| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY |

*Department of Internal Medicine, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany; and
Georgia Medical Care Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia.
Correspondence to Dr. Eberhard Ritz, Department of Internal Medicine, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany. Phone: 49-6221-91120; Fax: 49-6221-162476; E-mail: prof.e.ritz{at}T-online.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been known since the 1970s (1) that the cardiovascular (CV) risk is dramatically increased in patients who are on renal replacement therapy. The magnitude of the risk has been more clearly quantified in recent studies (2). What is new, however, is the recognition that even minor renal dysfunction as reflected by an increase in serum creatinine (or, more precise, by estimated GFR) on the one hand and/or albuminuria or trace proteinuria on the other hand has a major impact on the CV risk. Although a higher CV risk in patients with proteinuria had been recognized two decades ago (3), both the consistency and the magnitude of the CV risk, which is associated with minor renal dysfunction, have been fully appreciated only in the recent past (4, 5). The following series of "Frontiers in Nephrology" is designed to address several problems related to this issue.
First, what is the magnitude of the risk? As is outlined by Mann, an increase of the CV risk by a factor of 2 to 4 with elevated creatinine or microalbuminuria retrospectively has been recognized in multiple populations (616), including (1) in the general population, i.e., the Framingham study (14) and confirmed in the prospective Hoorn study (17); (2) in individuals with hypertension (18); and (3) in individuals at high CV risk (19) as well as (4) in patients with heart failure (20). Furthermore, recent studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction (7, 8) documented a substantial increase of in-hospital and postdischarge mortality in individuals with acute myocardial infarction. This was explained only in part by iatrogenic factors, particularly withholding therapeutic options such as thrombolysis and interventional measures (coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) or cardioprotective medication (platelet inhibitors,
blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors). These results have been confirmed in a large international prospective observational study (21). These findings are further complemented by a recent analysis (22) indicating that the mortality after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty increased progressively with increasing serum creatinine concentrations in the high-normal to slightly elevated range, so the evidence is overwhelming (1) that in the individual with even slightly reduced renal function, the risk of a CV event is dramatically increased, comparable in magnitude to that conferred by diabetes (19, 23); and (2) that slight renal dysfunction exposes the patient with a cardiac event to an excessive cardiac mortality.
This raises the second question: Through which mechanisms does impaired renal function have an impact on the CV risk? It would be naive to assume that there is one single cause. One important factor is early activation of the sympathetic nervous system as a result of excitation of intrarenal chemoreceptors and mechanoreceptors that send activating signals into the hypothalamus, where catecholamine turnover is increased, leading to increased efferent sympathetic nerve traffic, as shown in experimental (24) and clinical (25) studies. This may occur even when GFR is still normal (26). Increased sympathetic activity is of course the last thing you want to have in a patient with CV problems. This issue is addressed by Koomans. There are several other pathogenetic pathways. First, the concept of Lindner of accelerated atherogenesis (1) was recently confirmed in an experimental study (27). As a cause or consequence of increased atherogenesis, evidence of oxidative stress and a state of microinflammation is usually found, and this is true in early renal failure as well, as recently found by Shlipak et al. (9). This issue is dealt with in depth by Kaysen.
These are not the only abnormalities of potential pathogenetic relevance. Abnormal apolipoprotein patterns with increased Lp(a) (28) as well as increased concentrations of an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, asymmetric dimethyl-L-arginine (ADMA), possibly secondary to impaired ADMA breakdown (29), have been found in patients with renal disease even when inulin clearance was still normal (30). In addition, increased BP and left ventricular dysfunction were documented in patients with biopsy-confirmed glomerulonephritis and normal inulin by Stefanski et al. (31). These and other pathomechanistically interesting abnormalities are fertile areas for future research. In this context, we point particularly to the fallacy of equating a normal whole-kidney GFR with normal renal parenchymal function, because nephron loss leads to increased single-nephron GFR, which may mask loss of nephrons and the associated loss in renal metabolic function.
What are the practical implications? First, recent epidemiologic data illustrated the magnitude of the problem. Although terminal renal failure is found only in a small proportion (0.1%) of the general population, it has recently been reported (32) that 3.0% of the population have estimated GFR of 60 to 69 ml/min and 3.4% have estimated GFR of 30 to 59 ml/min. It is interesting that a recent report by Muntner and colleagues (15, 33) found that the rate of ESRD attributable to individuals with prevalent CV disease (CVD) in the general population is comparable in magnitude (1463 per 1 million people per year) to that estimated for individuals with diabetes (2567 per 1 million people per year), rates much higher than those estimated for individuals with neither condition (153 per 1 million people per year). The high rate of ESRD among patients with CVD and the association of modest impairment of renal function with increased risk of CVD underscore the importance of sorting out the mechanisms that are responsible (Table 1).
|
The committee of the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines recommended not to rely on serum creatinine measurements only, which are easily confounded by muscle mass, dietary intake, and alterations of tubular creatinine transport, but to estimate GFR with an appropriate formula (35), although none of the current formulas is completely satisfactory (36). As nephrologists, we look forward to the day when chemical laboratories not only report accurately calibrated serum creatinine concentrations but also, based on information on age, gender, and body mass submitted to the laboratory, will be able to report an estimated GFR to identify early renal dysfunction as a novel and so far underappreciated CV risk factor. It has been argued thatanalogous to what has been postulated for diabetesrenal dysfunction should be considered a CV risk factor of the first order. Correspondingly, prevention should be regarded as "secondary prevention." We hope that the following contributions help to increase awareness and understanding of this problem, which has repercussions far beyond the nephrologic community. ![]()
|
|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. B. Newsome, D. G. Warnock, W. M. McClellan, C. A. Herzog, C. I. Kiefe, P. W. Eggers, and J. J. Allison Long-term Risk of Mortality and End-Stage Renal Disease Among the Elderly After Small Increases in Serum Creatinine Level During Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, March 24, 2008; 168(6): 609 - 616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chonchol, M. Cigolini, and G. Targher Association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetic patients with mild kidney dysfunction Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 269 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Addabbo, F. Mallamaci, D. Leonardis, R. Tripepi, G. Tripepi, M. S. Goligorsky, and C. Zoccali Searching for biomarker patterns characterizing carotid atherosclerotic burden in patients with reduced renal function Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2007; 22(12): 3521 - 3526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Goligorsky Frontiers in Nephrology: Viewing the Kidney through the Heart Endothelial Dysfunction in Chronic Kidney Disease J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2007; 18(11): 2833 - 2835. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.-L. Gross, H.-P. Meyer, H. Ziebart, P. Rieger, U. Wenzel, K. Amann, I. Berger, M. Adamczak, P. Schirmacher, and E. Ritz Calcification of Coronary Intima and Media: Immunohistochemistry, Backscatter Imaging, and X-Ray Analysis in Renal and Nonrenal Patients Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2007; 2(1): 121 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ritz and C. Wanner Lipid Changes and Statins in Chronic Renal Insufficiency J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12_suppl_3): S226 - S230. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Amann, C. Wanner, and E. Ritz Cross-Talk between the Kidney and the Cardiovascular System J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2006; 17(8): 2112 - 2119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Williams Coronary Revascularization in Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease/End-Stage Renal Disease: A Nephrologist's Perspective Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2006; 1(2): 209 - 220. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D.C., L. D.F., W. J., H. D., Y. X, T. J., B. K., S. M., D. P., L. R., et al. Accessory Renal Arteries--Mostly, But Not Always, Innocuous: Renin-Dependent Hypertension Caused by Nonfocal Stenotic Aberrant Renal Arteries--Proof of a New Syndrome. Hypertension 46: 380-385, 2005 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 3 - 11. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. R. Nolan Strategies for Improving Long-Term Survival in Patients with ESRD J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11_suppl_2): S120 - S127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. CY, M. CE, D. J, G. AS, I. C, T. E, C. HC, L. M, R. S, R. ER, et al. Which Comes First--Renal Dysfunction or High Blood Pressure?: Elevated Blood Pressure and Risk of End-Stage Renal Disease in Subjects without Baseline Kidney Disease. Arch Intern Med 165: 923-928, 2005 J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 2817 - 2820. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Vanholder, Z. Massy, A. Argiles, G. Spasovski, F. Verbeke, N. Lameire, and for the European Uremic Toxin Work Group (EUTox) Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2005; 20(6): 1048 - 1056. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. de Lusignan, T. Chan, P. Stevens, D. O'Donoghue, N. Hague, B. Dzregah, J. Van Vlymen, M. Walker, and S. Hilton Identifying patients with chronic kidney disease from general practice computer records Fam. Pract., June 1, 2005; 22(3): 234 - 241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. G. Shlipak, L. F. Fried, M. Cushman, T. A. Manolio, D. Peterson, C. Stehman-Breen, A. Bleyer, A. Newman, D. Siscovick, and B. Psaty Cardiovascular Mortality Risk in Chronic Kidney Disease: Comparison of Traditional and Novel Risk Factors JAMA, April 13, 2005; 293(14): 1737 - 1745. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohtake, S. Kobayashi, H. Moriya, K. Negishi, K. Okamoto, K. Maesato, and S. Saito High Prevalence of Occult Coronary Artery Stenosis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease at the Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy: An Angiographic Examination J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 1141 - 1148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Odden, M. A. Whooley, and M. G. Shlipak Association of Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia with Physical Capacity: The Heart and Soul Study J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2908 - 2915. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Amann, M.-L. Gross, and E. Ritz Pathophysiology Underlying Accelerated Atherogenesis in Renal Disease: Closing in on the Target J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2004; 15(6): 1664 - 1666. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |