| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY |



* Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts;
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland;
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania;
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; || University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; ¶ National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, Arizona; and ** Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
Correspondence: Dr. Lesley A. Stevens, Division of Nephrology, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington Street, Box #391, Boston, MA 02111. Phone: 617-636-2569; Fax: 617-636-5740; E-mail: lstevens1{at}tufts-nemc.org
Received for publication February 14, 2007. Accepted for publication June 2, 2007.
Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease. Performance of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation varies substantially among populations. To describe the performance of the equation in a large, diverse population, estimated GFR (eGFR) was compared to measured GFR (mGFR) in a cross-sectional analysis of 5504 participants in 10 studies that included measurements of standardized serum creatinine and urinary clearance of iothalamate. At eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, the MDRD Study equation had lower bias and higher precision than at eGFR
60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The accuracy of the equation, measured by the percent of estimates that fell within 30% of mGFR, was similar for eGFR values above or below 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (82% and 84%, respectively). Differences in performance among subgroups defined by age, sex, race, diabetes, transplant status, and body mass index were small when eGFR was <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The MDRD Study equation therefore provides unbiased and reasonably accurate estimates across a wide range of subgroups when eGFR is <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. In individual patients, interpretation of GFR estimates near 60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 should be interpreted with caution to avoid misclassification of chronic kidney disease in the context of the clinical setting.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Tagore, L. H. Ling, H. Yang, H.-Y. Daw, Y.-H. Chan, and S. K. Sethi Natriuretic Peptides in Chronic Kidney Disease Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1644 - 1651. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Parasuraman and K. K. Venkat Utility of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Live Kidney Donation Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., November 1, 2008; 3(6): 1608 - 1609. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Prince, H. Zhang, M. Morris, J. L. MacGregor, M. E. Grossman, J. Silberzweig, R. L. DeLapaz, H. J. Lee, C. M. Magro, and A. M. Valeri Incidence of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis at Two Large Medical Centers Radiology, September 1, 2008; 248(3): 807 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J. Glassock and C. Winearls Screening for CKD with eGFR: Doubts and Dangers Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1563 - 1568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Melamed, C. Bauer, and T. H. Hostetter eGFR: Is It Ready for Early Identification of CKD? Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., September 1, 2008; 3(5): 1569 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Coresh, E. Selvin, L. A. Stevens, J. Manzi, J. W. Kusek, P. Eggers, F. Van Lente, and A. S. Levey Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in the United States JAMA, November 7, 2007; 298(17): 2038 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673