| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
EDITORIALS |
Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, and the Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Correspondence to Dr. Bruce A. Molitoris, Division of Nephrology/ Department of Medicine, 1120 South Drive, Fesler Hall 115, Indianapolis, IN 46202. Phone: 317-274-7453; Fax: 317-274-8575; E-mail: bmolitor{at}iupui.edu
Ischemic acute renal failure (ARF) remains an area of immense clinical importance and cost. Outstanding advances in understanding the cellular and molecular aspects have occurred, yet little progress has been made in the translation of these findings to the clinical arena. In this issue of JASN, two important articles provide additional contributions to our understanding of the cellular events that mediate injury and subsequent cell death in renal tubule epithelial cells. Before discussing these articles individually, the context of their potential clinical importance should be outlined. Figure 1 illustrates the different stages of ischemic ARF and how therapy should be envisioned for each of these stages. Patients at high risk for ischemic ARF include those with a reduced effective arterial volume resulting in prerenal azotemia. Numerous ischemic insults, alone or in synergistic combination with nephrotoxins, initiate epithelial and vascular cell injury, resulting in an extremely rapid decrease in GFR appropriately termed the "initiation phase." The initiation phase is immediately followed by a phase that has recently been termed the "extension phase" (1). During the extension phase, multiple interrelated events lead to a worsening of epithelial and endothelial cell injury and cell death, primarily in the cortical-medullary region of the kidney. Existence of this phase has been postulated to occur in the clinical arena, but substantiating physiologic data are lacking. Nevertheless this concept is built on sound investigational data from both clinical sources and animal models. It also provides an important instructional framework upon which to base therapy, and it emphasizes the absolute necessity of a rapid diagnosis and institution of therapy in clinical ARF. The "maintenance phase" represents a phase of stabilization of injury, and subsequent correcting events leading to cellular repair, division, and redifferentiation. This sets the stage for improved epithelial and endothelial cell function and recovery of GFR during the "recovery phase."
|
The role of apoptosis in ischemic ARF has been a controversial area. Although known to occur, quantifying apoptosis in vivo is difficult because it is an ongoing process, with apoptotic cells appearing and disappearing in a relatively short period of time. Therefore, the extent of apoptotic cell injury relates to an integrated area under the curve requiring repeated observations over a prolonged period of time. Even more challenging is quantifying the role of apoptosis in the reduction of renal function after ischemic injury. In this issue of JASN, the work of Kelly et al. (12) emphasizes the potential importance of apoptosis in ischemic ARF. Using a moderate level of ischemic injury, 30 min of clamp ischemia in the rat model, the authors showed that expression of p53 in the cortical-medullary area increased over 24 h, while cortical p53 increased but then rapidly decreased to baseline values. Treatment with guanosine, previously shown by these authors to be protective, increased cellular GTP, prevented p53 upregulation, reduced apoptosis, minimized reductions in GFR, but had no effect on overall cellular histology. To more thoroughly evaluate the selective role of apoptosis in mediating the decrease in GFR, Kelly et al. (12) used a selective inhibitor of p53 function. Pifithrin-alpha, by binding to p53, inhibits mitochondrial and nuclear localization, thereby limiting its potential effects on downstream mediators of apoptosis, including p21 and Bax. Therefore, an increase in cellular p53, secondary to GTP depletion, or any of the other known inducers, can be effectively neutralized. These include genotoxic stresses mediating DNA damage that also lead to phosphorylation and activation of p53 (13,14).
The present data imply, but do not prove, that intracellular depletion of GTP may directly initiate the apoptotic cascade via p53 activation independent of the inflammatory cascade. Additional evidence supports this concept in endothelial cells (15). Therefore, multiple pathways induce p53 during ischemic/hypoxic injury. Having the ability to neutralize the function of p53 means therapeutic agents can minimize the effects of multiple intracellular cascades.
Another remarkable aspect of this article relates to the effectiveness of pifithrin-alpha after extended periods of reperfusion. When administered even 14 h after ischemic injury, the agent was still partially effective. It was also effective in the cortical-medullary area, an area not well reperfused after ischemic injury (1). Lack of blood flow to the cortical-medullary area during reperfusion results in continued hypoxia and further cell injury. It also minimizes drug delivery to this critical area, limiting our ability to therapeutically approach the extension phase of ARF.
Multiple questions remain to be answered regarding p53 blockade using pifithrin-alpha. For instance, is the effect seen for both epithelial and endothelial cells? Does it effect phosphorylation of p53 or the essential interaction between p53 and Pin1 (16)? Will short-term inhibition of apoptosis result in an increased tendency toward a malignant phenotype in cells or enhanced inflammation by limiting apoptosis in other cell types? Furthermore, does prevention of apoptosis in the initial stage of reperfusion result in a sustained protection of GFR? Or do these "protected" cells undergo apoptosis and/or necrosis later, resulting in an enhanced fibrotic response?
The present data also represent the second time these authors have dissociated cellular morphology and function. The data imply the reduction in GFR seen after ischemic injury is more dependent on ongoing injury or other cellular events than the initial epithelial and vascular cell injury. Does this relate to increased reperfusion and enhanced GFR based primarily on hemodynamic factors?
In all therapeutic studies of ischemic ARF, it is important to differentiate between direct and indirect effects of the agent in question. As ischemic ARF is a multifactoral process with numerous interrelated cascades, direct prevention of a proximal event will result in an effect on downstream processes. For example, multiple growth factors are known to be protective when given before, during, and even shortly after the ischemic event in animal models. These factors are known to have pleiotropic effects, with one effect being to increase renal blood flow. If this in turn increases cortical-medullary blood flow, then the observed decrease in apoptosis, inflammatory cell infiltrate, and oxygen free radical formation may well be indirect effects of increased perfusion and not due directly to the therapeutic agent. However, preventing or limiting these intracellular cascades is indeed the goal of preventative therapy and therapy given during the extension phase of ARF (Figure 1). It underscores the necessity of early diagnosis and rapid therapy in ARF, an area of little attention and progress in nephrology. Just as identifying patients at high risk for ARF has minimized the incidence and extent of ARF, so will developing approaches for the early diagnosis and rapid treatment of ischemic ARF.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Song, M. Meyer, T. R. Turk, B. Wilde, T. Feldkamp, R. Assert, K. Wu, A. Kribben, and O. Witzke Serum cystatin C in mouse models: a reliable and precise marker for renal function and superior to serum creatinine Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 11, 2008; (2008) gfn626v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ronco, J. A. Kellum, R. Bellomo, and A. A. House Potential Interventions in Sepsis-Related Acute Kidney Injury Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2008; 3(2): 531 - 544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Rosner, D. Portilla, and M. D. Okusa Analytic Reviews: Cardiac Surgery as a Cause of Acute Kidney Injury: Pathogenesis and Potential Therapies J Intensive Care Med, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 3 - 18. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Devarajan Update on Mechanisms of Ischemic Acute Kidney Injury J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 1503 - 1520. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Rosner and M. D. Okusa Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Cardiac Surgery Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., January 1, 2006; 1(1): 19 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wei, X.-M. Yin, M.-H. Wang, and Z. Dong Bid deficiency ameliorates ischemic renal failure and delays animal death in C57BL/6 mice Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): F35 - F42. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. de Araujo, L. Andrade, T. M. Coimbra, A. C. Rodrigues Jr, and A. C. Seguro Magnesium Supplementation Combined with N-Acetylcysteine Protects against Postischemic Acute Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3339 - 3349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Kielar, R. John, M. Bennett, J. A. Richardson, J. M. Shelton, L. Chen, D. R. Jeyarajah, X. J. Zhou, H. Zhou, B. Chiquett, et al. Maladaptive Role of IL-6 in Ischemic Acute Renal Failure J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2005; 16(11): 3315 - 3325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mishra, K. Mori, Q. Ma, C. Kelly, J. Yang, M. Mitsnefes, J. Barasch, and P. Devarajan Amelioration of Ischemic Acute Renal Injury by Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2004; 15(12): 3073 - 3082. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wei, J. Wang, M.-H. Wang, F. Yu, and Z. Dong Inhibition of apoptosis by Zn2+ in renal tubular cells following ATP depletion Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): F492 - F500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhang, V. K. Woodward, J. M. Shelton, J. A. Richardson, X. J. Zhou, D. Link, M. L. Kielar, D. R. Jeyarajah, and C. Y. Lu Ischemia-reperfusion induces G-CSF gene expression by renal medullary thick ascending limb cells in vivo and in vitro Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, June 1, 2004; 286(6): F1193 - F1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Wei, M. M. Alam, M.-H. Wang, F. Yu, and Z. Dong Bid activation in kidney cells following ATP depletion in vitro and ischemia in vivo Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2004; 286(4): F803 - F809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Mishra, Q. Ma, A. Prada, M. Mitsnefes, K. Zahedi, J. Yang, J. Barasch, and P. Devarajan Identification of Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin as a Novel Early Urinary Biomarker for Ischemic Renal Injury J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2003; 14(10): 2534 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Mehta and G. M. Chertow Acute Renal Failure Definitions and Classification: Time for Change? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 2178 - 2187. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |