MCP-1 Induces Inflammatory Activation of Human Tubular Epithelial Cells: Involvement of the Transcription Factors, Nuclear Factor-B and Activating Protein-1
Christiane Viedt*,
Ralph Dechend,
Jianwei Fei*,
Gertrud M. Hänsch,
Jörg Kreuzer* and
Stephan R. Orth
*Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany; Franz Volhard Clinic at the Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Medical Faculty of the Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany; Institute of Immunology, Ruperto Carola University, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital of Berne (Inselspital), Berne, Switzerland.
Correspondence to Dr. Stephan R. Orth, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Hospital of Berne (Inselspital), CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland. Phone: 0041-31-6322130; Fax: 0041-31-6329734; E-mail: stephan.orth{at}insel.ch
ABSTRACT. Monocyte chemoattractant protein1 (MCP-1) isa potent chemokine synthesized by several cell types, e.g.,inflammatory cells, such as monocytes, and resident renal cells,such as human tubular epithelial cells (TECs). Besides inductionof monocyte recruitment, MCP-1 has been suggested to inducenon-leukocytes to produce cytokines and adhesion molecules.Inflammation of the tubulointerstitium is a hallmark of manyrenal diseases and contributes to progression of renal failure;the purpose therefore of this study was to investigate the influenceof MCP-1 on markers of inflammatory activation in human TECs.MCP-1 stimulated interleukin-6 (IL-6) secretion and intercellularadhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) synthesis in a time- and dose-dependentmanner. In parallel, MCP-1 increased IL-6 and ICAM-1 mRNA expressionin human TECs. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin, GF109203X,BAPTA-AM, and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate inhibited MCP-1dependentIL-6 and ICAM-1 synthesis, suggesting the involvement of Gi-proteins,protein kinase C, intracellular Ca2+, and nuclear factorB(NF-B) in MCP-1 signaling. Using electrophoretic gel mobilityshift assay, we observed that MCP-1 stimulated binding activityof NF-B. Binding activity of the activator protein-1 (AP-1),which has been implicated to regulate induction of the IL-6gene together with NF-B, was also stimulated by MCP-1. In thepresent experiments, NF-B and AP-1 were involved in the MCP-1mediatedinduction of IL-6, as demonstrated by cis element double-stranded(decoy) oligonucleotides (ODN). In contrast to IL-6 release,MCP-1induced ICAM-1 expression was predominantly dependenton NF-B activation. These results document for the first timethat MCP-1 induces an inflammatory response in human TECs. Thismay be an important new mechanism in the pathogenesis of tubulointerstitialinflammation.
Independently of the underlying renal disease, tubulointerstitialrenal damage correlates best with the loss of renal functionand the risk of progression to end-stage renal failure (1).Resident renal cells, such as tubular epithelial cells (TECs),might have an important role in the tubulointerstitial inflammatoryprocess observed in many renal diseases (2). Human TECs in vitroproduce large amounts of cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6] andtumor necrosis factor [TNF-]) (35), chemokines(IL-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 [MCP-1]) (6,7), andadhesion molecules (intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [ICAM-1],vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 [VCAM-1]) (8). Elevated levelsof cytokines and chemokines have been documented in both residentrenal cells and infiltrating inflammatory cells in various formsof glomerulonephritis and tubulointerstitial nephritis and havebeen suggested to contribute to progressive renal failure invivo (9). Thus, TECs may be involved in renal inflammatory processes.
The CC chemokine MCP-1 is secreted by mononuclear cells andvarious non-leukocytic cells, including endothelial cells, vascularsmooth muscle cells (VSMC), and resident renal cells, such asmesangial cells and TECs (6,7,10,11). Recent studies revealedthat MCP-1 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of progressiveglomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions in different animalmodels of renal damage and human renal diseases (9).
To date, besides induction of monocyte recruitment in glomerularand tubulointerstitial inflammation, CC chemokines have notbeen shown to activate resident renal cells. The latter mayindeed occur, because MCP-1 is able to activate non-leukocytes,i.e., VSMC (12). Therefore, the current study was designed toexamine whether MCP1 has a proinflammatory effect on human TECsand, if so, to define the mechanisms involved.
The present data demonstrate that MCP-1 induces an inflammatoryresponse in human TECs via activation of the transcription factors,NF-B and AP-1, by inducing expression of the proinflammatorycytokine, IL-6, and the adhesion molecule, ICAM-1.
Materials
Human recombinant MCP-1, IL-8, and RANTES, as well as monoclonalantiMCP-1, anti-CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1), anti-CCR2,anti-CCR3, anti-CCR5, and antiIL-6 were purchased fromR&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Pertussis toxin (PTX), pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDTC), and BAPTA-AM were from Calbiochem (LaJolla, CA). GF109203X was from Biomol (Hamburg, Germany). Phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride (PMSF), NP-40, and insulin were from Sigma (Deisenhofen,Germany). 4-(2-aminoethyl)-benzenesulfonyl fluoride (Pefabloc)and E-64 were purchased from Roche (Mannheim, Germany). Anti-cytokeratinand antiICAM-1 (CD54:FITC) were from Serotec (Biozol,Eching, Germany). IgG1 (IgG1:FITC) was from Becton Dickinson(Heidelberg, Germany). Polyclonal antibodies to c-Jun, c-Fos,I-B, and NF-B proteins (i.e., p65, p50) were purchased fromSanta Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). NF-B and AP-1 oligonucleotideswere obtained from MWG (Ebersberg, Germany). Cell culture mediaand supplements were from Life Technologies SRL (Karlsruhe,Germany).
Human Tubular Epithelial Cell (TEC) Culture
Human TECs were isolated as described previously in detail (13).Cells were grown in DMEM with heat-inactivated fetal calf serum(FCS) (10%), 1% L-glutamine, penicillin (100 U/ml)/streptomycin(100 µg/mL), 1% vitamin mix, and 0.1% insulin (= standardgrowth medium). TECs were identified by: (1) characteristicpolygonal, typical cobblestone morphology; (2) positive stainingwith antibodies to aminopeptidase M and angiotensinase A (14)and to CD10 (15); (3) immunofluorescence staining for cytokeratin.The cultures were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphereof 5% CO2. Cells were grown as subconfluent monolayers and usedin passages 4 to 5. Before the experiments, the cells were washedwith phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and grown in serum-freemedium (2% Ultroser as serum substitute in DMEM) for 24 h torender TECs quiescent.
To determine the direction of IL-6 secretion, i.e., whetherit is secreted mainly to the apical or the basolateral compartment,TECs were seeded into cell culture inserts (Falcon, Heidelberg,Germany) with 0.4-µM pores (1.6 x 106 pores/cm2) and keptfor 24 h in standard growth medium to form confluent monolayers.Thereafter, the media of both compartments were changed to serum-freemedium containing MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) in either the apical or thebasolateral bathing. Because MCP-1 is a small peptide (8 kD),it may leak across the cell culture monolayer. Thirty minutesafter stimulation, the medium of both compartments was thereforereplaced by fresh serum-free medium to minimize potential leakage.Supernatants of the apical and the basolateral compartment werecollected separately after 48 h, and cytokine content was determinedby enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (vide infra). Valuesare corrected for differences in medium volume of the respectivecompartments.
Human Monocyte Culture
Monocytes were isolated from human blood samples using Ficoll-Paquefollowed by adhesion separation in RPMI-1640 with 10% FCS overnight. The adherent monocytes were incubated in RPMI-1640 (withoutFCS) in the presence or absence of MCP-1 for 24 h.
Determination of IL-6 Release
Cells were seeded in standard growth medium at a concentrationof 1 x 105 cells/well in 24-well plates for 24 h. Thereafter,cells were kept in serum-free medium for further 24 h. Afterstimulation, IL-6 was determined in cell culture supernatantsby ELISA (Quantikine Immunoassay, R&D Systems) accordingto the manufacturers instructions.
Determination of MCP-1 Release
TECs were grown in 24-well plates to confluency and kept inserum-free medium for 24 h. Thereafter, cells were kept in serum-freemedium for further 24, 48, or 72 h, respectively. MCP-1 wasdetermined in cell culture supernatants by ELISA (QuantikineImmunoassay) according to the manufacturers instructions.
Flow Cytometry Analyses
For flow cytometry, TECs were cultured in six-well plates andstimulated with MCP-1 in either the presence or absence of inhibitors.After stimulation, TECs were washed with PBS at 4°C andthen detached with trypsin/EDTA. Trypsinization was stoppedby the addition of PBS containing 1% NaN3 and 10% FCS. Thereafter,cells were centrifuged and incubated for 10 min at 4°C inPBS containing 1% NaN3 and 1% goat serum. Cells were washedagain with PBS/1% NaN3 and incubated with FITC-conjugated mouseanti-ICAM-1 (CD54), anti-CCR2 or IgG1 (isotype control), respectively(30 min at 4°C). Then, cells were washed with PBS/1% NaN3and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Flow cytometry analyses wereperformed with FACScan (10,000 cells per sample) (Becton-Dickinson,Mountain View, CA). After correction for nonspecific binding(isotype control), specific mean fluorescence intensity wasmeasured.
RNA-Isolation and Reverse TranscriptasePCR
Total RNA from TECs was extracted by Chomczynskis method,using TRIZOL (Life Technologies SRL). After isolation, the integrityof RNA samples was checked by gel electrophoresis in 1% agarosegel stained with ethidium bromide. Specific cDNA was reversetranscribed from 1 µg RNA in 20 µl of reaction mixturecontaining 2.5 mmol/L dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP, 100 pmol/Lrandom hexamers, and 20 U of MMLV (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).Incubation was carried out at 37°C for 60 min. An aliquotof cDNA was disolved in 40 µl of the reaction mixturecontaining 10 x PCR buffer (final Mg2+ concentration, 1.5 mmol/L),2.5 mmol/L dATP, dTTP, dCTP, and dGTP, 10 pmol/L upstream anddownstream primers (IL-6: 5'-ATGAACTCCTTCTCCACAAGCGC-3' and5'-GAAGAGCCCTCAGGCTGGACTG-3'; ICAM-1: R&D Systems [see manufacturersinformation]; GAPDH: 5'-CCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGCA-3' and 5'-TGCTAAGCAGTTGGTGGTGCAGGAG-3')and 1 U Taq polymerase (Roche). The amplification profile consistedof an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min followed bydenaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C for30 s and extension at 72°C for 60 s. For semiquantitativeanalyses, the linearity of amplification of IL-6, ICAM-1, andGAPDH cDNA depending on cycle number was established in pilotexperiments. It was 28 cycles for IL-6, 30 for ICAM-1, and 30for GAPDH. Amplification products were electrophoretically separatedin agarose gel (containing ethidium bromide) and quantifiedby use of a densitometer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, München,Germany). GAPDH was used as an internal standard. The IL-6 signalwas normalized by comparison with the GAPDH signal from thesame sample, and values expressed as x-fold change comparedwith unstimulated controls (1.0).
CCR2 RT-PCR
Total RNA from TECs and monocytes was extracted, and specificcDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 µg of RNA as describedby Denger et al. (16). Primers were synthesized according topublished sequences (17). PCR products were analyzed by gelelectrophoresis, and PCR products were cloned and sequencedby MWG (Ebersberg, Germany).
Biotinylated MCP-1 Binding Studies
Binding of MCP-1 to human TECs was measured using Fluorokinekits (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturersinstructions. Briefly, cells were grown to subconfluence andthen depleted of serum for 24 h. Cells were harvested with trypsin/EDTA,washed thrice, and resuspended in PBS. Biotinylated MCP-1 ornegative control protein was incubated at 4°C with 1 x 105cells, and binding was detected by using avidin-FITC. Cellswere washed and analyzed by flow cytometry on a FACScan. Thespecificity of MCP-1 binding was tested either by preincubatingthe biotinylated MCP-1 with anti-human MCP-1 antibody for 15min at 37°C or by the addition of 100-fold excess of nonbiotinylatedMCP-1.
NF-B and AP-1 Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) Preparation of Nuclear Extracts
For EMSA, nuclear protein extracts were prepared according tothe method of Schreiber et al. (18), with minor modifications.After MCP-1 stimulation, 2 x 10-6 cells were washed twice withPBS (4°C) and scraped into 400 µl of hypotonic buffer(10 mmol/L Hepes, pH 7.9, 10 mmol/L KCl, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 0.1mmol/L EGTA, 2 mmol/L dithiothreitol [DTT]) supplemented withproteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (5 µg/ml E-64, 1mmol/L NaF, 0.2 mmol/L Na3VO4, 0.5 mg/ml Pefabloc), incubatedfor 15 min on ice; thereafter, 25 µl of 10% NP-40 wasadded and the tubes were vigorously vortexed for 10 s. The nucleiwere recovered by centrifugation (14,000 rpm; 1 min; 4°C).The nuclear pellets were resuspended in 50 µl of coldbuffer C (20 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 0.4 mol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/LEDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 2 mmol/L DTT supplemented with 5 µg/mlE-64, 1 mmol/L NaF, 0.2 mmol/L Na3VO4, 0.5 mg/ml Pefabloc),and the tubes were vortexed for 15 min at 4°C. After centrifugation(14,000 rpm; 5 min; 4°C), the supernatants containing nuclearprotein were collected and stored at -80°C until used.
AP-1 Gel Mobility Shift Assay
Nuclear extracts (2 µg each) were incubated with labeledoligonucleotide probes and 2 µg of poly(deoxyinosine-deoxycytidine)-poly(deoxyinosine-deoxycytidine)in 20 µl of binding buffer (60 mmol/L HEPES, pH 7.9, 50%glycerol, 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 300 mmol/L KCl, 5 mmol/LEDTA, 100 µg/ml BSA, 2.5 mg/ml Pefabloc, 25 µg/mLE-64, 5 mmol/L NaF, 1 mmol/L Na3VO3, 5 mmol/L DTT for 5 minat RT). The sequence of the double-stranded oligonucleotideused was as follows: consensus AP-1, 5'-CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA-3'.The oligonucleotides were labeled with [32P]-ATP by using T4polynucleotide kinase. Binding reactions were resolved on a4% native polyacrylamide gel containing 1 x TAE buffer (25 mmol/LTris, 25 mmol/L boric acid, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA). Gels were runat 150 V in a cold room (4°C) for 2 to 3 h, dried, and exposedto x-ray film for 12 to 24 h. In addition, a supershift assayfor AP-1 was carried out using rabbit polyclonal antibodiesagainst c-Jun and c-Fos. The specific antibodies were incubatedwith samples after the initial binding reaction between nuclearprotein extracts and 32P-labeled consensus oligonucleotide (1h at RT).
NF-B Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Protein extracts from TECs were prepared as follows. After MCP-1stimulation, 2 x 106 cells were washed twice with PBS (4°C),scraped off the tissue culture dish, and sedimented by centrifugation.The cell pellet was lysed in lysis-buffer (20 mmol/L HEPES-KOH(pH 7.9), 0.35 mol/L NaCl, 20% glycerol, 1% NP-40, 1 mmol/LMgCl2, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, 0.5 mmol/L EGTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin,0.5 mmol/L DTT, 0.2 mmol/L PMSF) during an incubation for 30min on ice. After centrifugation, the supernatants containingthe protein fraction were collected and stored at -80°Cuntil used.
For electrophoretic mobility shift assay, protein extracts (10µg each) and labeled oligonucleotides (50,000 to 70,000cpm) were incubated for binding of active NF-B for 20 min atRT in a buffer containing 20 µg poly(deoxyinosine-deoxycytidine)-poly(deoxyinosine-deoxycytidine),8% Ficoll 400, 44 mmol/L HEPES-KOH (pH 7.9), 140 mmol/L KCl,4% glycerol, 0.05% NP-40, 0.1 mmol/L EDTA, 4.4 mmol/L DTT, and0.06 mmol/L PMSF. Immediately after binding, the protein/DNAcomplexes were separated from unbound oligonucleotides by electrophoresison a native 5% polyacrylamide gel in 1 x TAE buffer. Autoradiographywas performed with the dried gels. For testing of NF-B/DNA bindingspecificity, (1) antibodies against p65 or p50 subunits of NF-Bwere added to the proteins for supershift assay, and (2) a 20-foldmolar excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide was added to the bindingreaction, leading to a decrease in NF-Bbound radioactivityand 32P-labeled consensus oligonucleotide (1 h at RT).
Western Blot Analyses for I-B
Quiescent TECs were stimulated with MCP-1. After stimulation,cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS (4°C), lysed withlysis buffer (4°C; 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/LNaCl, 1 mmol/L EDTA, 1 mmol/L EGTA, 1% Triton, 2.5 mmol/L sodiumpyrophosphate, 1 mmol/L Na3VO4, 1 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mmol/LPMSF), scraped off the dish, sonicated, and centrifuged (13,000rpm; 4°C; 10 min). Protein concentrations were determinedby using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit from Pierce(Rockford, IL), according to the manufacturers protocol.The TEC lysates (10 µg per lane) were separated by 10%sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresisand transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher &Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The membranes were blocked (RT; 1h; TBST: 20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mmol/L NaCl, and 0.05%Tween 20, 5% BSA) and then incubated with primary antibodies(rabbit anti-I-B; 1 h; RT) followed by incubation with the appropriatesecondary peroxidase-conjugated antibodies (1 h; RT). The proteinswere detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence detectionsystem (ECL; Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to themanufacturers instructions. Exposures were recorded onHyperfilm (Amersham, UK) for different time points.
Decoy Oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) Technique
NF-B decoy, AP-1 decoy, and mutated controls used were double-strandedphosphorothioate-oligonucleotides. Their sequences were as follows:NF-B consensus sequence (5'-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3'), mutatedcontrol (5'-AGTTGAGGCGACTTTCCCAGGC-3'), AP-1 consensus sequence(5'-CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA-3'),and mutated control (5'-CGCTTGATGACTTGGCCGGAA-3'). Double-stranded(ds) ODN were prepared from complementary single-stranded phosphorothioate-bondedoligonucleotides, by melting at 95°C for 5 min followedby 3- to 4-h reconstitution period at RT. TECs were preincubatedwith 10 µM ds ODN for 6 h. Thereafter, the oligonucleotide-containingmedium was removed, cells were washed twice with medium andthen incubated in fresh medium containing the stimuli for theindicated time.
Statistical Analyses
Multiple comparisons were evaluated with ANOVA, followed byFishers protected least significant difference method.Data are presented as mean ± SD, and P < 0.05 wasconsidered statistically significant.
Induction of IL-6 by MCP-1 in Human TECs
To determine the inflammatory capacity of MCP-1 and other chemokinesin tubulointerstitial disorders, we measured the IL-6 releaseof human TECs in the cell supernatant after stimulation withMCP-1, RANTES, or IL-8, respectively. Only stimulation withrecombinant MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) resulted in a time-dependent IL-6secretion that was significantly increased after 24 h (Figure 1A),peaking with a 3.8-fold increase over control cells after48 h. To investigate whether the effect of MCP-1 was dose-dependent,human TECs were exposed to increasing concentrations of MCP-1(0.01 to 100 ng/ml). After 48 h, the supernatants were collectedand IL-6 concentrations were assessed (Figure 1B). In contrastto 10 ng/ml MCP-1, 100 ng/ml MCP-1 induced only a slight furtherincrease. Therefore, cells in all subsequent experiments weretreated with 10 ng/ml MCP-1 for 48 h. Six experiments with cellsfrom different donors yielded similar results.
Figure 1. Monocyte chemoattractant protein1 (MCP-1) induces interleukin-6 (IL-6) secretion of human tubular epithelial cells (TECs). (A) TECs (105 cells/ml) were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml), RANTES, or IL-8, respectively. The supernatants were collected after the indicated periods of time and assayed for IL-6 concentration by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). IL-6 release is shown as mean ± SD from four independent experiments; *P < 0.05. (B) Dose effect of MCP-1 on IL-6 secretion into the supernatant. TECs (105 cells/ml) were exposed to increasing doses of MCP-1 (0.01 to 100 ng/ml) for 48 h. Values are mean ± SD (n = 6); *P < 0.05.
Human TECs were seeded into cell culture inserts to study thedirection of IL-6 release and to define which compartment wasresponsible for the stimulated production of IL-6. Under controlconditions after 48 h, TECs secreted IL-6 into both the apical(2.81 ± 0.56 ng/ml) and basolateral media (4.53 ±0.75 ng/ml). Forty-eight hours after apical stimulation withMCP-1, the basolateral IL-6 secretion increased more than theapical secretion, i.e. 20.34 ± 4.10 ng/ml versus 5.48± 0.81 ng/ml (P < 0.05). The secretion of IL-6 48h after basolateral stimulation with MCP-1 was only slightlylower (P = NS), again showing higher IL-6 secretion toward thebasolateral compartment (basolateral, 16.74 ± 4.49 ng/ml;apical, 4.52 ± 0.65 ng/ml; P < 0.05).
Spontaneous Release of MCP-1 by TECs
We had found that stimulation of human TECs with MCP-1 increasesIL-6 secretion into the supernatant; we therefore investigatedthe spontaneous release of MCP-1 by TECs into the supernatant.This addresses the question of whether TECs are able to producesufficient amounts of MCP-1 to activate themselves in an autocrinefashion. Table 1 shows that unstimulated TECs secreted significantamounts of MCP-1 into the supernatant.
Table 1. Spontaneous release of monocyte chemoattractant protein1 by five different human tubular epithelial cell culture lines into the supernatanta
Induction of ICAM-1 by MCP-1 on Human TECs
To investigate the effect of MCP-1 on the expression of ICAM-1,human TECs were treated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) and surface expressionof ICAM-1 was measured by flow cytometry. A 4.3-fold increaseabove the constitutive expression of ICAM-1 was observed 24h after stimulation with MCP-1. Figure 2A shows that a detectableincrease of cell surface ICAM-1 was first seen within 6 h ofstimulation, peaking at 24 h and decreasing thereafter. Thisupregulation was dose-dependent, with increasing expressionat concentrations above 0.1 ng/ml (Figure 2B). All further experimentswere conducted using stimulation with 10 ng/ml MCP-1 for 24h. As for the release of IL-6, we also investigated the effectof other chemokines (RANTES, IL-8) on ICAM-1 expression. RANTESand IL-8 had no effect on ICAM-1 expression (data not shown).
Figure 2. MCP-1 induces intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) expression by human TECs. (A) TECs were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml), and ICAM-1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry after the indicated periods of time. ICAM-1 expression is shown as mean ± SDfold change from six independent experiments compared with unstimulated controls (1.0); *P < 0.05. (B) Dose effect of MCP-1 on ICAM-1 synthesis. TECs were exposed to increasing doses of MCP-1 (0.01 to 100 ng/ml) for 24 h. Values are mean ± SDfold change compared with unstimulated controls (1.0) from six independent experiments; *P < 0.05.
To further determine the specificity of MCP-1-induced IL-6 andICAM-1 expression in human TECs, we performed inhibition experimentswith a neutralizing antiMCP-1 antibody. Stimulation ofTECs with MCP-1 plus antiMCP-1 (10 µg/ml) resultedin significantly reduced IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression. An isotypecontrol antibody had no effect (Figure 3). To assess the contributionof raised IL-6 levels in the induction of ICAM-1 by MCP-1, anantiIL-6 neutralizing antibody (10 µg/ml) was used.As shown in Figure 3B, the antiIL-6 antibody had no effecton MCP-1induced expression of ICAM-1, indicating thatIL-6 is not involved in mediating MCP-1induced ICAM-1expression.
Figure 3. IL-6 release and ICAM-1 expression by human TECs is MCP-1-dependent. (A) TECs were exposed to MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) and neutralizing MCP-1 antibody or control IgG (10 µg/ml each). IL-6 release was determined by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 4); *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1. (B) TECs were exposed to MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) and neutralizing MCP-1 antibody, IL-6 antibody, or control IgG (10 µg/ml each). ICAM-1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry after 24 h. Values are mean ± SDfold change compared with unstimulated controls (n = 4); *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1.
Parallel with the increase in IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression, MCP-1induced a time-dependent induction of IL-6 and ICAM-1 mRNAs,suggesting regulation of these molecules at the pretranslationallevel. The increase in IL-6 mRNA was maximal 2 h after stimulationwith MCP-1, i.e., a 6.2-fold increase (n = 3; P < 0.05) comparedwith control conditions (Figure 4A). Figure 4B demonstratesthat MCP-1 induced a progressive increase in ICAM-1 mRNA transcriptlevels in human TECs. The maximal increase was detected 3 hafter stimulation, i.e., a 2.9-fold increase (n = 3; P <0.05) compared with control conditions, whereas the constitutivelyexpressed GAPDH gene was not upregulated (Figure 4). ActinomycinD (5 µg/mL) completely blocked the increase in MCP-1-stimulatedIL-6 and ICAM-1 mRNA, suggesting that the expression of IL-6and ICAM-1 is dependent on transcriptional regulation (datanot shown).
Figure 4. MCP-1 increases mRNA for IL-6 and ICAM-1 in human TECs. Cells were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated time periods. Total RNA was isolated from cultured TECs, reverse transcribed, and PCR for IL-6, ICAM-1, and GAPDH were performed. Representative ethidium bromidestained agarose gels of the RT-PCR products for IL-6 mRNA (A, top panel), ICAM-1 (B, top panel), and GAPDH (A and B, bottom panels) are shown. Results are representative for three independent experiments with cells from different donors.
Expression of CCR2
To investigate the expression of the MCP-1 receptor CCR2 onhuman TECs, we performed RT-PCR to amplify RNA isolated fromTECs and blood monocytes using specific primers for CCR2. ThePCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Asshown in Figure 5A, CCR2 mRNA was expressed in monocytes (lane3), whereas no band was seen in human TECs (lane 2). The CCR2sequence of monocytes was verified by sequencing of the PCRproduct (data not shown). To investigate whether human TECspossess the other known CC chemokine receptors, RT-PCR was alsoperformed with primers specific to CCR1, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5.No signals were seen with any of these primers (data not shown).
Figure 5. Analyses of MCP-1 receptor in TECs. (A) RT-PCR was performed using reverse-transcribed cDNA isolated from human TECs (lane 2) and monocytes (lane 3, as positive control). Using specific primers for CC chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2), PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Results are representative for three independent experiments with cells from different donors. (B) Flow cytometry analyses for the CCR2 receptor on TECs and monocytes; a, IgG control; b, CCR2 antibody; c, IgG control; d, CCR2 antibody. Results are representative for three independent experiments with cells from different donors.
To investigate whether CCR2 is detectable on the TEC surface,we performed flow cytometry analyses. In contrast to freshlyisolated human blood monocytes, human TECs showed no expressionof CCR2 on their surface (Figure 5B).
An additional experiment was performed to exclude that MCP-1inducedIL-6 secretion from human TECs is mediated via the CCR2 receptor.As shown in Figure 6A, MCP-1dependent IL-6 release fromTECs was not inhibited by preincubation with the CCR2 antibody(20 µg/mL; 15 min). To further exclude that IL-6 releasedepends on MCP-1binding to the CCR1, CCR3, or CCR5, respectively,we also performed preincubation experiments using specific antibodiesagainst these CC chemokine receptors. Again, none of these antibodiesblocked the effect of MCP-1 on IL-6 release from human TECs.In contrast, preincubation with the CCR2 antibody inhibitedIL-6release from human monocytes. As in TECs, the antibodiesagainst CCR1, CCR3, or CCR5 had no effect on MCP-1inducedIL-6 release from monocytes (Figure 6B).
Figure 6. IL-6 release by human TECs is independent of CCR2. (A) TECs were preincubated with CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, or CCR5 antibody (20 µg/mL; 15 min), respectively. Therafter, cells were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/mL) for 48 h. (B) Human monocytes were preincubated with CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, or CCR5 antibody (20 µg/mL, 15 min), respectively. Therafter, cells were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/mL) for 24 h. IL-6 release was determined by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 4); *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1.
MCP-1 Binds to Human TECs
To determine MCP-1 binding to human TECs, cells were incubatedwith biotinylated MCP-1. MCP-1 bound to TECs, shown as a rightwardshift in the fluorescence peak compared with the negative control(Figure 7). Binding was completely blocked by preincubationof the biotinylated MCP-1 with anti-MCP-1 neutralizing antibodyor by competition with 100-fold excess of nonbiotinylated MCP-1.
Figure 7. Flow cytometric analyses of MCP-1 binding to human TECs. Cells were incubated at 4°C with MCP-1biotin or a biotinylated control protein, followed by avidin-FITC. Washed cells were analyzed by flow cytometry in which accumulated events were gated against the biotinylated negative control. Binding was displaced by preincubation with antiMCP-1 antibody or coincubation with nonbiotinylated MCP-1. Results are representative for three independent experiments with cells from different donors.
Mechanisms of MCP-1-Induced IL-6 Secretion and ICAM-1 Expression
To investigate the signal transduction pathways leading to MCP-1mediatedIL-6 secretion and ICAM-1 expression, cells were preincubatedwith specific inhibitors. As shown in Figure 8, pretreatmentwith the Gi-protein inhibitor pertussis toxin (PTX; 100 ng/ml;16 h) inhibited IL-6 and ICAM-1 synthesis without affectingbasal levels. MCP-1induced IL-6 and ICAM-1 synthesiswas also inhibited by pretreatment with GF109203X (2 x 10-6mol/L; 60 min), a specific protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor.Incubation of human TECs in a calcium-free buffer containingEGTA (4 mmol/L) to chelate extracellular calcium (Ca 2+e) didnot inhibit the synthesis of IL-6 or ICAM-1 in response to MCP-1.In contrast, the addition of BAPTA-AM (10 µmol/L) to chelateintracellular calcium (Ca2+i) completely blocked the releaseof IL-6 and the expression of ICAM-1. Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate(PDTC; 10 µmol/L; 2 h), a pharmacologic inhibitor of theIL-6 transcription regulator NF-B, also markedly reduced MCP-1dependentIL-6 synthesis and ICAM-1 synthesis (Figure 8).
Figure 8. MCP-1induced IL-6 release and ICAM-1 expression involves Gi-proteins, protein kinase C (PKC), Ca2+, and nuclear factorB (NF-B). TECs were preincubated with pertussis toxin (PTX; 100 ng/ml; 16 h), GF109203X (2 x 10-6 mol/L; 60 min), EGTA (4 mmol/L), BAPTA-AM (10 µmol/L), or PDTC (20 µmol/L; 2 h) respectively, followed by stimulation with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml). (A) The supernatants were collected after 48 h and assayed for IL-6 concentration by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 6); *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1. (B) ICAM-1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry after 24 h. Values are mean ± SDfold change compared with unstimulated controls (1.0) from 6 independent experiments; *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1.
MCP-1 Activates Transcription Factors, NF-B and AP-1
NF-B and AP-1, which are both known to be activated by inflammatorymediators, are important transcriptional regulators of IL-6and ICAM-1 (1921). Therefore, the effects of MCP-1 onNF-B and AP-1 as downstream effectors were examined. EMSA resultsfor NF-B from lysates of MCP-1treated cells are shownin Figure 9A. The maximal NF-B activation was found 1 h afterstimulation. The specificity of the shifted bands was ascertainedin two ways. First, excess unlabeled oligonucleotides reducedthe signal intensity of the band associated with active NF-B.Second, addition of antibodies against the p65 or the p50 subunitof NF-B resulted in a shift of the binding complex (Figure 9B).
Figure 9. Effect of MCP-1 on the DNA-binding activity of NF-B and activator protein-1 (AP-1). (A) TECs were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated periods of time, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) for NF-B was performed as described in Materials and Methods. (B) Supershift experiments with antibodies against the subunits of NF-B. EMSA for NF-B after treatment of TECs with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for 1 h was performed. Cellular extracts were incubated with labeled oligonucleotides and polyclonal antibodies against the p65 and p50 subunit of NF-B as described in Materials and Methods. Competition of MCP-1 induced NF-B binding activity with a 20-fold excess of unlabeled consensus NF-B oligonucleotides demonstrates specificity of MCP-1induced DNA binding complexes (lane 2). (C) TECs were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated periods of time, and EMSA for AP-1 was performed as described in Materials and Methods. Competition of MCP-1 induced AP-1 binding activity with a 20-fold excess of unlabeled consensus AP-1 or NF-B oligonucleotides demonstrates specificity of MCP-1induced DNA binding complexes (lanes 8 and 9). (D) Supershift experiments with antibodies against subunits of AP-1. EMSA for AP-1 after treatment of TECs with MCP-1 for 2 h was performed. Cellular extracts were incubated with labeled oligonucleotides, and polyclonal antibodies against c-Jun and c-Fos as described in Materials and Methods. Representative autoradiograms of three independent experiments are shown.
Accordingly, MCP-1induced DNA-binding activity of AP-1was investigated and found to be increased 30 min after stimulation,with a peak activation at 1 and 2 h (Figure 9C). Binding wasdetermined to be specific as excess of unlabeled AP-1 consensussequence reduced the signal, whereas excess of unlabeled NF-Bdid not. Addition of antibodies specific for c-Jun and c-Fosto the AP-1 binding reaction resulted in a shift of the bindingcomplex and identified c-Jun as the prevailing protein in theAP-1 complex (Figure 9D).
Degradation of Cytoplasmic I-B
To further understand the mechanism of NF-B activation in TECsstimulated with MCP-1, the levels of I-B was determined withWestern blot of cytoplasmic extracts (Figure 10). Stimulationof cells with MCP-1 led to a transient decrease of I-B within1 h, which recovered after 2 h.
Figure 10. Expression of I-B in TECs stimulated by MCP-1. TECs were stimulated with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated time periods, and cytoplasmic I-B levels were assayed by Western blot. A representative Western blot of three independent experiments is shown.
Significance of NF-B and AP-1 Activation for MCP-1Induced IL-6 Synthesis
The role of NF-B and AP-1 in MCP-1mediated IL-6 generegulation was further elucidated by the use of cis elementdouble-stranded (decoy) oligonucleotides (ODN) that scavengeactive transcription factors, thereby blocking their bindingto the promoter regions in target genes. Gel mobility shiftconfirmed that decoy ODN against NF-B or AP-1 binding sitesspecifically competed, whereas control decoy ODN did not (Figure 11).Pretreatment with NF-B decoy ODN (10 µmol/L; 6 h),but not control decoy ODN, reduced IL-6 synthesis (67%; P <0.05) in cells stimulated with MCP-1. Treatment with AP-1 decoyODN (10 µmol/L, 6 h) also inhibited IL-6 stimulation (35%;P < 0.05), but to a lesser extent than NF-B decoy ODN (Figure 12A).
Figure 11. NF-B and AP-1 decoy ODN technique. (A) Human TECs were preincubated with NF-B decoy ODN (10 µM) or control decoy ODN (10 µM) for 6 h, followed by stimulation with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for 1 h. EMSA for NF-B was performed. (B) TECs were preincubated with AP-1 decoy ODN (10 µM) or control decoy ODN (10 µM) for 6 h, followed by stimulation with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml) for 2 h. EMSA for AP-1 was performed. Representative autoradiograms of three independent experiments are shown.
Figure 12. Transcription factordependent IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression of human TECs. Human TECs were preincubated with NF-B decoy ODN (10 µM), NF-B control decoy ODN (10 µM), AP-1 decoy ODN (10 µM), or AP-1 control decoy ODN (10 µM), respectively, for 6 h, followed by stimulation with MCP-1 (10 ng/ml). (A) The medium was collected after 48 h and assayed for IL-6 concentration by ELISA. Values are mean ± SD (n = 5); *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1. (B) ICAM-1 expression was assessed by flow cytometry after 24 h. Values are mean ± SDfold change compared with unstimulated controls (1.0) from six independent experiments; *P < 0.05 compared with unstimulated controls or **P < 0.05 compared with MCP-1.
Significance of NF-B and AP-1 Activation for MCP-1-Induced ICAM-1 Expression
Then, we determined the significance of NF-B and AP-1 activationfor MCP-1mediated ICAM-1 expression. Pretreatment withNF-B decoy ODN (10 µmol/L; 6 h), but not control decoyODN, specifically inhibited ICAM-1 expression in response toMCP-1. In contrast, treatment with AP-1 decoy ODN (10 µmol/L;6 h) had no significant effect on ICAM-1 expression (Figure 12B).
In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that MCP-1activates human TECs, leading to a time- and dose-dependentincrease in IL-6 secretion and ICAM-1 expression via Gi-protein-,PKC-, and intracellular Ca2+-dependent mechanisms. MCP-1 activates(1) NF-B, a transcription factor commonly involved in inflammatoryand immune responses, and (2) AP-1, a transcription factor involvedin inflammatory and growth responses. This suggests that inaddition to acting as a chemoattractant, MCP-1 may further increasethe inflammatory response by inducing cytokine and adhesionmolecule expression in human TECs.
The CC chemokine MCP-1 appears to play a predominant role inthe pathogenesis of renal diseases. Wada et al. (22) demonstratedthat the expression of MCP-1 is upregulated in TECs, endothelialcells, and mononuclear cell infiltrates in human diabetic nephropathy.In addition, urinary MCP-1 levels are significantly elevatedin patients with nephrotic proteinuria due to diabetic nephropathywith advanced tubulointerstitial lesions (22). Renal proximalTECs have been reported to produce MCP-1 in response to cytokines(7,23) and urinary proteins (24). Thus TECs, in addition tomesangial cells and infiltrating mononuclear cells (25), mightcontribute to the increased urinary excretion of MCP-1. UrinaryMCP-1 levels reflect the disease activity of lupus nephritis(26) and correlate with the extent of proteinuria and the numberof glomerular macrophages in various glomerular diseases inhumans (27). Glomerular expression of MCP-1 has been documentedin experimental and human glomerulopathies (28,29). Administrationof antibodies to MCP-1 decreases the extent of proteinuria,reduces glomerulosclerosis, and improves renal dysfunction inexperimental crescentic glomerulonephritis (30). Furthermore,MCP-1 plays a role in hypertensive renal damage in the two-kidneyone-clip rat model (31), which is possibly mediated by angiotensinII (32). Interestingly, MCP-1deficient mice comparedwith wild-type mice exhibit no differences in glomerular lesionsin nephrotic serum-induced nephritis, but exhibit less tubulointerstitiallesions (33). These reports support an important role of locallyproduced MCP-1 on the initiation and progression of renal damage,particularly tubulointerstitial damage.
However, besides induction of monocyte recruitment, no studydemonstrated that MCP-1 directly induces proinflammatory responsesin resident renal cells such as TECs.
Tubulointerstitial inflammation, often followed by fibrosis,has been proposed as a final common pathway for progressiverenal injury in most renal diseases. There is a strict correlationbetween tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, the extent ofinterstitial infiltrates, and renal dysfunction (1). TECs, onceconsidered passive bystanders in the disease process, have beenshown to be actively involved being a rich source of cytokines,chemokines, and others inflammatory mediators (3,7,9,22,23).For the following reasons, we investigated the pro-inflammatorycytokine IL-6 and the adhesion molecule ICAM-1 as relevant markersof inflammatory activation in human TECs. Within the kidney,elevated levels of IL-6 have been demonstrated in both residentand infiltrating cells in various forms of glomerulonephritisand tubulointerstitial nephritis. IL-6 has been suggested tocontribute to the pathogenesis and progression of renal diseases(4,34). The degree of mesangial hyperproliferation, tubularatrophy, and the intensity of interstitial infiltrates correlateto the renal expression of IL-6 (35,36). Furthermore, urinaryIL-6 excretion correlates to disease progression and increaseswith the degree of tubular dysfunction (37). De novo expressionof the adhesion molecule ICAM-1 by TECs and increased expressionby interstitial and glomerular cells has been observed in differentforms of glomerulonephritis, tubulointerstitial inflammation,and renal allograft rejection (8).
This study shows that MCP-1 was able to induce IL-6 releaseand the synthesis of ICAM-1 by human TECs. These effects werespecific for MCP-1 and could be induced by neither the CC chemokine,RANTES, nor the CXC chemokine, IL-8. Consistent with previousreports (6,7), unstimulated human TECs release significant amountsof MCP-1 into the supernatant. Stimulation of TECs with MCP-1from the apical and the basolateral compartment was equallyeffective in stimulating IL-6 secretion. Thus, both urinaryMCP-1 as well as MCP-1 generating from the tubulointerstitialcompartment may be able to activate TECs in vivo. TECs secretedapproximately fourfold higher amounts of IL-6 into the basolateralcompartment as compared with the apical compartment. This implicatesthat MCP-1induced IL-6 secretion into the tubulointerstitiummay be a player in the genesis of tubulointerstitial inflammationin vivo. IL-6 modulates the expression of ICAM-1 in other culturesystems (38); therefore, the role of IL-6 as a mediator of ICAM-1expression was examined. Although MCP-1 induced a significantincrease of IL-6 release into the culture medium, blockade ofthe effects of IL-6 by a monoclonal antibody did not modifythe increase of MCP-1induced ICAM-1 expression. Therefore,the stimulation of the expression of ICAM-1 by human TECs invitro does not depend on the autocrine secretion of IL-6. Furthermore,pharmacologic doses of recombinant IL-6 had no effect on theexpression of ICAM-1 by human TECs (data not shown).
The MCP-1 receptors belong to the family of heptahelical, pertussis-sensitiveG-proteincoupled receptors (39). The MCP-1 receptor onTECs appears to be coupled to Gi-protein activation, becausethe induction of IL-6 and ICAM-1 was inhibited by PTX. Thesefindings are in accordance with our observations in VSMC (Viedtet al., unpublished observation) and the data of Myers et al.(39) and Schecter et al. (12). The latter have shown that signaltransduction of the human MCP-1 receptor could be blocked byPTX in VSMC and embryonic kidney cells transfected with theMCP-1 receptor, respectively. To investigate the role of PKCin MCP-1induced upregulation of IL-6 and ICAM-1, we preincubatedTECs with the PKC antagonist, G109203X, which resulted in inhibitionof MCP-1induced IL-6 secretion and ICAM-1 expression.MCP-1 has been shown to mobilize Ca2+ in a number of studies(12,16,39). Schecter et al. (12) demonstrated that the inductionof tissue factor by MCP-1 in human VSMC required intracellularCa2+ (Ca2+i) mobilization and that it was PKC-dependent. Similarly,the present study demonstrates that MCP-1induced IL-6and ICAM-1 expression is Ca2+i-dependent. Therefore, althoughcurrently unproven, it is likely that MCP-1 signaling is mediatedby the classical PKC subgroups , , or .
Due to our above observations, we anticipated that culturedhuman TECs possess a functionally coupled MCP-1 receptor. Todate, expression of CCR15 mRNA transcripts in renal tissueof humans and experimental animals were detected only in infiltratingmononuclear cells (9,40,41). Two MCP-1 receptors, generatedby alternative splicing and designated as CCR2A and CCR2B, havebeen cloned in human monocytes (17). On the basis of our PCRstudies, the MCP-1 receptor on human TECs is distinct from thesetwo receptors. In addition, it is unlikely that the MCP-1 receptoron human TECs is generated by alternative splicing of the samegene, because no signal was seen on RNA blot analyses at moderatestringency washings using a random-primed probe encompassinga substantial part of the coding region (data not shown). AdditionalPCR studies employing primers from other cloned human CC chemokinereceptors also failed to produce a signal. These negative resultswere confirmed by using flow cytometry analyses for the detectionof the CCR2 on TECs. In contrast, the CCR2 could be detectedon monocytes using PCR and flow cytometry analyses, respectively.Preincubation with a specific CCR2 antibody inhibited MCP-1inducedexpression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 in monocytes, but not in TECs.Antibodies against CCR1, CCR3 and CCR5 failed to inhibit theeffects of MCP-1 in both monocytes and TECs. Therefore, we performedbinding studies for MCP-1. These studies clearly show that culturedhuman TECs express a MCP-1 binding protein on the cell surface.The data obtained after incubation of human TECs with biotinylatedMCP-1 in the presence of a neutralizing antibody against MCP-1or competition with 100-fold excess of nonbiotinylated MCP-1support the notion that the effects observed are specific forMCP-1. Since we were not able to characterize a classic receptorfor MCP-1 on TECs, but could prove binding of MCP-1, we investigatedwhether the effects of MCP-1 are mediated via an endosome-lysosomalpathway. The latter could be ruled out by the negative resultsof pharmacologic blockade of the endosome-lysosomal pathwayson MCP-1-induced IL-6 mRNA expression in TECs (data not shown).Taken together, our results implicate that it is likely thatthe MCP-1 receptor on human TECs is different from previouslycloned CC chemokine receptors. The nature of the MCP-1 receptor(s)on human TECs remains to be determined.
Previous studies focused on induction of MCP-1 by inflammatoryagents in renal diseases and TECs in vivo and in vitro (9).The present data provide evidence that MCP-1 itselfthroughproduction of IL-6 in response to NF-B and AP-1 activationactsas an inflammatory mediator for TECs. Several studies have shownthat NF-B plays an important role in renal damage (42). Ruiz-Ortegaet al. (43) found that activation of NF-B and MCP-1 in the renalcortex is reduced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitionin experimental immune complex nephritis. Renal damage in ratsharboring both human renin and angiotensinogen genes is accompaniedby the activation of NF-B and AP-1 in the kidney (44). Filteredalbumin is able to activate NF-B in the kidney in vivo (45)and TECs in vitro (24,46).
IL-6 and ICAM-1 syntheses are regulated at the transcriptionallevel. Previous reports indicated that the NF-B binding sitelocated between positions -72 and -63 on the IL-6 gene is importantfor the induction of IL-6 (20). AP-1 is another important transcriptionfactor that is involved in regulation of IL-6 transcription.AP-1 has a consensus binding sequence found in position -283to -277 in the IL-6 promoter (19). NF-B dimers do not promotegene transcription by themselves, but as a part of a complexof several coactivators (47). Moreover, NF-B interacts witha variety of other transcription factors in a positive or negativemanner. One of the factors most commonly involved in the activationof NF-B target genes is AP-1. Both NF-B and AP-1 are activatedin response to some proinflammatory stimuli, but they differin their response to oxidative stress (48).
We demonstrated in this study that MCP-1 (1) increased IL-6and ICAM-1 expression and (2) stimulated NF-B (mediated, atleast partially, by degradation of I-B) and AP-1 activation.Therefore, we reasoned that MCP-1 stimulates IL-6 gene expressionthrough the NF-B and AP-1 complexes. To prove this hypothesis,we employed the decoy approach against NF-B and AP-1 bindingsites, respectively. Gel mobility shift assay showed that decoyagainst NF-B or AP-1 binding sites specifically competed, whereascontrol decoy ODN did not. Next, we examined the functionalcoupling between NF-B and AP-1 activation and MCP-1inducedIL-6 synthesis. Our results show that NF-B, and to a lesserextent AP-1 decoy ODN, effectively inhibit IL-6 production inresponse to MCP-1. On the other hand, control decoy had no effect.This clearly shows that NF-B and AP-1 play an important rolein MCP-1induced IL-6 secretion. In contrast, MCP-1inducedICAM-1 expression was only dependent on NF-B activation, whereasAP-1 decoy activation had no significant effect. These datasuggest that, despite MCP-1induced AP-1 binding, AP-1activation is not required for MCP-1dependent inductionof ICAM-1 expression. These results are in agreement with areport from Papi and Johnston (49), which shows that rhinovirusinfection of airway epithelium results in AP-1 and NF-B activation.Despite activation of both transcription factors, only the NF-Bbinding site was required for rhinovirus-dependent ICAM-1 expression(49).
In conclusion, our data demonstrate that besides its chemotacticproperty, MCP-1 promotes proinflammatory responses in humanTECs. MCP-1 is able to directly upregulate the proinflammatorycytokine IL-6 and the adhesions molecule ICAM-1. The MCP-1inducedintracellular signaling mechanism involves Gi-protein, PKC,intracellular Ca2+, and classical inflammatory pathways, includingsequence-specific DNA binding of the nuclear factors, NF-B andAP-1. Thus, MCP-1 must be regarded as more than just a "chemokine,"but as a proinflammatory mediator inducing production of proinflammatorymolecules.
Acknowledgments
We thank Ms. Katharina Hanna for excellent technical assistance.
Bohle A, Müller GA, Wehrmann M, Mackensen-Haen S, Xiao JC: Pathogenesis of chronic renal failure in the primary glomerulopathies, renal vasculopathies, and chronic interstitial nephritides. Kidney Int Suppl 54: S2S9, 1996[Medline]
Remuzzi G, Bertani T: Pathophysiology of progressive nephropathies. N Engl J Med 339: 14481456, 1998[Free Full Text]
Boswell RN, Yard BA, Schrama E, van Es LA, Daha MR, van der Woude FJ: Interleukin 6 production by human proximal tubular epithelial cells in vitro: Analysis of the effects of interleukin-1 alpha (IL-1 alpha) and other cytokines. Nephrol Dial Transplant 9: 599606, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Leonard M, Ryan MP, Watson AJ, Schramek H, Healy E: Role of MAP kinase pathways in mediating IL-6 production in human primary mesangial and proximal tubular cells. Kidney Int 56: 13661377, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
Yard BA, Daha MR, Kooymans-Couthino M, Bruijn JA, Paape ME, Schrama E, van Es LA, van der Woude FJ: IL-1 alpha stimulated TNF alpha production by cultured human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney Int 42: 383389, 1992[Medline]
van Kooten C, van der Linde X, Woltman AM, van Es LA, Daha MR: Synergistic effect of interleukin-1 and CD40L on the activation of human renal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney Int 56: 4151, 1999[Medline]
Prodjosudjadi W, Gerritsma JS, Klar-Mohamad N, Gerritsen AF, Bruijn JA, Daha MR, van Es LA: Production and cytokine-mediated regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney Int 48: 14771486, 1995[Medline]
Brady HR: Leukocyte adhesion molecules and kidney diseases. Kidney Int 45: 12851300, 1994[Medline]
Segerer S, Nelson PJ, Schlöndorff D: Chemokines, chemokine receptors, and renal disease: From basic science to pathophysiologic and therapeutic studies. J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 152176, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Luster AD: Chemokineschemotactic cytokines that mediate inflammation. N Engl J Med 338: 436445, 1998[Free Full Text]
Egido J: Chemokines, chemokine receptors and renal disease. Kidney Int 56: 347348, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
Schecter AD, Rollins BJ, Zhang YJ, Charo IF, Fallon JT, Rossikhina M, Giesen PL, Nemerson Y, Taubman MB: Tissue factor is induced by monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in human aortic smooth muscle and THP-1 cells. J Biol Chem 272: 2856828573, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Viedt C, Bürger A, Hänsch GM: Fibronectin synthesis in tubular epithelial cells: Up-regulation of the EDA splice variant by transforming growth factor beta. Kidney Int 48: 18101817, 1995[Medline]
Scherberich JE, Wolf G, Albers C, Nowack A, Stuckhardt C, Schoeppe W: Glomerular and tubular membrane antigens reflecting cellular adaptation in human renal failure. Kidney Int Suppl 27: S38S51, 1989[Medline]
Platt JL, Grant BW, Eddy AA, Michael AF: Immune cell populations in cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity. J Exp Med 158: 12271242, 1983[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Denger S, Jahn L, Wende P, Watson L, Gerber SH, Kübler W, Kreuzer J: Expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 cDNA in vascular smooth muscle cells: Induction of the synthetic phenotype: a possible clue to SMC differentiation in the process of atherogenesis. Atherosclerosis 144: 1523, 1999[CrossRef][Medline]
Charo IF, Myers SJ, Herman A, Franci C, Connolly AJ, Coughlin SR: Molecular cloning and functional expression of two monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 receptors reveals alternative splicing of the carboxyl-terminal tails. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 27522756, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schreiber E, Matthias P, Müller MM, Schaffner W: Rapid detection of octamer binding proteins with mini-extracts, prepared from a small number of cells. Nucleic Acids Res 17: 6419. 1989[Free Full Text]
Vanden Berghe W, Vermeulen L, De Wilde G, De Bosscher K, Boone E, Haegeman G: Signal transduction by tumor necrosis factor and gene regulation of the inflammatory cytokine interleukin-6. Biochem Pharmacol 60: 11851195, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Shimizu H, Mitomo K, Watanabe T, Okamoto S, Yamamoto K: Involvement of a NF-kappa B-like transcription factor in the activation of the interleukin-6 gene by inflammatory lymphokines. Mol Cell Biol 10: 561568, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Stade BG, Messer G, Riethmüller G, Johnson JP: Structural characteristics of the 5' region of the human ICAM-1 gene. Immunobiology 182: 7987, 1990[Medline]
Wada T, Furuichi K, Sakai N, Iwata Y, Yoshimoto K, Shimizu M, Takeda SI, Takasawa K, Yoshimura M, Kida H, Kobayashi KI, Mukaida N, Naito T, Matsushima K, Yokoyama H: Up-regulation of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in tubulointerstitial lesions of human diabetic nephropathy. Kidney Int 58: 14921499, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerritsma JS, van Kooten C, Gerritsen AF, van Es LA, Daha MR: Transforming growth factor-beta 1 regulates chemokine and complement production by human proximal tubular epithelial cells. Kidney Int 53: 609616, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Wang Y, Rangan GK, Tay YC, Harris DC: Induction of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 by albumin is mediated by nuclear factor kappaB in proximal tubule cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 12041213, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Baggiolini M, Dewald B, Moser B: Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokinesCXC and CC chemokines. Adv Immunol 55: 97179, 1994[Medline]
Wada T, Yokoyama H, Su SB, Mukaida N, Iwano M, Dohi K, Takahashi Y, Sasaki T, Furuichi K, Segawa C, Hisada Y, Ohta S, Takasawa K, Kobayashi K, Matsushima K: Monitoring urinary levels of monocyte chemotactic and activating factor reflects disease activity of lupus nephritis. Kidney Int 49: 761767, 1996[Medline]
Rovin BH, Doe N, Tan LC: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 levels in patients with glomerular disease. Am J Kidney Dis 27: 640646, 1996[Medline]
Rovin BH, Rumancik M, Tan L, Dickerson J: Glomerular expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in experimental and human glomerulonephritis. Lab Invest 71: 536542, 1994[Medline]
Brown Z, Robson RL, Westwick J: Regulation and expression of chemokines: Potential role in glomerulonephritis. J Leukoc Biol 59: 7580, 1996[Abstract]
Wada T, Yokoyama H, Furuichi K, Kobayashi KI, Harada K, Naruto M, Su SB, Akiyama M, Mukaida N, Matsushima K: Intervention of crescentic glomerulonephritis by antibodies to monocyte chemotactic and activating factor (MCAF/MCP-1). Faseb J 10: 14181425, 1996[Abstract]
Hilgers KF, Hartner A, Porst M, Mai M, Wittmann M, Hugo C, Ganten D, Geiger H, Veelken R, Mann JF: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 and macrophage infiltration in hypertensive kidney injury. Kidney Int 58: 24082419, 2000[CrossRef][Medline]
Wolf G, Schneider A, Helmchen U, Stahl RA: AT1-receptor antagonists abolish glomerular MCP-1 expression in a model of mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis. Exp Nephrol 6: 112120, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Tesch GH, Schwarting A, Kinoshita K, Lan HY, Rollins BJ, Kelley VR: Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 promotes macrophage-mediated tubular injury, but not glomerular injury, in nephrotoxic serum nephritis. J Clin Invest 103: 7380, 1999[Medline]
Fukatsu A, Matsuo S, Tamai H, Sakamoto N, Matsuda T, Hirano T: Distribution of interleukin-6 in normal and diseased human kidney. Lab Invest 65: 6166, 1991[Medline]
Ranieri E, Gesualdo L, Petrarulo F, Schena FP: Urinary IL-6/EGF ratio: A useful prognostic marker for the progression of renal damage in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int 50: 19902001, 1996[Medline]
Ryffel B, Car BD, Gunn H, Roman D, Hiestand P, Mihatsch MJ: Interleukin-6 exacerbates glomerulonephritis in (NZB x NZW)F1 mice. Am J Pathol 144: 927937, 1994[Abstract]
Nakamura A, Suzuki T, Kohsaka T: Renal tubular function modulates urinary levels of interleukin-6. Nephron 70: 416420, 1995[Medline]
Bajaj P, Lawry J, Shenton G, Rees RC: Interleukin-6 and tumour necrosis factor alpha synergistically block S-phase cell cycle and upregulate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on MCF7 breast carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 71: 143149, 1993[CrossRef][Medline]
Myers SJ, Wong LM, Charo IF: Signal transduction and ligand specificity of the human monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 receptor in transfected embryonic kidney cells. J Biol Chem 270: 57865792, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Anders HJ, Vielhauer V, Kretzler M, Cohen CD, Segerer S, Luckow B, Weller L, Gröne HJ, Schlöndorff D: Chemokine and chemokine receptor expression during initiation and resolution of immune complex glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 919931, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Vielhauer V, Anders HJ, Mack M, Cihak J, Strutz F, Stangassinger M, Luckow B, Gröne HJ, Schlöndorff D: Obstructive nephropathy in the mouse: Progressive fibrosis correlates with tubulointerstitial chemokine expression and accumulation of CC chemokine receptor 2- and 5-positive leukocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 11731187, 2001[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Guijarro C, Egido J: Transcription factor-kappa B (NF- B) and renal disease. Kidney Int 59: 415424, 2001[CrossRef][Medline]
Ruiz-Ortega M, Bustos C, Hernandez-Presa MA, Lorenzo O, Plaza JJ, Egido J: Angiotensin II participates in mononuclear cell recruitment in experimental immune complex nephritis through nuclear factor-kappa B activation and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 synthesis. J Immunol 161: 430439, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Luft FC, Mervaala E, Müller DN, Gross V, Schmidt F, Park JK, Schmitz C, Lippoldt A, Breu V, Dechend R, Dragun D, Schneider W, Ganten D, Haller H: Hypertension-induced end-organ damage: A new transgenic approach to an old problem. Hypertension 33: 212218, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Donadelli R, Abbate M, Zanchi C, Corna D, Tomasoni S, Benigni A, Remuzzi G, Zoja C: Protein traffic activates NF-B gene signaling and promotes MCP-1-dependent interstitial inflammation. Am J Kidney Dis 36: 12261241, 2000[Medline]
Zoja C, Donadelli R, Colleoni S, Figliuzzi M, Bonazzola S, Morigi M, Remuzzi G: Protein overload stimulates RANTES production by proximal tubular cells depending on NF-kappa B activation. Kidney Int 53: 16081615, 1998[CrossRef][Medline]
Sheppard KA, Rose DW, Haque ZK, Kurokawa R, McInerney E, Westin S, Thanos D, Rosenfeld MG, Glass CK, Collins T: Transcriptional activation by NF-B requires multiple coactivators. Mol Cell Biol 19: 63676378, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Schenk H, Klein M, Erdbrugger W, Droge W, Schulze-Osthoff K: Distinct effects of thioredoxin and antioxidants on the activation of transcription factors NF-kappa B and AP-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 16721676, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Papi A, Johnston SL: Rhinovirus infection induces expression of its own receptor intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) via increased NF-B-mediated transcription. J Biol Chem 274: 97079720, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Received for publication August 23, 2001.
Accepted for publication March 1, 2002.