*Institute for Molecular and Cellular Regulation, Gunma University,
Maebashi, Japan. Third Department of Internal Medicine, Gunma University School of
Medicine, Maebashi, Japan.
Correspondence to Dr. Itaru Kojima, Institute for Molecular and Cellular
Regulation, Gunma University, Maebashi 371-8512, Japan. Phone: 81-27-220-8835;
Fax: 81-27-220-8893; E-mail:
ikojima{at}showa.gunma-u.ac.jp
Abstract. This study was conducted to investigate the involvement
ofthe activin-follistatin system in renal regeneration after ischemicinjury.
Expression of mRNA for the activin ßA subunitwas not detected
in normal kidneys but increased markedly afterrenal ischemia. Immunoreactive
ßA subunit was detectedin tubular cells of the outer medulla
in ischemic but not normalkidneys. Expression of mRNA for follistatin, an
antagonist ofactivin A, was abundant in tubular cells of the outer medullain
normal kidneys and decreased significantly after renal ischemia.For
assessment of the role of the activin-follistatin systemin renal regeneration
after ischemic injury, recombinant follistatinwas intravenously infused into
rats with renal ischemia, atthe time of reperfusion. Exogenous follistatin
prevented thehistologic changes induced by ischemic injury, reduced apoptosis
intubular cells, and accelerated tubular cell proliferation. Serumlevels of
creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were significantlylower in
follistatin-treated rats. Conversely, intravenous administrationof
recombinant activin A inhibited tubular cell proliferationafter ischemic
injury. These results indicate that the activin-follistatinsystem
participates in renal regeneration after ischemic injury.Follistatin
administered intravenously accelerates renal regenerationafter renal
ischemia, presumably by blocking the actions ofendogenous activin.
The kidney has a capacity to repair itself and recover its functionafter
ischemia/reperfusion injuries by recapitulating the molecularand cellular
events that are associated with nephrogenesis
(1).During acute tubular
necrosis induced by renal ischemia, normallyquiescent cells undergo
dedifferentiation and recover theirpotential to divide after enhancement of
their DNA synthesis.After proliferation, the new cells differentiate to
restorethe functional integrity of the nephron
(2). Many growth factors
criticalfor kidney development
(3,4)
may be involved in kidney regeneration
(5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14)
andmay play important roles in these processes as mitogens, motogens,and
morphogens (15). Tubular cell
regeneration is acceleratedby the addition of various growth factors. For
example, hepatocytegrowth factor (HGF) is a growth factor with renotropic
action(8), and administration
of HGF promotes recovery from renalischemia
(9). Similarly, bone
morphogenetic protein-7, insulinlikegrowth factor-1, and epidermal growth
factor were demonstratedto be effective in promoting renal regeneration after
ischemicinjury
(5,10,11).
Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor
(12),transforming growth
factor-ß (13), and
platelet-derivedgrowth factor
(14) expression is
up-regulated in injured kidneysand is also involved in renal regeneration
after ischemia.
Activins are multifunctional cytokines that belong to the transforming
growthfactor-ß superfamily and regulate the growth and differentiation
ofcells in various organs
(16,17).
The actions of activins aremodified at several levels by various factors. The
most importantfactor that modulates the actions of activins is an
activin-bindingprotein, namely follistatin
(18). This protein
stoichiometricallybinds to activins and blocks their action
(18,19).
Follistatinis expressed on the surface of the target cells of activinsby
binding to the extracellular matrix
(20). Activins trappedby
follistatin are internalized by endocytosis and subsequentlydegraded by
proteolysis (21). The
expression of follistatinis regulated by various factors, including activins
themselvesin many tissues
(22,23,24,25).
Hence, the activin-follistatinsystem is a complex regulatory system that
controls diversecellular functions, including growth and differentiation
duringdevelopment
(23,24,25).
Follistatin is abundantly expressed in tubular cells of adultkidneys
(26). However, the function of
the activin-follistatinsystem in adult kidneys is not well understood. We
recentlydemonstrated that activin A is an autocrine factor that is produced
intubular cells and tonically inhibits branching tubulogenesis
(27).Activin A produced in
tubular cells plays a vital role becauseHGF, which is a morphogen known to
regulate tubulogenesis (28),
inducesbranching tubulogenesis mainly by reducing the production ofactivin A
(27). Activin A is expressed
in fetal kidneys (29)and was
also demonstrated to inhibit branching morphogenesisof ureteric buds in organ
culture (30). Activin A may
act asa negative regulator of branching morphogenesis during kidney
development
(27,30,31).
Theseresults raise the possibility that the activin-follistatin system,
i.e.,morphomodulating proteins involved in tubulogenesis during
kidneydevelopment, may influence the migration, growth, and differentiation
oftubular cells after renal ischemia. In this study, we examinedthis
possibility. The results indicate that the production ofactivin A is
upregulated in tubular cells after renal ischemia.Blockade of endogenous
activin A action by administration offollistatin protects the kidney from
ischemic renal injury bypreventing apoptosis and promoting regeneration.
Experimental Protocols
Male Wistar rats weighing 200 to 230 g were obtained from theImai Animal
Co. (Saitama, Japan). Under anesthesia induced withsodium pentobarbital (30
mg/kg body wt), the abdominal cavitywas exposed via a midline incision. Renal
ischemia was inducedby clamping both renal arteries for 45 min, using a
nontraumaticvascular clamp. After removal of the clamp to allow reperfusion
forthe indicated periods, rats were euthanized and the kidneyswere removed.
The right kidney was fresh-frozen for RNA extraction,and the left kidney was
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for routineparaffin embedding and sectioning for
histologic analysis. Reperfusionwas assessed by visual examination of the
kidneys, which recoveredtheir usual color within 30 s. Sham operations were
performedin a similar manner, except for clamping of the renal arteries.
Bloodsamples were obtained at the time of death, and serum sampleswere
maintained at -20°C until measurements. Blood ureanitrogen (BUN) levels,
serum creatinine levels, and electrolyteconcentrations were measured with a
multiparametric autoanalyzer(model 7050; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). For analysis
of the efficacyof exogenous follistatin or activin A after ischemic renal
injury,the indicated dose of recombinant human (rh)-follistatin orrh-activin
A, dissolved in 0.5 ml of physiologic saline solution,was administered via
the tail vein at the time of reperfusion.Renal functions, histologic changes,
and the degree of DNA synthesisand apoptosis in tubular cells were analyzed.
Control animalsreceived the same volume of saline solution alone. Compared
withno treatment, treatment with physiologic saline solution didnot affect
the outcomes of the experiments performed (data notshown). The experimental
design is presented in Figure
1. rh-Follistatinand rh-activin A were generously provided by Dr.
Eto of theCentral Research Laboratory, Ajimonoto Inc. (Kawasaki, Japan).
Figure 1. Experimental design. The experimental groups, the time points
(arrows) for analysis of renal function, histologic features
(periodic acid-Schiff staining), cell proliferation [bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)
staining], and apoptosis [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated
dUTP-nick-end-labeling (TUNEL)], and the number of rats in each experimental
group at the indicated times are shown. rh, recombinant human.
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analyses
Total RNA was extracted from kidney homogenates with the TRIzolreagent
(Life Technologies BRL, Grand Island, NY). Northernblot analyses were
performed as described previously
(27), usingcDNA for rat
follistatin (provided by Dr. S. Shimasaki, SalkInstitute, La Jolla, CA) and
cDNA for human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase (GAPDH) (Clontech,
Palo Alto, CA). The membraneswere subjected to autoradiography and analyzed
using a FujiBAS 2000 (Fuji Photo Film, Tokyo, Japan). For quantificationof
the relative follistatin mRNA content, the intensities ofthe autoradiographic
signals for follistatin and GAPDH werequantified and expressed in arbitrary
density units. The follistatin/GAPDHratio (based on integrated signals) was
determined for eachsample.
Reverse Transcription-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from whole kidneys with the TRIzol reagent(Life
Technologies BRL). First-strand cDNA was made from totalRNA using Superscript
Preamplification System (Life TechnologiesBRL) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Contaminatinggenomic DNA was removed with
RNase-free DNase. Five microgramsof DNase-treated RNA was incubated with 1
µl of oligo(dT)at 70°C for 10 min. Two microliters of 10x PCR
buffer, 1µl of dithiothreitol (0.1 M), 2 µl of dNTP mixture(10 mM),
and 2 µl of MgCl2 (25 mM) were added to eachreaction. After
incubation for 5 min at 42°C, 1 µlof reverse transcriptase was added.
Samples were incubated at42°C for 50 min and then at 70°C for 15 min.
RNase H(1 µl) was added to each reaction, and samples were incubatedat
37°C for 20 min. PCR was performed as indicated by themanufacturer
(Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT), with the followingprimers: rat
ßA subunit: sense, 5'-GGACCTAACTCTCAGCCAGAGATG-3';
antisense,5'-TCTCAAAATGCAGTGTCTTCCTGG-3'; rat activin type I
receptor:sense, 5'-GGTCTATGAGCAGGGGAAGATGAC-3'; antisense,
5'-ACATT-TTCGCCTTGCCAGC-3'; rat activin type II receptor: sense,
5'-AGATGGAAGTCACACAGCCCAC-3';antisense,
5'-CAACACTGGTGCCTCTTTTCTCTG-3'; rat GAPDH: sense,
5'-CATGACCACAGTCCATGCCATC-3';antisense, 5'-CACCCTGTT-
GCTGTAG- CCATATTC-3'. Reactions included5 µl of 10x PCR
buffer, 2 µl of MgCl2 (50 mM), 1µl of dNTP mixture, 1 µl
of 3'-primer, 1 µlof 5'-primer, 0.5 µl of Taq
polymerase, and 1 µlof cDNA. Samples were incubated at 94°C for 5 min,
followedby the indicated numbers of cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 sat
58°C, and 90 s at 72°C, with final extension at 72°Cfor 10 min,
in a Perkin-Elmer DNA thermal cycler. PCR used 30cycles for the
ßA subunit and activin type I and IIreceptors and 18 cycles
for GAPDH. The levels of transcriptionof the GAPDH "housekeeping"
gene were found to be similar atall time points examined, enabling analysis
of the relativelevels of expression of the desired genes. Reactions without
cDNAwere used as negative controls. Rat hepatocyte cDNA was usedas a
positive control in each experiment. Reactions were repeatedat least
twice.
Measurement of DNA Synthesis
DNA synthesis in renal tubular cells was measured using bromodeoxyuridine
(BrdU)(32). At the indicated
times after reperfusion, BrdU (100 mg/kg),an analogue of thymidine, was
injected intraperitoneally intoevery animal used in the study. After 1 h,
rats were euthanized,and the kidneys were removed and fixed with 4%
formaldehydefor 24 h. Sections were immunostained using a cell proliferation
kit(Amersham, Tokyo, Japan), as described previously
(33). Thenumber of
BrdU-positive cells was counted in five randomly selectedfields of the outer
medulla, using a light microscope at x400magnification. The
proliferation index was measured in fivesections per rat, and the average of
the five determinationswas calculated. The results were indicated as the
numbers ofBrdU-positive cells per square micrometer.
In Situ Hybridization
The cRNA probe was transcribed from a pBluescript SK(+) vectorcontaining
an approximately 845-bp PstI/XbaI fragment derivedfrom rat
follistatin cDNA (provided by Dr. S. Shimasaki, SalkInstitute). Linearized
plasmids were used for in vitro transcriptionof
digoxigenin-11-UTP-labeled antisense and sense riboprobeswith SP6 and T7 RNA
polymerase, respectively, according to theinstructions provided by the
manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim,Mannheim, Germany). Eight-micrometer
sections were mounted onpoly-L-lysine-coated slides. After digestion with 5
µg/mlproteinase K at room temperature for 30 min, sections were postfixed
in0.4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C for 20 min and incubated overnightat
50°C with hybridization buffer containing 1 µg/mldigoxigenin-labeled
cRNA. The buffer contained 50% formamide,10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 600 mM
NaCl, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate,0.25% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 1
x Denhardt's solution, 200 µg/mlyeast tRNA, and 10% dextran sulfate.
After hybridization, sectionswere washed in 2x SSC/50% formamide at
58°C for 30 min,incubated in 1 µg/ml RNase A solution at 37°C for
30min, and then washed once in 2x SSC and twice in 0.2x SSC at
50°C,for 20 min each time. Sections were then incubated in a 1:500
dilutedsolution of polyclonal sheep anti-digoxigenin Fab antibody conjugated
withalkaline phosphatase, before washing and detection of the labelwith
nitroblue tetrazolium chloride and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate.
Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase-Mediated
dUTP-Nick-End-Labeling
For identification of nuclei with DNA strand breaks at the cellularlevel,
the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-nick-end-labeling
(TUNEL)method (34) was
performed, using an apoptosis in situ detectionkit (Wako, Tokyo,
Japan). Quantification of TUNEL-positive cellswas performed by counting
positive nuclei in tubular cells fromfive randomly selected fields of the
outer medulla, with a lightmicroscope at x400 magnification. Apoptosis
was measured asa percentage of total tubular cells in five sections per rat
kidney,and the average of the five determinations was used as an apoptotic
index.
Immunohistochemical Analyses
The localization of activin A was examined immunohistochemicallywith an
avidin-biotin coupling immunoperoxidase technique, usinga Vectastain Elite
ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame,CA) according to the instructions
provided by the manufacturer.Briefly, the paraffin-embedded sections (4
µm) were deparaffinizedand rehydrated in a routine manner. After
inactivation of endogenousperoxidase with 1% metaperiodic acid in
phosphate-buffered saline(PBS) for 10 min at room temperature, sections were
preincubatedwith normal goat serum for 60 min. The sections were then
incubatedwith a polyclonal rabbit anti-activin A antibody for 2 h, washed
withPBS, and reacted with a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG for1 h. After
washing with PBS, sections were reacted with VectastainElite ABC reagent. The
antibody was detected with diaminobenzidinetetrahydrochloride in PBS, and the
sections were counterstainedwith hematoxylin. For immunohistochemical
controls, the primaryantibody was replaced with 5% normal goat serum in PBS,
whichdid not demonstrate positive staining, thus confirming specificity.The
anti-human activin A antibody used in this study recognizesdimers as well as
monomers of the rat ßA subunit
(35).
The localization of type II and type IIB activin receptors wasexamined in
a similar manner. Polyclonal rabbit anti-activintype II receptor and
anti-activin type IIB receptor antibodieswere generously provided by Dr. K.
Miyazono (Cancer Institute,Tokyo, Japan).
Histologic Analyses
Sections were cut at 4 µm and stained with periodic acid-Schiffstain.
Sections were microscopically examined for lesions 1,2, 3, and 5 d after
reperfusion. The changes observed were limitedto the outer medulla, where
tubular damage is most obvious,and were graded as follows: 0, normal; 1,
areas of tubular dilation,necrosis, hemorrhage, and cell desquamation
involving <20%of the fields; 2, similar changes involving >20% but
<40%of the fields; 3, similar changes involving >40% but <60%of the
fields; 4, similar changes involving >60% of the fields.Five sections per
rat were used for analysis. The results wereexpressed as mean ± SEM
for each experimental group.
Statistical Analysis
The significance of differences between means was compared byt
test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Changes in the Expression of Activin and Activin Receptors after
Ischemic Renal Injury
To examine whether activin A is involved in renal regeneration,we analyzed
changes in the expression of mRNA for the ßAsubunit of
activin after ischemic renal injury by using reversetranscription-PCR. As
shown in Figure 2, levels of
ßAsubunit mRNA, which was virtually absent in normal and
sham-operatedkidneys, were upregulated 12 h after ischemic renal injury and
remainedelevated for approximately 96 h. The localization of activinA was
studied by immunohistochemical analysis using an anti-activinA antibody.
Immunoreactive activin A was not observed in normalkidneys
(Figure 3A) or sham-operated
kidneys (data not shown),an observation consistent with the reverse
transcription-PCRresults. In contrast, immunoreactive activin A was detected
intubular cells in the outer medulla of ischemic kidneys
(Figure 3B).No positive cells
were observed in sections from ischemickidneys reacted with normal rabbit
serum (data not shown). Thebiologic effects of activin A are mediated by
heteromeric receptorcomplexes consisting of two different types of receptor,
i.e.,type I and II activin receptors
(24). We examined changes in
theexpression of activin receptors. Type I and II activin receptorexpression
was detected but was not altered after ischemic renalinjury
(Figure 2). The localization of
type II and IIB activinreceptors in normal and ischemic kidneys was examined
by immunohistochemicalanalyses (Figure
4). Type II activin receptor immunoreactivitywas observed
ubiquitously in tubular cells (including proximaland distal tubules) and
collecting ducts in normal kidneys (Figure
4, A to C).Type IIB activin receptor immunoreactivity was also
observed,in a pattern similar to that for type II activin receptors,in
normal kidneys (Figure 4, D and
E). No positive cells wereobserved in sections from normal
kidneys reacted with normalgoat serum
(Figure 4F). However,
distribution of these receptorswas not altered by renal ischemia (data not
shown).
Figure 2. Changes in the expression of mRNA for the ßA subunit of
activin and activin receptors after ischemic renal injury. Whole-kidney RNA
was isolated at the indicated times after ischemic renal injury, and
expression of mRNA for the ßA subunit of activin and activin
receptors (ActR) was analyzed by reverse transcription-PCR. Reactions without
cDNA were used as negative controls (N). The rat hepatocyte reverse
transcription product was used as a positive control (P). M, molecular
markers. GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Product sizes are
indicated in the right. Representative results from three separate experiments
are shown.
Figure 3. Induction of activin A in tubular cells after renal ischemia. The
localization of activin A was examined by immunohistochemical analysis using
an anti-human activin A antibody, as described in the Materials and Methods
section. Paraffin sections from normal (A) and ischemic (B) kidneys 24 h after
reperfusion are presented. Arrow-heads indicate brown staining for activin A.
Magnification, x400.
Figure 4. Localization of activin receptors in normal kidneys. The localization of
type II (A through C) and type IIB (D and E) activin receptors was examined by
immunohistochemical analysis, as described in the Materials and Methods
section. Paraffin sections from the cortex (A, D, and F), outer medulla (B),
and inner medulla (C and E) of normal kidneys are presented. A section reacted
with normal goat serum is shown in F. Magnification, x400.
Changes in the Expression of Follistatin after Ischemic Renal
Injury
We then examined changes in the expression of follistatin mRNAby using
Northern blotting (Figure 5).
Consistent with previousreports
(26), follistatin mRNA was
abundantly expressed in normalkidneys. Sham operations did not affect
follistatin mRNA expressionlevels. However, ischemia/reperfusion injury
transiently decreasedfollistatin mRNA expression in the kidneys
(Figure 5A). Therelative
levels of follistatin mRNA in ischemic kidneys weredramatically reduced at 24
and 48 h and returned to basal levels72 h after reperfusion
(Figure 5B).
Figure 5. Changes in the expression of mRNA for follistatin after ischemic renal
injury. (A) Changes in follistatin mRNA expression after ischemic renal
injury. Rat kidneys were isolated from ischemia-treated or sham-operated rats
at the indicated times after reperfusion. Total RNA (20 µg) was subjected
to Northern blotting, using cDNA probes for follistatin and GAPDH.
Representative results from three separate experiments are shown. (B)
Quantification of follistatin/GAPDH levels after ischemic renal injury. Values
are mean ± SEM of three separate experiments and are expressed in
arbitrary density units.
Next, we examined the localization of follistatin mRNA in normal,
sham-operated,and ischemic kidneys by in situ hybridization
(Figure 6). Innormal kidneys,
hybridization signals were observed mainly inthe inner stripe of the outer
medulla, without any detectablehybridization in the cortex or inner medulla
(Figure 6, A to C).Follistatin
mRNA was distributed in tubular cells
(Figure 6D).No staining was
observed in any cells of the glomeruli
(Figure 6A).Hybridization
signals in ischemic kidneys were considerablyreduced, compared with normal
kidneys (Figure 6E).
Hybridizationwith a control sense probe demonstrated no positive signals
(Figure 6F).
Figure 6. Localization of follistatin mRNA in normal and ischemic kidneys. In
situ hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe was performed
using sections from the cortex (A), outer medulla (B, D, and F), and inner
medulla (C) of normal kidneys and the outer medulla of ischemic kidneys (E) 48
h after reperfusion. (A through E) Hybridization with an antisense probe. (F)
Hybridization with a sense probe. Magnifications: x400 in A, B, C, and
F; x1000 in D and E.
Effect of rh-Follistatin on Renal Function after Ischemic Renal
Injury
To assess the role of endogenous activin A in renal regeneration,we
administered rh-follistatin (25 µg/kg) or saline solutionto rats with
ischemic renal injuries. First, we evaluated parametersof renal function
(Figure 7). In control
(saline-treated) rats,the serum creatinine levels peaked 12 h after
reperfusion andrh-follistatin significantly reduced the peak creatinine
concentration(Figure 7A). The
serum BUN levels peaked 24 h after reperfusionand returned to normal levels
72 h after reperfusion. Peak BUNlevels were significantly lower for
rh-follistatin-treated ratsthan for control rats
(Figure 7B). Electrolyte
concentrationswere not affected by rh-follistatin administration (data not
shown).No significant differences in body weights between the controland
rh-follistatin-treated groups were observed at the indicatedtimes
(Figure 7C).
Figure 7. Changes in renal function and body weight for rats treated with saline
solution or rh-follistatin after ischemic renal injury. Rats were given
infusions of rh-follistatin (25 µg/kg) () or saline solution ([UNK])
at the time of reperfusion, and serum creatinine levels (A), blood urea
nitrogen (BUN) levels (B), and body weight (C) were measured at the indicated
time points. Values are mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.01
versus saline solution.
Effect of rh-Follistatin on Histologic Changes Induced by Renal
Ischemia
We next examined whether exogenous follistatin affects the histologic
changesinduced by ischemia. Control (saline-treated) kidneys exhibitedsigns
of congestion, hemorrhage, tubular dilation, cast formation,and tubules
plugged with desquamated epithelial cells afterischemic renal injury
(Figure 8, A and B). In
contrast, rh-follistatin-treatedkidneys exhibited no cast formation and fewer
tubules were dilated(Figure
8D). Apoptotic tubular cells with highly condensed nuclear
chromatinwere also observed in control kidneys
(Figure 8C) but not in
rh-follistatin-treatedkidneys. Neutrophil infiltration was observed in both
controlkidneys and rh-follistatin-treated kidneys (data not shown).
Semiquantitativeanalysis demonstrated that the damaged tubular areas in
rh-follistatin-treatedkidneys were smaller than those in control kidneys
(Figure 8E).
Figure 8. Histologic changes in the kidneys of rats treated with saline solution or
rh-follistatin after ischemic renal injury. rh-Follistatin (25 µg/kg) or
saline solution was injected at the time of reperfusion, via the tail vein.
The kidneys were removed 48 h after the injection. (A through D) Tissue
sections from saline-treated (A through C) or rh-follistatin-treated (D) rats
were stained with periodic acid-Schiff stain. Note that tubular dilation
(* in A), cast formation (arrows in B), and apoptotic cells with
highly condensed chromatin (arrowheads in C) were observed in
ischemic kidneys treated with saline solution. (E) Semiquantitative analysis
of the histologic changes induced by ischemia was performed. Sections were
microscopically examined for lesions 1, 2, 3, and 5 d after reperfusion. The
changes observed were graded as follows: 0, normal; 1, areas of tubular
dilation, necrosis, hemorrhage, and cell desquamation involving <20% of the
fields; 2, similar changes involving >20% but <40% of the fields; 3,
similar changes involving >40% but <60% of the fields; 4, similar
changes involving >60% of the fields. Five sections per rat were used for
analysis. The results are expressed as mean ± SEM for each experimental
group. Magnifications: x400 in A, B, and D; x1000 in C.
Effect of rh-Follistatin on Apoptosis Induced by Ischemic Renal
Injury
We next examined the effect of rh-follistatin on renal ischemia-induced
apoptosisby using the TUNEL method (Figure
9). TUNEL-positive cells werenot observed in normal or
sham-operated kidneys (Figure 9, A and
B).In contrast, TUNEL-positive cells were predominantlylocalized
in the outer medulla of control (saline-treated) kidneysafter ischemic renal
injury (Figure 9C); only a few
positivecells were observed in the cortex and inner medulla (data notshown).
Consistent with light-microscopic examination results,the number of
TUNEL-positive cells in rh-follistatin-treatedkidneys was markedly lower than
that in control kidneys (Figure
9D).Reduction of the number of TUNEL-positive cells by exogenous
follistatinwas observed 24 and 48 h after reperfusion
(Figure 9E).
Figure 9. Apoptotic tubular cells in kidneys treated with saline solution or
rh-follistatin after ischemic renal injury. (A through D) rh-Follistatin (25
µg/kg) (D) or saline solution (C) was injected at the time of reperfusion,
via the tail vein. The kidneys were removed 48 h after the injection. Tissue
sections from normal (A) and sham-operated (B) kidneys were also used for
experiments. The TUNEL method was performed as described in the Materials and
Methods section. (E) Quantification of TUNEL-positive cells was performed by
counting the number of TUNEL-positive tubular cells in randomly selected
fields of the outer medulla of saline- or rh-follistatin-treated kidneys, and
results are expressed as percentages of total tubular cells. Values are mean
± SEM (n = 6). *, P < 0.01
versus ischemia treated with saline solution. Magnification, x
1000 in A through D.
Effect of rh-Follistatin on DNA Synthesis in Tubular Cells after
Ischemic Renal Injury
Proliferation of tubular cells is the hallmark of early regenerationafter
ischemic renal injury (1). To
investigate the effect ofexogenous rh-follistatin on cell proliferation after
ischemicrenal injury, we measured DNA synthesis in renal tubular epithelial
cells(Figure 10). In normal
(Figure 10A) and sham-operated
(datanot shown) kidneys, BrdU-positive cells were rarely observed.
Twenty-fourhours after ischemic renal injury, BrdU-positive cells were
observedpredominantly in the outer medulla of control (saline-treated)
kidneys(Figure 10B), where
damage to the tubular cells was most obvious,but not in other regions (data
not shown). In contrast, thenumber of BrdU-positive cells in
rh-follistatin-treated kidneyswas significantly greater than that in control
kidneys (Figure 10, C and D).Quantitative analysis demonstrated that intravenousinfusion of rh-follistatin
enhanced renal tubular epithelialcell proliferation
(Figure 11). Enhancement of
DNA synthesisby rh-follistatin was observed at concentrations of 15
µg/kg.
Figure 10. DNA synthesis in renal tubular cells in the kidneys of rats treated with
saline solution or rh-follistatin after ischemic renal injury. rh-Follistatin
(25 µg/kg) or saline solution was injected at the time of reperfusion, via
the tail vein. The kidneys were removed 24 h after the injection. DNA
synthesis was assessed by BrdU staining, as described in the Materials and
Methods section. Tissue sections from normal (A) and ischemic kidneys treated
with saline solution (B) or rh-follistatin (C and D) were used for
experiments. Magnifications: x 400 in A, B, and C; x 1000 in
D.
Figure 11. Quantitative analysis of DNA synthesis in renal tubular cells after
ischemic renal injury. Saline solution, rh-activin A (12.5 µg/kg), or
rh-follistatin (5, 15, or 25 µg/kg) was administered to rats with ischemic
renal injury, at the time of reperfusion. In separate experiments,
rh-follistatin (15 µg/kg) was administered to normal rats. After 24 h, the
kidneys were removed and used for experiments. DNA synthesis was assessed by
BrdU staining, as described in the Materials and Methods section. BrdU-labeled
cells were counted in randomly selected fields of the outer medulla in each
kidney, and results are expressed as the number per square micrometer
(proliferation index). Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5 to 10).
*, P < 0.01 versus ischemia treated with
saline solution. **, P < 0.001 versus ischemia
treated with saline solution.
Effect of rh-Activin A on DNA Synthesis in Tubular Cells after
Ischemic Renal Injury
To further assess the role of the activin-follistatin systemin renal
regeneration, we administered rh-activin A (12.5 µg/kg)to rats with
ischemic renal injuries. Exogenously administeredactivin A did not affect
renal function after ischemic injury(data not shown) but inhibited DNA
synthesis in tubular cells.The number of BrdU-positive cells in ischemic
kidneys treatedwith rh-activin A was significantly lower than that in
ischemickidneys treated with saline solution
(Figure 11).
Effect of rh-Follistatin on DNA Synthesis in Tubular Cells in Intact
Kidneys
To elucidate the mechanism of DNA synthesis enhancement by exogenous
follistatin,we administered rh-follistatin to normal rats and examined
whethertubular cell proliferation in intact kidneys was induced by
rh-follistatinadministration. Exogenously administered follistatin did not
inducetubular cell proliferation (Figure
11) or affect tubular structureor renal function (data not
shown).
In this study, we investigated changes in the activin-follistatinsystem
during kidney repair and regeneration. As in other tissues
(36),the expression of
activin and follistatin in the kidneys changedsignificantly after ischemic
injury. The expression of activinA was not detected in normal kidneys,
whereas activin A mRNAand protein expression was augmented after renal
ischemia. Histologically,activin A immunoreactivity was induced in tubular
cells. Becausethe expression of activin receptors was detected but was not
alteredafter renal ischemia, it is expected that the action of activinA
becomes dominant in the kidneys after ischemic injury. Inaddition,
follistatin mRNA expression was markedly reduced afterrenal ischemia. Because
follistatin is an inhibitor of activinaction
(18), these results indicate
that the upregulated activinA in tubular cells is functionally active after
renal ischemia.The significance of the induction of activin A expression in
acuterenal failure caused by renal ischemia is unclear. However,results
obtained with the administration of exogenous activinA to ischemic kidneys
provide some insights into the role ofactivin A under these conditions. As
demonstrated in Figure 11,exogenous activin A significantly reduced the number ofBrdU-positive cells
after renal ischemia. Activin A also inhibitsDNA synthesis in the proximal
tubular cell line LLC-PK1in vitro(Maeshima A, Kojima I,
unpublished observations). These observationsare corroborated by previous
reports that activin A acts asa growth inhibitor in various types of cells
(23,24,25,37).
Therefore,it is likely that endogenous activin A tonically inhibits the
regenerationof renal tubular cells. Consistent with this hypothesis,
follistatinadministration markedly increased the number of BrdU-positive
cellsafter renal ischemia. Furthermore, follistatin attenuated histologic
changesin tubular cells and improved renal function. Exogenously administered
follistatindid not induce tubular cell proliferation in intact kidneys
(Figure 11).These results
suggest that the acceleration of renal regenerationinduced by exogenous
follistatin after ischemic injury resultsfrom the inactivation of upregulated
endogenous activin A andnot from the mitogenic effects of follistatin
itself.
Apoptosis triggered by ischemia potentially contributes to thedevelopment
of postischemic tubular cell death
(38). A previousstudy
demonstrated a biphasic pattern of tubular cell apoptosisafter renal
ischemia, suggesting that apoptosis observed inthe early phase after renal
ischemia is mainly attributableto the ischemic injury and that late-phase
apoptosis is attributableto the programmed removal of tubular cells for
control of excessiveproliferation
(39). In this study, the
expression of activinA was observed 12 h after reperfusion, which preceded
the appearanceof TUNEL-positive tubular cells. Exogenous follistatin reduced
thenumber of TUNEL-positive cells 24 and 48 h after reperfusionbut not
thereafter (Figure 9E). This
result suggests that, afterrenal ischemia, upregulated endogenous activin A
may be involvedin the induction of early-phase apoptosis of tubular
cells.
Inflammation is also considered to be one of the most importantcauses of
tissue injury in organs subjected to ischemia. A seriesof recent studies
suggested a novel role for activin in inflammationand repair processes in
various organs
(36,40,41,42).
For example,increased expression of activin was observed in various typesof
inflammatory processes, including cutaneus wound repair andinflammatory
arthropathies. The level of activin expressionwas correlated with the degree
of inflammation in inflammatorybowel disease. Strong expression of activin A
was induced invitro by proinflammatory cytokines such as
interleukin-1 andtumor necrosis factor-, which are known to be
released frommacrophages and stromal cells at the sites of tissue injuryand
inflammation (43). Therefore,
proinflammatory cytokinesare possible inducers of activin expression in this
model. Withrespect to the mechanism of action of activin, the release of
activininto the circulation precedes the release of proinflammatorycytokines
after lipopolysaccharide treatment, suggesting a proinflammatoryaction of
activin (41). In contrast,
activin A produces anti-inflammatoryeffects by blocking the action of
interleukin-6 (42). The action
ofactivin in inflammatory processes probably depends on the typeof cell or
tissue. It was recently reported that inhibitionof ischemia-induced apoptosis
prevents inflammation and subsequenttissue injury
(44). Our results demonstrated
that rh-follistatinreduced the number of apoptotic cells
(Figure 9). Therefore,it is
possible that rh-follistatin exerts an anti-inflammatoryaction. Although we
could not observe rh-follistatin modulationof neutrophil infiltration in this
study, we cannot completelyexclude the possibility that endogenous activin
regulates thedegree of inflammation after renal ischemia, including
myeloperoxidaseactivity, the degree of monocyte/macrophage infiltration, and
thetissue levels of proinflammatory cytokines. This issue remainsto be
addressed.
Our results demonstrate for the first time that blockade ofthe action of
endogenous growth inhibitors is an alternativeto the infusion of growth
factors for acceleration of renalregeneration. Follistatin probably
potentiates multiple typesof endogenous growth factors involved in renal
regeneration.Follistatin may also enhance the effects of any exogenous growth
factors.The advantage of using follistatin is that it accumulates inthe
kidneys after intravenous administration
(45). In the kidneys,
follistatinbinds to heparan sulfate proteoglycan
(20) and remains in the
extracellularmatrices for several days
(45). The stability of
follistatinmay be beneficial for the treatment of acute renal failure aftera
variety of insults.
In summary, the activin-follistatin system is altered in kidneysafter
ischemic injury. Endogenous activin A may function topromote apoptosis and
inhibit regeneration of renal tubularcells. Blockade of the actions of
activin with the administrationof follistatin accelerates recovery from
ischemic renal injuries.Follistatin has therapeutic potential for the
prevention andtreatment of tubular damage leading to acute renal failure.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant-in-aid from the Ministryof Education,
Sports, Science, and Culture of Japan. We thankMayumi Odagiri for technical
secretarial assistance.
Witzgall R, Brown D, Schwarz C, Bonventre JV: Localization of
proliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the
post-ischemic kidney. J Clin Invest93
: 2175-2188,1994
Toback FG: Regeneration after acute tubular necrosis.
Kidney Int 41:226
-246, 1992[Medline]
Kuure S, Vuolteenaho R, Vainio S: Kidney morphogenesis: Cellular
and molecular regulation. Mech Dev92
: 31-45,2000[Medline]
Davies JA, Bard JBL: The development of the kidney. Curr
Top Dev Biol 39:245
-301, 1998[Medline]
Vukicevic S, Basic V, Rogic D, Basic N, Shin MS, Shepard A, Jin D,
Dattabreyamurty B, Jones W, Dorai H, Ryan S, Griffiths D, Maliakal J, Jelic M,
Pastorcic M, Stavljenic A, Sampath TK: Osteogenic protein-1 (BMP-7) reduces
severity of injury after ischemic acute renal failure in rat. J
Clin Invest 102:202
-219, 1998[Medline]
Almanzar MM, Frazier KS, Dube PH, Piqueras AI, Jones WK, Charette
MF, Paredes AL: Osteogenic protein-1 mRNA expression is selectively modulated
after ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol9
: 1456-1463,1998[Abstract]
Simon M, Maresh JG, Harris SE, Hernandez DJ, Arar N, Olson MS,
Abboud HE: Expression of bone morphogenetic protein-7 mRNA in normal and
ischemic adult rat kidney. Am J Physiol276
: F382-F389,1999
Nagaike MS, Hirano S, Tajima H, Noji S, Taniguchi S, Matsumoto K,
Nakamura T: Renotropic functions of hepatocyte growth factor in renal
regeneration after unilateral nephrectomy. J Biol Chem266
: 22781-22784,1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Miller SB, Martin DR, Kissane J, Hammerman MR: Hepatocyte growth
factor accelerates recovery from acute ischemic renal injury in rats.
Am J Physiol 266:F129
-F134, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Miller SB, Martin DR, Kissane J, Hammerman MR: IGF-I accelerates
recovery from ischemic acute tubular necrosis in the rat. Proc Natl
Acad Sci USA 89:11876
-11880, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Humes HD, Cieslinski DA, Coimbra TM, Messana JM, Galvao C:
Epidermal growth factor enhances renal tubule cell regeneration and repair and
accelerates the recovery of renal function in postischemic acute renal
failure. J Clin Invest 84:1757
-1761, 1989
Sakai M, Zhang M, Homma T, Garrick B, Abraham JA, Mckanna JA:
Production of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor in
the early phase of regeneration after acute renal injury. J Clin
Invest 99:2128
-2138, 1997[Medline]
Basile DP, Rovak JM, Martin DR, Hammerman MR: Increased
transforming growth factor-ß1 expression in regenerating rat renal
tubules following ischemic injury. Am J Physiol270
: F500-F509,1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nakagawa T, Sasahara M, Haneda M, Kataoka H, Nakagawa H, Yagi M,
Kikkawa R, Hazama F: Role of PDGF B-chain and PDGF receptors in rat tubular
regeneration after acute injury. Am J Pathol155
: 1689-1699,1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Nigam SK, Lieberthal W: Acute renal failure. III. The role of
growth factors in the process of renal regeneration and repair. Am
J Physiol 279:F3
-F11, 2000
Vale W, Rivier J, Vaughham J, McClintock R, Corrigan A, Woo W, Karr
D, Spiess J: Purification and characterization of FSH-releasing protein from
porcine ovarian follicular fluid. Nature (Lond)321
: 776-779,1986[Medline]
Ling N, Ying SY, Ueno N, Shimasaki S, Esch F, Hotta M, Guillemin R:
Pituitary FSH is released by a heterodimer of the ß-subunits from the two
forms of inhibin. Nature (Lond)321
: 779-782,1986[Medline]
Nakamura T, Takio K, Eto Y, Shibai H, Titani K, Sugino H:
Activin-binding protein from rat ovary is follistatin. Science
(Washington DC) 247:836
-838, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Shimonaka M, Inoue S, Shimasaki S, Ling N: Follistatin binds to
both activin and inhibin through the common beta-subunit.
Endocrinology 128:3313
-3315, 1991[Abstract]
Nakamura T, Sugino K, Titani K, Sugino H: Follistatin, an
activin-binding protein, associates with heparan sulfate chains of
proteoglycans on follicular granulosa cells. J Biol
Chem 266:19432
-19437, 1991[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Hashimoto O, Nakamura T, Shoji H, Shimasaki S, Hayashi Y, Sugino H:
A novel role of follistatin, an activin-binding protein in the inhibition of
activin action in rat pituitary cells. J Biol Chem272
: 13835-13842,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Zhang YQ, Kanzaki M, Shibata H, Kojima I: Regulation of the
expression of follistatin in rat hepatocytes. Biochim Biophys
Acta 1354:204
-210, 1997[Medline]
Ying SY: Inhibins, activins and follistatins: Gonadal proteins
modulating the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone. Endocr
Rev 9: 267-293,1988[Medline]
Ying SY, Zhang Z, Furst B, Batres Y, Huang G, Guangwu L: Activins
and activin receptors in cell growth. Proc Soc Exp Biol
Med 214: 114-122,1997[Abstract]
Mather JP, Moore A, Li RH: Activins, inhibins and follistatins:
Further thoughts on a growing family of regulators. Proc Soc Exp
Biol Med 215:209
-222, 1997[Abstract]
Kogawa K, Ogawa K, Hayashi Y, Nakamura T, Titani K, Sugino H:
Immunohistochemical localization of follistatin in rat tissues.
Endocrinol J 38:383
-391, 1991
Maeshima A, Zhang YQ, Furukawa M, Naruse T, Kojima I: Hepatocyte
growth factor induces branching tubulogenesis by modulating the
activin-follistatin system. Kidney Int58
: 1511-1522,2000[Medline]
Montesano R, Matsumoto K, Nakamura T, Orci L: Identification of a
fibroblast-derived epithelial morphogen as hepatocyte growth factor.
Cell 67:901
-908, 1991[Medline]
Tuuri T, Eramaa M, Hilden K, Ritvos O: The tissue distribution of
activin ßA and ßB subunits and follistatin
mRNA suggests multiple sites of action of the activin-follistatin system
during human development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab78
: 1521-1524,1994[Abstract]
Ritvos O, Tuuri T, Eramaa K, Sainio K, Hilden K, Saxen L, Gilbert
SF: Activin disrupts epithelial branching morphogenesis in developing
glandular organs of the mouse. Mech Dev50
: 229-245,1995[Medline]
Granzner HG: Monoclonal antibody to 5-bromo- and
5-iodode-oxyuridine: A new reagent for detection of DNA replication.
Science (Washington DC) 218:474
-476, 1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Kogure K, Omata W, Kanzaki M, Zhang YQ, Yasuda H, Mine T, Kojima I:
A single intraportal administration of follistatin accelerates liver
regeneration in partially hepatectomized rats.
Gastroenterology 108:1136
-1142, 1995[Medline]
Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA: Identification of programmed
cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA
fragmentation. J Cell Biol 119:493
-501, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Yasuda H, Inoue K, Shibata H, Takeuchi T, Eto Y, Hasegawa Y, Sekine
N, Totsuka Y, Mine T, Ogawa E, Kojima I: Existence of activin A in A- and
D-cells of rat pancreatic islets. Endocrinology133
: 624-630,1993[Abstract]
Hubner G, Alzheimer C, Werner S: Activin: A novel player in tissue
repair process. Histol Histopathol14
: 295-304,1999[Medline]
Yasuda H, Mine T, Shibata H, Eto Y, Hasegawa Y, Takeuchi T, Asano
S, Kojima I: Activin A: An autocrine inhibitor of initiation of DNA synthesis
in rat hepatocytes. J Clin Invest92
: 1491-1496,1993
Schumer M, Colombel MC, Sawczuk IS, Gobe G, Connor J, O'Toole KM,
Olsson CA, Wise GL, Buttyan R: Morphologic biochemical and molecular evidence
of apoptosis during the reperfusion phase after brief periods of renal
ischemia. Am J Pathol 140:831
-838, 1992[Abstract]
Shimizu A, Yamanaka N: Apoptosis and cell desquamation in repair
process of ischemic tubular necrosis. Virchows Arch B Cell
Pathol 64:171
-180, 1993[Medline]
de Kretser DM, Hedger MP, Phillips DJ: Activin A and follistatin:
Their role in the acute phase reaction. J Endocrinol161
: 195-198,1999[Medline]
Jones KL, Brauman JN, Groome NP, de Kretser DM, Phillips DJ:
Activin A release into the circulation is an early event in systemic
inflammation and precedes the release of follistatin.
Endocrinology 141:1905
-1908, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
Russell CE, Hedger MP, Brauman JN, de Kretser DM, Phillips DJ:
Activin A regulates growth and acute phase proteins in the human liver cell
line, HepG2. Mol Cell Endocrinol148
: 129-136,1999[Medline]
Hubner G, Werner S: Serum growth factors and proinflammatory
cytokines are potent inducers of activin expression in cultured fibroblasts
and keratinocytes. Exp Cell Res228
: 106-113,2000
Daemen MARC, Vant Veer C, Denecker G, Heemskerk VH, Wolfs TGAM,
Clauss M, Vandenabeele P, Buurman WA: Inhibition of apoptosis induced by
ischemia-reperfusion prevents inflammation. J Clin
Invest 104:541
-549, 1999[Medline]
Kogure K, Zhang YQ, Kanzaki M, Omata W, Mine T, Kojima I:
Intravenous administration of follistatin: Delivery to the liver and effect on
liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy.
Hepatology 24:361
-366, 1996[Medline]
Received for publication January 23, 2001.
Accepted for publication February 21, 2001.
This article has been cited by other articles:
A. A. Eddy Ramping up endogenous defences against chronic kidney disease
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
May 1, 2006;
21(5):
1174 - 1177.
[Full Text][PDF]
A. Maeshima, H. Sakurai, and S. K. Nigam Adult Kidney Tubular Cell Population Showing Phenotypic Plasticity, Tubulogenic Capacity, and Integration Capability into Developing Kidney
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2006;
17(1):
188 - 198.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
F. Aoki, M. Kurabayashi, Y. Hasegawa, and I. Kojima Attenuation of Bleomycin-induced Pulmonary Fibrosis by Follistatin
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.,
September 15, 2005;
172(6):
713 - 720.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
K. Maeshima, A. Maeshima, Y. Hayashi, S. Kishi, and I. Kojima Crucial Role of Activin A in Tubulogenesis of Endothelial Cells Induced by Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
Endocrinology,
August 1, 2004;
145(8):
3739 - 3745.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
W. Wada, A. Maeshima, Y.-Q. Zhang, Y. Hasegawa, H. Kuwano, and I. Kojima Assessment of the function of the {beta}C-subunit of activin in cultured hepatocytes
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab,
August 1, 2004;
287(2):
E247 - E254.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
S. Yamashita, A. Maeshima, I. Kojima, and Y. Nojima Activin A Is a Potent Activator of Renal Interstitial Fibroblasts
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
January 1, 2004;
15(1):
91 - 101.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
J. Yoshino, T. Monkawa, M. Tsuji, M. Hayashi, and T. Saruta Leukemia Inhibitory Factor Is Involved in Tubular Regeneration after Experimental Acute Renal Failure
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
December 1, 2003;
14(12):
3090 - 3101.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Maeshima, S. Yamashita, and Y. Nojima Identification of Renal Progenitor-Like Tubular Cells that Participate in the Regeneration Processes of the Kidney
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
December 1, 2003;
14(12):
3138 - 3146.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Maeshima, S. Yamashita, K. Maeshima, I. Kojima, and Y. Nojima Activin A Produced by Ureteric Bud Is a Differentiation Factor For Metanephric Mesenchyme
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
June 1, 2003;
14(6):
1523 - 1534.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Luhe, H. Hildebrand, U. Bach, T. Dingermann, and H.-J. Ahr A New Approach to Studying Ochratoxin A (OTA)-Induced Nephrotoxicity: Expression Profiling in Vivo and in Vitro Employing cDNA Microarrays
Toxicol. Sci.,
June 1, 2003;
73(2):
315 - 328.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]
A. Maeshima, K. Maeshima, Y. Nojima, and I. Kojima Involvement of Pax-2 in the Action of Activin A on Tubular Cell Regeneration
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
December 1, 2002;
13(12):
2850 - 2859.
[Abstract][Full Text][PDF]