Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 HOME   AUTHOR INFO   EDITORIAL BOARD   SUBSCRIBE   FEEDBACK   ALERTS   HELP 
    advanced
CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LALOUEL, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LALOUEL, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, K.
J Am Soc Nephrol 12:606-615, 2001
© 2001 American Society of Nephrology


REVIEW

Angiotensinogen in Essential Hypertension: From Genetics to Nephrology

JEAN-MARC LALOUEL*,{dagger}, ANDREAS ROHRWASSER*, DANIEL TERREROS{ddagger},||, TERRY MORGAN* and KENNETH WARD§

* Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
{dagger} Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
{ddagger} Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
§ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
|| Department of Veterans Affairs, Salt Lake City, Utah.

Correspondence to Dr. Jean-Marc Lalouel, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Eccles Institute of Human Genetics, 6th Floor, University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Phone: 801-581-4311; Fax: 801-587-9045; E-mail: jml{at}howard.genetics.utah.edu


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Abstract. There is general consensus that genetic variation accounts in part for individual susceptibilities to essential hypertension. In marked contrast to classic mendelian disorders, in which genetic alterations produce a gain or loss of function, genetic determinants of essential hypertension, high blood pressure of unknown cause, are expected to be small, achieving significance through the cumulative effects of environmental exposure over the course of a lifetime. Whether and how genetic factors that contribute to common diseases can be identified remain unclear. Research on a link between angiotensinogen and essential hypertension illustrates a path that began in genetics and is now leading toward nephrology. Various challenges encountered along the way may prove to be characteristic features of genetic investigations of the pathogenesis of common diseases. The implication of a gene by statistical analysis is only the beginning of a protracted process of functional analysis at increasing levels of biologic integration. The ultimate goal is to develop an understanding of the manner in which genetic variation at a locus can affect a physiologic parameter and to extract from this inference new knowledge of significance for the prevention or treatment of disease.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Physical health depends on both genetic background and environmental exposure. Although it is agreed that genes contribute to the development of common diseases, the identification of such genes has proven both challenging and frustrating. For conditions as poorly defined as essential hypertension, an understanding of genetic predisposition may lead to better diagnoses, prevention, or treatments. Whatever strategy is used to identify such genetic determinants, the task of establishing causation and demonstrating the mechanism of disease remains daunting. Investigations of the link between angiotensinogen and essential hypertension illustrate this point. A similar course is being pursued by other investigators in at least two other instances in which linkage and/or association with essential hypertension has been indicated (1,2).


    Development of a Genetic Hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Genetic Linkage
In 1989, we initiated genetic linkage studies of essential hypertension, in collaboration with Roger Williams, Pierre Corvol, and their colleagues. The three defining elements of the research program were a focus on components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the use of microsatellite multiallelic polymorphisms as genetic markers, and the sampling and analysis of pairs of hypertensive siblings, to test for genetic linkage with a minimum of genetic assumptions. Variations in the number of copies of a simple DNA sequence motif at the locus of interest generate size differences that can be revealed by electrophoresis; these differences can be used to track shared inheritance of a chromosomal segment among siblings. Linkage is inferred when siblings inherit the same parental copy of the gene more often than expected on the basis of random segregation (Figure 1).



View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Linkage tests in pairs of affected siblings. Whether siblings have inherited two, one, or no identical genes from the same parental copies can be estimated using electrophoretic separation of individual alleles resulting from variations in tandem repeats of simple sequence motifs.

 

Studies of renin, using either biallelic markers (3) or a microsatellite (Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Corvol P, Lalouel JM, unpublished observations), and angiotensin-converting enzyme (4) remained inconclusive. In contrast, significant genetic linkage was observed for angiotensinogen in two large series of independently ascertained sibling pairs, collected in Salt Lake City and Paris (5). In an attempt to define subsets with a greater likelihood of genetic determination, one of two criteria was used, i.e., the onset of hypertension before the age of 45 yr or the use of two antihypertensive medications (as a possible indicator of clinical severity). Greater statistical significance was achieved for each subset, despite the smaller sample sizes generated by these selection criteria. It was also noted that the greatest significance was achieved when the analysis was restricted to male siblings.

Angiotensinogen received less attention than other RAS components in previous genetic studies, despite warnings that it could well be an "underrated participant" in BP regulation and in the development of hypertension (6). It was not considered a candidate gene in early genetic studies of hypertensive rats. This relative lack of interest is attributable in part to the relative blandness of substrates, in contrast to enzymes. However, it also originates from the long-held view that angiotensinogen, which is present in plasma at concentrations long judged to be far in excess of the Km for its reaction with renin, could not contribute to BP regulation.

Allelic Association
Linkage between AGT and essential hypertension suggested that genetic variations in the AGT gene may affect individual predisposition to essential hypertension. The AGT gene was scanned for the presence of such variation, and the frequencies of common genetic polymorphisms were compared between case and control subjects. Case subjects consisted of a proband randomly selected from each sibship with multiple hypertensive patients, whereas control subjects were selected from normotensive reference populations. The most significant observation was that, at residue 235 of angiotensinogen, an allele encoding the presence of threonine (T235) instead of methionine (M235) was more frequent among case subjects than among control subjects (Figure 2A). This association was significant for both the Salt Lake City and Paris samples. Plasma angiotensinogen levels were measured for study subjects, affording a test of association with the T235/M235 polymorphism. Plasma angiotensinogen levels varied significantly with genotype, with T235 homozygotes exhibiting approximately 20% higher levels than M235 homozygotes (5). Statistical association indicates only correlation; therefore, those studies could not establish whether T235 directly imparted disease predisposition or was only a marker for other, unidentified, variations in the gene.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Allelic association between AGT and essential hypertension. (A) The T235 allele is more common than M235 among Caucasian subjects. (B) The significance of the association among Japanese subjects is more striking when it is examined in terms of genotypes, because the population frequency of the T235 allele (frequency, 0.75) is higher than that among Caucasian subjects (frequency, 0.40).

 

Genetic linkage and allelic association of an AGT variant with both essential hypertension and plasma angiotensinogen levels in two independent samples suggested that individual differences in the gene might contribute to disease development. Linkage analysis of another Caucasian sample provided consistent results (7,8). When data from nine European centers were pooled, however, no significant evidence of linkage could be obtained (9). The increased power expected for a larger sample may have been offset by increased heterogeneity of the patient populations sampled. Various attempts to replicate the association have been reported, with mixed results. Those studies were the subject of two meta-analyses, which confirmed significance in the aggregate and discussed features that affected the varying outcomes of the studies (10,11). These issues have been addressed by Corvol et al. (12).

Association with Essential Hypertension in the Japanese Population
An angiotensinogen-mediated predisposition to essential hypertension would be expected to affect sodium homeostasis and the regulation of fluid volume. Given the high prevalence of essential hypertension in Japan and the likely significance of dietary sodium for this population, a study was undertaken to test the association between T235 and essential hypertension among Japanese subjects. An initial report (13) revealed that T235 occurred at high frequency among Japanese subjects and was indeed associated with essential hypertension (Figure 2B). With one exception (14), subsequent studies in Japan have confirmed this association (15,16,17).

Association with Preeclampsia
Plasma angiotensinogen levels increase severalfold in estrogenic states such as pregnancy or oral contraceptive use, and hypertension may be induced by such states. Indeed, pre-eclampsia is a common form of pregnancy-induced hypertension that has long been considered to involve a significant but unknown genetic component. T235 occurred at higher frequency among Caucasian women with preeclampsia than among control subjects, a finding that was corroborated in a small Japanese sample (18). This observation was confirmed in a larger sample of Caucasian patients (K. Ward, unpublished observations).

Haplotype Studies
If T235 serves only as a marker for one or more unknown functional variants in the gene, stronger association may be observed for subsets of T235 alleles defined through variations occurring at other sites in the gene. Common biallelic polymorphisms were identified by screening a 1200-nucleotide segment of the AGT promoter, all exons, the intron-exon junctions, and the 3'-untranslated segment of the gene. These segments were also sequenced for 16 individuals homozygous for T235 alleles. Multiple polymorphisms that occurred non-randomly, and thus generated a limited number of haplotypes, were observed (19). The T235 alleles were subdivided into five subsets, whereas only one common variation subdivided the M235 allele (Figure 3). None of the subsets exhibited greater association with hypertension than that observed for T235 alone.



View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. Haplotypes (Hap) of AGT in a case-control study of French subjects. No single haplotype appears to account for the T235 association (19).

 

Another feature of this investigation of genetic polymorphism was the observation that several variants occurred in quasi-complete association. In particular, with few exceptions, T235 occurred with adenine (A) at position -6, whereas M235 occurred with guanine (G) at position -6. Therefore, all associations reported for T235 directly extend to A(-6).


    Development of a Molecular Hypothesis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Testing of the Significance of the T235/M235 Polymorphism
The relevance of the RAS in arterial pressure (AP) regulation and the association of the T235 allele with higher plasma angiotensinogen levels suggested that, rather than serving as a marker for a neighboring gene, molecular variation in the angiotensinogen gene could mediate individual predisposition to essential hypertension. The complete association of the T235 and A(-6) alleles forced the consideration of several hypotheses. Either variant could be functionally implicated in predisposition or both could serve as markers for one or more unknown functional determinants.

The only well defined function of angiotensinogen is its role as a hormone precursor, serving as a substrate for renin in the formation of angiotensin I (AngI). On the basis of its sequence similarity, the protein belongs to the family of serine protease inhibitors, or serpins. The family includes inhibitors such as {alpha}1-antitrypsin and antithrombin III but also includes proteins that do not exhibit an inhibitor function, such as ovalbumin. Although there is no direct evidence that angiotensinogen can serve as a serine protease inhibitor, the matter has been the subject of repeated investigations (20).

The substitution of threonine for methionine at codon 235 does not, by itself, provide any functional clue. This residue occurs in a segment of the protein that demonstrates little conservation across species. Although the three-dimensional structure of angiotensinogen has not been established, some features can be inferred from consideration of the structures of other serpins, such as {alpha}1-antitrypsin and antithrombin III (21). Codon 235 seems to occur in a part of the molecule that is not in close proximity to the amino terminus of the protein that encodes AngI. Structural models of renin complexed with peptide inhibitors demonstrate that the substrate assumes an extended conformation in the active cleft of the enzyme (22), which suggests that the amino-terminal portion of angiotensinogen protrudes in solution, with little secondary structure.

It remains conceivable that the T235/M235 polymorphism affects angiotensinogen function indirectly, by affecting protein conformation or glycosylation. To test this hypothesis, the protein, with either threonine or methionine at codon 235, was transiently expressed in cultured mammalian cells. Pulse-chase experiments demonstrated no difference between the two proteins with respect to glycosylation, secretion, or stability. Furthermore, the substitution had no detectable effect on the kinetics of enzymatic cleavage of the protein by purified recombinant human renin (23).

The T235/M235 polymorphism could also affect other biochemical characteristics and functions of angiotensinogen. A cysteine residue at position 232 may be involved in complex formation with other proteins, a process that may be differentially affected by the T235/M235 polymorphism (24). It has also been suggested that angiotensinogen may have a reactive center that mediates a serine protease inhibitor function (20); in vitro evidence was recently presented (25).

Testing of the Significance of Promoter Variants In Vitro
The G(-6)/A(-6) polymorphism occurs in the core promoter of the angiotensinogen gene. Mutations in such a gene region could affect DNA interactions with factors involved in transcription initiation and could thus affect the rate at which the gene is expressed. Markedly reduced expression of a reporter gene in HepG2 cells after removal of the residues from position -16 to position +44 indicated the critical significance of this segment of the AGT promoter (26). Other experiments have led to the suggestion that a ubiquitous transcription factor that binds to a segment of the mouse promoter spanning residues -6 to +22 could be an important determinant of transcriptional activity (27).

To test the significance of the G(-6)/A(-6) polymorphism in angiotensinogen expression, fusion genes were generated by placing a reporter gene (luciferase) under the control of segments of the human angiotensinogen promoter spanning either nucleotides -256 to +90 or nucleotides -70 to +90. Such fusion genes with either variant were transiently expressed in two types of mammalian cells, i.e., HepG2 and HEK293, which are transformed human hepatocyte and embryonic kidney cell lines, respectively. A large number of parallel experiments were performed in quadruplicate, using a variety of controls, to ensure the validity of the experimental comparisons. Further validation was provided by mutagenesis studies.

These experiments revealed consistent effects of the nucleotide substitution at position -6 on the transcriptional activity of the reporter (Figure 4). The differences observed were highly statistically significant, with significance levels ranging from 10-8 to 10-16. The magnitude of the observed effect, however, was modest; differences ranged from 20 to 50% when expressed on the observed scale of reporter activity, with A(-6) exhibiting greater activity than G(-6). Compared with effects typically analyzed in the transcription field, where losses or gains of certain DNA-protein interactions are examined, this seems to be a small effect. It is also small compared with the large differences noted between experiments, because the design affords little control of factors affecting transfection efficiency. If we follow the convention of expressing the data after standardization within experiments, the substitution effect can be expressed relative to its SD (as determined by t test). The differences noted were equal to or exceded 2 SD units (Figure 4). For statisticians, the magnitude of the difference between two means can be ascertained only by reference to the SD of the observations. When the data are considered in that context, the high level of significance observed reflects the high statistical power afforded by extensive experimental replication (23).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Functional test of a AGT core promoter variant in vitro. Transactivation experiments revealed a significant effect of G(-6)/A(-6) on a reporter gene transfected into cultured hepatocytes. Results are presented as means and SD, after standardization among multiple experiments. Luc, luciferase.

 

The differences in promoter activity associated with the nucleotide substitution suggested that the substitution could affect interactions with nuclear proteins involved in transcriptional control. DNA binding studies provided support for such specific interactions (23). The identification of specific factors that bind to this region of the gene could prove challenging, however, given the relatively low affinities revealed in these experiments.

This work illustrates some of the unique challenges that face investigators who attempt to elucidate the genetic determinants of common diseases. Graded differences that affect homeostatic regulation are not expected to produce the clear-cut qualitative differences that accompany mutations that produce gain or loss of function. It is also clear that causality cannot be inferred from such experiments. The novel observation that an additional common polymorphism at nucleotide 67 is in complete association with both the G(-6)/A(-6) and M235/T235 polymorphisms (28) (Rohrwasser A, Lalouel JM, unpublished observations) further emphasizes this point. Because this polymorphism was also present in our expression studies (23), our published results reflect the compound effects of joint substitutions at nucleotides -6 and 67. In preliminary experiments, substitution at either site appears to affect transcription in vitro.

In Vivo Correlations
These promoter transactivation experiments support the conclusion that naturally occurring variations in the AGT promoter can affect basal transcription in vitro. As noted, "it is clearly not possible to directly extend the results of transfection experiments done with truncated AGT promoters in cultured cells to the function of an intact AGT gene at the level of the whole organism" (23). Two independent lines of evidence provide support for this hypothesis, however.

Smithies and colleagues (29,30) have provided direct evidence that a modest increase in AGT expression can lead to both increased plasma angiotensinogen levels and increased AP. Those authors used homologous recombination to inactivate or generate targeted gene duplication of the AGT gene in mice, generating animals with zero to four functional AGT genes. Of particular significance in the present context was the observation that animals with three functional AGT genes exhibited 10 to 20% elevations in plasma angiotensinogen levels and AP, compared with animals with two unaltered genes (Figure 5). The transgenic approach demonstrated a direct causal link between increased AGT expression and elevated BP. Furthermore, it demonstrated that a difference in expression of no more than 50% was sufficient to produce a detectable difference in AP.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 5. Effect of AGT copy number on plasma angiotensinogen levels and arterial pressure in mice. The results reported by Smithies and colleagues (29,30) are compared with the association between the M235/T235 polymorphism and plasma angiotensinogen concentrations in human subjects.

 

The complete association between the polymorphism at nucleotide -6 and that at codon 235 suggested that the latter variation, which is present in transcribed mRNA, could serve as a marker to test for effects of the former on gene expression in tissue extracts. Although liver tissue was not readily available to us for this purpose, we had access to decidual tissue collected from women who had undergone elective abortions in the first trimester of pregnancy. We observed that, in human decidua, AGT expression was restricted to the smooth muscle cells of the spiral arteries (31). Total RNA isolated from decidual tissue from 39 women with the heterozygous M235/T235 genotype was tested for differential representation of AGT mRNA carrying either allele, using two different procedures, i.e., an allele-specific ligation assay and a single-nucleotide primer extension assay (31). Both assays revealed a significant excess of mRNA with T235 over mRNA with M235, providing an in vivo correlation in support of our hypothesis.

Molecular Hypothesis
The experimental evidence accumulated thus far affords the delineation of a working hypothesis. This hypothesis states that individual variations in the AGT gene that are associated with naturally occurring variations at nucleotides -6 and 67 and codon 235 impart modest differences in AGT gene expression. Individuals with the A(-6), C67, and T235 alleles may exhibit increased basal expression of the gene, which with time may lead to elevated baseline AP, compared with individuals without these alleles. The hypothesis that a chronic difference in AGT expression can lead to hypertension is supported by the animal experiments reported by Smithies and colleagues (29,30).


    Significance of Angiotensinogen in Circulatory Homeostasis
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Challenges in Proving Function and Cause
Genetic and molecular studies of the angiotensinogen gene support the hypothesis that genetic variations at this locus impart individual differences in AP regulation and the likelihood of developing essential hypertension. The finding that the linkage and association observed for such a phenotype are only modest could have been anticipated, given the high prevalence of essential hypertension, the ambiguous nature of its definition, the lack of specificity of the phenotype, its multifactorial causation, and the significance of environmental factors (such as diet and lifestyle) in its determination. For classic mendelian inheritance, support for linkage can be strengthened by tracing single mutations in extended pedigrees. For common diseases, extending a collection of sibling pairs may not necessarily increase the statistical power, because enhanced ascertainment may be achieved only at the cost of increased heterogeneity in the sample.

Similarly, it is not altogether surprising that the actual molecular variants involved in the angiotensinogen gene, and the manner in which they affect circulatory homeostasis, cannot be established from direct observation of the mutation. Nonsense mutations, which signal gain or loss of function in classic mendelian disorders, were not found in the gene, nor were they expected for a genetic determinant of a common disease that must be both frequent in the population and of limited physiologic significance.

The molecular hypothesis outlined above suggests that genetic variations may affect angiotensinogen gene expression. It provides few clues, however, regarding the physiologic processes affected by the molecular variations observed in human subjects. To better understand the functional significance of individual variations for angiotensinogen expression, knowledge must advance at two levels, as follows. What physiologic functions are affected by changes in angiotensinogen expression? In what cell, in what organ, and under what circumstances can such differences in expression ultimately affect AP?

Evidence that Changes in Angiotensinogen Concentrations Can Affect the Rate of AngII Formation
The activity of the RAS depends on the rate of formation of AngII. Acute stimulation or depression of the system is mediated primarily by regulation of renin release and expression (32). In contrast to renin, the plasma concentrations of angiotensinogen vary slowly. However, in response to stimulation by estrogens, glucocorticoids, or thyroid hormone, plasma angiotensinogen levels can increase severalfold in 1 to 4 d. It was long thought that angiotensinogen was present in plasma at concentrations far in excess of the Km for its reaction with renin and that it was therefore not an important determinant of AngII formation. In more recent work performed with highly purified preparations of both enzyme and substrate, it was recognized that the plasma concentration of angiotensinogen was close to the Km for the reaction (33). It follows that changes in plasma angiotensinogen levels can indeed affect the rate of AngII formation, with other factors being equal. Another recent argument supporting the same conclusion is that, because of the high affinity but slow cleavage rate for the reaction between angiotensinogen and renin, the concentration of the former may affect the catabolism of the latter (34).

Evidence that Chronic Elevations in AngII Formation Can Lead to Increased AP
Angiotensinogen may contribute to AP regulation through extracellular fluid volume control. Gene titration experiments demonstrated that moderate but sustained increases in AGT expression led directly to increased AP (29,30), and kinetic considerations indicate that such increases could affect AngII formation.

Proof that chronic infusion of AngII at subpressor doses can lead to progressive increases in AP has been provided (35,36). Guyton long ago suggested that the increases in AP resulted from sodium retention, concluding that "the sodium-retaining effect of angiotensin almost certainly results from a direct effect of angiotensin on the kidney itself" (37, p 191).

Effects on Systemic and Local RAS
The systemic RAS and multiple local RAS are involved in AP control (32), and any of these systems can be affected by variation in angiotensinogen expression. The correlated increases in plasma angiotensinogen levels and AP observed in transgenic animals as the number of AGT genes is increased do not necessarily indicate a causal relationship between these two phenotypes. The detection of abundant angiotensinogen mRNA in proximal tubule and its stimulation by dietary salt (38,39) suggested a significant role for a local RAS in some aspects of proximal tubule function.

Significance of AngII in Renal Function
There is considerable evidence that AngII of both intrarenal and circulating origin affects renal function through effects on hemodynamics, the regulation of glomerular filtration, or the regulation of sodium reabsorption. Hall and Brands presented a very cogent review of the evidence supporting the conclusion that "the direct intrarenal actions of angiotensin II play a dominant role in long-term regulation of volume homeostasis and blood pressure" (40). It is often assumed that the sodiumretaining effects of AngII are mediated by stimulation of aldosterone secretion. Experimental models, however, convincingly demonstrated that, although minimal levels of aldosterone are necessary for normal physiologic function, "changes in aldosterone secretion are normally not essential in maintaining sodium balance or arterial pressure during fluctuations in sodium intake" (40).

