| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clinical Nephrology |

* Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, and
Department of Biostatistics, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Peoples Republic of China
Address correspondence to: Dr. Fan Fan Hou, Renal Division, Nanfang Hospital, 1838 North Guangzhou Avenue, Guangzhou 510515, Peoples Republic of China. Phone: +86-20-61641591; Fax: +86-20-87281713; E-mail: ffhou{at}public.guangzhou.gd.cn
Received for publication December 19, 2006. Accepted for publication March 27, 2007.
The Renoprotection of Optimal Antiproteinuric Doses (ROAD) study was performed to determine whether titration of benazepril or losartan to optimal antiproteinuric doses would safely improve the renal outcome in chronic renal insufficiency. A total of 360 patients who did not have diabetes and had proteinuria and chronic renal insufficiency were randomly assigned to four groups. Patients received open-label treatment with a conventional dosage of benazepril (10 mg/d), individual uptitration of benazepril (median 20 mg/d; range 10 to 40), a conventional dosage of losartan (50 mg/d), or individual uptitration of losartan (median 100 mg/d; range 50 to 200). Uptitration was performed to optimal antiproteinuric and tolerated dosages, and then these dosages were maintained. Median follow-up was 3.7 yr. The primary end point was time to the composite of a doubling of the serum creatinine, ESRD, or death. Secondary end points included changes in the level of proteinuria and the rate of progression of renal disease. Compared with the conventional dosages, optimal antiproteinuric dosages of benazepril and losartan that were achieved through uptitration were associated with a 51 and 53% reduction in the risk for the primary end point (P = 0.028 and 0.022, respectively). Optimal antiproteinuric dosages of benazepril and losartan, at comparable BP control, achieved a greater reduction in both proteinuria and the rate of decline in renal function compared with their conventional dosages. There was no significant difference for the overall incidence of major adverse events between groups that were given conventional and optimal dosages in both arms. It is concluded that uptitration of benazepril or losartan against proteinuria conferred further benefit on renal outcome in patients who did not have diabetes and had proteinuria and renal insufficiency.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Saran and T. D. DuBose Jr Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2008; 2(6): 425 - 434. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. HIRSCH An update on proteinuric chronic kidney disease: the dual-goal approach. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, October 1, 2008; 75(10): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Berl Maximizing inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system with high doses of converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 1, 2008; 23(8): 2443 - 2447. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673