluorometry was lower in HiPro than CON. Mean BPwas not different in HiPro and CON (111.5 ± 2.4 versus110.1 ± 2.2 mmHg; P = 0.67) at week 3.
Table 2. Plasma acid-base data in conscious animals after three weeks of dietary protein (HiPro)a
Effect of HiPro on Renal Acidification Figure 1 shows higher urine NAE in HiPro than CON at weeks 1,2, and 3 (7067 ± 937 versus 4460 ± 639 µM/d;P < 0.04 at week 3). Higher NAE in HiPro was due to higherammonium (NH4+) excretion (5117 ± 613 versus 2455 ±353 µM/d; P < 0.003) and lower HCO3 excretion (56 ±21 versus 257 ± 68 µM/d; P < 0.002), but titratableacid excretion was not different between HiPro and CON (2006± 338 versus 2261 ± 345 µM/d respectively;NS). Distal nephron net HCO3 reabsorption was higher at week1 in HiPro than CON whether perfused at 6 nl/min (26.1 ±2.2 versus 12.2 ± 1.4 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001)or 9 nl/min (39.0 ± 3.6 versus 18.2 ± 1.6 pmol/mmper min; P < 0.001) as shown in Figure 2. Higher distal nephronnet HCO3 reabsorption in HiPro than CON at week 1 was due tohigher H+ secretion (29.1 ± 2.7 versus 21.6 ±2.0 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.02 for 6 nl/min; 43.5 ±3.9 versus 26.2 ± 2.5 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.002 for9 nl/min) and less so to lower HCO3 secretion (3.0 ±0.5 versus 6.1 ± 0.8 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.001for 6 nl/min; 4.5 ± 0.6 versus 8.0 ±1.0 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.001 for 9 nl/min). Similarly,Figure 2 shows that distal nephron net HCO3 reabsorption washigher at week 3 in HiPro than CON whether perfused at 6 nl/min(25.8 ± 2.2 versus 14.4 ± 2.0 pmol/mm per min;P < 0.004) or 9 nl/min (37.8 ± 3.2 versus 16.6 ±1.5 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001) as shown in Figure 2. Higherdistal nephron net HCO3 reabsorption in HiPro than CON at week3 was due to higher H+ secretion (28.7 ± 2.8 versus 19.9± 1.9 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.03 for 6 nl/min; 41.3± 4.0 versus 23.0 ± 2.1 pmol/mm per min, P <0.002 for 9 nl/min) and less so to lower HCO3 secretion (2.8± 0.3 versus 5.5 ± 0.5 pmol/mm per min,P < 0.001 for 6 nl/min; 3.5 ± 0.4 versus 6.4± 0.8 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.001 for 9 nl/min).
Figure 1. Daily urine net acid excretion (NAE) measured in weekly intervals in conscious rats that initially ate standard chow with 23% protein before being changed to the study diets with 50% (HiPro) and 20% (CON) protein provided as purified casein. *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Figure 2. Distal nephron net HCO3 reabsorption (Net JHCO3) in tubules that were microperfused in vivo at 6 or 9 nl/min in HiPro and CON at weeks 1 and 3 of the protocol. *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Transport Mediators of HiPro-Induced Enhanced Distal Nephron Acidification Figure 3 shows that at week 1, the net decrease in distal nephronH+ secretion was greater in HiPro than CON with EIPA (19.3± 1.5 versus 10.9 ± 0.7 pmol/mm per min,P < 0.006 at 6 nl/min; 18.9 ± 1.6 versus 11.9± 0.9 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.006 at 9 nl/min) andbafilomycin (16.4 ± 1.3 versus 7.6 ±0.6 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.001 at 6 nl/min; 15.1 ±1.3 versus 5.9 ± 0.7 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.006at 9 nl/min), consistent with enhanced Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPaseactivity, respectively. Net decrease in H+ secretion inducedby Sch 28080 was not different in HiPro and CON (3.0± 0.7 versus 2.5 ± 0.6 pmol/mm per min,P = 0.60 at 6 nl/min; 3.6 ± 0.7 versus 2.4± 0.5 pmol/mm per min, P = 0.18 for 9 nl/min), consistentwith no increased H+, K+-ATPase activity in HiPro. Similarly,net decrease in distal nephron H+ secretion was greater in HiProthan CON at week 3 with EIPA (15.5 ± 1.0 versus11.3 ± 0.8 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.006 at 6nl/min; 15.9 ± 1.1 versus 11.1 ±0.8 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.004 at 9 nl/min) and bafilomycin(14.5 ± 1.1 versus 6.0 ± 0.5 pmol/mmper min, P < 0.001 at 6 nl/min; 12.4 ± 1.0versus 5.5 ± 0.8 pmol/mm per min, P < 0.001at 9 nl/min), consistent with enhanced Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPaseactivity, respectively, as shown in Figure 3. Net decrease inH+ secretion induced by Sch 28080 was not different in HiProand CON (3.4 ± 0.9 versus 2.6 ±0.8 pmol/mm per min, P = 0.52 at 6 nl/min; 4.0 ±0.8 versus 2.9 ± 0.6 pmol/mm per min, P = 0.29for 9 nl/min), consistent with no increased activity of H+,K+-ATPaseactivity in HiPro.
Figure 3. Net change in distal nephron proton (H+) secretion at weeks 1 and 3 in response to in vivo microperfusion at 6 or 9 nl/min with inhibitors of Na+/H+ exchange (EIPA), H+-ATPase (Bafilomycin), and H+,K+-ATPase (Sch 28080). *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Effect of HiPro on Renal ET-1 Production Figure 4 shows that HiPro compared with CON had similar urineET-1 excretion at week 0 (42.9 ± 5.8 versus 33.2 ±3.7 fmol/kg body wt per d; P = 0.18), but HiPro was higher atweek 1 (122.4 ± 26.8 versus 39.5 ± 3.9 fmol/kgbody wt per d; P < 0.009), week 2 (89.6 ± 16.1 versus30.8 ± 3.4 fmol/kg body wt per d; P < 0.004), andweek 3 (80.0 ± 15.7 versus 29.0 ± 3.9 fmol/kgbody wt per d; P < 0.008). In addition, Figure 4 shows thatHiPro and CON had similar ET-1 addition to microdialysate atweek 0 (275.2 ± 81.0 versus 249.3 ± 30.5 fmol/gkidney wt/ per min; P = 0.77), but HiPro had greater renal corticalmicrodialysate addition at week 1 (612.4 ± 81.0 versus255.2 ± 32.5 fmol/g kidney wt per min; P < 0.002),week 2 (456.8 ± 62.5 versus 216.3 ± 34.1 fmol/gkidney wt per min; P < 0.005), and week 3 (386.1 ±49.4 versus 230.8 ± 29.2 fmol/g kidney wt per min; P< 0.02). In addition, Figure 5 shows a qualitative increasein renal cortical mRNA in HiPro than CON at week 3. HiPro hadhigher urine flow than CON, and high urine flow might itselfincrease urine ET-1 excretion (18). Consequently, we studiedCON ingesting 20% protein diet and distilled H2O compared withthose ingesting 4% dextrose-containing drinking water (CON-D4W)to increase daily urine volume to a level comparable to thatof HiPro without providing additional dietary protein. At week3, CON-D4W compared with CON had higher daily urine volume (40.2± 3 versus 14 ± 1 ml/d, respectively; n = 8; P< 0.001) and numerically higher urine ET-1 excretion (43.6± 9.5 fmol/kg body wt per d versus respective week 3CON; n = 8; P = 0.18). Nevertheless, ET-1 addition to renalcortical microdialysate in animals when compared with thosewithout the dextrose-containing drinking solution was not different(238 ± 39 fmol/g kidney wt per min versus respectiveweek 3 CON; n = 8; P = 0.88). Although qualitative comparisonof CON-D4W and CON ET-1 mRNA expression suggested a small difference(Figure 5), absolute quantitative analysis failed to show anydifferences (data not shown).
Figure 4. Daily urine endothelin-1 excretion (UET-1V; A) and ET-1 microdialysate addition (B) at weekly intervals in HiPro and CON conscious rats. *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Figure 5. Qualitative comparison of ET-1 mRNA using real-time PCR and LightCycler technology. CON indicates animals ingesting the 20% experimental diet and CON-D4W indicates CON drinking 4% dextrose solution to increase urine flow to that comparable to HiPro. Earlier amplification indicates greater number of ET-1 mRNA copies.
Effect of ET-1 Receptor Blockade on Arterial Blood and Urine Parameters Table 3 shows that bosentan did not affect CON arterial plasmaacid-base parameters at weeks 1 or 3. By contrast, Table 4 showsthat HiPro receiving bosentan had lower plasma TCO2 at week1 but not week 3. In addition, mean BP was not different inbosentan-ingesting compared with noningesting HiPro (109.7 ±2.3 versus 111.5 ± 2.4 mmHg; P = 0.60) or CON (110.4± 2.3 versus 110.1 ± 2.2 mmHg; P = 0.93). Figure 6shows that HiPro receiving bosentan had lower urine NAE (5704± 594 versus 7067 ± 937 µM/d; P < 0.05,paired t) at week 1, but NAE was comparable without and withbosentan at week 3. Lower NAE at week 1 in HiPro with bosentanwas due to lower NH4+ excretion (3715 ± 416 versus 5117± 613 µM/d; P < 0.03, paired t) and higher HCO3excretion (231 ± 42 versus 56 ± 21 µM/d;P < 0.001, paired t), but titratable acid excretion was notdifferent (2006 ± 338 versus 2221 ± 304 µM/d,respectively; P = 0.64).
Figure 6. Daily urine NAE in HiPro animals that did an did not ingest the ET A/B receptor antagonist bosentan. *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Effect of ET-1 Receptor Blockade on HiPro-Induced Changes in Distal Nephron Acidification
Distal nephron acidification was not different between CON receivingand not receiving bosentan (data not shown). At week 1, Figure 7shows that HiPro receiving bosentan had lower distal tubulenet HCO3 reabsorption when perfused at 9 nl/min (21.5 ±2.1 versus 39.0 ± 3.6 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001).Lower net HCO3 reabsorption at week 1 was due to lower H+ secretion(28.7 ± 2.5 versus 43.5 ± 3.9 pmol/mm per min;P < 0.007) and higher HCO3 secretion (6.1 ±0.8 versus 3.0 ± 0.5 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.006).Figure 7 also shows that week 3 HiPro animals that receivedbosentan and perfused at 9 nl/min had lower distal tubule netHCO3 reabsorption (22.4 ± 1.9 versus 37.8 ± 3.2pmol/mm per min; P < 0.001). This lower distal tubule netHCO3 reabsorption was due to lower H+ secretion (28.4 ±2.4 versus 41.3 ± 4.0 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.016)and higher HCO3 secretion (6.0 ± 0.7 versus 3.5± 0.4 pmol/mm per min; P < 0.006).
Figure 7. Distal tubule net HCO3 reabsorption (Net JHCO3) and its components, HCO3 and H+ secretion, at weeks 1 and 3 by in vivo microperfusion in HiPro animals that did and did not ingest the ET A/B receptor antagonist bosentan. *P < 0.05 versus CON.
Effect of ET-1 Receptor Blockade on Enhanced H+ Transporter Activity Induced by HiPro
At week 1, net decrease in distal nephron H+ secretion was notdifferent in bosentan-ingesting compared with noningesting HiProperfused at 9 nl/min with EIPA (16.4 ± 1.8 versus18.9 ± 1.6 pmol/mm per min; P = 0.32) and bafilomycin(14.0 ± 1.5 versus 15.1 ± 1.3 pmol/mmper min; P = 0.59), consistent with no additional effect ofthese H+ inhibitors on Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPase activity,respectively, in HiPro with ET A/B receptor blockade (Figure 8).There was no difference in net H+ secretion decrease inHiPro perfused with Sch 28080 (4.4 ± 0.6 versus3.0 ± 0.7 pmol/mm per min; P = 0.15), consistentwith no additional effect of ET A/B receptor blockade on H+,K+-ATPaseactivity in HiPro. Similarly, net decrease in distal nephronH+ secretion at week 3 was not different in the bosentan-ingestingcompared with the noningesting HiPro animals perfused at 9 nl/minwith EIPA (13.4 ± 1.2 versus 15.9 ±1.1 pmol/mm per min; P = 0.15) and bafilomycin (11.0± 1.0 versus 12.4 ± 1.0 pmol/mm per min;P = 0.34), consistent with no additional effect of these H+inhibitors on Na+/H+ exchange and H+-ATPase activity, respectively,in HiPro with ET A/B receptor blockade. The was also no differencein net in H+ secretion decrease in HiPro perfused with Sch 28080(5.0 ± 0.8 versus 3.4 ± 0.9 pmol/mmper min; P = 0.21), consistent with no additional effect ofET A/B receptor blockade on H+, K+-ATPase activity in HiPro.
Figure 8. Net change in distal nephron proton (H+) secretion in HiPro at weeks 1 and 3 in response to in vivo microperfusion at 6 or 9 nl/min with inhibitors of Na+/H+ exchange (EIPA), H+-ATPase (Bafilomycin), and H+,K+-ATPase (Sch 28080). *P < 0.05 versus CON.
The present studies show that increased dietary protein as purifiedcasein augments distal nephron acidification and does so byincreasing H+ secretion through increased Na+/H+ exchange andincreased H+-ATPase activity and to a lesser extent by decreasingHCO3 secretion. Increased dietary protein increased renal ET-1production, and the data support that each component of increaseddistal nephron acidification was mediated by increased ET activity.That the studies used in vivo microperfusion of the distal nephronsupports that the observed ET effects were mediated througheffects on transport rather than hemodynamics. These studiesshow that ET is a mediator of increased renal acidificationin response to dietary protein, the common acid challenge facedby humans.
ET increases Na+/H+ exchange in renal epithelia in vitro (19,20),and ET A/B receptor antagonism inhibits Na+/H+ exchange in thedistal nephron in vivo (14), but we are not aware of studiesshowing that ET increases H+-ATPase activity. This suggeststhat the increased H+-ATPase activity that is reduced by ETA/B receptor blockade is an indirect effect of ET, possiblyacting through another agent. A possible scenario is that increasedrenal ET production induced by dietary protein increases adrenalsecretion of aldosterone (21) that in turn increases distalnephron H+-ATPase activity (22). Further studies will be necessaryto explore this hypothesis.
Table 2 shows lower plasma TCO2 in HiPro compared with CON,consistent with a relative metabolic acidosis in HiPro comparedwith CON. Because plasma TCO2 remained at this slightly reducedlevel at weeks 1 and 3, it seems that increased dietary proteinas casein leads to a steady-state but not progressive acidosis.That the metabolic acidosis was not progressive is likely dueto the marked increase in urine NAE (Figure 1). Dietary mineralacid causes mild net acid retention that mediates the sustainedassociated increase in urine NAE (23). Also, increased [H+]in vitro increases ET-1 release from renal microvascular endothelium(24) and renal epithelium (20), and so increased endogenousET might contribute to the untoward effects postulated for chronicmetabolic acidosis (25).
Figure 1 shows that bosentan decreased urine NAE in HiPro atweek 1 but not at week 3, suggesting greater ET dependence ofHiPro-induced acidification at week 1. Although the net reductionof distal nephron acidification measured per millimeter of tubulelength was not different at weeks 1 and 3, the perfused distalnephron segment was longer at week 3, consistent with tubulehypertrophy induced by HiPro. Because there was residual acidificationin animals that ingested bosentan, the longer tubule at week3 might have allowed for more overall ET-independent acidificationat this time point.
In summary, increased dietary protein augments distal nephronacidification through an ET-dependent mechanism. The data supportthat ET contribute to the overall acidification response tothis common dietary challenge to systemic acid-base homeostasisfaced by humans.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funds from the Larry and Jane WoirhayeMemorial Endowment in Renal Research the Texas Tech UniversityHealth Sciences Center.
We are grateful to Jeri Tasby and Cathy Hudson for expert technicalassistance. We are also grateful to Martine Clozel, MD, forgenerously providing bosentan for use in these studies.
Wesson DE: Reduced bicarbonate secretion mediates increased distal nephron acidification induced by dietary acid. Am J Physiol 271: F670F678, 1996
Wesson DE: Endogenous endothelins mediate increased distal tubule acidification induced by dietary acid in rats. J Clin Invest 99: 22032211, 1997[Medline]
Vandorpe D, Levine DZ: Distal tubule bicarbonate reabsorption in NH4Cl acidotic rats. Clin Invest Med 12: 224229, 1989[Medline]
Buerkert J, Martin D, Trigg D: Segmental analysis of the renal tubule in buffer production and net acid formation. Am J Physiol 244 : F442F4454, 1983
Knepper MA, Packer R, Good DW: Ammonium transport in the kidney. Physiol Rev 69: 179248, 1989[Free Full Text]
Remer T: Influence of nutrition on acid-base balance-metabolic aspects. Eur J Nutr 40: 214220, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
Clozel M, Breu V, Gray G, Kalina B, Loffler B-M, Burri K, Cassal J-M, Hirth G, Muller M, Neidhart W, Ramuz H: Pharmacological characterization of Bosentan, a new potent orally active nonpeptide endothelin receptor antagonist. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 270: 228235, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wesson DE: Dietary bicarbonate reduces rat distal nephron acidification evaluated in situ. Am J Physiol 258 : F870F876, 1990
Wesson DE, Dolson GM: Augmented bidirectional HCO3 transport by rat distal tubules in chronic alkalosis. Am J Physiol 261 : F308F317, 1991
Wesson DE: Endogenous endothelins mediate increased distal tubule acidification induced by dietary acid in rats. J Clin Invest 99: 22032211, 1997
Levine DZ, Iacovitti M, Nash L, Vandorpe D: Secretion of bicarbonate by rat distal tubules in vivo. Modulation by overnight fasting. J Clin Invest 81: 18731878, 1988
Wesson DE: Depressed distal tubule acidification corrects chloride-deplete alkalosis in rats. Am J Physiol 259 : F636F644, 1990
Wesson DE: Endogenous endothelins mediate augmented acidification in remnant kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 18261835, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Wesson DE: Na+/H+ exchange mediates increased distal tubule acidification in chronic alkalosis. Kidney Int 53: 945951, 1998[Medline]
Chomczynski P, Sacchi N: Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162: 156159, 1987[Medline]
Star RA: Quantitation of total carbon dioxide in nanoliter samples by flow-through fluorometry. Am J Physiol 258: F429F432, 1990
Wesson DE: Dietary HCO3 reduces distal tubule acidification by increasing cellular HCO3 secretion. Am J Physiol 271: F132F142, 1996
Zeiler M, Loffler BM, Bock HA, Thiel G: ET-1 excretion is urine flow-dependent in kidney donors and transplant recipients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 26 [Suppl 3]: S513S515, 1995
Eiam-Ong S, Hilden SA, King AJ, Johns CA, Madias NE: Endothelin-1 stimulates the Na+/H+ and Na+/HCO3- transporters in rabbit renal cortex. Kidney Int 42: 1824, 1992[Medline]
Chu T-S, Peng Y, Cano A, Yanagisawa M, Alpern RJ: EndothelinB receptor activates NHE-3 by a Ca2+-dependent pathway in OKP cells. J Clin Invest 97: 14541462, 1996[Medline]
Mazzocchi G, Rebuffat P, Gottardo G, Meneghelli V, Nussdorfer GG: Evidence that both ETA and ETB receptor subtypes are involved in the in vivo aldosterone secretagogue effect of endothelin-1 in rats. Res Exp Med 196: 145152, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
Eiam-Ong S, Kurtzman NA, Sabatini S: Regulation of collecting tubule adenosine triphosphatases by aldosterone and potassium. J Clin Invest 91: 23852392, 1993
Wesson DE: Dietary acid increases blood and renal cortical acid content in rats. Am J Physiol 274 : F97F102, 1997
Wesson DE, Simoni J, Green DF: Reduced extracellular pH increases endothelin-1 secretion by human renal microvascular cells. J Clin Invest 101: 578583, 1998[Medline]
Alpern RJ, Sakhaee K: The clinical spectrum of chronic metabolic acidosis: Homeostatic mechanisms produce significant morbidity. Am J Kidney Dis 29: 291302, 1997[Medline]
Received for publication December 13, 2003.
Accepted for publication June 24, 2004.
This article has been cited by other articles:
D. E. Wesson, J. Simoni, and S. Prabhakar Endothelin-Induced Increased Nitric Oxide Mediates Augmented Distal Nephron Acidification as a Result of Dietary Protein
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
February 1, 2006;
17(2):
406 - 413.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
K. E. Finberg, C. A. Wagner, M. A. Bailey, T. G. Paunescu, S. Breton, D. Brown, G. Giebisch, J. P. Geibel, and R. P. Lifton The B1-subunit of the H+ ATPase is required for maximal urinary acidification
PNAS,
September 20, 2005;
102(38):
13616 - 13621.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Khanna, J. Simoni, and D. E. Wesson Endothelin-Induced Increased Aldosterone Activity Mediates Augmented Distal Nephron Acidification as a Result of Dietary Protein
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
July 1, 2005;
16(7):
1929 - 1935.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]