Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATZAK, A.
Right arrow Articles by PERSSON, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PATZAK, A.
Right arrow Articles by PERSSON, P. B.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:1122-1127, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology

Interaction of Angiotensin II and Nitric Oxide in Isolated Perfused Afferent Arterioles of Mice

ANDREAS PATZAK*, RALF MROWKA*, EBERHARD STORCH*, BERTHOLD HOCHER{dagger},{ddagger} and PONTUS B. PERSSON*

* Johannes-Müller-Institute of Physiology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
{dagger} Department of Nephrology, University-Hospital Charité, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
{ddagger} Institute of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Correspondence to Dr. A. Patzak, Johannes-Müller-Institut für Physiologie, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Tucholskystrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany. Phone: +49-30-2802-6683; Fax: +49-30-2802-6662; E-mail: andreas.patzak{at}charite.de


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Abstract. The present study was performed to evaluate angiotensin II (Ang II)—nitric oxide (NO) interaction in afferent arterioles (Af) of wild-type mice and mice that are homozygous (-/-) for disruption of the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) gene. Af were microperfused, and the dose responses were assessed for the NO precursor L-arginine (n = 4), NO inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME, n = 5), L-NAME after pretreatment with L-arginine (n = 5), Ang II (n = 8), and Ang II after pretreatment with L-NAME (n = 7). Acute administration of L-arginine and L-NAME (both in doses from 10-6 to 10-3 mol/L) did not change arteriolar diameter. Moreover, pretreatment with L-arginine did not change the response to L-NAME. However, Ang II, applied in doses of 10-12, 10-10, 10-8, and 10-6 mol/L, significantly reduced the lumen to 66.5 ± 7.0% and 62.2 ± 8.0% at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L Ang II, respectively. The contraction was augmented after L-NAME pretreatment (19.5 ± 13.6% and 25.5 ± 10.2% at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L Ang II, respectively). In eNOS (-/-) mice (n = 8), the response to Ang II also was enhanced (9.1 ± 6.0% and 11.2 ± 8.2% at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L Ang II, respectively). Female mice did not differ from male mice in their reactivity to Ang II (n = 9) and Ang II + L-NAME pretreatment (n = 11). The study shows that (1) it is feasible to microperfuse mouse Af, (2) the basal production of endothelial NO is very low and not inducible by L-arginine in Af of mice, and (3) a counteracting effect of NO is initiated by Ang II. High Ang II sensitivity in eNOS (-/-) mice underscores the considerable role of endothelial-derived NO to balance Ang II vasoconstriction in Af.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Nitric oxide (NO) released from endothelial cells and the macula densa is involved in the control of glomerular hemodynamics by acting as a potent vasodilator. Unspecific blockade of the NO synthase (NOS) isoforms leads to increases in mean arterial BP and decreases in renal blood flow and GFR (1,2). Moreover, in vitro studies that used the juxtamedullary nephron preparation showed significant reductions in diameters of afferent arterioles (Af) during NOS inhibition (3). This suggests a tonic NO production.

Enhanced Af vasoconstrictor responses to NOS blockade were observed in angiotensin II (Ang II)—induced hypertensive rats in comparison with responses in normotensive controls (3). These results suggest an Ang II—induced NO production that is mediated by either subtype 1 (AT1) or subtype 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptors (4,5). Experiments in isolated perfused rabbit arterioles underscore an important interaction between Ang II and NO: Ang II—induced arteriolar constriction in this preparation is transient only because of activation of local NO (6).

It remains unclear whether this effect is due to endothelial-derived NO or whether the neuronal NOS isoform located in the macula densa cells is responsible for counteracting Ang II vasoconstriction. The availability of mice that are homozygous (-/-) for disruption of the endothelial NOS (eNOS) gene allows the study of selectively inhibited NO production by eNOS. However, to perfuse isolated mouse Af, a perfusion setup must be miniaturized. In the present study, this was put into effect.

Recent studies demonstrated significantly higher BP in eNOS knockout mice (7,8). Furthermore, overexpression of eNOS causes hypotension and reduces NO-elicited vasorelaxation in mice (9). Thus, in this animal model, an important contribution of endothelial-derived NO on vascular resistance was apparent. However, the role of NO in adjustment of renal arterioles in the mice still is not understood fully. Therefore, in the present study, we examined to what extent NO modulates the constriction of Af because of Ang II. Reduction of NO production was achieved by application of the unspecific NO inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). In addition, eNOS knockout mice were studied. Experiments were carried out on isolated perfused Af, which are not under control of the sympathetic nervous system and circulating vasoactive substances.

We tested further whether the Ang II-NO interaction is gender dependent. There are some indications that sex hormones interact with the renin-Ang and NO system. For example, it has been found that estrogen reduces Ang II plasma levels (10) and downregulates the AT1 receptor expression in ovariectomized female rats (11). Moreover, a significant association between the number of estrogen receptors and basal release of NO in mouse aorta has been described elsewhere (12).


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Solutions
Physiologic salt solution (PSS) was used with the following composition: 115 mmol/L NaCl, 25 mmol/L NaHCO3, 2.5 mmol/L K2HPO4, 1.3 mmol/L CaCl2, 1.2 mmol/L MgSO4, and 5.5 mmol/L glucose. The K+ solution consisted of 100 mmol/L KCl, whereby 95 mmol/L NaCl was substituted by KCl. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) was supplied with 100 mg of streptomycin and 100,000 U of penicillin. The bicarbonate-buffered solution was equilibrated with 5% CO2 and 95% O2. The pH was adjusted to 7.4 after addition of bovine serum albumin (BSA). The concentration of BSA in DMEM (preparation solution) and in PSS was 0.1% (bath solution). The perfusate consisted of PSS with a BSA concentration of 1%. BSA was obtained from SERVA Electrophoresis (Heidelberg, Germany), Ang II and DMEM were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Deisenhofen, Germany), and L-arginine and L-NAME were obtained from Alexis Biochemicals (Grünberg, Germany). Streptomycin and penicillin were produced by Sigma-Aldrich.

Animals and Microperfusion Procedure
A total of 57 mice (20 to 30 g) of both genders were used in this study. The mice were wild types from the C57BL/6 strain and eNOS mutants (8) (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME). Animals were fed with standard mouse chow and allowed free access to tap water. All animal procedures conformed with the guidelines for care and handling of animals established by the U.S. Department of Health and Public Services and published by the National Institutes of Health.

After each animal was killed, the kidneys were removed immediately and sliced along the corticomedullary axis. The Af were prepared in DMEM at 4°C. The dissection of individual arterioles was performed under a stereoscopic microscope at magnifications up to 250x and with the help of sharpened forceps (No. 5; Dumont, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland). The position of Af in the slice was indicated by the glomerulus that belonged to it. Tubuli were removed, and the arterioles were identified by preparation of the arterial tree, including the interlobular artery. Normally, Af used were located at the end of the arterial tree. The arteriole with its glomerulus intact was cut with miniblades and transferred into a thermoregulated chamber (vol 1.5 ml; VETEC, Rostock-Warnemünde, Germany) on a stage of an inverted microscope. The perfusion system allowed movement and adjustment of concentric, holding, and perfusion pipettes (Luigs & Neumann, Ratingen, Germany). Pipettes were produced with the help of a self-manufactured apparatus and with the use of custom glass tubes (Drummond Scientific Company, Broomall, PA). The holding pipette (outer diameter, 0.084''; inner diameter, 0.064'') into which the proximal end of the arteriole was aspirated had an aperture of approximately 26 µm at the tip and a constriction of approximately 20 µm after customization. The inner perfusion pipette (outer diameter, 0.047''; inner diameter, 0.040'') with an aperture of 5 µm was advanced into the lumen of the arteriole. It was connected to a reservoir that contained the perfusion solution and to a manometer. Af of wild-type and eNOS knockout mice were perfused with similar pressures between 60 and 80 mmHg at 37°C. Although the arterial BP in eNOS knockout mice is approximately 20 mmHg higher than that of wild types (8), pressure was unchanged in all series to exclude the influence of this factor. If perfusion was not achieved within 120 min after the mouse was killed, then the experiment was stopped. The time of adaptation after the start of perfusion and heating of the bath chamber was 20 min. Only arterioles with remaining basal tone were used. Hypoxic or otherwise injured vessels were identified readily by pronounced vasodilatation and failed constriction to K+ -rich solution, which was used to test the viability of the arterioles at the beginning of the experiment. Thereafter, a recovery of 10 min was allowed. In all series, the last 10 s of the treatment period were used for statistical analysis of steady-state responses.

Experimental Protocols
Series 1. The effect of the NO precursor L-arginine on arteriolar diameter was determined, L-arginine was added to the bath in concentrations of 10-6, 10-5, 10-4, and 10-3 mol/L. A 3-min treatment period was used. Af diameters were measured under control conditions and during exposure of L-arginine.

Series 2. To determine whether an endogenous, tonic NO release plays a role for the arteriolar diameter in this preparation, we added the NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME to the bath solution. The L-NAME concentration was increased from 10-6 to 10-3 mol/L with treatment periods of 3 min. The diameter was determined before and during the exposure of L-NAME.

Series 3. To exclude that the lack of the NO precursor L-arginine prevents a tonic production and release of NO as tested in series 2, all solutions were enriched with L-arginine (10-4 mol/L). The protocol corresponds to that in series 2.

Series 4. In this series, the dose response to Ang II was determined at concentrations of 10-12, 10-10, 10-8, and 10-6 mol/L. The treatment period was 2 min. Af diameters were measured before and during the addition of Ang II. Female as well as male mice were used, to assess any gender-specific effects of Ang II on arteriolar diameter.

Series 5. Experiments were performed to determine whether NO modulates the arteriolar reactivity to Ang II. The bath solution was enriched with L-NAME at a concentration of 10-4 mol/L. The doses of Ang II were the same as those in series 3. Female and male mice were included, to test for gender-specific effects.

Series 6. Mice that were homozygous (-/-) for disruption of the eNOS gene were used to test the effect of total blockade of endothelial NO production by eNOS. The reactivity of the vessel to Ang II was determined by addition of Ang II in concentrations of 10-12, 10-10, 10-8, and 10-6 mol/L.

Data Analyses
Experiments were recorded on SVHS videotapes (video recorder AG-MD 830; Panasonic, Yokohama, Japan). The magnification results from an objective (x40; Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and projection (x1) on a 0.3'' chip digital camera (CB-3803S; GKB, Tai Chung, Taiwan). Video sequences were digitized by use of a frame grabber card (UDT 55-LC-EZ-50; Data Translation, Marlboro, MA). The vessel diameter was determined by use of customized software (Dr. H. Siegmund, Institute of Physiology, Humboldt-University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany). The equipment allowed a resolution of 0.2 µm of the vessel structures.

Statistical Analyses
The luminal diameter of the arterioles was determined. In all series, the last 10 s of the treatment and control period were used for statistical analysis of steady-state responses. For each 10-s period, five measurements were averaged. To test diameter dose responses, we performed a nonparametric Friedman two-way ANOVA. If significance was found, then the Mann-Whitney U test was applied. The same test was used for the comparison of independent measures. The confidence level, {alpha}, was set to 0.05. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
Pharmacologic Stimulation and Inhibition of NOS
Acute addition of L-arginine to the bath solution in increasing doses did not change the diameter of the arterioles (Figure 1, n = 4, male mice). However, the highest dose led to a transient contraction of the vessels, which, however was completely normalized at the time of measurement. L-NAME also had no effect on the vessel diameter (Figure 2, n = 5, male mice). Pretreatment with L-arginine, which was added to all solutions, did not change the response of the vessel to L-NAME (Figure 2, n = 5, male mice).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Effect of L-arginine administration to the bath solution in increasing doses from 10-6 to 10-3 mol/L on the luminal diameter (male mice, n = 4).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Effect of NG-nitro-L-arginine-methyl ester (L-NAME; 10-6 to 10-3 mol/L, male, n = 5) on luminal diameter without ({blacksquare}) and after pretreatment with ({square}) L-arginine (10-4 mol/L, male mice, n = 5).

 

Effect of Ang II
Ang II reduced the diameter significantly, from 8.1 ± 0.5 µm (control) to 5.6 ± 0.8 µm (66.5 ± 7.0%) and to 5.2 ± 0.8 µm (62.2 ± 8.0%) at doses of 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L, respectively. There were no differences between female (n = 9) and male (n = 8) mice, either for the absolute diameter or for percentage changes (Figure 3).



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Effect of angiotensin II (Ang II) and Ang II after pretreatment with L-NAME (10-4 mol/L L-NAME) on the luminal diameter of afferent arterioles (Af) of female and male mice. The doses of Ang II were 10-12, 10-10, 10-8, and 10-6 mol/L. * and # indicate significant changes in the diameter, compared with the control value for female and male mice, respectively. Significant differences between the effect of Ang II and Ang II + L-NAME are indicated by {clubsuit} and {diamondsuit} for female and male mice, respectively.

 

Effect of L-NAME on Responses to Ang II
Ang II significantly reduced arteriolar diameter in vessels that were pretreated with L-NAME (male mice, n = 7). The diameter averaged 8.9 ± 1.0 µm during control, 1.8 ± 1.3 µm (19.5 ± 12.6%; P < 0.05) at 10-8 mol/L Ang II, and 2.4 ± 1.1 µm (25.5 ± 10.2%; P < 0.05) at 10-6 mol/L Ang II. As shown in Figure 3, Ang II + L-NAME led to further constriction, in comparison with Ang II without L-NAME pretreatment (1.8 ± 1.3 versus 5.6 ± 0.8 µm [P < 0.05] and 19.5 ± 12.6% versus 66.5 ± 7.0% [P < 0.05] at 10-8 mol/L Ang II; 2.3 ± 1.1 µm versus 5.2 ± 0.8 µm [P = 0.054], 25.5 ± 10.2% versus 62.2 ± 8.0% [P < 0.05] at 10-6 mol/L Ang II, male mice). Female (n = 11) and male (n = 7) mice did not differ in regard to their response to Ang II during the exposure to L-NAME (Figure 3).

Ang II Effect in eNOS Knockout Mice
In mice that were homozygous (-/-) for disruption of the eNOS gene (female mice, n = 8), Ang II reduced diameters from 8.2 ± 0.9 µm (control) to 0.7 ± 0.5 µm (P < 0.05) and 9.1 ± 6.0% (P < 0.05), respectively, at 10-8 mol/L Ang II and to 0.8 ± 0.6 µm (P < 0.05) and 11.2 ± 8.2% (P < 0.05), respectively, at 10-6 mol/L Ang II (Figure 4). The values at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L were significantly less in comparison with arteriolar diameters of wild-type mice that were treated with the same Ang II dose (female mice, n = 9). No significant differences in Ang II reactivity were found between eNOS knockout and wild-type mice that were pretreated with L-NAME (female mice, n = 11; Figure 4). In both groups, complete constriction of the vessels usually occurred at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L Ang II (for example, see Figure 5).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Comparison of vasoconstriction to Ang II, Ang II + L-NAME treatment, and Ang II in mice that were homozygous (-/-) for disruption of the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) gene. *, significant differences in arteriolar diameter in comparison of Ang II and Ang II + L-NAME; #, significant differences in arteriolar diameter in comparison of Ang II in wild-type and eNOS knockout mice.

 


View larger version (92K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Isolated, perfused Af of the mouse (perfusion pressure 70 mmHg) during the control period (A) and after administration of Ang II (10-8 mol/L) and pretreatment with L-NAME (10-4 mol/L). Complete constriction is observed in B.

 


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 
This study shows that endothelial NO is important in counteracting Ang II vasoconstriction of isolated mouse Af. Remarkably, however, administration of the precursor of the NO production L-arginine or blockage of the NOS activity by L-NAME without Ang II does not influence the diameter of Af (Figures 1 and 2). Thus, the basal activity of NO is negligible in this preparation.

In vivo, L-arginine causes an increased plasma flow and GFR in rats (13). Accordingly, pharmacologic blockade of NO production leads to an increase in renal vascular resistance (1, 13,14,15) and a decrease in renal plasma flow in the rat (13,16). A bulk of evidence indicates that the L-arginine-mediated vasodilatation depends on NO (for overview, see reference 17). As was mentioned above, in the present study, L-arginine did not significantly change afferent vessel diameter. This may be explained, in part, by experimental conditions, e.g., the absence of circulating vasoactive substances. Notably, the inhibition with L-NAME did not change the arteriolar diameter either. In isolated perfused vessels, there is no supply of NO precursors during the experiment, which could explain the lacking L-NAME vasoconstriction. However, replenishing L-arginine to the bath solution failed to elicit an L-NAME response. These results differ from studies on isolated Af of the rabbit (6,18). In those studies, a clear reduction of the vessel diameter in response to L-NAME pretreatment was observed. Methods and drug concentration used in these studies match with our experimental protocols. Thus, our results suggest that, in mice, vasoconstriction caused by Ang II (or possibly other vasoconstrictors) is a prerequisite for a functional significance of the NO system in the control of vascular diameter.

In our study, Ang II constricted the Af significantly in a dose-dependent manner. The contraction reached significance at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L Ang II. The results agree well with investigations in vivo and in vitro that demonstrated the vasoconstrictor properties of Ang II in Af in rabbit and rat (6,19,20,21). In contrast to previous experiments in isolated Af in the rabbit (6), we observed a prolonged contraction. This can be explained by the proposed low eNOS activity in mice. Accordingly, pretreatment with L-NAME augmented the vasoconstrictor action of Ang II at 10-8 and 10-6 mol/L.

The advantage of miniaturizing the experimental setup to allow Af perfusion of the mouse is that knockout models can be investigated. In eNOS knockout mice, which have a very low endothelial NO production, the response to Ang II was increased (Figure 4). An antagonistic action of Ang II and NO on Af in normotensive rats (19,21) and in isolated perfused Af in rabbits has been reported elsewhere (6,18). From these studies, as well as from studies in Ang II—hypertensive rats (22), it is assumed that Ang II induces NO production in renal vessels. Thus, blocking NO withdraws the counterbalance to Ang II vasoconstriction. Remarkably, in the present study, the entire effect of NO relied on Ang II induction. It is not clear whether the activation of AT1 or AT2 receptors stimulates the release of NO from Af. Both AT1 receptors of endothelial cells and AT2 receptors have been discussed elsewhere (4,18,23,24).

In the kidney, all isoforms of NOS have been discovered (25,26). Neuronal NOS and eNOS are found in the renal vasculature and in the glomerulus (27,28). The question arises as to which of the isoforms are involved in the Ang II—NO interaction. It could be shown that Ang II acts dose dependently and that the vasoconstrictive effect is enhanced in eNOS knockout mice. Because both the L-NAME treatment and knockout of the eNOS produces comparable increases in Ang II vasoconstriction, it is concluded that the mainly endothelial-derived NO counteracts the Ang II effect in our preparation. The clear enhancement of Ang II reactivity in the eNOS knockout mice is a little surprising, because compensating mechanisms can be assumed in such mice with congenital defect of NO.

Af vasoconstriction in response to Ang II did not differ between male and female mice. Moreover, there were no differences after pretreatment with L-NAME in the Ang II dose response in either of these groups. Our perfusion model is free of circulating hormonal influences and does not contain estrogen. Hormones were not added, and so, in the present model, it is assumed that gender does not change the response to Ang II.

In conclusion, the present study shows that it is feasible to microdissect and microperfuse mouse Af, thereby allowing studies on genetically modified mice. From the data obtained in Af of eNOS knockout mice and Af pretreated with L-NAME, it seems that the Ang II vasoconstriction elicits a counterbalancing NO release. The endothelial NOS isoform is responsible for this action. Furthermore, the NO system of isolated perfused Af in mice differs from other species in regard to its dependence on Ang II. Finally, this study also shows that there are no gender differences in Ang II—NO interaction in Af.


    Acknowledgments
 
The excellent technical assistance of Uta Stangenberg is gratefully acknowledged. Pernille B. Hansen and Ole Skøtt (Odense, Denmark) are thanked for their help with the microperfusion technique and for helpful discussions, as well as Holger Scholz for his intellectual input.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Baumann JE, Persson PB, Ehmke H, Nafz B, Kirchheim HR: Role of endothelium-derived relaxing factor in renal autoregulation in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol 263:F208 -F213, 1992[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Chin SY, Wang CT, Majid DS, Navar LG: Renoprotective effects of nitric oxide in angiotensin II-induced hypertension in the rat. Am J Physiol 274:F876 -F882, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Navar LG, Ichihara A, Chin SY, Imig JD: Nitric oxide-angiotensin II interactions in angiotensin II-dependent hypertension. Acta Physiol Scand 168:139 -147, 2000[Medline]
  4. Boulanger CM, Caputo L, Levy BI: Endothelial AT1-mediated release of nitric oxide decreases angiotensin II contractions in rat carotid artery. Hypertension 26:752 -757, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Siragy HM, Carey RM: The subtype-2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor regulates renal cyclic guanosine 3', 5'-monophosphate and AT1 receptor-mediated prostaglandin E2 production in conscious rats. J Clin Invest 97:1978 -1982, 1996[Medline]
  6. Ito S, Johnson CS, Carretero OA: Modulation of angiotensin II-induced vasoconstriction by endothelium-derived relaxing factor in the isolated microperfused rabbit afferent arteriole. J Clin Invest 87:1656 -1663, 1991
  7. Stauss HM, Godecke A, Mrowka R, Schrader J, Persson PB: Enhanced blood pressure variability in eNOS knockout mice. Hypertension 33:1359 -1363, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Shesely EG, Maeda N, Kim HS, Desai KM, Krege JH, Laubach VE, Sherman PA, Sessa WC, Smithies O: Elevated blood pressures in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:13 ,176-13,181, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ohashi Y, Kawashima S, Hirata K, Yamashita T, Ishida T, Inoue N, Sakoda T, Kurihara H, Yazaki Y, Yokoyama M: Hypotension and reduced nitric oxide-elicited vasorelaxation in transgenic mice overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase. J Clin Invest102 : 2061-2071,1998[Medline]
  10. Brosnihan KB, Li P, Ganten D, Ferrario CM: Estrogen protects transgenic hypertensive rats by shifting the vasoconstrictor-vasodilator balance of RAS. Am J Physiol273 : R1908-R1915,1997
  11. Nickenig G, Baumer AT, Grohe C, Kahlert S, Strehlow K, Rosenkranz S, Stablein A, Beckers F, Smits JF, Daemen MJ, Vetter H, Bohm M: Estrogen modulates AT1 receptor gene expression in vitro and in vivo. Circulation 97:2197 -2201, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Rubanyi GM, Freay AD, Kauser K, Sukovich D, Burton G, Lubahn DB, Couse JF, Curtis SW, Korach KS: Vascular estrogen receptors and endothelium-derived nitric oxide production in the mouse aorta. Gender difference and effect of estrogen receptor gene disruption. J Clin Invest 99:2429 -2437, 1997[Medline]
  13. Baylis C, Harton P, Engels K: Endothelial derived relaxing factor controls renal hemodynamics in the normal rat kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 1:875 -881, 1990[Abstract]
  14. Sandner P, Kornfeld M, Ruan X, Arendshorst WJ, Kurtz A: Nitric oxide/cAMP interactions in the control of rat renal vascular resistance. Circ Res 84:186 -192, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. De Nicola L, Blantz RC, Gabbai FB: Nitric oxide and angiotensin II. Glomerular and tubular interaction in the rat. J Clin Invest 89:1248 -1256, 1992
  16. King AJ, Troy JL, Anderson S, Neuringer JR, Gunning M, Brenner BM: Nitric oxide: A potential mediator of amino acid-induced renal hyperemia and hyperfiltration. J Am Soc Nephrol1 : 1271-1277,1991[Abstract]
  17. Klahr S: Can L-arginine manipulation reduce renal disease? Semin Nephrol 19:304 -309, 1999[Medline]
  18. Kohagura K, Endo Y, Ito O, Arima S, Omata K, Ito S: Endogenous nitric oxide and epoxyeicosatrienoic acids modulate angiotensin II-induced constriction in the rabbit afferent arteriole. Acta Physiol Scand 168:107 -112, 2000[Medline]
  19. Parekh N, Dobrowolski L, Zou AP, Steinhausen M: Nitric oxide modulates angiotensin II- and norepinephrine-dependent vasoconstriction in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 270:R630 -R635, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Ichihara A, Imig JD, Inscho EW, Navar LG: Interactive nitric oxide-angiotensin II influences on renal microcirculation in angiotensin II-induced hypertension. Hypertension31 : 1255-1260,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ikenaga H, Fallet RW, Carmines PK: Basal nitric oxide production curtails arteriolar vasoconstrictor responses to ANG II in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 271:F365 -F373, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sigmon DH, Beierwaltes WH: Angiotensin II: Nitric oxide interaction and the distribution of blood flow. Am J Physiol265 : R1276-R1283,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Pueyo ME, Arnal JF, Rami J, Michel JB: Angiotensin II stimulates the production of NO and peroxynitrite in endothelial cells. Am J Physiol 274:C214 -C220, 1998
  24. Siragy HM, Carey RM: The subtype 2 (AT2) angiotensin receptor mediates renal production of nitric oxide in conscious rats. J Clin Invest 100:264 -269, 1997[Medline]
  25. Star RA: Intrarenal localization of nitric oxide synthase isoforms and soluble guanylyl cyclase. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 24:607 -610, 1997[Medline]
  26. Mundel P, Bachmann S, Bader M, Fischer A, Kummer W, Mayer B, Kriz W: Expression of nitric oxide synthase in kidney macula densa cells. Kidney Int 42:1017 -1019, 1992[Medline]
  27. Kone BC, Baylis C: Biosynthesis and homeostatic roles of nitric oxide in the normal kidney. Am J Physiol272 : F561-F578,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Millatt LJ, Abdel-Rahman EM, Siragy HM: Angiotensin II and nitric oxide: A question of balance. Regul Pept81 : 1-10,1999[Medline]
Received for publication July 18, 2000. Accepted for publication November 22, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M. Carlstrom, E. Y. Lai, A. Steege, M. Sendeski, Z. Ma, S. Zabihi, U. J. Eriksson, A. Patzak, and A. E. G. Persson
Nitric Oxide Deficiency and Increased Adenosine Response of Afferent Arterioles in Hydronephrotic Mice With Hypertension
Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1386 - 1392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
L. Nordquist, E. Y. Lai, M. Sjoquist, A. Patzak, and A. E. G. Persson
Proinsulin C-peptide constricts glomerular afferent arterioles in diabetic mice. A potential renoprotective mechanism
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2008; 294(3): R836 - R841.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
A. Patzak, A. Steege, E. Y. Lai, J. O. Brinkmann, E. Kupsch, N. Spielmann, A. Gericke, A. Skalweit, J. Stegbauer, P. B. Persson, et al.
Angiotensin II response in afferent arterioles of mice lacking either the endothelial or neuronal isoform of nitric oxide synthase
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R429 - R437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
J. Stegbauer, Y. Kuczka, O. Vonend, I. Quack, L. Sellin, A. Patzak, A. Steege, K. Langnaese, and L. C. Rump
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase is predominantly involved in angiotensin II modulation of renal vascular resistance and norepinephrine release
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2008; 294(2): R421 - R428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
E. Y. Lai, A. E. G. Persson, B. Bodin, O. Kallskog, A. Andersson, U. Pettersson, P. Hansell, and L. Jansson
Endothelin-1 and pancreatic islet vasculature: studies in vivo and on isolated, vascularly perfused pancreatic islets
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1616 - E1623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
E. Y. Lai, L. Jansson, A. Patzak, and A. E. G. Persson
Vascular Reactivity in Arterioles From Normal and Alloxan-Diabetic Mice: Studies on Single Perfused Islets
Diabetes, January 1, 2007; 56(1): 107 - 112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
Y.-F. Li, W. Wang, W. G. Mayhan, and K. P. Patel
Angiotensin-mediated increase in renal sympathetic nerve discharge within the PVN: role of nitric oxide
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2006; 290(4): R1035 - R1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Patzak, J. Bontscho, E. Lai, E. Kupsch, A. Skalweit, C.-M. Richter, M. Zimmermann, C. Thone-Reineke, O. Joehren, M. Godes, et al.
Angiotensin II sensitivity of afferent glomerular arterioles in endothelin-1 transgenic mice
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., December 1, 2005; 20(12): 2681 - 2689.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
C. S. Wilcox
Oxidative stress and nitric oxide deficiency in the kidney: a critical link to hypertension?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, October 1, 2005; 289(4): R913 - R935.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
K. Sato, M. Kihara, T. Hashimoto, K. Matsushita, Y.-I. Koide, K. Tamura, N. Hirawa, Y. Toya, A. Fukamizu, and S. Umemura
Alterations in Renal Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase Expression by Salt Diet in Angiotensin Type-1a Receptor Gene Knockout Mice
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2004; 15(7): 1756 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Y. Zhou, W. P. Dirksen, G. J. Babu, and M. Periasamy
Differential vasoconstrictions induced by angiotensin II: role of AT1 and AT2 receptors in isolated C57BL/6J mouse blood vessels
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2797 - H2803.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. B. Hansen, S. Hashimoto, J. Briggs, and J. Schnermann
Attenuated renovascular constrictor responses to angiotensin II in adenosine 1 receptor knockout mice
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2003; 285(1): R44 - R49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
P. A. Ortiz and J. L. Garvin
Cardiovascular and renal control in NOS-deficient mouse models
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, March 1, 2003; 284(3): R628 - R638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
C. Yan, D. Kim, T. Aizawa, and B. C. Berk
Functional Interplay Between Angiotensin II and Nitric Oxide: Cyclic GMP as a Key Mediator
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., January 1, 2003; 23(1): 26 - 36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
M. Alonso-Galicia, K. G. Maier, A. S. Greene, A. W. Cowley Jr., and R. J. Roman
Role of 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid in the renal and vasoconstrictor actions of angiotensin II
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, July 1, 2002; 283(1): R60 - R68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by PATZAK, A.
Right arrow Articles by PERSSON, P. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by PATZAK, A.
Right arrow Articles by PERSSON, P. B.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP