Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Hennepin County
Medical Center, and University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis,
Minnesota.
Correspondence to Dr. Venkateswara K. Rao, Hennepin County Medical Center, 701
Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55415. Phone: 612-347-5813; Fax: 612-347-7549;
E-mail:
raoxx007{at}tc.umn.edu
Atheroembolic renal disease (AERD), also called atheroembolism
(1),cholesterol embolism
(2,3),
cholesterol atheroembolic renaldisease
(4), or cholesterol crystal
embolization (5), oftenis an
underdiagnosed clinical illness. The kidney is usuallyinvolved because of
proximity of the renal arteries to abdominalaorta, wherein the erosion of
atheromatous plaque is most likelyto occur. Cholesterol embolism also can
occur in other visceralorgans, as well as in the upper and lower extremities.
Becausethe renal arteries have their origin from abdominal aorta andan
enormous amount of blood flows through the kidney, it becomesa prime target
in cholesterol crystal embolization.
AERD can be defined as renal failure secondary to the occlusionof renal
arteries, arterioles, and glomerular capillaries withatheromatous plaques
that are dislodged from the aorta and othermajor arteries. The release of
cholesterol plaques into thecirculation can occur spontaneously or after
intravascular traumawith angiographic catheters or after the use of
anticoagulantsand thrombolytic agents. Like the native kidneys, a
transplantedkidney also can be affected with cholesterol embolism
(6,7,8),
andit should be considered in the differential diagnosis of worseningrenal
allograft function. Furthermore, AERD should be distinguishedfrom other
embolic disorders, such as atrial fibrillation, leftatrial myxoma, and
bacterial endocarditis.
The exact incidence of AERD is not known. The clinical experienceis
limited to isolated case reports and clinicopathologic casediscussion
(9,10).
There have been no prospective studies thatfocused on this problem in a
systematic manner. From a historicalperspective, Panum
(11) first described this
entity in 1862.Subsequently, Flory
(12) published a series of
autopsy casesof atheroembolism in 1945. Thurlbeck and Castlemann
(13) reviewedtheir autopsy
cases and reported an incidence of 4% in elderlysubjects (age 65 yr and
older) who had minimal atherosclerosis.However, the incidence increased to
77% in older patients withsevere atherosclerosis. Most of these later
subjects had undergonesurgical repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. In a
biopsystudy, Jones and Iannaccone
(14) reported an incidence of
1.1%.Of the 755 renal biopsies reviewed in this study (all age groups),only
8 (1.1%) had features of AERD. Greenberg et al.
(15) reviewed500 renal
biopsies and detected AERD in 24 cases (1.6%). Prestonet al.
(16) reported an incidence of
4.25% in older patients(age 65 yr and older) who underwent a renal biopsy.
The lowincidence of AERD diagnosed on renal biopsy most likely is dueto a
selection bias. AERD was diagnosed as the primary causeof renal failure in
1.9% of our patients accepted for chronicdialysis between 1985 and 1990 and
2.7% between 1991 and 1995.It is conceivable that there may have been other
patients whohad chronic renal failure secondary to AERD and who were notin
need of dialysis and were not included.
The reported incidence of AERD varied in the literature becauseof the
differences in study design and the different criteriaused for making the
diagnosis. For example, retrospective dataderived from autopsy or biopsy
studies may exaggerate the frequencyby including many subclinical cases.
Clinical observations thatare based on a short duration of follow-up after an
invasivevascular procedure and the infrequency of the confirmatory renal
biopsiescan lead to an underestimation of the true incidence of AERD.
However,during the past few years, the observed incidence of AERD inclinical
practice seems to have increased. The possible reasonsinclude (1)
increased clinical awareness, (2) increased longevityof patients
with atherosclerotic vascular disease, (3) an increasein the number
of invasive vascular procedures, and (4) the routineuse of
thrombolytics and anticoagulants in clinical practice.
There are many inherent difficulties in diagnosing AERD. Ittherefore has
been labeled as the great masquerader
(2). Thespecific diagnosis can
be made only by demonstrating the cholesterolcrystals within the renal
vessels and glomeruli in kidney biopsyor autopsy specimens. However, in older
patients with atheroscleroticvascular disease (who are the prime subjects for
AERD), thereis a general reluctance on the part of physicians to perform
renalbiopsies. Possible reasons for this reluctance include (1)
advancedage of the patient and (2) smaller kidney size, from a
coexistingrenovascular disease. AERD typically is observed after an invasive
vascularprocedure or after thrombolytic/anticoagulant therapy, but italso
can develop spontaneously. The disease can present as suddenonset of acute
renal failure or have a smoldering course withdeclining renal function over a
period of several months. Therenal failure in this setting often is
attributed to other conditionssuch as (1) radio-contrast
nephropathy, (2) acute tubular necrosis,(3) drug-induced
interstitial nephritis, and (4) intravascularvolume depletion.
Presence of cholesterol emboli in other tissueswill, of course, strengthen
the diagnosis. In some individuals,cholesterol emboli maybe found in the skin
and muscle biopsyspecimens but not in the kidney. This scenario is more
likelyto occur when atheromatous plaques are dislodged from distalaorta,
below the origin of renal arteries. The predisposingfactors for the
development of AERD are shown in Table
1.
Table 1. Predisposing factors for atheroembolic renal disease
Blakenship et al.
(17) described cholesterol
embolism in 12%of patients who underwent coronary angiography and bypass
surgeryafter an acute myocardial infarction. They found no differencein the
incidence among patients treated conservatively or thosegiven thrombolytics.
The diagnosis was based on the examinationof two muscle biopsy specimens and
a skin biopsy specimen, whichwere taken at the time of harvesting the
saphenous vein forbypass surgery. Because the patients were not
systematicallyassessed for symptoms of AERD after the bypass surgery, it is
conceivablethat some of them could have developed AERD at a later stageand
thus were not included in the 12% incidence reported earlier.Furthermore, the
diagnostic sensitivity of the muscle or skinbiopsy specimen can vary,
depending on the site of the biopsy.Maurizi et al.
(18) reported that the
sensitivity of a skinbiopsy specimen was 41%, compared with 100% for a muscle
biopsy.One should consider the limitations of these studies, such asthe
variability of sample size and the small number of specimensexamined. Because
cholesterol embolism affects multiple organsand the disease progresses slowly
over a period of several weeksto months, it also can mimic systemic
vasculitis.
The classic lesion in AERD is the occlusion of arcuate and interlobular
arteriesand the glomerular capillaries with cholesterol emboli. The
cholesterolcrystal emboli generally are recognized by the characteristic
biconvex,needle-shaped clefts appearing as "ghosts"
(Figure 1). The crystals
normallyare dissolved during routine histologic preparation. However,when
specimens are snap-frozen with liquid nitrogen and thefrozen specimen is
examined under polarized light, one can demonstratethe birefringent character
of the cholesterol crystals
(19).Although atherosclerosis
contributes to blockage of the renalartery and its major branches, the
atheroemboli typically occludethe medium-sized arterioles (150 to 200 µm
in diameter)and glomerular capillaries. The involvement usually is patchy
(1,14).
In the initial stages of atheromatous occlusion, varying degreesof
polymorphonuclear and eosinophilic infiltration occurs aroundthe occluded
vessel. Subsequently, other mononuclear cells accumulatein the infiltrate,
because the crystals attract inflammatorycells to the site of injury.
Frequently, multinucleated giantcells also are seen within this perivascular
inflammatory cellinfiltrate
(20). Over a period of time,
the affected blood vesselsare occluded further from intimal hyperplasia and
perivascularfibrosis. Although some affected vessels may recanalize, onecan
still find cholesterol crystals within the vascular lumen.Because of the
ongoing ischemic injury, glomerular sclerosis,tubular atrophy, and
interstitial fibrosis are frequent findingsin the later stages of this
disease (21). The dislodged
atheromatousdebris may be showered into the circulation at different time
intervals.Consequently, the kidney biopsy specimens may reveal different
stagesof histologic evolution in individual patients. Because of thelimited
sample size and the patchy nature of this disease, arenal biopsy may not
always show the classic pathologic lesionsin patients who have AERD.
Atheromatous occlusion of the medium-sized arteries and arteriolescan lead
to ischemic injury and tissue infarction. Morphologicfeatures of focal
segmental necrotizing glomerulonephritis andcrescentic glomerulonephritis
also were noted in the renal biopsyspecimens of patients with AERD
(22). Wrinkling of glomerular
capillarybasement membrane is not an uncommon finding. Because of thehigh
prevalence of hypertension in these elderly patients, arteriolar
nephrosclerosisoften is observed
(23). Previous studies also
showed a statisticalcorrelation between AERD and focal segmental and global
glomerulosclerosis
(15,23).
Whetherthe focal sclerosis is from aging process, chronic ischemicinjury, or
glomerular hyperfiltration is not known and remainsa matter of speculation.
Vidt et al. (24) from
Cleveland Clinicnoted concurrent renal artery stenosis in 19 of 24 patients
(77%)with AERD.
Hammerschmidt et al.
(21) showed that the material
extractedfrom the human atheromatous plaques can trigger complement pathway
invitro. They also observed in vivo complement activation
in apatient with AERD. Cosio et al.
(20) noted hypocomplementemia
inthree patients with AERD. Subsequently, they measured serumcomplement
levels in six additional patients and found thattwo thirds had decreased
levels of serum complement (C3 andC4) in the absence of any other known cause
of the hypocomplementemia.Others have confirmed these observations. The
subacute and smolderingclinical course, characteristic renal histology, and
evolvingpatchy inflammation around the occluded vessels suggest the
possibilitythat vascular inflammation plays a role in the pathogenesisof
AERD.
Previous studies showed that cholesterol embolism can occurin other
tissues, including the skin, subcutaneous tissue, skeletalmuscle, prostate,
pancreas, liver, spinal cord, and gastrointestinaltract
(1,5,25,26,27).
Erosion of the atheromatous plaques fromascending aorta may cause embolic
occlusions of intracerebralvessels and retinal circulation
(28).
Very few experimental studies have dealt with AERD
(29,30,31).
Theanimals used were either rats or rabbits. The experiments consistedof
injection of the plaque suspension (after it is ground andfiltered to keep
the particle size below 200 µm) intothe animal's left carotid artery or
the aorta. The model hasprovided a unique opportunity to study the evolution
of renallesions, by serial examination of the tissue specimens. These
experimentshave confirmed further the complement activation and
hypocomplementemia,which has been noted often in patients with AERD
(20,21).
One day after the injection of the plaque suspension, fragmentsof atheroma
were identified in the lumen of renal vessels. Focalfibrin deposits were
detected later in the glomeruli and inmedium-sized arterioles. Patchy
cortical infarction was common,perhaps the result of ischemic injury. Three
days after theinjection, the fibrin deposition was less prominent, but there
wasintense perivascular mononuclear and eosinophilic infiltration.Six days
after the infusion, intimal proliferation and luminalocclusion were observed
frequently
(20,21).
Because atherosclerosis seems to be a prerequisite for the developmentof
AERD, it is not surprising that the disease is seen morecommonly in patients
older than 65 yr. They also have otherrisk factors for vascular occlusion,
such as cigarette smoking,hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. In a series of
221 patientswith cholesterol embolism reported by Fine et al.
(5), only12 were younger than
51 yr. Also, there seems to be a preferentialinvolvement among white
individuals (32). It is
unclear whetherthe lower incidence in black individuals is due to less
frequentperformance of the invasive vascular procedures, greater difficulty
inrecognizing the cutaneous manifestations on a darker skin, orsome unique
properties of the atheromatous plaque with a lesserpropensity for erosion.
The disease is more prevalent in men
(5,15,23,33).
Because of the involvement of multiple organs, the clinicalmanifestations
of AERD are extremely variable (Table
2). Thedisease generally presents as an acute or subacute renal
failurein elderly patients who have a history of renal insufficiency.
Approximately80% of these patients have serum creatinine levels of 2.0 mg/dl
ormore at the time of the initial presentation
(5), and nearly40% have far
advanced renal failure, needing dialysis. Therefrequently is a worsening of
systemic hypertension
(9,33,34).
TheBP often is difficult to control; it can even be malignant onoccasions
because of excessive activation of the renin-angiotensinsystem.
Table 2. Atheroembolic renal disease: clinical and laboratory features
Cholesterol embolization at other sites may lead to cutaneous,
musculoskeletal,gastrointestinal, neurologic, and ophthalmic manifestations
(25,26,27,28,35,36,37).
Theclassic cutaneous lesions of AERD are livedo reticularis (purplishrash
over the lower extremities and abdominal wall), small nailbed infarcts, and
purple toes (35). The patients
also may developsymptoms such as abdominal pain; nausea and/or vomiting;
occultor frank blood loss; acute pancreatitits; and visceral perforationfrom
cholesterol embolization in the gastrointestinal tract,liver, pancreas, and
spleen
(26,37).
The musculoskeletal featuresinclude muscle pain, arthralgias, and, on
occasion, rhabdomyolysis(36).
Mental confusion, focal neurologic deficits, and amaurosisfugax are the
common central nervous system findings
(25). Funduscopicexamination
may show occlusion of retinal arteries leading topallor from retinal
infarction (Hollenhorst sign), which maybe helpful as an additional
diagnostic feature in this disease.
Constitutional symptoms of fever, malaise, and weight loss oftenare
present in these patients, which may add to the diagnosticconfusion. The
hypocomplementemia, elevated sedimentation rate,and increased level of
C-reactive protein and the peripheralblood eosinophilia are pseudo vasculitic
presentations, andAERD should be distinguished from the true vasculitis on
thebasis of other clinical findings and renal histology. Subclinical
involvementof the adrenal glands, testes, prostate, thyroid gland, and
avascularnecrosis of the head of the femur also were noted in autopsystudies
of patients with atheroembolism
(19,27).
The urinalysis may show bland urine, microscopic hematuria,or even red
cell casts. The proteinuria can be minimal or highin the nephrotic range.
Fine et al. (5)
described proteinuria(1+ or more by dipstick) in 53% of patients with AERD.
Nephrotic-rangeproteinuria, which once was considered a rare finding, is now
beingreported more frequently
(38,39).
It was suggested that theproteinuria and urinary sediment abnormalities are
more likelyto occur in patients who have glomerular embolization than the
moretypical vascular occlusion. Eosinophiluria also was noted in8 of 24
patients (33%) who had biopsy-proven AERD
(40). Likein renal
vasculitis, AERD patients frequently have an elevatederythrocyte
sedimentation rate (5).
However, in contrast tovasculitis, the platelet count usually is low
(3). Both peripheral
eosinophiliaand eosinophiluria also were observed in this disease, but the
findingsare not consistent
(40,41).
Kasinath et al. (41)
described eosinophiliain 80% of patients with AERD. We also observed it in
60% ofour patients (42).
Hypocomplementemia is common, but, like eosinophilia,it is not a consistent
finding and lacks specificity.
The diagnosis of AERD requires that the physician be suspicious.If a
patient presents with worsening renal failure, particularlyafter undergoing
an invasive vascular procedure or thrombolytictherapy, one must look for
evidence of cholesterol embolismin the kidney and other sites, including
lower extremities,abdomen, and eyes. The diagnosis has to be confirmed by
demonstratingcholesterol crystals in the biopsy specimens. Other diseases
thatshould be considered in the differential diagnosis are (1)
radio-contrastnephropathy, (2) ischemic acute renal failure,
(3) systemicvasculitis, (4) thrombotic thrombocytopenia
purpura, and (5)bacterial endocarditis
(Table 3). In contrast
nephropathy, therenal failure occurs within 48 to 72 h after the dye infusion
andgenerally resolves within 4 to 7 d. Ischemic acute renal failureis
diagnosed by its immediate onset, its association with hypotension,and the
lack of systemic manifestations such as skin rash, eosinophilia,and
hypocomplementemia. Because of the multisystem involvement,cholesterol
embolism can mimic other systemic diseases suchas vasculitis, bacterial
endocarditis, polymyositis, and thromboticthrombocytopenic purpura. These
disorders have to be excludedthrough use of appropriate diagnostic
studies.
Renal biopsy seems to be a reliable diagnostic test in patientswith AERD.
However, the procedure has some limitations. Thetypical lesion,
i.e., blockage of small arteries, arterioles,and the glomerular
capillaries, usually is focal. In a patientwith AERD who died from acute
renal failure, of the 12 renalcortical specimens studied at autopsy, only 9
(75%) showed thetypical cholesterol emboli. The diagnostic sensitivity of a
singlerenal biopsy is 75%. However, with two biopsies on the samepatient,
the sensitivity improves to 94%. In a patient who presentswith worsening
renal failure, in the absence of kidney biopsy,demonstration of cholesterol
emboli in other tissues would supportthe diagnosis. Even in patients who have
endstage renal failureand are undergoing chronic dialysis, cholesterol
embolizationmay occur after an invasive vascular procedure
(42). AERD remains
underdiagnosedbecause one of the clues to the clinical
diagnosisworseningof renal failureoften is absent. In elderly
dialysispatients, the cutaneous manifestations of AERD, i.e., livido
reticularisin the lower extremities, often are mistaken for ischemic skin
lesionsresulting from peripheral vascular disease.
Relationship to Invasive Vascular Procedures and
Thrombolytic/Anticoagulant Agents
AERD has a variable but temporal relationship to the performanceof
invasive vascular procedures and pharmacologic treatmentwith
thrombolytic/anticoagulant agents. The clinical symptomsmay develop
immediately after the vascular procedure or canevolve slowly over a period of
weeks or months. Lack of awarenessof this disease among nonrenal physicians,
the variable clinicalpresentation, and the infrequency of obtaining biopsy
specimensoften lead to an underestimation of the true incidence of AERDas a
complication of the invasive vascular procedures.
In a prospective study of 183 elderly patients who underwentcardiac
catheterization, Rich and Crecelius
(43) noted acuterenal failure
in 19 patients (10.5%) within 48 h after angiography.Surprising, AERD was not
even considered in the differentialdiagnosis of acute renal failure. Thirty
to 85% of patientswith AERD have a history of antecedent invasive vascular
proceduresuch as aortography or coronary angiography. At our own institution,
85%of patients who presented with AERD had had an invasive vascularprocedure
(abdominal aortography or carotid or coronary angiography)during the previous
3 mo (42).
Ramirez et al. (44) noted
cholesterol emboli at autopsy in 30%of patients who died within 6 mo after
undergoing aortographyand 25.5% of patients who died within 6 mo after
undergoingcoronary angiography. In contrast, the incidence of cholesterol
embolismwas 4.3% in age-matched controls who had not undergone a previous
invasivevascular procedure. The cholesterol emboli in the control groupmay
have resulted from spontaneous erosion of atheromatous plaquesor from
previous anticoagulant or thrombolytic therapy. Theauthors did not indicate
whether there were any cases of renalfailure associated with atheroembolism
in either the controlor the reference group. The low incidence most likely is
dueto underdiagnosis, because renal function was not systematicallymonitored
in patients after the angiography. Whether the approachused for aortogram or
coronary angiogram has any impact on subsequentdevelopment of AERD remains
only as a speculation. In a retrospectivestudy of 1579 cases of coronary
angiography, Johnson et al.
(45)did not find any
difference in peripheral vascular complicationsbetween the brachial and
femoral approach. Only a single patienthad cholesterol embolism after the
femoral approach, which wasthe routine site used at their center.
AERD was found to occur more frequently after thrombolytic therapythan
after the use of anticoagulants
(6,46,47,48,49,50,51).
Previousstudies showed that 13 to 22% of patients with cholesterol embolism
hadprevious anticoagulant therapy (either heparin or warfarin).This temporal
relationship also was noted in several case reports
(49,50,51).
Ina prospective study, Blankenship et al.
(17) failed to findany
increase in AERD after thrombolytic therapy, but the studyhad many
limitations. Because the superficial clots stabilizethe ruptured
atherosclerotic plaque, dissolution of these bythrombolytic agents may cause
showering into the systemic circulationand subsequent lodging in other
organs.
Despite the widespread use of anticoagulants and thrombolyticagents, the
incidence of AERD in the absence of a precedinginvasive vascular procedure
remains low, at 4.3%. One mightconclude from these observations that AERD is
not a common complicationof these medications. However, "purple toes
syndrome," whichwas described as a complication of warfarin use by
Fedar andAuerbach in 1961
(49), may very well be a
manifestation of cholesterolembolization of small arterioles in the feet, and
it may notalways be associated with renal failure
(48). AERD is knownto occur
spontaneously, but it is rare. Spontaneous cholesterolembolization may occur
after a blunt trauma (10). In
patientswho experienced spontaneous atheroembolism, severe occlusive
aorto-iliacdisease or an aortic aneurysm with intramural thrombus was the
frequentfinding. Cholesterol embolism also can be a recurrent process.Of the
70 patients with AERD who were receiving chronic dialysis,we noted recurrent,
spontaneous cholesterol embolization in2
(42).
Twenty-one cases of biopsy-proven AERD were reported in therenal
allografts
(6,7,8).
The time of the diagnosis ranged fromimmediately before transplantation to 15
yr posttransplantation(8).
After reviewing 200 renal transplant biopsies performedat our center between
1990 and 1995, we found 2 other casesof cholesterol embolism. The source of
cholesterol emboli inthe transplanted kidneys could be (1) an
unsuspected AERD inthe donor kidney and (2) spontaneous dislodgment
of an atheromatousplaque from the aorta of an elderly transplant recipient.
AERDmay remain as an incidental finding without any obvious clinical
abnormalitiessuch as hematuria, proteinuria, or decreased allograft function.
Theclinical course of these patients varied from complete recoveryof renal
function to permanent graft loss.
There is no specific therapy directed against the existing vascular
lesions.The interventions included (1) interposition of prosthetic
bypassgrafts, (2) angioplasty, and (3) extracorporeal
arterial reconstruction(52).
These surgical maneuvers may not be successful if thesource of atheroembolism
is in the suprarenal part of the aorta.With reference to medical management,
there are a few case reportsthat documented recovery of renal function and
disappearanceof cyanotic features after the use of lipid lowering agents
(53,54).
However,no studies have analyzed the benefits of one form of therapyover the
other in the management of patients with AERD.
The prognosis in this disease is considered to be very poor.The reported
mortality has varied from 64 to 81%
(5). The highmortality most
likely is due to a selection bias, because mostof the published cases were
diagnosed at autopsy. Over the pastdecade, a few case reports documenting the
recovery of renalfunction in patients with AERD appeared in the literature
(53).
To assess the course of AERD in the patients undergoing dialysis,we
compared the rate of hospitalization and survival on dialysisof 40 patients
with end-stage renal failure from AERD (meanage, 70.5 yr) and 1063
age-matched controls (mean age, 70.3yr) who had other causes of end-stage
renal failure. All patientsincluded in the study were accepted for dialysis
between 1986and 1992. The diagnosis of AERD was made on the basis of the
classicclinical presentation and the demonstration of cholesterol crystalsin
tissue specimens. Our results showed that patients who wereundergoing
dialysis and who had a primary diagnosis of AERDhad no significant increase
in rate of hospitalization or mortality,compared with age-matched controls
(42).
AERD remains an unexplored "gold mine" for nephrology research.
Apartfrom the clinicopathologic case discussions, single case reports,and a
few retrospective studies, there are no prospective studiesthat evaluated the
precise relationship between invasive vascularprocedures or
thrombolytic/anticoagulant therapy and atheroembolicrenal disease. Whether
there is any potential benefit of screeningthe thoracoabdominal aorta for the
presence of atheromatousplaques (by use of noninvasive devices such as
ultrasound ormagnetic resonance imaging) before performing the invasive
vascularprocedure should be studied in a prospective manner.
The pathogenesis of renal failure in AERD may not be due entirelyto
occlusion of medium-sized arterioles with cholesterol emboli.Reactive
inflammation surrounding the cholesterol crystals mayplay a significant role
in causing the luminal occlusion andsubsequent renal failure. Activation of
complement (particularlyC5) by cholesterol crystals in vitro and the
clinical observationof low serum complement and peripheral eosinophilia
stronglysuggest a possible role for inflammation in the pathogenesisof AERD,
and this area needs to be explored. Furthermore, thenature of inflammatory
cells involved in pathogenesis of AERDremains to be defined. If inflammation
surrounding the cholesterolemboli is indeed the cause of progressive renal
failure, therecould be a potential role for the use of steroids in this
disease.Supporting this concept is the observation of Dahlberg et
al.(55), who noted
improvement in clinical symptoms in two patientswith AERD after the use of
high-dose corticosteroids.
In patients who have AERD and are undergoing dialysis, it isnot known
whether the hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis offersa better chance of
survival and lower patient morbidity. Elderlypatients who undergo
hemodialysis frequently are treated withCoumadin for maintaining the patency
of vascular access, and,in addition, they receive heparin during dialysis to
preventthe clotting in extracorporeal circuit. Continued use of heparinand
other anticoagulants in hemodialysis patients can potentiallyretard the
healing of an eroded, atheromatous plaque and promotethe dislodgment of
cholesterol emboli into the renal and peripheralcirculation.
Hemodialysis-associated hypotension also is a commonproblem in elderly
patients. Because the diseased kidney doesnot have the benefit of renal
autoregulation, perhaps it isat higher risk for developing ischemic injury
after each hypotensiveepisode. Whether peritoneal dialysis, which does not
requirethe use of anticoagulants and usually is not associated with
hemodynamicinstability, would lead to better outcomes (patient survivaland
recovery of renal function) remains to be studied.
McGown JA, Greenberg A: Cholesterol atheroembolic renal disease.
Report of 3 cases with emphasis on diagnosis by skin biopsy and extended
survival. Am J Nephrol 6:135
-139, 1986[Medline]
Fine MJ, Kapoor W, Falanga V: Cholesterol crystal embolization: A
review of 221 cases in the English literature.
Angiology 38:769
-784, 1987
Pirson Y, Honhon B, Cosyns JP, van Ypersele C: Cholesterol embolism
in a renal graft after treatment with streptokinase. Br Med
J 296: 394-395,1988
Singh I, Killen PD, Leichtman AB: Cholesterol emboli presenting as
acute allograft dysfunction after renal transplantation. J Am Soc
Nephrol 6:165
-170, 1994[Abstract]
Ripple M, Charney D, Nadasdy T: Cholesterol embolization in renal
allografts. Transplantation 69:2221
-2225, 2000[Medline]
Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Case 4, 1984).
N Engl J Med 310:244
-253, 1984[Medline]
Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital (Case 2-1991).
N Engl J Med 324:113
-120, 1991[Medline]
Panum PL: Experimentelle Beitrage zur Lehre von der Embolie.
Virchows Arch Pathol Anat Physiol25
: 308-310,1862
Flory CM: Arterial occlusions produced by emboli from eroded aortic
atheromatous plaques. Am J Pathol21
: 549-565,1945
Thurlbeck WM, Castleman B: Atheromatous emboli to the kidneys after
aortic surgery. N Engl J Med257
: 442-447,1957
Jones DB, Iannaccone PM: Atheromatous emboli in renal biopsies.
Am J Pathol 78:261
-271, 1975[Abstract]
Greenberg A, Bastacky SI, Iqbal A, Borochovitz D, Johnson JP: Focal
segmental glomerulosclerosis associated with nephrotic syndrome in cholesterol
atheroembolism: Clinicopathological correlations. Am J Kidney
Dis 29: 334-344,1997[Medline]
Preston RA, Stemmer CL, Materson BJ, Perez-Stable E, Pardo V: Renal
biopsy in patients 65 years of age or older: An analysis of the results of 334
biopsies. J Am Geriatr Soc 38:669
-674, 1990[Medline]
Blankenship JC, Butler M, Garbes A: Prospective assessment of
cholesterol embolization in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated
with thrombolytic vs conservative therapy. Chest107
: 662-668,1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Maurizi CP, Barker AE, Truehart RE: Atheromatous emboli: A
postmortem study with special reference to the lower extremities.
Arch Pathol 86:528
-534, 1968[Medline]
Hammerschmidt DE, Greenberg CS, Yamada O, Craddock PR, Jacob HS:
Cholesterol and atheroma lipids activate complement and stimulate
granulocytes. A possible mechanism for amplification of ischemic injury in
atherosclerotic states. J Lab Clin Med98
: 68-77,1981[Medline]
Goldman M, Thoua Y, Dhaene M, Toussaint C: Necrotising
glomerulonephritis associated with cholesterol microemboli. Br Med
J 290: 205-206,1985
Crosson JT, Modi KS, Vanikar A: Histopathologic evaluation of
atheroembolic renal disease (AERD) [Abstract]. J Am Soc
Nephrol 8: 534A,1997
Vidt DG, Eisele G, Gephardt GN, Tubbs R, Novick AC: Atheroembolic
renal disease: Association with renal artery stenosis. Cleve Clin J
Med 56: 407-413,1989[Medline]
Desnuelle C, Lanteri-Minet M, Hofman P, Butori C, Bedoucha P,
Chatel M: Cholesterol emboli with neurologic manifestation in the spinal cord.
Rev Neurol (Paris) 148:715
-718, 1992[Medline]
Bourdages R, Prentice RSA, Beck IT, Dacosta LR, Paloschi GB:
Atheromatous embolization to the stomach, an unusual cause of gastrointestinal
bleeding. Am J Digest Dis 21:889
-894, 1976[Medline]
Knechtges TC, Defever BA: Cholesterol emboli in transurethral
curettings: Report of 4 cases. J Urol114
: 102-106,1975[Medline]
Bruno A, Russel PW, Jones WL, Austin JK, Weinstein ES, Steel SR:
Concomitants of asymptomatic retinal cholesterol emboli.
Stroke 23:900
-902, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Snyder HE, Shapiro JL: A correlative study of atheroembolism in
human beings and experimental animals. Surgery49
: 195-204,1961
Otken LB: Experimental production of atheromatous embolization.
Arch Pathol 68:685
-689, 1959[Medline]
Saklayen M, Park Y, Cunningham J, Mandal A: Animal model of
atheroembolic renal disease [Abstract]. J Am Soc
Nephrol 2: 560A,1991
Saklayen MG: Atheroembolic renal disease: Preferential occurrence
in whites only [Letter]. Am J Nephrol9
: 87-88,1989[Medline]
Dalakos TG, Streeten DPH, Jones D, Obeid A: "Malignant"
hypertension resulting from atheromatous embolization predominantly of one
kidney. Am J Med 57:135
-138, 1974[Medline]
Handler FP: Clinical and pathologic significance of atheromatous
embolization, with emphasis on an etiology of renal hypertension.
Am J Med 20:366
-373, 1956[Medline]
Falanga V, Fine MJ, Kapoor WN: The cutaneous manifestations of
cholesterol crystal embolization. Arch Dermatol122
: 1194-1198,1986[Medline]
Robinson RJ, Pemberton M, Goddard MJ: Myositis due to cholesterol
emboli. Postgrad Med J 69:947
-949, 1993[Abstract]
Hashemi HA, Comerota AJ, Dempsey DT: Foregut revascularization via
retrograde splenic artery perfusion after resection of a juxtaceliac mycotic
aneurysm: Complicated by pancreatic infarction because of cholesterol emboli.
J Vasc Surg 21:530
-536, 1995[Medline]
Williams HH, Wall BM, Cooke CR: Reversible nephrotic range
proteinuria and renal failure in atheroembolic renal disease. Am J
Med Sci 299:58
-61, 1990[Medline]
Haqqie SS, Urizar RE, Singh J: Nephrotic-range proteinuria in renal
atheroembolic disease: Report of four cases. Am J Kidney
Dis 28: 493-501,1996[Medline]
Wilson DM, Salazer TL, Farkouh ME: Eosinophiluria in atheroembolic
renal disease. Am J Med 91:186
-189, 1991[Medline]
Kasinath BS, Corwin HL, Bidani AK, Korbet SM, Schwartz MM, Lewis
EJ: Eosinophilia in the diagnosis of atheroembolic renal disease.
Am J Nephrol 7:173
-177, 1987[Medline]
Modi K, Rao, KV: Clinical presentation and survival on
dialysis of patients with atheroembolic renal disease (AERD)
[Abstract]. Presented at 5th Asian Pacific Congress of Nephrology. New
Delhi, India, 1992
Rich MW, Crecelius CA: Incidence, risk factors, and clinical course
of acute renal insufficiency after cardiac catheterization in patients 70
years of age or older. Arch Intern Med150
: 1237-1242,1990[Medline]
Ramirez G, O'Neill WM Jr, Lambert R, Bloomer A: Cholesterol
embolization: A complication of angiography. Arch Intern
Med 138:1430
-1432, 1978[Medline]
Johnson LW, Esente P, Giambortolomei A, Grant WD, Loin M, Reger MJ,
Shaw C, Walford GD: Peripheral vascular complications of coronary angioplasty
by the femoral and brachial techniques. Cathet Cardiovasc
Diagn 31:165
-172, 1994[Medline]
Schwarz MW, McDonald GB: Cholesterol embolization syndrome.
Occurrence after intravenous streptokinase therapy for myocardial infarction.
JAMA 258:1934
-1935, 1987[Abstract]
Wong FK, Chan SK, Ing TS, Li CS: Acute renal failure after
streptokinase therapy in a patient with acute myocardial infarction.
Am J Kidney Dis 26:508
-510, 1995[Medline]
Hyman BT, Landas SK, Ashman RF, Schelper RL, Robinson RA:
Warfarin-related purple toes syndrome and cholesterol microembolization.
Am J Med 82:1233
-1237, 1987[Medline]
Feder W, Auerbach R: "Purple toes": An uncommon sequela
of oral Coumadin drug therapy. Ann Intern Med55
: 911-917,1961
Bruns FJ, Segal DP, Alder S: Control of cholesterol embolization by
discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Am J Med Sci275
: 105-108,1978[Medline]
Gupta BK, Spinowitz BS, Charytan C, Wahl SJ: Cholesterol crystal
embolization-associated renal failure after therapy with recombinant
tissue-type plasminogen activator. Am J Kidney Dis21
: 659-662,1993[Medline]
Woolfson RG, Lachman H: Improvement in renal cholesterol emboli
syndrome after simvastatin. Lancet351
: 1331-1332,1998[Medline]
Cabili S, Teachman I, Goor Y: Reversal of gangrenous lesions in the
blue toe syndrome with lovastatina case report.
Angiology 44:821
-825, 1993
Dahlberg PJ, Frecentese DF, Cogbill TH: Cholesterol embolization:
Experience with 22 histologically proven cases.
Surgery 105:737
-746, 1989[Medline]
Received for publication July 7, 2000.
Accepted for publication August 16, 2000.
This article has been cited by other articles:
C. Sommerer, R. Waldherr, and C. Morath Rapid deterioration of renal function in a long-term allograft recipient with recurrent IgA nephritis is it the only cause?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
October 1, 2007;
22(10):
3079 - 3081.
[Full Text][PDF]
G. B. Piccoli, E. Maddalena, R. Fenoglio, D. Bilucaglia, E. Mezza, L. Colla, C. Rabbia, and G. P. Segoloni The long-term dialysis patient with purple-blue toes
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
July 1, 2006;
21(7):
2022 - 2023.
[Full Text][PDF]
Y. P. Liew and J. R Bartholomew Atheromatous embolization
Vascular Medicine,
November 1, 2005;
10(4):
309 - 326.
[Abstract][PDF]
R. de Silva, N. P. Nikitin, S. Bhandari, A. Nicholson, A. L. Clark, and J. G.F. Cleland Atherosclerotic renovascular disease in chronic heart failure: should we intervene?
Eur. Heart J.,
August 2, 2005;
26(16):
1596 - 1605.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. D. Weisbord and P. M. Palevsky Radiocontrast-Induced Acute Renal Failure
J Intensive Care Med,
March 1, 2005;
20(2):
63 - 75.
[Abstract][PDF]
F. Scolari, P. Ravani, A. Pola, S. Guerini, R. Zubani, E. Movilli, S. Savoldi, F. Malberti, and R. Maiorca Predictors of Renal and Patient Outcomes in Atheroembolic Renal Disease: A Prospective Study
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
June 1, 2003;
14(6):
1584 - 1590.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Brammah, S. Robertson, G. Tait, and C. Isles Lesson of the week: Bilateral renovascular disease causing cardiorenal failure
BMJ,
March 1, 2003;
326(7387):
489 - 491.
[Full Text][PDF]