| 2007 JASN IMPACT FACTOR 7.111 | HOME AUTHOR INFO EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP | |||
| CURRENT ISSUE | ARCHIVES | JASN Express | ONLINE SUBMISSION | |
CLINICAL SCIENCE |



*Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Division of Nephrology, and
Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Division of Urology, University of Bari, Policlinico, Bari, Italy; and
Department of Nephrology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
Correspondance to Dr. Salvatore Di Paolo, Division of Nephrology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplant, University of Bari, Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. Phone: +39-080-5593231; Fax: +39-080-5593227;
ABSTRACT. Delayed graft function (DGF) has long been identified as one of the main correlates of poor graft survival in cadaveric renal transplantation, but the factors that affect its onset and duration are not fully elucidated. The impact of two immunosuppressive protocols on the incidence and length of DGF among kidney transplant recipients of a suboptimal organ was evaluated. Patients were randomly treated with corticosteroids (CS); low-dose cyclosporine (CsA) and sirolimus (SRL; group 1; n = 42); or CS, full-dose CsA, and mycophenolate mofetil (group 2; n = 48). All recipients received immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab. After 3 mo, group 1 discontinued CsA and continued with SRL, whereas group 2 continued the same treatment. The incidence of DGF was similar in the two groups (group 1 = 52.4%; group 2 = 58.3%), whereas its duration was significantly higher in the group 1 (19.0 ± 6.0 versus 10.3 ± 3.2 d; P = 0.001). Both groups showed 100% actuarial graft and patient survival at 1-yr. Among DGF patients, serum creatinine (sCr) at discharge was significantly worse in group 1 (sCr, 3.0 ± 1.0 versus 1.5 ± 0.2 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 31.2 ± 9.3 versus 61.1 ± 10 ml/min; P = 0.001). During the first year, the former group displayed a significant improvement of graft function, such that at 1-yr, no difference could be measured between groups (sCr, 1.8 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.4 mg/dl; calculated creatinine clearance, 51.5 ± 10.2 versus 53.3 ± 9.4 ml/min). In conclusion, in de novo renal transplanted patients, the administration of SRL, in combination with low-dose CsA, is associated with a delayed recovery from DGF but does not worsen 1-yr graft function. E-mail: s.dipaolo@nephro.uniba.it
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. Weimbs Polycystic kidney disease and renal injury repair: common pathways, fluid flow, and the function of polycystin-1 Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, November 1, 2007; 293(5): F1423 - F1432. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Teutonico, P. F. Schena, and S. Di Paolo Glucose Metabolism in Renal Transplant Recipients: Effect of Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal and Conversion to Sirolimus J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2005; 16(10): 3128 - 3135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Loverre, P. Ditonno, A. Crovace, L. Gesualdo, E. Ranieri, P. Pontrelli, G. Stallone, B. Infante, A. Schena, S. Di Paolo, et al. Ischemia-Reperfusion Induces Glomerular and Tubular Activation of Proinflammatory and Antiapoptotic Pathways: Differential Modulation by Rapamycin J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2004; 15(10): 2675 - 2686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
HOME
CURRENT ISSUE
ARCHIVES
JASN Express
ONLINE SUBMISSION
AUTHOR INFO
EDITORIAL BOARD SUBSCRIBE FEEDBACK ALERTS HELP |
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Nephrology. Online ISSN: 1533-3450 Print ISSN: 1046-6673