| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hemodynamics and Vascular Regulation |


* Department of Clinical Pharmacology and
Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; and
Sanofi-Aventis Pharma Deutschland, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
Address correspondence to: Dr. Richard P.E. van Dokkum, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Groningen Institute for Drug Exploration, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, NL-9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. Phone: +31-50-363-2840; Fax: +31-50-363-2812; E-mail: r.p.e.van.dokkum{at}med.umcg.nl
Received for publication March 7, 2006. Accepted for publication August 9, 2006.
Recently, it was shown that myocardial infarction aggravates preexistent mild renal damage that is elicited by unilateral nephrectomy in rats. The mechanism behind this cardiorenal interaction likely involves the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system and/or vasoactive peptides that are metabolized by neutral endopeptidase (NEP). The renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition (ACEi) as well as combined ACE/NEP inhibition with a vasopeptidase inhibitor (VPI) was investigated in the same model to clarify the underlying mechanism. At week 17 after sequential induction of unilateral nephrectomy and myocardial infarction, treatment with lisinopril (ACEi), AVE7688 (VPI), or vehicle was initiated for 6 wk. Proteinuria and systolic BP (SBP) were evaluated weekly. Renal damage was assessed primarily by proteinuria, interstitial
-smooth muscle actin (
-SMA) staining, and the incidence of focal glomerulosclerosis (FGS). At start of treatment, proteinuria had increased progressively to 167 ± 20 mg/d in the entire cohort (n = 42). Both ACEi and VPI provided a similar reduction in proteinuria,
-SMA, and FGS compared with vehicle at week 23 (proteinuria 76 ± 6 versus 77 ± 4%;
-SMA 60 ± 6 versus 77 ± 3%; FGS 52 ± 14 versus 61 ± 10%). Similar reductions in systolic BP were observed in both ACEi- and VPI-treated groups (33 ± 3 and 37 ± 2%, respectively). Compared with ACEi, VPI-treated rats displayed a significantly larger reduction of plasma (41 ± 5 versus 61 ± 4%) and renal (53 ± 6 versus 74 ± 4%) ACE activity. It is concluded that both ACEi and VPI intervention prevent renal damage in a rat model of cardiorenal interaction. VPI treatment seemed to provide no additional renoprotection compared with sole ACEi after 6 wk of treatment in this model, despite a more pronounced ACE-inhibiting effect of VPI.
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673