High Luminal Concentrations of AngII in Proximal Tubule
The finding by Seikaly et al. (41) that AngII is present in the luminal fluid of proximal tubule at concentrations that exceed those in plasma by at least 2 orders of magnitude suggested local formation of the peptide. Because the high molecular weight of angiotensinogen precludes its filtration through the glomerular membrane, tubular AngII is likely to be derived from angiotensinogen synthesized in the proximal tubule. Braam et al. (42) confirmed such high AngII concentrations. They also demonstrated that AngI was present in tubular fluid at concentrations similar to those of AngII. Local conversion is likely, because high levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme in proximal tubule have been reported (43). Whether angiotensinogen or angiotensin peptides are secreted by proximal tubule and whether filtered or locally produced renin catalyzes the reaction remains unsettled, as reviewed by Navar et al. (44). Formation of AngII at this site could be significant for the regulation of sodium reabsorption in this proximal segment of the nephron. Angiotensin receptors have been observed at both the basolateral and luminal sides of proximal tubule (45). There is abundant evidence that luminal AngII stimulates the apical sodium/hydrogen-exchanger and possibly other transport systems in proximal tubule (46).

Whether AngII exerts any effects in more distal segments of the nephron is less clear, although several arguments suggest that it might (40,44). At least one report indicates that it may affect sodium reabsorption by an amiloride-sensitive channel in early collecting tubule (47). Angiotensin-converting enzyme is found in luminal fluid as well as at the luminal surface of distal sites (43), and AngII receptors have been mapped along most of the nephron, with evidence for their presence on the luminal side being provided by immunocytochemical analyses (48).


    Elements of a Paracrine System along the Entire Nephron
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
Luminal Secretion of Angiotensinogen
Taken together, these observations point to the significance of angiotensinogen expression in proximal tubule for some aspects of tubular function, particularly in proximal tubule. While reexamining this issue, we obtained experimental evidence suggesting that a paracrine RAS may operate along the entire nephron (49).

Using mice as an experimental model, we confirmed that angiotensinogen was expressed in proximal tubule, in a dietary sodium-dependent manner (38), and in no other tubular segments. The granular appearance of angiotensinogen in the vicinity of periodic acid-Schiff-counterstained brush borders in proximal tubule sections suggested a secretory process (Figure 6A). When confluent monolayers of conditionally immortalized murine proximal tubule cells (50) were grown on permeable membranes, angiotensinogen was reproducibly detected only in the apical chamber (Figure 6B). These in vitro data suggested secretion into the tubular lumen in vivo; some evidence for this process was previously provided by micropuncture data presented in abstract form (51). Because angiotensinogen is not filtered, indirect evidence for luminal secretion can be sought by testing for the presence of angiotensinogen in the final urine. Angiotensinogen was detected in the urine of mice and human subjects by an indirect immunoassay that measured uncleaved protein. No significant amounts of material could be detected for mice fed a high-sodium diet, whereas amounts reaching nanomolar concentrations were observed after sodium restriction. Taken together, these observations support the conclusion that angiotensinogen is secreted in the tubular fluid of proximal tubule, as a function of dietary sodium, and transits through the entire nephron. This contrasts with the fact that neither renin protein nor renin mRNA could be observed in proximal tubule under conditions of either high or low sodium intake, whether tissues or murine proximal tubule cells were examined.



View larger version (99K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 6. Angiotensinogen expression in proximal tubule. (A) Immunoreactive angiotensinogen is evident in the vicinity of brush borders of proximal tubule epithelium in sodium-restricted animals. (B) Proximal tubule epithelial cells grown as monolayers secrete angiotensinogen (Ang) to the apical side.

 

Renin Expression in Connecting Tubule
The presence of angiotensinogen in tubular fluid throughout the nephron could represent elimination or delivery to a distal site. Immunoreactive renin has occasionally been noted in tubular segments (52,53,54,55), but those observations have been interpreted either as artifactual or as evidence for nonspecific reuptake of filtered renin. We examined renin distribution in the kidneys of animals after acute changes in dietary sodium levels. In sodium-restricted animals, specific immunostaining was observed in cortical clusters of open tubular segments that, on the basis of their distribution and morphologic features, were identified as the arcades formed by merging connecting tubules of midcortical and deep nephrons (Figure 7A). Staining was predominantly observed at the apical side of some of the cells in these tubular sections. Staining for renin and H+-ATPase in consecutive serial sections revealed that the two stains were mutually exclusive, supporting the conclusion that renin expression was restricted to principal cells of the connecting tubule (Figure 7B).



View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 7. Renin in connecting tubule. (A) Immunoreactive renin is observed in tubular arcades of midcortical nephrons. (B and C) Renin immunostaining is observed in principal cells of connecting tubule (B) but not in intercalated cells staining for H+-ATPase (C).

 

Local synthesis was demonstrated using two approaches, i.e., microdissection of tubular segments followed by reverse-transcription-PCR and in situ reverse transcription-PCR (49). For each approach, four independent experiments were performed and yielded concordant results. Detection of renin mRNA required induction by either acute sodium restriction or amiloride inhibition of sodium reabsorption in animals after the switch to a high-sodium diet. To obtain additional evidence for the local production of renin, segments of midcortical tubular arcades were microdissected from sodium-restricted animals and the cells were dissociated, washed, transferred to charged membranes, and probed for the presence of immunoreactive renin (56). Connecting tubule cells displayed immunoreactive halos similar to those observed for positive control cells (Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transformed for mouse renin), in contrast to negative control cells (Chinese hamster ovary cells stably transformed for human angiotensinogen) (49).


    Significance of a Tubular RAS along the Entire Nephron
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
These observations provide direct evidence for a RAS extending from proximal to distal segments of the nephron (Figure 8). The regulation and function of this paracrine system are only partly understood at this time. The contrasted distribution of angiotensinogen in proximal tubule and renin in connecting tubules suggests both regional and coordinated functions.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 8. Elements of a paracrine tubular renin-angiotensin system. Filtered renin (R) of systemic origin may interact with angiotensinogen (A) secreted by proximal tubule (PT) to regulate bulk sodium reabsorption. Connecting tubule (CNT) renin may interact with angiotensinogen of proximal origin to regulate fine sodium reabsorption.

 

In proximal tubule, the partition of circulating and luminal angiotensinogen across the glomerular membrane contrasts with the filtration of systemic renin. This topographic organization affords both independent regulation of the rate of angiotensin formation through control of substrate availability in each compartment and coordinated regulation through delivery of active enzyme. Assuming that the dominant role of the circulating RAS is in regulating vascular tone, whereas that of AngII formation in proximal tubule is via its effect on bulk sodium reabsorption, this disposition may be critical for circulatory homeostasis, by affording coordinated regulation of both vascular tone and plasma volume.

The macula densa provides a mechanism to relate renin release by the juxtaglomerular apparatus into the circulation to sodium delivery downstream from the proximal tubule. Aspects of this feedback regulation have been well characterized (57). Although it is self-evident that sodium excretion depends on fine reabsorption in terminal segments of the nephron, it is unclear whether and how the RAS is involved. There is ample indirect evidence that intrarenal generation of AngII plays a critical role in circulatory homeostasis in response to changes in dietary sodium (40). The synthesis and secretion of renin in connecting tubules and the action of renin on luminal angiotensinogen originating in proximal tubule would allow AngII to participate in the regulation of sodium excretion through its effect on sodium reabsorption in the collecting duct. Interactions between substrate originating in proximal tubule and renin generated in connecting tubule may also provide a mechanism to coordinate bulk and fine sodium reabsorption at these two sites, in a manner that remains to be characterized. Although speculative, these considerations can serve as a basis for future experimental studies.


    Conclusion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 
The identification of genetic determinants of essential hypertension might prove more challenging than expected from the remarkable advances that have been made regarding the molecular basis of inherited mendelian disorders. The reason evidently is that essential hypertension does not follow simple mendelian inheritance. Modest genetic differences become relevant only with integration of various environmental exposures with time. Such subtle individual differences may represent the key to disease mechanisms and specific therapeutic interventions, however. When the bases of individual differences in physiologic regulation are understood, risk factors may be better correlated with biologic parameters that more directly reflect genetic effects, and drugs may be developed to target such individual differences. The key to effective diagnosis and treatment remains the identification of inborn differences that account for innate individual tendencies to deviate from good health.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Development of a Genetic...
 Development of a Molecular...
 Significance of Angiotensinogen...
 Elements of a Paracrine...
 Significance of a Tubular...
 Conclusion
 References
 

  1. Ferrandi M, Bianchi G: Genetic mechanisms underlying the regulation of urinary sodium excretion and arterial blood pressure: The role of adducin. Acta Physiol Scand 168:187 -193, 2000[Medline]
  2. Siffert W: G protein beta3 subunit 825T allele, hypertension, obesity, and diabetic nephropathy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15:1298 -1306, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jeunemaitre X, Rigat B, Charru A, Houot AM, Soubrier F, Corvol P: Sib pair linkage analysis of renin gene haplotypes in human essential hypertension. Hum Genet 88:301 -306, 1992[Medline]
  4. Jeunemaitre X, Lifton RP, Hunt SC, Williams RR, Lalouel JM: Absence of linkage between the angiotensin converting enzyme locus and human essential hypertension. Nat Genet 1:72 -75, 1992[Medline]
  5. Jeunemaitre X, Soubrier F, Kotelevtsev YV, Lifton RP, Williams CS, Charru A, Hunt SC, Hopkins PN, Williams RR, Lalouel JM, et al.: Molecular basis of human hypertension: Role of angiotensinogen. Cell 71:169 -180, 1992[Medline]
  6. Menard J, el Amrani AI, Savoie F, Bouhnik J: Angiotensinogen: An attractive and underrated participant in hypertension and inflammation [Letter]. Hypertension 18:705 -707, 1991[Free Full Text]
  7. Caulfield M, Lavender P, Farrall M, Munroe P, Lawson M, Turner P, Clark AJ: Linkage of the angiotensinogen gene to essential hypertension. N Engl J Med 330:1629 -1633, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Caulfield M, Lavender P, Newell-Price J, Kamdar S, Farrall M, Clark AJ: Angiotensinogen in human essential hypertension. Hypertension 28:1123 -1125, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Brand E, Chatelain N, Keavney B, Caulfield M, Citterio L, Connell J, Grobbee D, Schmidt S, Schunkert H, Schuster H, Sharma AM, Soubrier F: Evaluation of the angiotensinogen locus in human essential hypertension: A European study. Hypertension31 : 725-729,1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kunz R, Kreutz R, Beige J, Distler A, Sharma AM: Association between the angiotensinogen 235T-variant and essential hypertension in whites: A systematic review and methodological appraisal. Hypertension 30:1331 -1337, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Staessen JA, Kuznetsova T, Wang JG, Emelianov D, Vlietinck R, Fagard R: M235T angiotensinogen gene polymorphism and cardiovascular renal risk. J Hypertens 17:9 -17, 1999[Medline]
  12. Corvol P, Persu A, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Jeunemaitre X: Seven lessons from two candidate genes in human essential hypertension: Angiotensinogen and epithelial sodium channel. Hypertension 33:1324 -1331, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hata A, Namikawa C, Sasaki M, Sato K, Nakamura T, Tamura K, Lalouel JM: Angiotensinogen as a risk factor for essential hypertension in Japan. J Clin Invest 93:1285 -1287, 1994
  14. Kato N, Sugiyama T, Morita H, Kurihara H, Yamori Y, Yazaki Y: Angiotensinogen gene and essential hypertension in the Japanese: Extensive association study and meta-analysis on six reported studies. J Hypertens 17:757 -763, 1999[Medline]
  15. Iwai N, Ohmichi N, Nakamura Y, Mitsunami K, Kinoshita M: Molecular variants of the angiotensinogen gene and hypertension in a Japanese population. Hypertens Res 17:117 -121, 1994
  16. Kamitani A, Rakugi H, Higaki J, Yi Z, Mikami H, Miki T, Ogihara T: Association analysis of a polymorphism of the angiotensinogen gene with essential hypertension in Japanese. J Hum Hypertens8 : 521-524,1994[Medline]
  17. Nishiuma S, Kario K, Kayaba K, Nagio N, Shimada K, Matsuo T, Matsuo M: Effect of the angiotensinogen gene Met235 Thr variant on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in two Japanese populations. J Hypertens 13:717 -722, 1995[Medline]
  18. Ward K, Hata A, Jeunemaitre X, Helin C, Nelson L, Namikawa C, Farrington PF, Ogasawara M, Suzumori K, Tomoda S, et al.: A molecular variant of angiotensinogen associated with preeclampsia. Nat Genet 4: 59-61,1993[Medline]
  19. Jeunemaitre X, Inoue I, Williams C, Charru A, Tichet J, Powers M, Sharma AM, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Hata A, Corvol P, Lalouel JM: Haplotypes of angiotensinogen in essential hypertension. Am J Hum Genet 60:1448 -1460, 1997[Medline]
  20. Tewksbury D: Angiotensinogen. Handb Physiol2000
  21. Carrell RW, Stein PE, Fermi G, Wardell MR: Biological implications of a 3 structure of dimeric antithrombin. Structure 2:257 -270, 1994[Medline]
  22. Dhanaraj V, Dealwis CG, Frazao C, Badasso M, Sibanda BL, Tickle IJ, Cooper JB, Driessen HP, Newman M, Aguilar C, et al.: X-ray analyses of peptide-inhibitor complexes define the structural basis of specificity for human and mouse renins. Nature (Lond)357 : 466-472,1992[Medline]
  23. Inoue I, Nakajima T, Williams CS, Quackenbush J, Puryear R, Powers M, Cheng T, Ludwig EH, Sharma AM, Hata A, Jeunemaitre X, Lalouel JM: A nucleotide substitution in the promoter of human angiotensinogen is associated with essential hypertension and affects basal transcription in vitro.J Clin Invest 99:1786 -1797, 1997[Medline]
  24. Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Celerier J, Schmid G, Corvol P, Jeunemaitre X: Role of cysteine residues in human angiotensinogen: Cys232 is required for angiotensinogen-pro major basic protein complex formation. J Biol Chem 273:34480 -34487, 1998[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Celerier J, Schmid G, Le Caer JP, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Bur D, Friedlein A, Langen H, Corvol P, Jeunemaitre X: Characterization of a human angiotensinogen cleaved in its reactive center loop by a proteolytic activity from Chinese hamster ovary cells. J Biol Chem275 : 10648-10654,2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fukamizu A, Takahashi S, Seo MS, Tada M, Tanimoto K, Uehara S, Murakami K: Structure and expression of the human angiotensinogen gene: Identification of a unique and highly active promoter. J Biol Chem 265:7576 -7582, 1990[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Tamura K, Umemura S, Ishii M, Tanimoto K, Murakami K, Fukamizu A: Molecular mechanism of transcriptional activation of angiotensinogen gene by proximal promoter. J Clin Invest93 : 1370-1379,1994
  28. Ishigami T, Tamura K, Fujita T, Kobayashi I, Hibi K, Kihara M, Toya Y, Ochiai H, Umemura S: Angiotensinogen gene polymorphism near transcription start site and blood pressure: Role of a T-to-C transition at intron I. Hypertension 34:430 -434, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Smithies O, Kim HS: Targeted gene duplication and disruption for analyzing quantitative genetic traits in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:3612 -3615, 1994[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kim HS, Krege JH, Kluckman KD, Hagaman JR, Hodgin JB, Best CF, Jennette JC, Coffman TM, Maeda N, Smithies O: Genetic control of blood pressure and the angiotensinogen locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:2735 -2739, 1995[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Morgan T, Craven C, Nelson L, Lalouel JM, Ward K: Angiotensinogen T235 expression is elevated in decidual spiral arteries. J Clin Invest 100:1406 -1415, 1997[Medline]
  32. Sealey JE, Laragh JH: The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system for normal regulation of blood pressure and sodium and potassium homeostasis. In: Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, Vol. 1, edited by Laragh JH, Brenner BM, New York, Raven Press, 1990, pp1287 -1317
  33. Gould AB, Green D: Kinetics of the human renin and human substrate reaction. Cardiovasc Res 5:86 -89, 1971[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Bohlender J, Menard J, Ganten D, Luft FC: Angiotensinogen concentrations and renin clearance: Implications for blood pressure regulation. Hypertension 35:780 -786, 2000[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Cowley AW, McCaa RE: Acute and chronic dose-response relationships for angiotensin, aldosterone, and arterial pressure at varying levels of sodium intake. Circ Res 39:788 -797, 1976[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. DeClue JW, Guyton AC, Cowley AW Jr, Coleman TG, Norman RA Jr, McCaa RE: Subpressor angiotensin infusion, renal sodium handling, and salt-induced hypertension in the dog. Circ Res43 : 503-512,1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Guyton AC: Arterial Pressure and Hypertension. Philadelphia, W.B. Saunders,1980
  38. Ingelfinger JR, Pratt RE, Ellison K, Dzau VJ: Sodium regulation of angiotensinogen mRNA expression in rat kidney cortex and medulla. J Clin Invest 78:1311 -1315, 1986
  39. Ingelfinger JR, Schunkert H, Ellison KE, Pivor M, Zuo WM, Pratt R, Dzau VJ: Intrarenal angiotensinogen: Localization and regulation. Pediatr Nephrol 4:424 -428, 1990[Medline]
  40. Hall J, Brands M: Intrarenal and circulating angiotensin II and renal function. In: The Renin-Angiotensin System, Vol.1 , edited by Robertson J, Nicholls MG, New York, Gower Medical Publishing, 1993, pp26.1 -26.43
  41. Seikaly MG, Arant BS Jr, Seney FD Jr: Endogenous angiotensin concentrations in specific intrarenal fluid compartments of the rat. J Clin Invest 86:1352 -1357, 1990
  42. Braam B, Mitchell KD, Fox J, Navar LG: Proximal tubular secretion of angiotensin II in rats. Am J Physiol264 : F891-F898,1993[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Casarini DE, Boim MA, Stella RC, Krieger-Azzolini MH, Krieger JE, Schor N: Angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity in tubular fluid along the rat nephron. Am J Physiol 272:F405 -F409, 1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Navar LG, Imig JD, Zou L, Wang CT: Intrarenal production of angiotensin II. Semin Nephrol17 : 412-422,1997[Medline]
  45. Quan A, Baum M: Regulation of proximal tubule transport by angiotensin II. Semin Nephrol17 : 423-430,1997[Medline]
  46. Liu FY, Cogan MG: Angiotensin II stimulation of hydrogen ion secretion in the rat early proximal tubule: Modes of action, mechanism, and kinetics. J Clin Invest 82:601 -607, 1988
  47. Wang T, Giebisch G: Effects of angiotensin II on electrolyte transport in the early and late distal tubule in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 271:F143 -F149, 1996[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Harrison-Bernard LM, Navar LG, Ho MM, Vinson GP, el-Dahr SS: Immunohistochemical localization of ANG II AT1 receptor in adult rat kidney using a monoclonal antibody. Am J Physiol273 : F170-F177,1997[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Rohrwasser A, Morgan T, Dillon HF, Zhao L, Callaway CW, Hillas E, Zhang S, Cheng T, Inagami T, Ward K, Terreros DA, Lalouel JM: Elements of a paracrine tubular renin-angiotensin system along the entire nephron. Hypertension 34:1265 -1274, 1999[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Loghman-Adham M, Rohrwasser A, Helin C, Zhang S, Terreros D, Inoue I, Lalouel JM: A conditionally immortalized cell line from murine proximal tubule. Kidney Int 52:229 -239, 1997[Medline]
  51. Navar LG, Lewis L, Hymd A, Mitchell KD: Proximal tubular fluid levels of angiotensinogen in anesthetized rats. FASEB J 10: A22,1996
  52. Celio MR, Inagami T: Angiotensin II immunoreactivity coexists with renin in the juxtaglomerular granular cells of the kidney. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:3897 -3900, 1981[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Celio MR, Inagami T: Renin in the human kidney: Immunohistochemical localization. Histochemistry72 : 1-10,1981[Medline]
  54. Taugner R, Hackenthal E, Rix E, Nobiling R, Poulsen K: Immunocytochemistry of the renin-angiotensin system: Renin, angiotensinogen, angiotensin I, angiotensin II, and converting enzyme in the kidneys of mice, rats, and tree shrews. Kidney Int12 [Suppl]: S33-S43,1982
  55. Taugner R, Hackenthal E, Inagami T, Nobiling R, Poulsen K: Vascular and tubular renin in the kidneys of mice. Histochemistry 75:473 -484, 1982[Medline]
  56. Chiou CY, Williams GH, Kifor I: Study of the rat adrenal renin-angiotensin system at a cellular level. J Clin Invest 96:1375 -1381, 1995
  57. Briggs J, Schubert G, Schnermann J: Further evidence for an inverse relationship between macula densa NaCl concentration and filtration rate. Pflügers Arch392 : 372-378,1982[Medline]
Received for publication June 28, 2000. Accepted for publication September 13, 2000.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HypertensionHome page
B. C. Rossier and L. Schild
Epithelial Sodium Channel: Mendelian Versus Essential Hypertension
Hypertension, October 1, 2008; 52(4): 595 - 600.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J.-M. Lalouel and A. Rohrwasser
Genetic Susceptibility to Essential Hypertension: Insight From Angiotensinogen
Hypertension, March 1, 2007; 49(3): 597 - 603.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. T. Chelbi, F. Mondon, H. Jammes, C. Buffat, T.-M. Mignot, J. Tost, F. Busato, I. Gut, R. Rebourcet, P. Laissue, et al.
Expressional and Epigenetic Alterations of Placental Serine Protease Inhibitors: SERPINA3 Is a Potential Marker of Preeclampsia
Hypertension, January 1, 2007; 49(1): 76 - 83.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LALOUEL, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by LALOUEL, J.-M.
Right arrow Articles by WARD, K.


HOME CURRENT ISSUE ARCHIVES JASN Express ONLINE SUBMISSION AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP