Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoehner, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoehner, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, W. M.
J Am Soc Nephrol 13:1626-1634, 2002
© 2002 American Society of Nephrology

Association of the Insulin Resistance Syndrome and Microalbuminuria among Nondiabetic Native Americans.The Inter-Tribal Heart Project

Christine M. Hoehner*, Kurt J. Greenlund{dagger}, Stephen Rith-Najarian{ddagger}, Michele L. Casper{dagger} and William M. McClellan*

*Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; {dagger}Cardiovascular Health Branch, Division of Adult and Community Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; {ddagger}Bemidji Area Indian Health Service, Bemidji, Minnesota.

Correspondence to Dr. William M. McClellan, 57 Executive Park South, NE, Suite 200, Atlanta, GA 30329. Phone: 404-982-7573; Fax: 404-982-7591; E-mail: bmcclell{at}gmcf.org


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
ABSTRACT. This study investigated the association between microalbuminuria and the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS) among nondiabetic Native Americans. In a cross-sectional survey, age-stratified random samples were drawn from the Indian Health Service clinic lists for one Menominee and two Chippewa reservations. Information was collected from physical examinations, personal interviews, and blood and urine samples. The urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR) was measured using a random spot urine sample. The IRS was defined by the number of composite traits: hypertension, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), high fasting insulin, low HDL cholesterol, and hypertriglyceridemia. Among the 934 eligible nondiabetic participants, 15.2% exhibited microalbuminuria. The prevalence of one, two, and three or more traits was 27.0, 16.6, and 7.4%, respectively. After controlling for age, sex, smoking, body mass index, education, and family histories of diabetes and kidney disease, the odds ratio (OR) for microalbuminuria was 1.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.8) for one IRS trait, 1.8 (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.2) for two traits, and 2.3 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.9) for three or more traits (versus no traits). The pattern of association appeared weaker among women compared with men. Of the individual IRS traits, only hypertension and IFG were associated with microalbuminuria. Among these nondiabetic Native Americans, the IRS was associated with a twofold increased prevalence of microalbuminuria. Health promotion efforts should focus on lowering the prevalence of hypertension, as well as glucose intolerance and obesity, in this population at high risk for renal and cardiovascular disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Microalbuminuria is an early indicator of renal disease among individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (14). Microalbuminuria in diabetic patients is associated with the insulin resistance syndrome (IRS), also known as the metabolic syndrome, syndrome X, and the multiple metabolic syndrome (57). The IRS is comprised of impaired glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, hypertriglyceridemia, low concentration of HDL cholesterol, high BP, and sometimes-central adiposity and obesity. In persons with diabetes, several of these factors, including high BP, dyslipidemia, central adiposity, and obesity, are associated with increased risk of microalbuminuria (812).

Although microalbuminuria has been associated with an increased rate of decline in creatinine clearance in nondiabetic hypertensive patients (1314), there is generally less information about its association with the IRS in persons without diabetes. If the metabolic and hemodynamic abnormalities characteristic of the IRS are causally related to microalbuminuria, we would expect to find an association between IRS and microalbuminuria in nondiabetic persons similar to that observed among patients with diabetes. We studied this possibility by examining the association between the IRS and prevalent microalbuminuria among nondiabetic members of a population of Native Americans.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Study Design
The Inter-Tribal Heart Project (ITHP) was a cross-sectional study conducted in 1992 to 1994 to study patterns of cardiovascular risk among Native Americans residing on the Menominee reservation in central Wisconsin and the Red Lake and White Earth Chippewa reservations in Minnesota. The institutional review board of each participating tribe, the Indian Health Service, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention approved the study.

Subjects
An age-stratified random sample (ages 25 to 44 yr and >=45 yr) was drawn from the Indian Health Service clinic lists for each community. These lists included all persons who had used the local Indian Health Service/Tribal healthcare facility at least once during the three preceding years. We excluded persons who reported histories of kidney failure, pregnant women, persons with diabetes mellitus (by history or with a fasting blood glucose >126 mg/dl), and those with macroalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine ratio [ACR] >=300 mg/g).

Data
Examinations took place in the tribal clinics after informed consent was obtained. Interviewers at each site ascertained medical, psychosocial, behavioral, and sociodemographic information, and trained technicians obtained physical measures and blood and urine samples from each participant.

Participants were instructed to fast 12 h before the examination. Blood and urine samples were collected and shipped to the Medical Research Laboratory (Highland Heights, KY) for analysis. Urine albumin concentration was measured on a spot urine sample using nephelometry. The alkaline picrate method was used to measure urine creatinine concentration.

Measures of glucose, serum total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum creatinine were determined by enzymatic methods using a Hitachi 737 chemistry analyzer and reagents from Boehringer Mannheim Diagnostics (Indianapolis, IN). LDL cholesterol was calculated using the formula of Friedewald et al. (15). Serum insulin was determined by RIA (Diagnostic Products, Los Angeles, CA) and was reported in mIU/ml.

BP was measured by a mercury sphygmomanometer three times at 30-s intervals after an initial 5-min rest. The second and third readings were averaged to estimate systolic (first Korotkoff sound) and diastolic (fifth Korotkoff sound) BP. Mean arterial pressure was defined as the sum of the diastolic pressure and one third of the difference between the systolic and diastolic values. Body height (cm) and weight (kg) were measured with the participant dressed in light clothing and without shoes. Abdominal girth was determined at the level of the umbilicus with the participant supine. The anthropometric measurements yielded two adiposity measurements: body mass index (BMI), equal to weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2), and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR).

Educational attainment was categorized as less than, equal to, or more than a high school education. Participants were classified as current smokers if they smoked presently and had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, former smokers if they did not currently smoke but had smoked at least 100 cigarettes in their lifetime, or non-smokers. Self-reported family histories of diabetes and kidney disease among biologic parents or siblings were recorded.

For this study, we defined the IRS as a phenotype comprised of five discrete conditions—hypertension, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), high fasting insulin, low HDL cholesterol, and high triglycerides (16). We defined hypertension as a systolic pressure >=140 mmHg, a diastolic pressure >=90 mmHg, or current use of antihypertensive medication. For fasting blood glucose (FBG), <110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/L) was considered normal, and >=110 mg/dl (6.1 mmol/L) but <126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/L) was considered IFG (17). All persons with FBG concentration >=126 mg/dl (7.0 mmol/L) or a diagnosis of diabetes were considered diabetic (17). High insulin was defined as a fasting insulin concentration >14 mIU/ml, equivalent to the 75th percentile (18). Low HDL was defined as <35 mg/dl (0.9 mmol/L), and high triglycerides as >=250 mg/dl (2.8 mmol/L) (19).

Participants with a BMI >=30 kg/m2 were considered obese (20). Obesity, however, was not included in the IRS definition because of its high prevalence in this population (41.3% with BMI >=30 kg/m2; 76.5% with BMI >=30 kg/m2 and/or WHR > 0.9 in women or WHR > 1.0 in men). In addition, we wanted to determine if the association between the IRS and microalbuminuria was the same or different for obese and non-obese participants.

We defined microalbuminuria as an ACR of 30 to 299 mg/g with normal values <30 mg/g (21). Persons whose albumin concentrations were undetectable were set to the minimum value of 0.89 mg/g.

Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using the SAS statistical software (version 8.0; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). A descriptive analysis included either proportions or means and SD for selected characteristics. Bivariate analyses used two-tailed t tests and ANOVA for continuous variables and {chi}2 tests for categorical variables to assess differences in characteristics between groups defined by either microalbuminuria or IRS traits (22).

Logistic regression was performed to measure the association between the IRS and microalbuminuria by (1) those with particular numbers of IRS traits compared with those having none, and (2) the individual IRS traits and the presence of microalbuminuria (23). An unadjusted model and fully adjusted model were examined. Covariates in the full model included age, gender, BMI, education, smoking history, and family histories of diabetes and kidney disease. To comply with confidentiality agreements, we did not adjust for reservation site in the models. Log likelihood ratios were used to determine the significance of the interaction terms, namely the interactions of the IRS with gender and the IRS with BMI. The final model was derived using a hierarchical backwards elimination procedure in which higher order (interaction) terms were dropped before lower order terms.

Finally, because information regarding the distribution of ACR was lost when we created the dichotomous variable for microalbuminuria (yes, no), we examined the association between the log-transformed ACR and individual IRS traits using Pearson correlation coefficients and the general linear model. The distributions of all continuous variables were examined, and those that displayed significant degree of skewness, including the urinary ACR, were log-transformed. In the full model, the independent associations between the log-transformed ACR and each of the individual IRS traits, namely systolic and diastolic BP, fasting blood glucose, HDL cholesterol concentrations, and the log-transformed values for triglyceride and fasting insulin, were assessed (24). This model adjusted for BMI, WHR, education, smoking history, and family histories of kidney disease and diabetes.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
A total of 2068 persons aged >=25 yr were eligible to participate in the ITHP; 399 (19.3%) declined and 294 (14.2%) agreed to participate but did not appear for examination, leaving 1376 (527 men; 849 women). We excluded persons with a history of kidney failure (n = 29) and pregnancy (n = 14), those with incomplete data on microalbuminuria (n = 21), hypertensive status (n = 12), diabetes status (n = 1), or serum insulin concentrations (n = 21), and those with diabetes (n = 338) or macroalbuminuria (n = 6). Thus, the final study population numbered 934.

Microalbuminuria was observed in 15% of the 934 nondiabetic participants (Table 1). Persons with microalbuminuria were older (P = 0.001) and had higher systolic BP (P = 0.004) than those without microalbuminuria. Participants without microalbuminuria were more likely to have at least a high school education compared with their counterparts (P = 0.007).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1. Population characteristics of nondiabetic Native Americans participating in the Inter-Tribal Heart Project who met eligibility requirements
 
Almost half (49.0%) of the population had no IRS traits; 27.0% had one trait, and 16.6% had two IRS traits (Table 2). Among the 252 persons with only one trait, 38.9% had hypertension and 34.1% had high insulin. Among the 155 with two traits, 27.7% had both IFG and high insulin, 21.3% had hypertension and high insulin, and 17.4% had hypertension and IFG. Three or more traits were present in 7.4% of the study population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2. Percentages and mean ± SD obesity measures and insulin resistance syndrome traits among participants with none, one, two, three, four, or five traits
 
Consistent with expectations, the mean BMI (± SD) (in kg/m2) increased from 27.3 (± 4.6) for persons with no traits to 34.5 (± 7.3) for those with four traits and 32.8 (± 3.0) among the five participants with five IRS traits (P = 0.0001) (Table 2). Similarly, as the number of IRS traits increased, the mean level of arterial pressure, fasting blood glucose, insulin, and triglycerides increased while HDL cholesterol values decreased (all P = 0.0001) (Table 2).

The mean (± SD) ACR for men and women combined was 20.3 (± 29.0) mg/g (Table 3). The mean ACR increased from 16.8 mg/g among those with no traits to 25.5 mg/g among those with two and 25.1 mg/g among the 69 persons with three or more traits. Similar increases in mean ACR by number of IRS traits were observed by gender. Among men and women combined, mean ACR was significantly higher among those with hypertension and IFG. Mean ACR was significantly higher among men with high fasting insulin yet was similar among women with and without high fasting insulin. In addition, mean ACR was significantly lower among women with low HDL cholesterol but was comparable among men with and without low HDL cholesterol. No differences in mean ACR were observed among participants with and without high triglycerides.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3. Relationship between mean albumin:creatinine and the insulin resistance syndrome for the total population and by gender
 
Among men and women combined, the prevalence odds ratio (OR) for microalbuminuria was 1.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1 to 2.6) for one IRS trait, 1.7 (95% CI, 1.0 to 2.8) for two traits, and 2.1 (95% CI, 1.1 to 4.0) for three or more traits compared with no traits (Table 4). The changes to the estimates after adjusting for age, gender, BMI, education, smoking history, and family histories of diabetes and kidney disease were negligible.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4. Unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the relationship between microalbuminuria (albumin:creatinine >=30 mg/g but <300 mg/g) and the insulin resistance syndrome, in terms of the number of traits and specific insulin resistance syndrome traits
 
In the multivariate logistic model, hypertension was the only individual trait (adjusted OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.6) associated with microalbuminuria (Table 4). IFG reached near-significance (OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.6), whereas high fasting insulin, high triglycerides, and low HDL cholesterol were not associated with microalbuminuria. In addition, after controlling for all covariates, there was no independent association between obesity (BMI, >=30 kg/m2 versus <30 kg/m2) and microalbuminuria (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.52 to 1.2) (data not shown).

Because the pattern of association was different between men and women, the results are presented separately by gender. Although the interaction did not attain statistical significance (P between 0.05 and 0.10), the association between microalbuminuria and the IRS, by number of traits, appeared stronger among men and resembled more of a dose response relationship compared with that among women. Figure 1 further illustrates the differences between men and women in the prevalence of microalbuminuria by number of IRS traits. No interaction between the IRS and obesity was observed.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Prevalence of microalbuminuria among participants by sex and number of insulin resistance syndrome traits. Albumin:creatinine >=30 mg/g but <300 mg/g. Men: no traits, n = 147 (42.6%); one trait, n = 91 (26.4%); two traits, n = 68 (19.7%); three or more traits, n = 39 (11.3%). Women: no traits, n = 311 (52.8%); one trait, n = 161 (27.3%); two traits, n = 87 (14.8%); three or more traits, n = 30 (5.1%). P values are based on the {chi}2 test.

 
The log-transformed ACR was positively correlated with systolic BP (r = 0.1404; P < 0.001), fasting glucose (r = 0.0722; P = 0.027), and HDL cholesterol (r = 0.0966; P = 0.003). No correlation was found between ACR and diastolic BP (r = 0.0110; P = 0.737), fasting insulin (r = 0.0172; P = 0.600), BMI (r = -0.0117; P = 0.723), WHR (r = 0.0272; P = 0.409), or serum triglycerides (r = 0.0073; P = 0.824).

After controlling for age, gender, smoking history, educational status, and family histories of diabetes and kidney disease in the general linear model, only systolic BP (P = 0.03) was independently associated with the urinary ACR. No association was found for fasting blood glucose (P = 0.15), diastolic BP (P = 0.71), HDL (P = 0.20), triglycerides (P = 0.40), insulin (P = 0.36), BMI (P = 0.30), or WHR (P = 0.44).


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
The IRS is defined by the aggregation or clustering of several distinctive traits, including hyperinsulinemia, glucose intolerance, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and low HDL cholesterol concentrations (18). Hyperinsulinemia is thought to develop as a result of genetic factors that interact with environmental influences such as consumption of excess calories and diminished physical activity that increase risk of obesity (56). Yet, although weight gain and obesity result in decreased sensitivity to insulin and elevated insulin concentrations, hyperinsulinemia and the clinical manifestations of IRS can be seen in the absence of obesity (56). There is possibly a genetic predisposition to insulin resistance that interacts with other genetic and environmental factors to contribute to the joint occurrence of hypertension, lipid abnormalities, and disordered glucose metabolism.

Commonly associated with diabetes, the IRS, as represented by three or more traits, was present in a small proportion (7.4%) of our nondiabetic population. In general, BMI increased with increasing number of IRS traits. As expected, insulin concentrations and the metabolic and physiologic abnormalities associated with the IRS increased as participants went from zero to three or more IRS traits.

The link between elevated insulin concentrations and the phenotypic traits of the IRS is still only partially understood. Hyperinsulinemia may contribute to the development of hypertension through multiple mechanisms, including Na+ retention (25), activation of the sympathetic nervous system (26), decreased Na+-K+-ATPase activity (27), and increased Na+-H+ pump activity (28). Similarly, hyperinsulinemia may contribute to dyslipidemia by increasing the synthesis of VLDL by the liver (29), resulting in increased concentrations of triglycerides. Moreover, the low concentrations of HDL in the IRS may reflect an increased rate of catabolism of apoA1 seen in persons with elevated insulin (3031). Finally, the progressive impairment of glucose tolerance is thought to reflect the loss of beta-cell reserves due to persistent hyperinsulinemia (32).

It has been suggested that microalbuminuria could be another component of the IRS (3338). Mechanisms that might link hyperinsulinemia to greater urinary albumin excretion include increased glomerular hemodynamic pressure, greater permeability of the filtration barrier due to advanced glycosylation end products, and endothelial dysfunction that results in increased transcapillary escape of albumin.

Several studies that were not population-based have found associations between hyperinsulinemia and microalbuminuria in persons without diabetes, but population-based studies have sometimes found different results. In the former group, for example, Bianchi et al. (39) measured insulin responsiveness in response to a glucose load in persons without diabetes and found a direct correlation between increased insulin secretion and urinary albumin excretion rates. In addition, nondiabetic persons with microalbuminuria have been reported to have higher insulin values in response to a glucose load (4041), and their albumin urinary excretion rates have been found to be directly proportional to serum glucose concentrations (42). An association between microalbuminuria and hyperinsulinemia has also been reported for young black subjects (43).

Population-based studies, on the other hand, have found less consistent evidence for an association between insulin and microalbuminuria in persons without diabetes. In one study, Haffner et al. (44) examined the association between microalbuminuria and IRS traits in nondiabetic persons living in low-income communities in Mexico City. Microalbuminuria was highly prevalent (55.1%), but no association was found between this condition and mean systolic BP or fasting insulin. In contrast, those with microalbuminuria had higher triglyceride values, and higher fasting and 2-h blood glucose concentrations. After controlling for age (P = 0.289) and parental history of diabetes (P = 0.036), neither the presence of glucose intolerance (P = 0.524) nor a 10 mmHg difference in systolic BP was associated with the presence of microalbuminuria.

In another population-based study, this one of European whites living in the Netherlands, a much lower prevalence of microalbuminuria was found among nondiabetic persons with normal (6.8%) or impaired glucose tolerance (8.7%) than in persons with diabetes (21.3%) (45). In both nondiabetic groups, median triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, fasting blood glucose, and fasting insulin were comparable in those with and without microalbuminuria. After controlling for age, gender, impaired glucose tolerance, a history of hypertension, fasting hyperinsulinemia, the joint distribution of HDL cholesterol and triglyceride values, and WHR, only a history of hypertension and WHR were significantly associated with the presence of microalbuminuria.

Our study’s main finding demonstrating an increased prevalence OR for microalbuminuria and a higher mean ACR for those with three or more IRS traits (versus none) supports a positive association between the IRS and microalbuminuria. However, the gradient of the effect from one to three or more traits was minimal. At the same time, evidence consistent with previous reports supporting no association with individual IRS traits was found. For one, insulin, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol concentrations were similar between those with and without microalbuminuria, and no association between urinary ACR and these traits was detected.

The differences in the association of the IRS and microalbuminuria between men and women were unexpected yet intriguing. The relationship appeared to be restricted to men only, with an apparently weak relationship in women. If this phenomenon were found in other studies, it would be reasonable that it might reflect a different biologic response between men and women, in that the IRS imparts a stronger, adverse pathophysiologic reaction on the body’s vessels in men as compared with women. Yet, because the interaction was not statistically significant in our models, we can only recommend further investigation on this topic.

Aside from high fasting insulin, the definition of which was based on the population distribution, hypertension was the most prevalent IRS trait both in the total population and among participants with one (38.9%) trait. Moreover, hypertension was the only IRS trait that was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with microalbuminuria after adjusting for the other risk factors in the total population. In this particular population of nondiabetic Native Americans, the association between the IRS and microalbuminuria may be due primarily to one IRS trait, hypertension. However, in men, the joint effect of the IRS traits on microalbuminuria exceeded that of any single metabolic or hemodynamic abnormality, including hypertension. Among women, on the other hand, it appeared that hypertension predominately contributed to the presence of microalbuminuria because it was the only trait significantly associated with this condition.

The prevalence of microalbuminuria in our population is comparable to that previously reported for other non-European, nondiabetic populations (46). For example, the highest reported prevalence of microalbuminuria among nondiabetic persons has been found among Nauru Islanders (21%), New Zealand Maori (11%), and New Zealand Pacific Islanders (10%) (46). The prevalence among nondiabetic Native Americans aged <=45 yr who participated in the Strong Heart Study ranged from 3.9% among those in Oklahoma with normal glucose tolerance (ages, 55 to 64 yr) to 23.1% among those in Arizona with impaired glucose tolerance (ages, 65 to 74 yr) (47). Comparable rates among nondiabetic European populations range between 2% and 10% (46).

Four limitations to our study should be noted. First, clinic lists were used to determine the study population. All persons who had used the clinics within the previous 3 yr were eligible to be selected for participation in the study, and persons who had not used the clinics for health care were not eligible. The lists, however, were considered most representative of the Native Americans living on the reservations at the time of the study due to several factors including geographic isolation of the reservation communities, limited access to non-Indian Health Service facilities, the comprehensive range of services provided by the clinics, and the prerequisite that individuals register with the clinics for reimbursement of services provided outside of the clinics.

A second limitation was the substantial nonparticipation rate. For this to have biased our findings, however, persons with the IRS and microalbuminuria would have to have declined participation at rates greater than other persons. Although possible, this event seems unlikely due to the asymptomatic nature of microalbuminuria.

A third limitation was that we measured microalbuminuria only once and, thus, some persons may have been misclassified. Current American Diabetes Association recommendations suggest 2 of 3 positive tests for diagnosis of microalbuminuria (21). In addition, false positive urine albumin specimens (e.g., bacteria, blood, or white blood cells) may be present. For this to have biased our findings, however, the rate of misclassification would have to differ between men and women with and without the IRS. For example, the rate of false positives would either have to be disproportionately higher among men with the IRS or, conversely, among women without the IRS.

The possibility for insufficient power to detect associations between microalbuminuria and the individual IRS traits, specifically high insulin, high triglycerides, and low HDL cholesterol, served as a fourth limitation. However, the point estimates for these traits all wavered around the null value, which suggested no association.

In summary, we found that in this particular nondiabetic Native American population with a high prevalence of microalbuminuria, the IRS was associated with increased prevalence of microalbuminuria. Our findings suggest that the risk of early proteinuria is increased twofold by the presence of three or more IRS traits. Only one of the syndrome’s traits, elevated BP, was independently associated with increased risk of prevalent microalbuminuria. In general, health promotion efforts should focus on lowering the prevalence of hypertension, as well as glucose intolerance and obesity, in this particular Native American population, which is at high risk for renal and cardiovascular disease.


    Acknowledgments
 
This work was made possible by the people who agreed to participate in the Inter-Tribal Heart Project and the local tribal governments. This study was funded as part of the Interagency Agreement #CC91-008 between the Indian Health Service and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The project was supported by a Memorandum of Understanding between the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Indian Health Service and by the following Tribal Council Resolutions: 91 to 42 of the Menominee Tribe of Wisconsin, 157 to 91 of the Red Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, and 063 to 92–001 of the White Earth Reservation Tribal Council.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Viberti GC, Hill RD, Jarrett RJ, Argyropoulos A, Mahmud U, Keen H: Microalbuminuria as a predictor of clinical nephropathy in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1: 1430–1432, 1982[CrossRef][Medline]
  2. Mogensen CE, Christensen CK: Predicting diabetic nephropathy in insulin-dependent patients. N Engl J Med 311: 89–93, 1984[Abstract]
  3. Wirta O, Pasternack A, Mustonen J, Oksa H, Koivula T, Helin H: Albumin excretion rate and its relation to kidney disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med 237: 367–373, 1995[Medline]
  4. Mogensen CE: Microalbuminuria predicts clinical proteinuria and early mortality in maturity-onset diabetes. N Engl J Med 310: 356–360, 1984[Abstract]
  5. Reaven GM: Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37: 1595–1607, 1988[Abstract]
  6. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E: Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 14: 173–194, 1991[Abstract]
  7. Haffner SM, Valdez RA, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Morales PA, Stern MP: Prospective analysis of the insulin-resistance syndrome (syndrome X). Diabetes 41: 715–722, 1992[Abstract]
  8. Niskanen LK, Laakso M: Insulin resistance is related to albuminuria in patients with type ii (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Metabolism 42: 1541–1545, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
  9. Nosadini R, Cipollina MR, Solini A, Sambataro M, Morocutti A, Doria A, Fioretto P, Brocco E, Muollo B, Frigato F: Close relationship between microalbuminuria and insulin resistance in essential hypertension and non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Soc Nephrol 3 [Suppl 4]: 56–63, 1992
  10. Groop L, Ekstrand A, Forsblom C, Widen E, Groop PH, Teppo AM, Eriksson J: Insulin resistance, hypertension, and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 36: 642–647, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
  11. Chan JC, Tomlinson B, Nicholls MG, Swaminathan R, Cheung CK, Woo J, Cockram CS: Albuminuria, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia in Chinese patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes (NIDDM). Diabet Med 13: 150–155, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  12. Niskanen L, Uusitupa M, Sarlund H, Siitonen O, Voutilainen E, Penttila I, Pyorala K: Microalbuminuria predicts the development of serum lipoprotein abnormalities favouring atherogenesis in newly diagnosed type 2 (non-insulin dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia 33: 237–243, 1990[CrossRef][Medline]
  13. Bigazzi R, Bianchi S, Baldari D, Campese VM: Microalbuminuria predicts cardiovascular events and renal insufficiency in patients with essential hypertension. J Hypertens 16: 1325–1333, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  14. Ruilope LM, Campo C, Rodriguez-Artalejo F, Lahera V, Garcia-Robles R, Rodicio JL: Blood pressure and renal function: Therapeutic implications. J Hypertens 14: 1259–1263, 1996[CrossRef][Medline]
  15. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 18: 499–502, 1972[Abstract]
  16. Greenlund KJ, Valdez R, Casper ML, Rith-Najarian S, Croft JB: Prevalence and correlates of the insulin resistance syndrome among Native Americans. The Inter-Tribal Heart Project. Diabetes Care 22: 441–447, 1999[Abstract]
  17. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 20: 1183–1197, 1997[Medline]
  18. Liese AD, Mayer-Davis EJ, Haffner SM: Development of the multiple metabolic syndrome: an epidemiologic perspective. Epidemiol Rev 20: 157–172, 1998[Free Full Text]
  19. Consensus Conference: Treatment of hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA 251: 1196–1200, 1984[CrossRef][Medline]
  20. Must A, Spadano J, Coakley EH, Field AE, Colditz G, Dietz WH: The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 282: 1523–1529, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. American Diabetes Association: Diabetic nephropathy (Position Statement). Diabetes Care 24 [Suppl 1]: S69–S71, 2001[CrossRef]
  22. Zar JH: Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edition, Englewood NJ, Prentice Hall, 1984
  23. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE: Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariable Methods, Boston MA, PWS-Kent Publishing Co, 1988
  24. Kutner MH, Nachtschiem CJ, Wasserman W, Neter J: Applied Linear Statistical Models, Columbus OH, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 1996
  25. DeFronzo RA, Cooke CR, Andres R, Faloona GR, Davis PJ: The effect of insulin on renal handling of sodium, potassium, calcium, and phosphate in man. J Clin Invest 55: 845–855, 1975
  26. Rowe JW, Young JB, Minaker KL, Stevens AL, Palotta J, Landsberg L: Effect of insulin and glucose infusions on sympathetic nervous system activity in normal man. Diabetes 30: 219–225, 1981[Medline]
  27. Clausen T, Everts ME: Regulation of the Na, K-pump in skeletal muscle. Kidney Int 35: 1–13, 1989[Medline]
  28. Moore RD: Stimulation of Na:H exchange by insulin. Biophys J 33: 203–210, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Tobey TA, Greenfield M, Kraemer F, Reaven GM: Relationship between insulin resistence, insulin secretion, very low density lipoprotein kinetics and plasma triglyceride levels in normotriglyceridemic man. Metabolism 30: 165–171, 1981[CrossRef][Medline]
  30. Golay A, Zech L, Shi MZ, Chiou Y-AM, Reaven GM, Chen YD: High density lipoprotein (HDL) metabolism in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: Measurement of HDL turnover using tritiated HDL. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 65: 512–518, 1987[Abstract]
  31. Brinton EA, Eisenberg S, Breslow JL: Human HDL cholesterol levels are determined by apoA-I fractional catabolic rate, which correlates inversely with estimates of HDL particle size. Effects of gender, hepatic and lipoprotein lipases, triglyceride and insulin levels, and body fat distribution. Arterioscler Thromb 14: 707–720, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Reaven GM, Hollenbeck CB, Chen YD: Relationship between glucose tolerance, insulin secretion, and insulin action in non-obese individuals with varying degrees of glucose tolerance. Diabetologia 32: 52–55, 1989[Medline]
  33. Forsblom CM, Eriksson JG, Ekstrand AV, Teppo AM, Taskinen MR, Groop LC: Insulin resistance and abnormal albumin excretion in nondiabetic first-degree relatives of patients with NIDDM. Diabetologia 38: 363–369, 1995[Medline]
  34. Yip J, Mattock MB, Morocutti A, Sethi M, Trevisan R, Viberti G: Insulin resistance in insulin-dependent diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. Lancet 342: 883–887, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
  35. Groop L, Ekstrand A, Forsblom C, Widen E, Groop PH, Teppo AM, Eriksson J: Insulin resistance, hypertension and microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 36: 642–647, 1993
  36. Pinkney JH; Denver AE; Mohamed-Ali V; Foster C; Yudkin JS: Insulin resistance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with microalbuminuria independently of ambulatory blood pressure. J Diabetes Complications 9: 230–233, 1995[CrossRef][Medline]
  37. Gruden G, Cavallo-Perin P, Olivetti C, Repetti E, Sivieri R, Bruno A, Pagano G: Albumin excretion rate levels in nondiabetic offspring of NIDDM patients with and without nephropathy. Diabetologia 38: 1218–1222, 1995[Medline]
  38. Agewall S, Fagerberg B, Attvall S, Ljungman S, Urbanavicius V, Tengborn L, Wikstrand J: Microalbuminuria, insulin sensitivity and haemostatic factors in nondiabetic treated hypertensive men. Risk Factor Intervention Study Group. J Intern Med 237: 195–203, 1995[Medline]
  39. Bianchi S, Bigazzi R, Valtriani C, Chiapponi I, Sgherri G, Baldari G, Natali A, Ferranini E, Campese VM: Elevated serum insulin levels in patients with essential hypertension and microalbuminuria. Hypertension 23: 681–687, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Woo J, Cockram CS, Swaminathan R, Lau E, Chan A, Cheung R: Microalbuminuria and other cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects. Int J Cardiol 37: 345–350, 1992[CrossRef][Medline]
  41. Haffner SM, Stern MP, Gruber KK, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Patterson JK: Microalbuminuria. Potential marker for increased cardiovascular risk factors in nondiabetic subjects? Arteriosclerosis 10: 727–731, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Collins VR, Dowse GK, Finch CF, Zimmet PZ, Linnane AW: Prevalence and risk factors for micro- and macroalbuminuria in diabetic subjects and entire population of Nauru. Diabetes 38: 1602–1610, 1989[Abstract]
  43. Falkner B, Kushner H, Levison S, Canessa M: Albuminuria in association with insulin and sodium-lithium countertransport in young African Americans with borderline hypertension. Hypertension 25: 1315–1321, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Haffner SM, Gonzales C, Valdez RA, Mykkanen L, Hazuda HP, Mitchell BD, Monterrosa A, Stern MP: Is microalbuminuria part of the prediabetic state? The Mexico City Diabetes Study. Diabetologia 36: 1002–1006, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
  45. Jager A, Kostense PJ, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Boutner LM, Stehouwer CD: Microalbuminuria is strongly associated with NIDDM and hypertension, but not with the insulin resistance syndrome: The Hoorn Study. Diabetologia 41: 694–700, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
  46. Metcalf PA, Scragg RK: Epidemiology of microalbuminuria in the general population. J Diab Complications 8: 157–163, 1994
  47. Robbins DC, Knowler WC, Lee ET, Yeh J, Go OT, Welty T, Fabritz R, Howard BV: Regional differences in albuminuria among American Indians: An epidemic of renal disease. Kidney Int 49: 557–563, 1996[Medline]
Received for publication August 7, 2001. Accepted for publication February 4, 2002.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
K. A. Griffin, H. Kramer, and A. K. Bidani
Adverse renal consequences of obesity
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, April 1, 2008; 294(4): F685 - F696.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Nguyen, C. McCulloch, P. Brakeman, A. Portale, and C.-y. Hsu
Being Overweight Modifies the Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Microalbuminuria in Adolescents
Pediatrics, January 1, 2008; 121(1): 37 - 45.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
A. Whaley-Connell, B. S. Pavey, K. Chaudhary, G. Saab, and J. R. Sowers
Review: Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system intervention in the cardiometabolic syndrome and cardio-renal protection
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, October 1, 2007; 1(1): 27 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
A. Rashidi, A. Ghanbarian, and F. Azizi
Are Patients Who Have Metabolic Syndrome without Diabetes at Risk for Developing Chronic Kidney Disease? Evidence Based on Data from a Large Cohort Screening Population
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2007; 2(5): 976 - 983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
J. Nogueira and M. Weir
The Unique Character of Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease and Its Implications for Treatment with Lipid-Lowering Drugs
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2007; 2(4): 766 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
M. Scavini, C. A. Stidley, S. S. Paine, V. O. Shah, F. Tentori, A. Bobelu, T. K. Welty, J. W. MacCluer, and P. G. Zager
The Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease among the Zuni Indians: The Zuni Kidney Project
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2007; 2(3): 509 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. Cirillo, W. Sato, S. Reungjui, M. Heinig, M. Gersch, Y. Sautin, T. Nakagawa, and R. J. Johnson
Uric Acid, the Metabolic Syndrome, and Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., December 1, 2006; 17(12_suppl_3): S165 - S168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. Locatelli, P. Pozzoni, and L. Del Vecchio
Renal Manifestations in the Metabolic Syndrome.
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2006; 17(4_suppl_2): S81 - S85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. H. Jee, L. E. Boulware, E. Guallar, I. Suh, L. J. Appel, and E. R. Miller III
Direct, Progressive Association of Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Incident Proteinuria: Results From the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation (KMIC) Study
Arch Intern Med, October 24, 2005; 165(19): 2299 - 2304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
M. Kurella, J. C. Lo, and G. M. Chertow
Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease among Nondiabetic Adults
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2005; 16(7): 2134 - 2140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
K. R. Tuttle
Renal manifestations of the metabolic syndrome
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2005; 20(5): 861 - 864.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
G. C. Shearer, J. W. Newman, B. D. Hammock, and G. A. Kaysen
Graded Effects of Proteinuria on HDL Structure in Nephrotic Rats
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2005; 16(5): 1309 - 1319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
J. R. Schelling and J. R. Sedor
The Metabolic Syndrome as a Risk Factor for Chronic Kidney Disease: More than a Fat Chance?
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2773 - 2774.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
F. A. El-Atat, S. N. Stas, S. I. McFarlane, and J. R. Sowers
The Relationship between Hyperinsulinemia, Hypertension and Progressive Renal Disease
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 2816 - 2827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. A. Sayeed, H. Mahtab, P. A. Khanam, K. A. Ahsan, A. Banu, A.N.M. B. Rashid, and A.K. A. Khan
Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glycemia in the Tribes of Khagrachari Hill Tracts of Bangladesh
Diabetes Care, May 1, 2004; 27(5): 1054 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
J. T. Lane
Microalbuminuria as a marker of cardiovascular and renal risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a temporal perspective
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, March 1, 2004; 286(3): F442 - F450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. Chen, P. Muntner, L. L. Hamm, D. W. Jones, V. Batuman, V. Fonseca, P. K. Whelton, and J. He
The Metabolic Syndrome and Chronic Kidney Disease in U.S. Adults
Ann Intern Med, February 3, 2004; 140(3): 167 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
V. O. Shah, M. Scavini, C. A. Stidley, F. Tentori, T. K. Welty, J. W. MacCluer, A. S. Narva, A. Bobelu, C. P. Albert, D. S. Kessler, et al.
Epidemic of Diabetic and Nondiabetic Renal Disease among the Zuni Indians: The Zuni Kidney Project
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2003; 14(5): 1320 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. DiabetesHome page
N. R. Loon
Diabetic Kidney Disease: Preventing Dialysis and Transplantation
Clin. Diabetes, April 1, 2003; 21(2): 55 - 62.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoehner, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoehner, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by McClellan, W. M.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIB