Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriëls, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriëls, G.
J Am Soc Nephrol 15:967-977, 2004
© 2004 American Society of Nephrology


BASIC SCIENCE

Renal Transplantation Modulates Expression and Function of Receptors and Transporters of Rat Proximal Tubules

Ana Velic*, Jochen R. Hirsch*, Jasmin Bartel*, Regina Thomas*, Rita Schröter*, Heike Stegemann*, Bayram Edemir*, Christian August{dagger}, Eberhard Schlatter* and Gert Gabriëls*

*Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik D, Experimentelle Nephrologie, and {dagger}Gerhard-Domagk-Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.

Correspondence to Prof. Dr. Eberhard Schlatter, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik D, Experimentelle Nephrologie, Domagkstra{beta}e 3a, D-48149 Münster, Germany. Phone: 49-251-83-56991; Fax: 49-251-83-56973; E-mail: eberhard.schlatter{at}uni-muenster.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. Kidney transplantation often leads to disturbances of solute and volume maintenance in humans. To investigate underlying mechanisms, expression and function of renal transporters and receptors of the proximal tubule (PT) were analyzed in an acute rejection model of rat kidney transplantation. Semiquantitative RT-PCR and Western blot, histology, immunohistochemistry, and microfluorometry were performed on whole kidneys and isolated PT. With acute rejection, Na+/H+-exchanger type-3 (NHE-3) was markedly downregulated. Na+-HCO3--cotransporter (NBC-1) and Na+-glucose transporter type-2 (SGLT2) were upregulated after transplantation. Expressions of Na+/H+-exchanger type-1 (NHE-1), Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA), angiotensin II (AngII) receptor (AT-1), or natriuretic peptide receptor (GC-A) were unaltered. Microfluorometric analyses of intracellular pH, Na+, and Ca2+ demonstrated a decrease in NHE-3 function and AngII-mediated stimulation of NHE-3. AngII-mediated inhibition of NHE-1 and function of all other transporters tested remained unaltered. Function of AT-1 and GC-A were unaffected. Reduced expression of NHE-3 was also confirmed by semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. These findings suggest that expression and function of transmembrane proteins involved in Na+-transport after transplantation and rejection is specifically modulated. The local renin-angiotensin-system is apparently not altered. Downregulation of NHE-3 may be a protective mechanism occurring in the graft.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
After renal transplantation, patients often develop tubular disorders. Disturbances of Ca2+ and phosphate metabolism, changes in amino acid transport, and renal tubular acidosis have been described (1–3). Activation of glucose, Na+ and water reabsorption as well as of K+ secretion was demonstrated in the first 5 d after renal homotransplantation (4), and marked diuresis can occur within the first hours after surgery (5). We were interested in the mechanisms involved in these Na+ and water imbalances occurring shortly after transplantation. Possible reasons for this decreased renal function immediately after transplantation are denervation, ischemia, organ rejection, activation of the sympathetic nervous system, or changes in the renin-angiotensin-system (RAS). Long-term effects are mostly due to nephrotoxicity of immunosuppressants or renal artery stenoses (6–9). Postransplantational disturbances diminish within weeks, while long-term lesions due to rejection and immunosuppression frequently are irreversible (10). Ischemia/reperfusion connected with increased Na+ excretion seems to bias prognosis of the transplant (11). Na+/H+ exchange is involved in regeneration of the transplanted kidney. Non-immunologic factors are increasingly regarded as important for the prognosis of the transplant. In humans, investigations of changes on the tubular level are hardly possible, and only a few functional studies in animals are available (12–20). No direct data exist on expression and function of transporters and receptors involved in transport after renal transplantation.

Transport activity in proximal tubules (PT) is regulated by hormones including angiotensin II (AngII) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) (21,22). AngII affects Na+ transport via G-protein-coupled receptors (22–27). Low concentrations (<1 nM) stimulate Na+ reabsorption through Na+/H+ exchanger type 3 (NHE-3) involving PKA (21,22) or PKC (28) and modulates NaHCO3 cotransport (NBC-1) (29,30) and Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) (31). AngII above 10 nM inhibits Na+/H+ exchanger type 1 (NHE-1) due to PLA2-mediated generation of arachidonic acid and P-450-monooxygenase (25,32). ANP inhibits AngII-stimulated Na+-transport (21).

Thus, changes of tubular transport immediately after kidney transplantation could be caused by changes in hormone secretion, expression of receptors or transporters, or variations in transporter activities.

We investigated the effect of transplant rejection on mRNA and protein expression and on functional activity and regulation of transporters involved in Na+-reabsorption in PT after transplantation. We present first data from PT segments isolated from rat kidneys up to 5 d after transplantation, demonstrating predominant reduction in NHE-3 expression and function after kidney transplantation undergoing acute rejection.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Kidney Transplantation
Male Lewis-Brown-Norway (LBN) and Lewis (LEW) rats (250 to 300 g; Charles River, Sulzfeld, Germany) with free access to standard rat chow (Ssniff, Soest, Germany) and tap water were used. Experiments were approved by a governmental committee on animal welfare and were performed in accordance with national animal protection guidelines. Transplantation was performed as published in detail before (33). In short, the left kidney, including ureter, renal artery, a piece of the aorta, and renal vein, was transferred into the recipient for acute rejection, kidneys of LBN rats were transplanted into uninephrectomized LEW rats. Controls were the second kidney of LBN donors, the second kidney of the recipient. and syngeneically transplanted LBN kidneys.

RT-PCR and Western Blot
mRNA-expression was studied in whole kidney and isolated PT lysates. PT segments were enzymatically isolated as described in detail before (34). Total RNA was isolated using RNeasy-kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) incubated with 10 U DNase I (Promega, Heidelberg, Germany) to digest genomic DNA. cDNA first strand synthesis was performed with 5 µg of total RNA, 10 nM dNTP-Mix (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany), 1 nM p(dT)10 nucleotide primer (Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany), and 200 U Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (MMLV-RT; Promega).

cDNA first strand reaction mixture was subjected to a 50 µl of PCR reaction in an UNO II thermo cycler (Biometra) using 20 pmol of each primer (Table 1) and 1 U TaqDNA polymerase (Qiagen). Signals were sequenced by SeqLab (Göttingen, Germany). Semiquantification was done by comparing specific signals with an internal standard (GAPDH) amplified in parallel.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. PCR primers and antibodies used for Western blota
 
Proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide (8%) electrophoresis and transferred to a PVDF membrane incubated with blocking-agent (Amersham, Freiburg, Germany). After primary antibody (Table 1) incubation membranes were covered with SuperSignal (Pierce, Bonn, Germany) before exposure (Kodak, Stuttgart, Germany). Semiquantification was performed by parallel blotting of specific signals and internal standard GAPDH.

Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Portions of kidneys were snap-frozen and fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS. Histologic changes were examined by light microscopy in paraffin-embedded tissue with specific staining. Glomerular accumulation of matrix proteins was demonstrated by periodic acid-Schiff, peritubular and glomerular fibrosis by Masson-Goldner.

Kryoslices were blocked with blocking agent (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), incubated with primary antibodies (Table 1) and secondary goat-anti-rabbit antibody (Vector, Dianova, Hamburg, Germany), incubated in Streptavidin, Alexa-Flour-594-Conjugate (Mobitec, Göttingen, Germany), and covered with Mounting-Media containing DAPI (Vector, Burlingame, VT). NHE-3 staining was quantified by analyzing percentage of stained tubules in an area of 105.000 µm2.

Isolation of PT Segments for Microfluorometry
PT (S1 to S2 segments) were mechanically isolated in MEM-EARLE medium (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany), transferred to a perfusion chamber, and fixed by two holding pipettes for microfluorometry at the open end of tubules.

General Functional Data
Total kidney function, body weight, and BP (tail cuff plethysmography) were recorded daily. Twenty-four hours before surgery, animals were housed in metabolic cages. Urine and blood samples were analyzed for protein (Bradford Blue), creatinine (photometric kit, Enzym-Pap; Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and electrolytes by flame photometry (Instrumentation Laboratory 943, Kirchheim, Germany).

Chemicals and Solutions
During fluorescence measurements, PT were superfused at 10 ml/min with standard solution (37°C; 145 mM NaCl, 1.6 mM K2HPO4, 0.4 mM KH2PO4, 5 mM D-glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.3 mM Ca2+-gluconate, pH 7.4) or a HCO3-/CO2–containing solution (110 mM NaCl, 25 mM NaHCO3, 3.6 mM KCl, 5 mM D-glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.3 mM Ca2+-gluconate, pH 7.4) gassed with 5% CO2/95% air. To estimate activity of Na+/H+ exchange, the NH4+/NH3-pulse technique was used with 20 mM NaCl replaced by 20 mM NH4Cl.

2',7'-bis(2-carboxy-ethyl)-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein-acetoxylmethyl ester (BCECF-AM), fura2-acetoxylmethyl ester (fura2-AM), ionomycin, and carbonylcyanid-m-chlorophenyl hydrazon (CCCP) were obtained from Sigma (Taufkirchen, Germany). Sodium-binding benzofuran isophtalate-acetoxylmethyl ester (SBFI-AM) was obtained from Molecular Probes (Leiden, The Netherlands), and nystatin from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). AngII, ouabain, 4,4'-diisothiocyanostilbene-2,2'-disulfonic acid (DIDS), pluronic F-127, phlorizin, and standard chemicals were obtained from Sigma. ANP was provided by Niedersächsisches Institut für Peptid-Forschung, Hannover, Germany, and NHE-1–specific and NHE-3–specific inhibitors (HOE694 and S0100669) kindly provided by J. Puenter, Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt.

Measurements of pHi, [Ca2+]i, and [Na+]i
PT were separately loaded with BCECF-AM (2 µM, 15 min), fura2-AM (5 µM, 30 min), or SBFI-AM (10 µM, 45 min) and excited at 488 and 436 nm (BCECF) or 340 and 380 nm (fura2, SBFI), respectively, as described before (34,35). Fluorescence was detected at 520 to 560 nm (BCECF) or 500 to 530 nm (fura2, SBFI) with a single photon-counting-tube (H3460–04; Hamamatsu, Herrsching, Germany). Calibration of pHi and [Na+]i were performed with CCCP (1 µM) or nystatin (160 µM) (35), respectively, in separate experiments. Calibration of [Ca2+]i was attempted with the Ca2+-ionophore ionomycin (1 µM) (36).

Statistical Analyses
Functional experiments were performed with averaged pre- and post-control measurements for each experimental maneuver. Data were compared with two-sided unpaired, paired t test or ANOVA variance analysis for multiple comparisons where appropriate. Data are presented as mean values ± SEM (n = number of tubules, kidneys, or lysates). A P-value < 5% was considered statistically significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
General Functional Data
Blood and urine samples were collected 24 h before surgery/sacrifice. Serum values for Na+, K+, protein, creatinine clearance, BP, and body weight did not differ between the groups (Table 2). Urinary Na+ and K+ excretion decreased, and proteinuria was observed only on day 2 after transplantation, and urine volume increased up to day 4.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Effects of transplantation on whole animal functional dataa
 
PCR and Western Blot
mRNA and protein expression was tested in whole kidney 1, 2, 4, and 5 d after transplantation, and mRNA expression in isolated PT 2 and 4 d after transplantation. Figure 1 summarizes the observed decreases in NHE-3 mRNA and protein expression and an early increase in NBC-1 mRNA expression with delayed increase in protein expression. mRNA expression for Na+-glucose cotransporter type 2 (SGLT2) was unaltered except for a slight increase on day 1 (control: 0.71 ± 0.12; n = 5; day 2: 1.70 ± 0.17, n = 6). Due to lack of commercially available antibodies against rat SGLT2, Western blot experiments were not performed. Expression of NHE-1, NKA, AngII receptor (AT1), and guanylate cyclase receptor type A (GC-A) remained unaltered (Table 3).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Na+/H+-exchanger type-3 (NHE-3) and Na+-HCO3--cotransporter (NBC-1) expression with acute rejection. NHE-3 mRNA in isolated proximal tubules (A) and whole kidney lysates (B); NHE-3 protein expression in whole kidney lysates (C). Significant reductions were found of the messages for NHE-3 in isolated proximal tubules and whole kidney lysates as well as in the amount of NHE-3 protein in whole kidney lysates. NBC-1 mRNA in isolated proximal tubules (D) and whole kidney lysates (E); NBC-1 protein expression in whole kidney lysates (F). Significant increases were found of the message for NBC-1 in isolated proximal tubules and whole kidney lysates as well as in the amount of NBC-1 protein in whole kidney lysates. C = kidneys obtained from Lewis-Brown-Norway (LBN) donor rats. 1, 2, 4, 5 = transplanted LBN kidneys of Lewis recipients obtained 1, 2, 4, and 5 d after transplantation (d.a.t.). Mean values ± SEM with number of animals examined in parenthesis. * Significantly different from controls, P < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Changes in expression levels of mRNA and protein in the acute rejection modela
 
To study whether changes in expression were restricted to transplanted kidneys or rejection, expression was also examined in the remaining second kidney of recipients and syngeneically transplanted kidneys. Figure 2 shows mRNA expression in right own kidneys of LEW recipients of LBN (acute rejection) and of syngeneically transplanted LBN kidneys (no rejection). Neither NHE-1 nor NHE-3 expression was significantly changed in both groups.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. mRNA expression of NHE-3 and NHE-1 in remaining own kidneys of Lewis recipients and syngeneically transplanted LBN kidneys. Two and four days after transplantation, neither NHE-3 (A) nor NHE-1 mRNA expression (C) in whole kidney lysates was significantly changed in right kidneys of Lewis recipients of LBN kidneys that underwent acute rejection. C = kidneys obtained from LBN donor rats. 2 and 4 = remaining own kidney of Lewis recipients of LBN kidneys obtained 2 or 4 d after transplantation (d.a.t.). mRNA and protein expression of NHE3 (B) and NHE-1 (D) of syngeneically transplanted LBN kidneys. C = kidneys obtained from LBN donor rats. 4 = LBN kidneys transplanted into LBN rats obtained 2 or 4 d after transplantation. Mean values ± SEM with number of animals examined in parenthesis. * Significantly different from controls, P < 0.05.

 
Histology
With acute rejection, perivascular edema with sparse cortical and medullary initial infiltrates of lymphocytes (day 1) and of immunocompetent cells (day 2) were found, without changes in vessels, glomeruli, and tubules (Figure 3). Glomerulitis, endothelialitis in larger vessels, and spots of peritubular interstitial infiltrates of blastoid lymphatic cells were diagnosed on day 4; on day 5, the whole renal parenchyma was excessively infiltrated by lymphatic cells, immunocompetent cells (tubulitis), severe glomerulitis, and endovasculitis were found. In syngeneically transplanted animals, no pathologic findings were diagnosed.



View larger version (101K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Composite photomicrograph demonstrating representative histologic lesions of control rats and acute rejection after transplantation of LBN kidneys into LEW-rats (PAS; magnification, x200): Control kidney (A). Increased number of infiltrating cells 2 (B) and 4 d (C) after transplantation mediating the immunologic process of interstitial and vascular rejection.

 
Immunohistochemistry
In immunohistochemical stainings, intensity of NHE-1 and NHE-3 paralleled the Western blot results. Figure 4 demonstrates unchanged NHE-1 expression restricted to the basolateral membrane at day 4, while NHE-3 expression was clearly reduced but restricted to the luminal membrane already at day 2 after transplantation. In five kidneys, significant decreases in stained tubules from 85 ± 3% to 70 ± 3% (day 2) and 67 ± 4% (day 4) after transplantation were seen.



View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Representative immunohistochemical stainings of NHE-1 and NHE-3 in control LBN kidneys and in LBN kidneys undergoing acute rejection after transplantation into Lewis rats (microscopic magnification, x100 or x400, respectively). NHE-1 expression and localization were not altered up to 4 days after transplantation (d.a.t.), whereas marked reductions of NHE-3 expression were found immunohistochemically already 2 d.a.t..

 
pHi Measurements
Postransplantational basal pHi in PT remained unchanged. Possible changes in basal activities of transporters and influence of GC-A on pHi were studied in control and PT isolated from kidneys 2 and 4 d after transplantation (Table 4). The NHE1-inhibitor HOE694 (1 µM) and the NHE3-inhibitor S0100669 (10 µM) caused only small decreases of resting pHi, which were unaltered by transplantation. Inhibition of NBC-1 with DIDS (0.5 mM) increased basal pHi with no effect of transplantation. Removal of HCO3-/CO2 rapidly acidified PT similarly in controls and after transplantation. The small acidification caused by ANP (10 nM) in controls was also not altered by transplantation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Effects of HOE694 (NHE-1 specific inhibitor), S0100669 (NHE-3 specific inhibitor), DIDS (NBC-1 specific inhibitor), HCO3-/CO2 removal, and ANP on resting pH1 of isolated PTa
 
AngII at 10 nM decreased pHi similarly between the groups (Figure 5). AngII at 10 pM increased pHi in PT from control kidneys, which was reversed to decreases at days 2 and 4. When acidifying PT (NH4+-pulse) Na+/H+ exchange was activated.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Effects of low and high concentrations of angiotensin II (AngII) on basal pHi of proximal tubules (PT) isolated from kidneys of control rats and of kidneys 2 or 4 d after transplantation. While the inhibitory effect of 10 nM AngII (black bars) was unaltered after transplantation, the stimulatory effect of 10 pM AngII (open bars) was lost after transplantation. Mean values ± SEM with the number of observations given in brackets. * Statistical difference to the effects in PT from control kidneys (P < 0.05).

 
Transplantation had no effect on pHi recovery rates in the presence of the NHE-1-inhibitor HOE694 (Table 5), while it was reduced in the presence of the NHE-3-inhibitor S0100669 (10 µM, Figure 6). ANP (10 nM)–induced reduction in pHi recovery rate was unaltered by transplantation (Table 5).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 5. Effects of transplantation on pHi recovery from NH4+-induced acidification in the presence of the NHE-1 inhibitor or of ANPa
 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Changes in Na+/H+ exchange activity (% inhibition) induced by the NHE-3 inhibitor S0100669 (10 µM) in PT isolated from kidneys of control rats and from transplanted kidneys 2 or 4 d after transplantation. Data represent effects on pHi recovery rates after NH4+-induced (20 mM) acidification. Mean values ± SEM with the number of observations given in brackets. * Statistical difference to the effects in PT from control kidneys (P < 0.05).

 
pHi recovery increased in the presence of 10 pM AngII and decreased at 10 nM AngII (Figure 7). Comparable to effects on basal pHi (Figure 5), stimulation of pHi recovery by 10 pM AngII was decreased after 2 d and reversed to an inhibition after 4 d, with qualitatively identical effects in the presence (data not shown) or absence of HCO3-/CO2.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Effects of low and high concentrations of AngII on pHi recovery rates after NH4+-induced (20 mM) acidification of PT isolated from kidneys of control rats and of kidneys 2 or 4 d after transplantation. While the inhibitory effect of 10 nM AngII (black bars) was unaltered after transplantation, the stimulatory effect of 10 pM AngII (open bars) was decreased and finally lost after transplantation. Mean values ± SEM with the number of observations given in brackets. * Statistical difference to the effects in PT from control kidneys (P < 0.05).

 
In PT from recipient’s own kidneys and in syngeneically transplanted kidneys 2 and 4 d after transplantation, both pHi recovery in the presence of the NHE-3-inhibitor S0100669 (10 µM) or the stimulatory effect of 10 pM AngII did not differ from controls (Figure 8).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Effects of the inhibitor of the NHE-3 inhibitor S0100669 (10 µM) and of AngII (10 pM) on pHi-recovery after NH4+-induced (20 mM) acidification of PT isolated from LEW controls and from remaining own kidneys of the recipient 2 and 4 d after transplantation (filled bars) and of syngeneically transplanted LBN kidneys (open bars). Mean values ± SEM with the number of observations given in brackets. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P < 0.05).

 
[Ca2+]i and [Na+]i Measurements
Figure 9 summarizes concentration dependence curves of AngII effects on [Ca2+]i in PT before and 2 and 4 d after transplantation. Curves for peak increases or plateau values of [Ca2+]i after AngII did not differ between the groups.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 9. Effects of AngII (100 nM) on [Ca2+]i of PT isolated from kidneys of control rats and of kidneys 2 or 4 d after transplantation. Concentration-response curves show mean values ± SEM obtained in control PT and those 2 or 4 d after transplantation. Upper curves with filled symbols represent peak values of [Ca2+]i, lower curves with open symbols represent plateau values 90 s after addition of AngII. EC50 values of 4.5 nM (controls), 6.3 nM (day 2), and 10 nM (day 4) calculated for the peak increase were not significantly different from each other.

 
Ouabain (NKA-inhibitor, 1 mM) and phlorizin (SGLT2-inhibitor, 1 mM) caused reversible increases or decreases in [Na+]i, respectively, which were not altered by transplantation. Basal [Na+]i in control PT was 20 mM ± 1 (n = 53), which was unchanged after transplantation.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The kidney has a major role in the regulation of salt and water balance; therefore, specific studies of renal transport function after transplantation are of principal relevance. In the human situation, identification of mechanisms involved in functional changes after kidney transplantation is complicated by the fact that these patients receive immunosuppression therapies. Certain immunosuppressants like cyclosporin A alter transport along the nephron. We have chosen animal models that allow to differentiate the effects of transplantation with and without rejection on tubular transport from those of an immunosuppression therapy. Furthermore, severe uremia, which occurs within a few days if both kidneys are removed before transplantation of an allogeneic kidney in the absence of immunosuppression, would again complicate the differentiation of the various factors involved in transplantation-related alterations in renal function. The present study, summarizing results from renal transplantations without any immunosuppression, needs to be compared in a further step with renal transplantations, including immunosuppression and bilateral nephrectomy.

In the acute rejection model of rat renal transplantation without immunosuppression, we observed specific changes in mRNA and protein expression as well as function of transporters and hormone receptors, partially already occurring within 24 h. In detail, with acute rejection mRNA and protein levels for NHE-3 were downregulated, while those for NBC-1 were upregulated. Other transporters (NHE-1, SGLT2, NKA) and hormone receptors (AT1, GC-A) showed unaltered expression. Decreased NHE-3 expression was paralleled by decreased activity and lack of AngII-mediated stimulation. These results favor reduced reabsorption of Na+ and H2O acutely after transplantation. Apparently changes in the RAS system are not involved, because AT1-expression and AngII-mediated increases in [Ca2+]i were unaltered.

These findings differ from those for ischemia/reperfusion models (37) and suggest that changes in expression of proteins involved in tubular transport after transplantation are subjected to rejection-associated mechanisms. Marked histologic changes typical for rejection occurred in the grafts; therefore, decreased tubular function due to nonspecific degenerative changes must be considered. This however, is highly unlikely, because expression, activity, and regulation of transporters was selectively unaffected, reduced, or augmented. In another syngeneic rat kidney transplantation model without rejection, limited urinary concentrating ability and tubular damage was also reported (14). Ischemia after transplantation could be considered as a cause of delayed graft function (19,38), but ischemia/reperfusion results in a different pattern of changes in expression levels of renal transporters and receptors compared with the present findings. Furthermore, the ischemic period was only 40 min in this model; therefore, the described functional changes after transplantation are probably not primarily due to ischemia/reperfusion.

AngII regulates transepithelial Na+ reabsorption via Na+/H+-exchange and NaHCO3-cotransport in PT (22,23,27–29,39). Na+/H+-exchange across the luminal membrane is mediated by NHE-3 (40,41), whereas NHE-1 in the basolateral membrane serves pHi regulation (42). With acute rejection, no changes of AT1 expression were found, indicating that cellular components of the RAS were unaltered. This unchanged expression was paralleled by unaltered AngII-mediated increases in [Ca2+]i. The signaling pathway of AngII concentrations above 10 nM involves an increase in [Ca2+]i (43). This does not exclude changes in circulating AngII levels, which still could modify RAS-mediated functions.

Primary tubular effects of ANP and GC-A in the PT are inhibition of reabsorption of substrates, electrolytes, and volume (21,25,44,45). In the present study also, no significant changes in GC-A expression were found. Thus, the receptors of the two counterpart systems, AT1 and GC-A, were not primarily modified after kidney transplantation.

Due to unchanged expression levels of GC-A and AT1 in PT of transplanted kidneys, we were interested whether there is any change in AngII- or ANP-mediated regulation of Na+/H+-exchange in isolated PT after transplantation. ANP caused a small acidification of PT, which did not differ between tubules from control and transplanted kidneys. The inhibition of Na+/H+ exchange by ANP also remained unmodified. AngII displays different effects on renal Na+ and fluid retention (22,43,46). Concentrations of AngII below 1 nM activate several transporters including NHE-3, whereas concentrations of AngII above 10 nM have opposite effects. Ischemia/reperfusion in rat kidneys led to a decline in mRNA-expression of NHE-3 and an increase of NHE-1 (11,47). In the present study, NHE-3 expression was downregulated during acute rejection. By contrast to intense ischemia/reperfusion, NHE-1 expression was not changed with acute rejection, indicating a subtype-specific downregulation of Na+/H+ exchange. Finally, AngII-mediated stimulation (low concentration) of Na+/H+ exchange, due to NHE-3-activation, was lost after transplantation, whereas AngII-mediated inhibition (high concentration) of Na+/H+ exchange, probably reflecting an action on basolateral NHE-1 (22), remained unaltered. These findings suggest that the observed changes in AngII-mediated regulation of Na+/H+ exchange are due to a reduction in NHE-3 expression only and not in AT1, as this should have modified regulation of NHE-1 as well. Again, decreased NHE-3 activity was not observed in the recipients’ own kidney and only minor in syngeneically transplanted kidneys. This small decrease in NHE-3 expression probably reflects the small ischemia-induced effect reported before (11,47), which significantly differs from the marked decrease seen after transplantation with acute rejection. These observations clearly indicate that reduced NHE-3 expression and function is not due to either systemic factors or ischemia/reperfusion damage. Interestingly, changed activity of NHE-3 has been shown to participate in acute and chronic hypertension in rats (48), making this transporter a prime target for changes in expression and function under pathophysiological conditions.

Conflicting results exist regarding NKA expression after ischemia/reperfusion. In rats after severe ischemic damage or reperfusion, NKA expression was significantly reduced (11,37,49); after mild ischemia, cortical NKA expression was unaltered, but the protein was also expressed in luminal membranes (50,51). The fact that neither NKA expression in whole kidney nor expression or function in PT were altered in the rejection model studied here supports again that ischemia/reperfusion was at best only of minor importance, probably due to the short cold and warm ischemic periods in these models.

In contrast to the downregulation of NHE-3, NBC-1 was upregulated with acute rejection, suggesting that the observed changes are due to specific mechanisms and not to general damage. These slightly delayed changes in HCO3- transport in the PT after transplantation might hint at secondary changes due to possible transplantation-associated disturbances in the acid-base status of the animals. Such differential regulation of NBC-1 and NHE-3 will lead to reduction in energy-consuming Na+-transport and still helps to keep intracellular Na+ concentration low. Thus, this regulation could be a protective response of the traumatized kidney.

In rabbits, reduced mRNA expression of Na+-glucose transporters as a consequence of ischemia/reperfusion had been reported (52). We showed unchanged SGLT2 expression. Phlorizin-induced inhibition of SGLT, mostly represented by SGLT2 in S1/S2-segments (51), similarly increased [Na+]i in PTs from control and transplanted kidneys suggesting unaltered activity.

The observed changes in our model, partially observed already 24 h after transplantation, are most likely not due to infiltration or histologic derangements, as these changes need more time to fully develop. Therefore, immediately after transplantation, multiple in part non-immunologic factors, like changes of the RAS and of the endothelins, may contribute to the regulation of the transporters observed in the present study.

Nevertheless, because, in contrast to findings in kidneys undergoing rejection, none of the observed changes in expression or function were significantly altered in the remaining second autochthonous kidney of the recipients nor in syngeneically transplanted kidneys, regulation of transmembrane proteins found in kidneys undergoing rejection are certainly triggered by rejection and most likely not consequences of systemic effects.

In conclusion, we demonstrate first, that expression of membrane proteins is specifically modulated early after transplantation, indicating that changes in expression and function in these models are not due to general necrosis or apoptosis. Second, our results differ from data obtained after ischemia/reperfusion. Third, the regulatory pattern seems not to be the consequence of a systemic effect. We suppose that changes in expression of transporters and receptors after transplantation and rejection are continuously modulated, which may influence the prognosis of the graft. These data suggest that transplantation with acute rejection leads to ischemia-independent downregulation of Na+ and H2O reabsorption in PT. Such a downregulation of the most important transport system primarily involved in Na+ reabsorption and consecutively solute and volume reabsorption within 24 h after transplantation leads to a significant decrease in energy consumption in this sensitive nephron segment. This mechanism could be an important step for the highly traumatized transplanted kidney to save energy and avoid further functional and structural damages. Thus, inhibition of NHE-3 in the donor organ before transplantation and immediately after transplantation may be advantageous for the recovery of renal function and, therefore, for the prognosis of the renal transplant. Go


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 6. Effects of transplantation on Na+-K+-ATPase and Na+-glucose cotransporta
 


    Acknowledgments
 
Excellent technical help from Ute Kleffner and Truc Van Le is gratefully acknowledged. This study was supported by a grant from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Fö.01KS9604/0) and the Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research Münster (IZKF Project No. D19).


    Footnotes
 
Ana Velic and Jochen R. Hirsch contributed equally to this study.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Batlle DC, Mozes MF, Manaligod J, Arruda JA, Kurtzman NA: The pathogenesis of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis associated with kidney transplantation. Am J Med 70: 786–796, 1981[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Curtis JJ: Hypertension following kidney transplantation. Am J Kidney Dis 23: 471–475, 1994[Medline]
  3. Heering P, Degenhardt S, Grabensee B: Tubular dysfunction following kidney transplantation. Nephron 74: 501–511, 1996[Medline]
  4. Ogden AD, Sitprija V, Holmes JH: Function of the renal homograft in man immediately after transplantation. Am J Med 38: 873–882, 1965[CrossRef][Medline]
  5. Henderson LW, Nolph KD, Puschett JB, Goldberg M: Proximal tubular malfunction for diuresis after renal homotransplantation. New Engl J Med 278: 467–473, 1968
  6. Graf C, Maser-Gluth C, de Muinck Keizer W, Rettig R: Sodium retention and hypertension after kidney transplantation in rats. Hypertension 21: 724–730, 1994
  7. Hestin D, Mertes PM, Hubert J, Claudon M, Mejat M, Renoult E, Pertek JP, Frimat, L., Burlet C, Kessler M: Relationship between blood pressure and renin, angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic factor after renal transplantation. Contr Nephrol 48: 98–103, 1997
  8. Kwon O, Corrigan G, Myers BD, Sibley R, Scandling JD, Dafoe D, Alfrey E, Nelson WJ: Sodium reabsorption and distribution of Na+/K+-ATPase during postischemic injury to the renal allograft. Kidney Int 55: 963–975, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Rettig R, Büch M, Gerstberger R, Schnatterbeck P, Paul M: Effects of kidney transplantation on the renin-angiotensin systems of the recipients. Kidney Int 46: 1536–1538, 1994[Medline]
  10. Mackenzie HS, Ziai F, Nagano H, Azuma H, Troy JL, Rennke HG, Tilney NL, Brenner BM: Candersatan cilexetil reduces chronic renal allograft injury in Fisher->Lewis rats. J Hypertens Suppl 15: S21–S25, 1997[Medline]
  11. Wang Z, Rabb H, Haq M, Shull GE, Soleimani M: A possible molecular basis of natriuresis during ischemic-reperfusion injury in the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 605–613, 1998[Abstract]
  12. Bricker NS, Slatopolsky E, Reiss E, Avioli LV: Calcium, phosphorus and bone in renal disease and transplantation. Arch Intern Med 123: 543–553, 1969[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. De Keijzer MH, Provoost AP, Wolff ED, Kort WJ, Weijma IM, Van Aken M, Molenaar JC: The effect of a reduced sodium intake on post-renal transplantation hypertension in rats. Cell Signal 66: 269–276, 1984
  14. Michimata M, Wang WH, Fujita S, Mizutani H, Fujimori K, Satomi S, Ohta M, Ito S, Kimura T, Araki T, et al: Limited urinary concentration and damaged tubules in rats with a syngeneic kidney graft. Kidney Int 60: 672–679, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Müller-Suur C, Norlen BJ, Persson AEG: Resetting of tubuloglomerular feedback in rat kidneys after unilateral nephrectomy. Kidney Int 18: 48–57, 1980[Medline]
  16. Norlen BJ, Müller-Suur C, Persson AEG: Tubulo-glomerular feedback response and excretory characteristics of the transplanted rat kidney. Scand J Urol Nephrol 12: 27–33, 1978[Medline]
  17. Rettig R, Schmitt B, Pelzl B, Speck T: The kidney and primary hypertension: contributions from renal transplantation studies in animals and humans. J Hypertens 11: 883–891, 1993[Medline]
  18. Szabo A, Patschan O, Kuttler B, Müller V, Philipp T, Rettig R, Heemann U: Hypertension accelerates the pace of chronic graft dysfunction in the rat. Transpl Int 11: S10–S14, 1998
  19. Vaskonen T, Mervaala E, Nevala R, Soots A, Krogerus L, Lähteenmäki T, Karppanen H, Vapaatalo H, Ahonen J: Development of chronic allograft rejection and arterial hypertension in Brown Norway rats after renal transplantation. Biochem Pharmacol 9: 162–168, 2000
  20. Yin M, Booster MH, Vd. Bogaard AEJM, Kootstra G: A simple technique to harvest two kidneys from one donor rat for transplantation. Lab Anim 28: 387–390, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Harris PJ, Thomas D, Morgan TO: Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits angiotensin-stimulated proximal tubular sodium and water reabsorption. Nature 326: 697–698, 1987[CrossRef][Medline]
  22. Reilly AM, Harris PJ, Williams DA: Biphasic effect of angiotensin II on intracellular sodium concentration in rat proximal tubules. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 269: F374–F380, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Chatsudthipong V, Chan YL: Inhibitory effect of angiotensin II on renal tubular transport. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 260: F340–F346, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Han HJ, Park SH, Koh HJ, Taub M: Mechanism of regulation of Na+ transport by angiotensin II in primary renal cells. Kidney Int 57: 2457–2467, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  25. Harris PJ, Hiranyachattada S, Antoine AM, Walker L, Reilly AM, Eitle E: Regulation of renal tubular sodium transport by angiotensin II and atrial natriuretic factor. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 23: S112–S118, 1996
  26. Navar GL, Carmines PK, Huang W-C, Mitchell KD: The tubular effects of angiotensin II. Kidney Int 31: S81–S88, 1987
  27. Wang T, Chan YL: Mechanism of angiotensin II action on proximal tubular transport. J Pharmacol Ex Ther 252: 689–695, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Karim Z, Defontaine N, Paillard M, Poggioli J: Protein kinase C isoforms in rat kidney proximal tubule: Acute effect of angiotensin II. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 269: C134–C140, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Geibel J, Giebisch G, Boron WF: Angiotensin II stimulates both Na+- H+ exchange and Na+/HCO-3 cotransport in the rabbit proximal tubule. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 7917–7920, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Robey RB, Ruiz OS, Espiritu DJD, Ibañez VC, Kear FT, Noboa OA, Bernardo AA, Arruda JAL: Angiotensin II stimulation of renal epithelial cell Na/HCO3 cotransport activity: A central role for src family kinase/classic MAPK pathway coupling. J Membr Biol 187: 135–145, 2002[CrossRef][Medline]
  31. Aperia A, Holtbäck U, Syrén M-L, Svensson L-B, Fryckstedt J, Greengard P: Activation/deactivation of renal Na+,K+-ATPase: A final common pathway for regulation of natriuresis. FASEB J 8: 436–439, 1994[Abstract]
  32. Houillier P, Chambrey R, Achard JM, Froissart M, Poggioli J, Paillard M: Signaling pathways in the biphasic effect of angiotensin II on apical Na/H antiport activity in proximal tubule. Kidney Int 50: 1496–1505, 1996[Medline]
  33. Gabriëls G, August C, Grisk O, Steinmetz M, Kosch M, Rahn K-H, Schlatter E: Impact of renal transplantation on small vessel reactivity. Transplantation 75: 689–697, 2003[CrossRef][Medline]
  34. Ankorina I, Haxelmans S, Schlatter E: Functional evidence for the regulation of cytosolic Ca2+ activity via V1-receptors and {beta}-adrenoceptors in rat CCD. Cell Calcium 21: 163–171, 1997[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Schlatter E, Haxelmans S, Ankorina I, Kleta R: Regulation of Na+/H+ exchange by diadenosine polyphosphates, angiotensin II and vasopressin in rat cortical collecting duct. J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1223–1229, 1995[Abstract]
  36. Grynkiewicz G, Poenie M, Tsien RY: A new generation of Ca2+ indicators with greatly improved fluorescence properties. J Biol Chem 260: 3440–3450, 1985[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Kwon T-H, Frokiaer J, Han JS, Knepper MA, Nielsen S: Decreased abundance of major Na+ transporters in kidneys of rats with ischemia-induced acute renal failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F925–F939, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Bonsip SM, Abul-Ezz SR, Ahmad I, Young SM, Ellis EN, Schneider DL, Walker PD: Acute rejection-associated tubular basement membrane defects and chronic allograft nephropathy. Kidney Int 58: 2206–2214, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
  39. Yanagawa N: Is angiotensin II a key regulator of proximal tubular function? Some answers and new questions. Exp Nephrol 6: 277–281, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  40. Biemesderfer D, Pizzonia JH, Abu-Alfa A, Exner M, Reilly R, Igarashi P, Aronson PS. NHE3: A Na+/H+ exchanger isoform of renal brush border. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 265: F736–F742, 1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Amemiya M, Loffing J, Lötscher M, Kaissling B, Alpern RJ, Moe OW: Expression of NHE-3 in the apical membrane of rat renal proximal tubule and thick ascending limb. Kidney Int 48: 1206–1215, 1995[Medline]
  42. Paillard M: Na+/H+ exchanger subtypes in the renal tubule: function and regulation in physiology and disease. Exp Nephrol 5: 277–284, 1997[Medline]
  43. Bouby N, Hus-Citharel A, Marchetti J, Bankir L, Corvol P, Llorens-Cortes C: Expression of type 1 angiotensin II receptor subtypes and angiotensin II-induced calcium mobilization along the rat nephron. J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 1658–1667, 1997[Abstract]
  44. Bacic D, Hernando N, Traebert M, Lederer E, Volkl H, Biber J, Kaissling B, Murer H: Regulation of the renal type IIa Na/Pi cotransporter by cGMP. Pflügers Arch 443: 306–313, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Mistry SK, Hawksworth GM, Struthers AD, McLay JS: Differential expression and synthesis of natriuretic peptides determines natriuretic peptide receptor expression in primary cultures of human proximal tubular cells. J Hypertens 19: 255–262, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Harris PJ, Young J: A: Dose-dependent stimulation and inhibition of proximal tubular sodium reabsorption by angiotensin II in the rat kidney. Pflügers Arch 367: 295–297, 1997
  47. Wang Z, Rabb H, Craig T, Burnham C, Shull GE, Soleimani M: Ischemic-reperfusion injury in the kidney: overexpression of colonic H+- K+-ATPase and suppression of NHE-3. Kidney Int 51: 1106–1115, 1997[Medline]
  48. Magyar CE, Zhang YB, Holstein-Rathlou NH, McDonough AA: Proximal tubule Na transporter responses are the same during acute and chronic hypertension. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 279: F358–F369, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Van Why SK, Mann AS, Ardito T, Siegel NJ, Kashgarian M: Expression and molecular regulation of Na+-K+-ATPase after renal ischemia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 267: F75–F85, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Coux C, Trumper L, Elias MM: Renal function and cortical Na+-K+-ATPase activity, abundance and distribution after ischaemia-reperfusion in rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 1586: 71–80, 2002[Medline]
  51. Molitoris BA, Dahl R, Geerdes A: Cytoskeleton disruption and apical redistribution of proximal tubule Na+-K+-ATPase during ischemia. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 263: F488–F495, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Jung JS, Lee RH, Koh SH, Kim YK: Changes in expression of sodium cotransporters and aquaporin-2 during ischemia-reperfusion injury in rabbit kidney. Renal Fail 22: 407–421, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Received for publication June 16, 2003. Accepted for publication December 12, 2003.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
B. Edemir, S. Reuter, R. Borgulya, R. Schroter, U. Neugebauer, G. Gabriels, and E. Schlatter
Acute Rejection Modulates Gene Expression in the Collecting Duct
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 19(3): 538 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Velic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriëls, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Velic, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gabriëls, G.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP